No statue for Robert E Lee but black ex-con Marion Barry gets one.

[Asclepias]

How could he free slaves he didnt own? Are you really that retarded?

Robert E. Lee - Wikipedia

"Lee owned a small number of slaves in his lifetime and considered himself a paternalistic master. However, he could also impose severe punishments for stealing, fighting, and especially for runaway slaves. Lee said very little in public about the institution of slavery. "

Well personally I found Tipsycatlover's explanation quite easy to understand and makes sense. Certain doesn't deserve insults for making an argument.

It doesnt make any sense. He had slaves prior to the ones his wife even inherited. I insulted it because it frequently says stupid things without checking the facts. How could he consider himself a paternalistic master if he didnt own slaves?

Robert E. Lee, slave owner

Maybe it doesn't make any sense. As far as I can tell his father-in-law asked that his slaves be freed, and yet Lee didn't free them until the plantation was able to make money. You are dealing with the times, Lee used slaves, but also freed slaves and also thought slavery was bad, but also needed to make the plantation work.

However I really don't see this as an issue, and certainly not an issue to insult people about. You have your argument, make your argument.

The issue is that Lee was a General in a treasonous army.

Not only this but these people on the right are getting all angry about people kneeling at football matches, but don't get angry that the Confederates killed 140,000 US military personnel. That contradiction right there is ridiculous.

He also didnt free the slaves he got from his mother. Yet he claimed slavery was evil. I dont have much respect for someone that knows they are doing wrong yet keeps doing it. People like that lack the stuff that makes you a man. Also if drunkycat wants to try and insult me I see no reason not to insult it back.

But it is such fun yanking your chain. Almost as if there's a collar around your neck. I don't sit around searching for ways to make you itch but when I find one, I use it. You never fail to disappoint.

Now youre trying to back pedal because I busted you.

 

[Tank]

But it is such fun yanking your chain. Almost as if there's a collar around your neck. I don't sit around searching for ways to make you itch but when I find one, I use it. You never fail to disappoint.

 

[Asclepias]

Anybody who went to Africa in those days would have thought blacks were some kind of monkey people

Doubt that. Whites have thin lips, attract lice, and are hairy just like monkeys. Pretty sure any white person thinking that would simply be projecting.

 

[Asclepias]

But it is such fun yanking your chain. Almost as if there's a collar around your neck. I don't sit around searching for ways to make you itch but when I find one, I use it. You never fail to disappoint.

Nice selfie Tank. How old are you in this pic?

 

[Tank]

You dont have to be a crackhead. They have help for that.

If only someone had told Barry that

 

[Asclepias]

You dont have to be a crackhead. They have help for that.

If only someone had told Barry that

Well I'm telling you. Barry has a statue. No one will make a statue for you unless its for your role in Planet of the Apes.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Well personally I found Tipsycatlover's explanation quite easy to understand and makes sense. Certain doesn't deserve insults for making an argument.

It doesnt make any sense. He had slaves prior to the ones his wife even inherited. I insulted it because it frequently says stupid things without checking the facts. How could he consider himself a paternalistic master if he didnt own slaves?

Robert E. Lee, slave owner

Maybe it doesn't make any sense. As far as I can tell his father-in-law asked that his slaves be freed, and yet Lee didn't free them until the plantation was able to make money. You are dealing with the times, Lee used slaves, but also freed slaves and also thought slavery was bad, but also needed to make the plantation work.

However I really don't see this as an issue, and certainly not an issue to insult people about. You have your argument, make your argument.

The issue is that Lee was a General in a treasonous army.

Not only this but these people on the right are getting all angry about people kneeling at football matches, but don't get angry that the Confederates killed 140,000 US military personnel. That contradiction right there is ridiculous.

He also didnt free the slaves he got from his mother. Yet he claimed slavery was evil. I dont have much respect for someone that knows they are doing wrong yet keeps doing it. People like that lack the stuff that makes you a man. Also if drunkycat wants to try and insult me I see no reason not to insult it back.

But it is such fun yanking your chain. Almost as if there's a collar around your neck. I don't sit around searching for ways to make you itch but when I find one, I use it. You never fail to disappoint.

Now youre trying to back pedal because I busted you.

No you are wrong and trying to parse words .

 

[Asclepias]

It doesnt make any sense. He had slaves prior to the ones his wife even inherited. I insulted it because it frequently says stupid things without checking the facts. How could he consider himself a paternalistic master if he didnt own slaves?

Robert E. Lee, slave owner

Maybe it doesn't make any sense. As far as I can tell his father-in-law asked that his slaves be freed, and yet Lee didn't free them until the plantation was able to make money. You are dealing with the times, Lee used slaves, but also freed slaves and also thought slavery was bad, but also needed to make the plantation work.

However I really don't see this as an issue, and certainly not an issue to insult people about. You have your argument, make your argument.

