Noam Chomsky: Obama is running biggest terrorist operation that exists

So righties are now siding with Noam Chomsky and Bill Ayers.

Somewhere there's a snowball in a place called hell.
 
And yet Chomsky endorsed Obama, so he helped to create what he now disses.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HtRTcBLXhAM].[/ame]

Noam Chomsky has said, "I’m not a great enthusiast for Obama, as you know, from way back, but at least he’s somewhere in the real world." He stated that the 2012 candidates are "Off the International Spectrum of Sane Behavior".

Read more: Noam Chomsky chooses Obama over GOPs as 2012 President
 
The principle of war is to strike first and defeat your enemy, Oblama has done nothing that any other leader would not do.
 
So righties are now siding with Noam Chomsky and Bill Ayers.

Somewhere there's a snowball in a place called hell.

I consider Noam Chomsky to be the last living Bolshevik. He's a true moonbat if there ever was one.

So was George Orwell, and his books illustrated the frightening reality of life under despotic leftist regimes. When a moonbat is raising alarms about the policies of a fellow leftist, they deserve some attention.
 

Chomsky calls himself a "libertarian socialist", the rest of us call him a pinko bed wetter. He's a pseudointellectual malcontent the moonbats prop up when it's convenient.

Libertarianism and socialism can not be conjoined. Socialism compels people to give up a huge percentage of their income towards the collective goals of the state without regard to their wishes.

A real libertarian can not tolerate a centrally controlled state economy. Whatever interest he has in liberty are for his own desires, because he clearly doesn't give a shit about anyone else's.
 

Chomsky calls himself a "libertarian socialist", the rest of us call him a pinko bed wetter. He's a pseudointellectual malcontent the moonbats prop up when it's convenient.

Libertarianism and socialism can not be conjoined. Socialism compels people to give up a huge percentage of their income towards the collective goals of the state without regard to their wishes.

A real libertarian can not tolerate a centrally controlled state economy. Whatever interest he has in liberty are for his own desires, because he clearly doesn't give a shit about anyone else's.
Call him what you will he is right on this point and libertarianism is the best way to go. Why should others be forced to pay for other people's needs? Being free is much better than being under forced government like we have now. He has plenty of care for others...which is why he is a Libertarian Socialist maybe you should read up on it...
 

Forum List

Back
Top