North Carolina Is The Latest Battleground In The Fight For Voting Rights

[The Rabbi]

"To those who say requiring government-issued identification should not be a problem..."

Those who say such a thing only exhibit their ignorance and stupidity.

Many older African-Americans born before the advent of the Civil Rights movement simply don't have the documents needed to obtain the required state issued ID, the consequence of segregation and discrimination.

These are voters currently registered and eligible to vote, who have been voting for the last 30 to 40 years in every election, now being denied that fundamental right.

It's perfectly appropriate to require a photo ID of a new voter registering to vote for the first time; but those currently registered should be allowed to continue voting absent an ID unless there's evidence of 'fraud' specific to that voter.

Utter bullshit. You need an ID for so much these days it is virtually impossible to function without one.
In any case, the OP is a fail. Voter turnout in NC amomg minorities is higher since they passed these laws.

 

[The Rabbi]

The biggest voting rights violation in North Carolina is gerrymandering

That's a problem country wide...except in a few places where citizens do the redistricting. Of course, that could end with a SCOTUS ruling.

Hope it does but doubt if the Supreme Court has the balls

Setting district lines should be taken away from the politicians

Thats a violation of the Constittution. Not that you really care about that.

 

[rightwinger]

The biggest voting rights violation in North Carolina is gerrymandering

That's a problem country wide...except in a few places where citizens do the redistricting. Of course, that could end with a SCOTUS ruling.

Hope it does but doubt if the Supreme Court has the balls

Setting district lines should be taken away from the politicians

Thats a violation of the Constittution. Not that you really care about that.

Link

 

[chikenwing]

"To those who say requiring government-issued identification should not be a problem..."

Those who say such a thing only exhibit their ignorance and stupidity.

Many older African-Americans born before the advent of the Civil Rights movement simply don't have the documents needed to obtain the required state issued ID, the consequence of segregation and discrimination.

These are voters currently registered and eligible to vote, who have been voting for the last 30 to 40 years in every election, now being denied that fundamental right.

It's perfectly appropriate to require a photo ID of a new voter registering to vote for the first time; but those currently registered should be allowed to continue voting absent an ID unless there's evidence of 'fraud' specific to that voter.

And you can prove ,the already proven false talking points?
So we should not do anything,until fraud has happened,yep that's a real smart way of going about things. Do you think before you post?

 

[The Rabbi]

The biggest voting rights violation in North Carolina is gerrymandering

That's a problem country wide...except in a few places where citizens do the redistricting. Of course, that could end with a SCOTUS ruling.

Hope it does but doubt if the Supreme Court has the balls

Setting district lines should be taken away from the politicians

Thats a violation of the Constittution. Not that you really care about that.

Link

U.S. Constitution Constitution US Law LII Legal Information Institute

 

[rightwinger]

The biggest voting rights violation in North Carolina is gerrymandering

That's a problem country wide...except in a few places where citizens do the redistricting. Of course, that could end with a SCOTUS ruling.

Hope it does but doubt if the Supreme Court has the balls

Setting district lines should be taken away from the politicians

Thats a violation of the Constittution. Not that you really care about that.

Link

U.S. Constitution Constitution US Law LII Legal Information Institute

Damn Rabbi .......when given a chance you fail again

Show where in the Constitution or in any case based on Constitutional grounds that the courts do not have the juristiction to rule on gerrymandering

Or why not make it easier on yourself and just admit you are making shit up again?

 

[The Rabbi]

That's a problem country wide...except in a few places where citizens do the redistricting. Of course, that could end with a SCOTUS ruling.

Hope it does but doubt if the Supreme Court has the balls

Setting district lines should be taken away from the politicians

Thats a violation of the Constittution. Not that you really care about that.

Link

U.S. Constitution Constitution US Law LII Legal Information Institute

Damn Rabbi .......when given a chance you fail again

Show where in the Constitution or in any case based on Constitutional grounds that the courts do not have the juristiction to rule on gerrymandering

Or why not make it easier on yourself and just admit you are making shit up again?