The issue is that Lee was a General in a treasonous army.

Not only this but these people on the right are getting all angry about people kneeling at football matches, but don't get angry that the Confederates killed 140,000 US military personnel. That contradiction right there is ridiculous.

He also didnt free the slaves he got from his mother. Yet he claimed slavery was evil. I dont have much respect for someone that knows they are doing wrong yet keeps doing it. People like that lack the stuff that makes you a man. Also if drunkycat wants to try and insult me I see no reason not to insult it back.

But it is such fun yanking your chain. Almost as if there's a collar around your neck. I don't sit around searching for ways to make you itch but when I find one, I use it. You never fail to disappoint.

Now youre trying to back pedal because I busted you.

No you are wrong and trying to parse words .

No. Youre making excuses because I caught you in a lie.

 

[Tank]

Well I'm telling you. Barry has a statue.

He's a God to the blacks

 

[Asclepias]

Well I'm telling you. Barry has a statue.

He's a God to the blacks

I agree. Hes more a god than that loser Lee for sure.

 

[frigidweirdo]

The allegation was made that Lee owned slaves. He did not. He inherited a few slaves but having no use for them, freed the slaves immediately.

How could he free slaves he didnt own? Are you really that retarded?

Robert E. Lee - Wikipedia

"Lee owned a small number of slaves in his lifetime and considered himself a paternalistic master. However, he could also impose severe punishments for stealing, fighting, and especially for runaway slaves. Lee said very little in public about the institution of slavery. "

Well personally I found Tipsycatlover's explanation quite easy to understand and makes sense. Certain doesn't deserve insults for making an argument.

It doesnt make any sense. He had slaves prior to the ones his wife even inherited. I insulted it because it frequently says stupid things without checking the facts. How could he consider himself a paternalistic master if he didnt own slaves?

Robert E. Lee, slave owner

Maybe it doesn't make any sense. As far as I can tell his father-in-law asked that his slaves be freed, and yet Lee didn't free them until the plantation was able to make money. You are dealing with the times, Lee used slaves, but also freed slaves and also thought slavery was bad, but also needed to make the plantation work.

However I really don't see this as an issue, and certainly not an issue to insult people about. You have your argument, make your argument.

The issue is that Lee was a General in a treasonous army.

Not only this but these people on the right are getting all angry about people kneeling at football matches, but don't get angry that the Confederates killed 140,000 US military personnel. That contradiction right there is ridiculous.

He also didnt free the slaves he got from his mother. Yet he claimed slavery was evil. I dont have much respect for someone that knows they are doing wrong yet keeps doing it. People like that lack the stuff that makes you a man. Also if drunkycat wants to try and insult me I see no reason not to insult it back.

The problem is the time. In the modern world you might find other examples. People who work for companies who they know aren't exactly moral, but they need to earn a wage.

You want to come on to a political forum and play like a child, I can't stop you. However I think if you looked at your morals you'd see that you might find that it's not the thing to do, but yet you do it anyway, like Lee.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Robert E. Lee?
Wasn’t he like a slaveholder who was a traitor who fought to destroy this country?

Robert E. Lee never owned a slave.

And as far as we know Hitler never actually killed a Jew with his own hands.

The allegation was made that Lee owned slaves. He did not. He inherited a few slaves but having no use for them, freed the slaves immediately.

How could he free slaves he didnt own? Are you really that retarded? You sound like a damn fool.

Robert E. Lee - Wikipedia

"Lee owned a small number of slaves in his lifetime and considered himself a paternalistic master. However, he could also impose severe punishments for stealing, fighting, and especially for runaway slaves. Lee said very little in public about the institution of slavery. "

Completely wrong. Lee never owned slaves. He inherited a few slaves from his wife's estate and freed them.

He was life long military and had no use for slaves.

What Robert E. Lee Wrote to The Times About Slavery in 1858

Actually he freed those slaves after he was supposed to free them. He kept those slaves for a while and then released them after his plantation got back on its feet. Military people might still have income other than their military income.

 

[Tank]

Lee and Barry both pimped out blacks

 

[Asclepias]

How could he free slaves he didnt own? Are you really that retarded?

Robert E. Lee - Wikipedia

"Lee owned a small number of slaves in his lifetime and considered himself a paternalistic master. However, he could also impose severe punishments for stealing, fighting, and especially for runaway slaves. Lee said very little in public about the institution of slavery. "

Well personally I found Tipsycatlover's explanation quite easy to understand and makes sense. Certain doesn't deserve insults for making an argument.

It doesnt make any sense. He had slaves prior to the ones his wife even inherited. I insulted it because it frequently says stupid things without checking the facts. How could he consider himself a paternalistic master if he didnt own slaves?

Robert E. Lee, slave owner

Maybe it doesn't make any sense. As far as I can tell his father-in-law asked that his slaves be freed, and yet Lee didn't free them until the plantation was able to make money. You are dealing with the times, Lee used slaves, but also freed slaves and also thought slavery was bad, but also needed to make the plantation work.

