Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The US Constitution isn't a "technicality" - with that said, yeah he did....I in no way said what he did was right, or supported him personally....but I do support the US Constitution, and the rule of law.Cosby got off on a technicality, hell he even admitted he was drugging women.we all are safer because the PA Supreme Court upheld the Constitutional safe guards in this case.
This case, and there have been many others, is an example of what happens when someone is targeted and mob rule as opposed to the rule of law is followed.
we all are safer because the PA Supreme Court upheld the Constitutional safe guards in this case.
This case, and there have been many others, is an example of what happens when someone is targeted and mob rule as opposed to the rule of law is followed.
Explain what part of the Constitution was violated that got Bill Cosby released. Give me the Articles.The US Constitution isn't a "technicality" - with that said, yeah he did....I in no way said what he did was right, or supported him personally....but I do support the US Constitution, and the rule of law.Cosby got off on a technicality, hell he even admitted he was drugging women.we all are safer because the PA Supreme Court upheld the Constitutional safe guards in this case.
This case, and there have been many others, is an example of what happens when someone is targeted and mob rule as opposed to the rule of law is followed.
Which just upsets leftist lynch mobs, and always has
If only Cosby had not drugged those women this would have went no where.Cosby was taken down primarily because he drugged over 60 women in order to have sex with themView attachment 507861
Now some of course will take this as proof that cosby was innocent.....far from it.
Here is the gist of the case.
Nolte: We're All Safer When the Constitution Protects a Bill Cosby
When a judiciary releases someone like a Bill Cosby from prison, we should all breathe a sigh of relief.www.breitbart.com
Another oddity about this case is that it was liberal pressure that brought about the trial and conviction of cosby....as in the liberal narrative of abused women over-ruled the liberal narrative of black victim-hood.
Cosby was taken down primarily because he dared to talk about what blacks needed to do to improve their lot....white liberals simply could not stand the fact that a black man dared to reveal the truth about his fellow blacks
All of that though known was ignored until Cosby started telling the truth about blacks.....in response to that a liberal comic brought up the fact that Cosby was a rapist and as such was in no position to criticize others....that got the ball rolling...the liberals saw a chance to bring cosby down and so they did it.
The US Constitution isn't a "technicality" - with that said, yeah he did....I in no way said what he did was right, or supported him personally....but I do support the US Constitution, and the rule of law.Cosby got off on a technicality, hell he even admitted he was drugging women.we all are safer because the PA Supreme Court upheld the Constitutional safe guards in this case.
This case, and there have been many others, is an example of what happens when someone is targeted and mob rule as opposed to the rule of law is followed.
Which just upsets leftist lynch mobs, and always has
I love the constitution and the rule of law.The US Constitution isn't a "technicality" - with that said, yeah he did....I in no way said what he did was right, or supported him personally....but I do support the US Constitution, and the rule of law.
Which just upsets leftist lynch mobs, and always has
don’t know off handThe US Constitution isn't a "technicality" - with that said, yeah he did....I in no way said what he did was right, or supported him personally....but I do support the US Constitution, and the rule of law.Cosby got off on a technicality, hell he even admitted he was drugging women.we all are safer because the PA Supreme Court upheld the Constitutional safe guards in this case.
This case, and there have been many others, is an example of what happens when someone is targeted and mob rule as opposed to the rule of law is followed.
Which just upsets leftist lynch mobs, and always has
When was the last time there was a lynching in the U.S. ?
the Constitution doesn’t have SOLI love the constitution and the rule of law.The US Constitution isn't a "technicality" - with that said, yeah he did....I in no way said what he did was right, or supported him personally....but I do support the US Constitution, and the rule of law.
Which just upsets leftist lynch mobs, and always has
Which upsets conservatives because under the statute of limitations, Obama, Clinton, Comey, Brennan etc. will be forever innocent.
I love the constitution and the rule of law.
Which upsets conservatives because under the statute of limitations, Obama, Clinton, Comey, Brennan etc. will be forever innocent.
The constitution requires nobody can be charged except upon indictment. And indictments have statues of limitation.the Constitution doesn’t have SOL
some do, sure but the Constitution doesn’t have them.I love the constitution and the rule of law.
Which upsets conservatives because under the statute of limitations, Obama, Clinton, Comey, Brennan etc. will be forever innocent.The constitution requires nobody can be charged except upon indictment. And indictments have statues of limitation.the Constitution doesn’t have SOL
Actually it does, the 6th amendment guarantees witnesses for the defense. And that is time limited.some do, sure but the Constitution doesn’t have them.And indictments have statues of limitation.
www.foxnews.com
Conservatives will defend even the worst of behavior of people on their side.Seven women came forward against Cosby. The courts had to act and even he confessed. And yet? He is the darling of the right? You guys really are sickos.
That coerced admission is the very reason why he walked out of prison.Cosby got off on a technicality, hell he even admitted he was drugging women.we all are safer because the PA Supreme Court upheld the Constitutional safe guards in this case.
This case, and there have been many others, is an example of what happens when someone is targeted and mob rule as opposed to the rule of law is followed.
Cosby got off on a technicality, hell he even admitted he was drugging women.
Which means you can't say Cosby is "innocent", you can only say he's guilty as charged, but overturned on a technicality.That coerced admission is the very reason why he walked out of prison.
the 6th amendment says nothing about a SOL.I love the constitution and the rule of law.
Which upsets conservatives because under the statute of limitations, Obama, Clinton, Comey, Brennan etc. will be forever innocent.The constitution requires nobody can be charged except upon indictment. And indictments have statues of limitation.the Constitution doesn’t have SOL
Amendment VIthe 6th amendment says nothing about a SOL.
the feds don’t have them on every crime as do many states
Cosby got off on a technicality, hell he even admitted he was drugging women.Which means you can't say Cosby is "innocent", you can only say he's guilty as charged, but overturned on a technicality.That coerced admission is the very reason why he walked out of prison.
Which means you can't say Cosby is "innocent", you can only say he's guilty as charged, but overturned on a technicality.
There was no coercion. There was a DA who may have extralegally granted Cosby protection from prosecution. I don't have all the details, because I read the agreement wasn't written. That the normal "use immunity" was "full" immunity instead.There was no technicality. A coerced confession is not a technicality. The prosecutor should get the Mark Nifong treatment,
sure snd we have one, the court can order witnesses to appear on the defense behalfAmendment VIthe 6th amendment says nothing about a SOL.
the feds don’t have them on every crime as do many states
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.
The constitution guarantees a process to produce such witnesses. It's obvious that as memories fade, or witnesses die, that that process can no longer be provided. And as such imposes an effective statute of limitations on all but notorious crimes.
