NO! Homosexuality IS NOT NORMAL

[RoshawnMarkwees]

I never claimed homos to be immoral. That's the argument the homonazis want. My argument is grounded in social science and logic.
You don't give drivers licenses to blind people.

That is because you can make a rational and compelling argument before the court. What is the rational and compelling argument for two same-sex adults not being able to marry? The court couldn't find one, and neither could anyone else.

No, the court ruled that outlawing homo marriage in relation to hetero marriage was an issue. There was no compelling case made for why it should exist. The argument was totally mishandled by the homofascist opposition.

Since they won, I doubt they mind, or give a fuck about your opinion...

Like your attitude about blacks' opinions following Dred Scott.

Since the ******* couldn't vote at that point yet, who cares?

That speaks for you perfectly.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

That is because you can make a rational and compelling argument before the court. What is the rational and compelling argument for two same-sex adults not being able to marry? The court couldn't find one, and neither could anyone else.

No, the court ruled that outlawing homo marriage in relation to hetero marriage was an issue. There was no compelling case made for why it should exist. The argument was totally mishandled by the homofascist opposition.

Since they won, I doubt they mind, or give a fuck about your opinion...

Like your attitude about blacks' opinions following Dred Scott.

Since the ******* couldn't vote at that point yet, who cares?

That speaks for you perfectly.

Reality, like payback, is a bitch. Now you know.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

No, the court ruled that outlawing homo marriage in relation to hetero marriage was an issue. There was no compelling case made for why it should exist. The argument was totally mishandled by the homofascist opposition.

Since they won, I doubt they mind, or give a fuck about your opinion...

Like your attitude about blacks' opinions following Dred Scott.

Since the ******* couldn't vote at that point yet, who cares?

That speaks for you perfectly.

Reality, like payback, is a bitch. Now you know.

Payback? What payback and for what?
Why don't you deal with the analysis?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Since they won, I doubt they mind, or give a fuck about your opinion...

Like your attitude about blacks' opinions following Dred Scott.

Since the ******* couldn't vote at that point yet, who cares?

That speaks for you perfectly.

Reality, like payback, is a bitch. Now you know.

Payback? What payback and for what?
Why don't you deal with the analysis?

I did. The faggots won, remember?

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Like your attitude about blacks' opinions following Dred Scott.

Since the ******* couldn't vote at that point yet, who cares?

That speaks for you perfectly.

Reality, like payback, is a bitch. Now you know.

Payback? What payback and for what?
Why don't you deal with the analysis?

I did. The faggots won, remember?

No, freedom and children lost. For now.

 

[Faun]

Oh, this is gonna leave a mark ....

No union is more profound than marriage, for it embodies the highest ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice, and family. In forming a marital union, two people become something greater than once they were. As some of the petitioners in these cases demonstrate, marriage embodies a love that may endure even past death. It would misunderstand these men and women to say they disrespect the idea of marriage. Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that they seek to find its fulfillment for themselves. Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is reversed.

It is so ordered.​

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Article. VI.

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Oh, this is gonna leave a mark ....

No union is more profound than marriage, for it embodies the highest ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice, and family. In forming a marital union, two people become something greater than once they were. As some of the petitioners in these cases demonstrate, marriage embodies a love that may endure even past death. It would misunderstand these men and women to say they disrespect the idea of marriage. Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that they seek to find its fulfillment for themselves. Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is reversed.

It is so ordered.​

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Article. VI.

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

They already had that equal dignity. They can marry a person of the opposite gender just like heteros.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Since the ******* couldn't vote at that point yet, who cares?

That speaks for you perfectly.

Reality, like payback, is a bitch. Now you know.

Payback? What payback and for what?
Why don't you deal with the analysis?

I did. The faggots won, remember?

No, freedom and children lost. For now.

You think this can be changed you're kidding yourself, or being lied to, or both...

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Oh, this is gonna leave a mark ....

No union is more profound than marriage, for it embodies the highest ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice, and family. In forming a marital union, two people become something greater than once they were. As some of the petitioners in these cases demonstrate, marriage embodies a love that may endure even past death. It would misunderstand these men and women to say they disrespect the idea of marriage. Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that they seek to find its fulfillment for themselves. Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is reversed.

