9thIDdoc
Gold Member
- Aug 8, 2011
- 7,956
- 3,113
If you aren't willing to consider an honest response why ask the question?True. I'm the only one who even attempted to stay on subject anyway, so fuck it. I found what I expected to find. All you are going to do is spout a handful of gun nut quotes anyway.That also has nothing to do with the OP. Do as I say; not as I do?A large majority of Americans want universal background checks,The only important definition is the legal one. The President doesn't make law. The ATF doesn't make law. The Constitution is very specific about how laws are passed and then they still can be overturned by the supreme court if they are not Constitutional..
Still the only reason I would be concerned about the ATF's definition,
Is that I am fairly certain they will be consulted by lawmakers should the question arise,
And they will be responsible for enforcing whatever law is created should the definition be required.
That's not saying it should be one way or the other,
just the ability to understand what will probably happen.
I am also not prepared to pretend that the Federal Government won't try, and hasn't already been successful ...
In regards to infringing upon our Constitutionally Protected Rights.
.