However I really don't see this as an issue, and certainly not an issue to insult people about. You have your argument, make your argument.

The issue is that Lee was a General in a treasonous army.

Not only this but these people on the right are getting all angry about people kneeling at football matches, but don't get angry that the Confederates killed 140,000 US military personnel. That contradiction right there is ridiculous.

He also didnt free the slaves he got from his mother. Yet he claimed slavery was evil. I dont have much respect for someone that knows they are doing wrong yet keeps doing it. People like that lack the stuff that makes you a man. Also if drunkycat wants to try and insult me I see no reason not to insult it back.

The problem is the time. In the modern world you might find other examples. People who work for companies who they know aren't exactly moral, but they need to earn a wage.

You want to come on to a political forum and play like a child, I can't stop you. However I think if you looked at your morals you'd see that you might find that it's not the thing to do, but yet you do it anyway, like Lee.

But we arent talking about other people. We are talking about Lee who said slavery was evil. Since he believed that then he lacked the fortitude to be a man and do what he knew was right.

My morals line up with my actions. I'm nothing like Lee. He was mentally weak and lacked personal honor and courage. I'm the exact opposite.

 

[Asclepias]

Robert E. Lee never owned a slave.

And as far as we know Hitler never actually killed a Jew with his own hands.

The allegation was made that Lee owned slaves. He did not. He inherited a few slaves but having no use for them, freed the slaves immediately.

How could he free slaves he didnt own? Are you really that retarded? You sound like a damn fool.

Robert E. Lee - Wikipedia

"Lee owned a small number of slaves in his lifetime and considered himself a paternalistic master. However, he could also impose severe punishments for stealing, fighting, and especially for runaway slaves. Lee said very little in public about the institution of slavery. "

Completely wrong. Lee never owned slaves. He inherited a few slaves from his wife's estate and freed them.

He was life long military and had no use for slaves.

What Robert E. Lee Wrote to The Times About Slavery in 1858

Actually he freed those slaves after he was supposed to free them. He kept those slaves for a while and then released them after his plantation got back on its feet. Military people might still have income other than their military income.

He never released his personal slaves. I could find no record of it.

 

[Tank]

My morals line up with my actions. I'm nothing like Lee. He was mentally weak and lacked personal honor and courage. I'm the exact opposite.

They should put a statue of you in front of USMB headquarters

 

[Tank]

He never released his personal slaves. I could find no record of it.

Lee was a pimp

 

[Asclepias]

My morals line up with my actions. I'm nothing like Lee. He was mentally weak and lacked personal honor and courage. I'm the exact opposite.

They should put a statue of you in front of USMB headquarters

No thanks. I'd rather have shirts that say "Recessive Idiot Killer" printed in my honor.

 

[Asclepias]

He never released his personal slaves. I could find no record of it.

Lee was a pimp

Lee was a coward and ass muncher.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Well personally I found Tipsycatlover's explanation quite easy to understand and makes sense. Certain doesn't deserve insults for making an argument.

It doesnt make any sense. He had slaves prior to the ones his wife even inherited. I insulted it because it frequently says stupid things without checking the facts. How could he consider himself a paternalistic master if he didnt own slaves?

Robert E. Lee, slave owner

Maybe it doesn't make any sense. As far as I can tell his father-in-law asked that his slaves be freed, and yet Lee didn't free them until the plantation was able to make money. You are dealing with the times, Lee used slaves, but also freed slaves and also thought slavery was bad, but also needed to make the plantation work.

However I really don't see this as an issue, and certainly not an issue to insult people about. You have your argument, make your argument.

The issue is that Lee was a General in a treasonous army.

Not only this but these people on the right are getting all angry about people kneeling at football matches, but don't get angry that the Confederates killed 140,000 US military personnel. That contradiction right there is ridiculous.

He also didnt free the slaves he got from his mother. Yet he claimed slavery was evil. I dont have much respect for someone that knows they are doing wrong yet keeps doing it. People like that lack the stuff that makes you a man. Also if drunkycat wants to try and insult me I see no reason not to insult it back.

The problem is the time. In the modern world you might find other examples. People who work for companies who they know aren't exactly moral, but they need to earn a wage.

You want to come on to a political forum and play like a child, I can't stop you. However I think if you looked at your morals you'd see that you might find that it's not the thing to do, but yet you do it anyway, like Lee.

But we arent talking about other people. We are talking about Lee who said slavery was evil. Since he believed that then he lacked the fortitude to be a man and do what he knew was right.

My morals line up with my actions. I'm nothing like Lee. He was mentally weak and lacked personal honor and courage. I'm the exact opposite.

So you never, ever do anything which goes against what your morals huh?

Well, Lee was what Lee was, in the environment he was. Again, I don't think this is the issue.