It is so ordered.​

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Article. VI.

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

They already had that equal dignity. They can marry a person of the opposite gender just like heteros.

Save it, you lost, a week ago.

 

[Faun]

Oh, this is gonna leave a mark ....

No union is more profound than marriage, for it embodies the highest ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice, and family. In forming a marital union, two people become something greater than once they were. As some of the petitioners in these cases demonstrate, marriage embodies a love that may endure even past death. It would misunderstand these men and women to say they disrespect the idea of marriage. Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that they seek to find its fulfillment for themselves. Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is reversed.

It is so ordered.​

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Article. VI.

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

They already had that equal dignity. They can marry a person of the opposite gender just like heteros.

That you think they already had it only serves to reflect how dead your brain really is. What a shame.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Oh, this is gonna leave a mark ....

No union is more profound than marriage, for it embodies the highest ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice, and family. In forming a marital union, two people become something greater than once they were. As some of the petitioners in these cases demonstrate, marriage embodies a love that may endure even past death. It would misunderstand these men and women to say they disrespect the idea of marriage. Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that they seek to find its fulfillment for themselves. Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is reversed.

It is so ordered.​

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Article. VI.

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

Yet the 5 Socialists on the SCOTUS found no problem with untethering themselves from the Constitution of the United States.

As the Constitution of the United States does not provide a fundamental right to marriage, as such does not exist outside of the natural standard of Marriage as defined by the Human Physiological Standard and the other soundly reasoned conditions required by the desire of the collective to sustain a viable culture.

 

[Syriusly]

You're right, it's not Normal, that's 50% + 1, it's just Natural, and has been around as long as we have as far as we can tell.

So has blindness.

Yep, and you don't try to outlaw that now do you? You also don't spend much effort denouncing it as immoral either.

I never claimed homos to be immoral. That's the argument the homonazis want. My argument is grounded in social science and logic.
You don't give drivers licenses to blind people.

Your arguments have nothing to do with social science or logic- you are just quoting the playbook of the Anti-gay Fascists.

 

[Syriusly]

You're right, it's not Normal, that's 50% + 1, it's just Natural, and has been around as long as we have as far as we can tell.

So has blindness.

Yep, and you don't try to outlaw that now do you? You also don't spend much effort denouncing it as immoral either.

I don't quite see the parallel, unless you're making the ridiculous claim that there's an effort to outlaw homosexuality.

There is always an effort to do that, usually here as well.

Really? Because all I see conservatives saying is they don't care what people do in their own bedroom as long as it isn't shoved in their faces. If you see that as an effort to outlaw homosexuals, perhaps you need to see a psychotherapist who prescribes strong, psychotropic drugs that make those mean little voices go away.

Get some help, nutjob.

You know thats not true.

Homosexual sex was outlawed- and that was driven by Conservatives- and overturned only by the Supreme Court.

Conservatives in Louisiana have still continued to try to criminalize homosexuality- from actually arresting homosexuals after Lawrence v. Texas- to arguing against the repeal of the Homosexual sodomy laws.

I agree however that they do not speak for all Conservatives- but there certainly are Conservatives such as Keys who would outlaw it again in a heartbeat.

 

[Syriusly]

You're right, it's not Normal, that's 50% + 1, it's just Natural, and has been around as long as we have as far as we can tell.

So has blindness.

Yep, and you don't try to outlaw that now do you? You also don't spend much effort denouncing it as immoral either.

I never claimed homos to be immoral. That's the argument the homonazis want. My argument is grounded in social science and logic.
You don't give drivers licenses to blind people.

That is because you can make a rational and compelling argument before the court. What is the rational and compelling argument for two same-sex adults not being able to marry? The court couldn't find one, and neither could anyone else.

No, the court ruled that outlawing homo marriage in relation to hetero marriage was an issue. There was no compelling case made for why it should exist. The argument was totally mishandled by the homofascist opposition.

LOL- no matter how much you try to re-write history- and the decision by the court- you can't.

The Court ruled that Americans have a right to marriage- and that includes gay Americans. And that the States did not provide any compelling interest to deny gay Americans that right.

Just as you can't.

 

[Syriusly]

Is oral sex between a man and wife normal or abnormal?

It could be more normal, and I wouldn't object...

The number one reason so many woman object to performing oral sex is that it means they have to stop talking for 5 minutes.

No it's not, it's because women understand the only reason a man enjoys it is because it positions the woman in a role of SUBMISSION and the man in a role of control and superiority

If you really believe that is the only reason a man enjoys a blowjob- you either have never had one- or you have never had a good one.

well I'm a girl so....

So then you are admitting you really were just pulling that claim out of your butt?

Or maybe- and tragically- the situations you have been in makes you think that is the only reason why men enjoy blowjobs.

As a man, I can say with great certainty- its not because 'it positions the woman in role of SUBMISSION- the best blowjobs are when the woman is the one entirely in control.

 

[Syriusly]

Actually, it does. You might want to look a little closer at the definition for normal.

Normal - conforming to a standard; usual, typical, or expected

Homosexual behaviors are not unusual in the animal kingdom. It's seen in several species.

Sorry. No matter how many species it happens in fucking another man up the ass is not normal.

Normal or not boys, it's natural BTW, they are your equals.

Correct. God loves everyone., but only those that accept Jesus as Lord and Savior are saved. Homosexuality is a sin as is sex outside of marriage. God does not recognize homosexual marriage vows

How do you know that God does not recognize homosexual marriage vows?

because the Bible says men laying with men is an abomination in God's site.

And again- how does that make you know that God does not recognize homosexual marriage vows?

Really- as a Christian doesn't it make you a tad uncomfortable to be claiming to know what God does and does not 'recognize'?

There is a certain hubris to that.

 

[Syriusly]

Since the ******* couldn't vote at that point yet, who cares?

That speaks for you perfectly.

Reality, like payback, is a bitch. Now you know.

Payback? What payback and for what?
Why don't you deal with the analysis?

I did. The faggots won, remember?

No, freedom and children lost. For now.

LOL- yes- homosexuals are free to get married now- to you that means that freedom has been lost.

The children of homosexuals can now have married parents- to you that means children lost.

What a sad view of the world you have.

People in love are getting married, their children are celebrating- love is in the air.

Life is good.

 

[Syriusly]

Oh, this is gonna leave a mark ....

No union is more profound than marriage, for it embodies the highest ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice, and family. In forming a marital union, two people become something greater than once they were. As some of the petitioners in these cases demonstrate, marriage embodies a love that may endure even past death. It would misunderstand these men and women to say they disrespect the idea of marriage. Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that they seek to find its fulfillment for themselves. Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is reversed.

It is so ordered.​

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Article. VI.

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

They already had that equal dignity. They can marry a person of the opposite gender just like heteros.

Yeah- just like the people who opposed Loving v. Virginia- you can continue to argue the courts were wrong until the cows come home- just displays your bigotry the better.

 

[JoeB131]

They already had that equal dignity. They can marry a person of the opposite gender just like heteros.

And now they can marry a person of the same gender... because YOU LOSE!!!!

Bwahahahahahahahaha

 

[Bonzi]

Sorry. No matter how many species it happens in fucking another man up the ass is not normal.

Normal or not boys, it's natural BTW, they are your equals.

Correct. God loves everyone., but only those that accept Jesus as Lord and Savior are saved. Homosexuality is a sin as is sex outside of marriage. God does not recognize homosexual marriage vows

How do you know that God does not recognize homosexual marriage vows?

because the Bible says men laying with men is an abomination in God's site.

And again- how does that make you know that God does not recognize homosexual marriage vows?

Really- as a Christian doesn't it make you a tad uncomfortable to be claiming to know what God does and does not 'recognize'?

There is a certain hubris to that.

If I didn't feel certain it was a sin, no. There are things I do that I know God doesn't approve of. Many, actually but just because I like doing them doesn't make it no sinful. I see the planks in my eyes also.

Prayer and Bible reading along with taking Bible courses make me certain what God considers sin, not matter what alternate arguments are out there. I could debate divorce and sex before marriage with the same conviction.