Wow, nutjobber. Do I need to teach you how to read as well? Do you need it spoon fed to you? Or are you being being a dishonest shithead yet again moving the goalposts, first wanting redistricting taken away from elected officials and now claiming that courts can rule on districting issues? Yes, of cours eyou are. Because you are a dishonest lying fuck of a piece of shit.

 

[rightwinger]

Hope it does but doubt if the Supreme Court has the balls

Setting district lines should be taken away from the politicians

Thats a violation of the Constittution. Not that you really care about that.

Link

U.S. Constitution Constitution US Law LII Legal Information Institute

Damn Rabbi .......when given a chance you fail again

Show where in the Constitution or in any case based on Constitutional grounds that the courts do not have the juristiction to rule on gerrymandering

Or why not make it easier on yourself and just admit you are making shit up again?

Wow, nutjobber. Do I need to teach you how to read as well? Do you need it spoon fed to you? Or are you being being a dishonest shithead yet again moving the goalposts, first wanting redistricting taken away from elected officials and now claiming that courts can rule on districting issues? Yes, of cours eyou are. Because you are a dishonest lying fuck of a piece of shit.

Holy shit Rabbi

Your third shot and you have still failed to back up your ridiculous claim
Talking out of your ass will do that

 

[The Rabbi]

Thats a violation of the Constittution. Not that you really care about that.

Link

U.S. Constitution Constitution US Law LII Legal Information Institute

Damn Rabbi .......when given a chance you fail again

Show where in the Constitution or in any case based on Constitutional grounds that the courts do not have the juristiction to rule on gerrymandering

Or why not make it easier on yourself and just admit you are making shit up again?

Wow, nutjobber. Do I need to teach you how to read as well? Do you need it spoon fed to you? Or are you being being a dishonest shithead yet again moving the goalposts, first wanting redistricting taken away from elected officials and now claiming that courts can rule on districting issues? Yes, of cours eyou are. Because you are a dishonest lying fuck of a piece of shit.

Holy shit Rabbi

Your third shot and you have still failed to back up your ridiculous claim
Talking out of your ass will do that

Fuck off you dishonest piece of shit. Go troll somewhere else.

 

[Jarlaxle]

"To those who say requiring government-issued identification should not be a problem..."

Those who say such a thing only exhibit their ignorance and stupidity.

Many older African-Americans born before the advent of the Civil Rights movement simply don't have the documents needed to obtain the required state issued ID, the consequence of segregation and discrimination.

Bullshit.

These are voters currently registered and eligible to vote, who have been voting for the last 30 to 40 years in every election, now being denied that fundamental right.

It's perfectly appropriate to require a photo ID of a new voter registering to vote for the first time; but those currently registered should be allowed to continue voting absent an ID unless there's evidence of 'fraud' specific to that voter.

More bullshit.

Why do you think that blacks are not smart enough to get photo ID?

 

[The Rabbi]

"To those who say requiring government-issued identification should not be a problem..."

Those who say such a thing only exhibit their ignorance and stupidity.

Many older African-Americans born before the advent of the Civil Rights movement simply don't have the documents needed to obtain the required state issued ID, the consequence of segregation and discrimination.

Bullshit.

These are voters currently registered and eligible to vote, who have been voting for the last 30 to 40 years in every election, now being denied that fundamental right.

It's perfectly appropriate to require a photo ID of a new voter registering to vote for the first time; but those currently registered should be allowed to continue voting absent an ID unless there's evidence of 'fraud' specific to that voter.

More bullshit.

Why do you think that blacks are not smart enough to get photo ID?

Like rural white people can get IDs but black people cant. It boggles the mind.

 

[rightwinger]

Link

U.S. Constitution Constitution US Law LII Legal Information Institute

Damn Rabbi .......when given a chance you fail again

Show where in the Constitution or in any case based on Constitutional grounds that the courts do not have the juristiction to rule on gerrymandering

Or why not make it easier on yourself and just admit you are making shit up again?

Wow, nutjobber. Do I need to teach you how to read as well? Do you need it spoon fed to you? Or are you being being a dishonest shithead yet again moving the goalposts, first wanting redistricting taken away from elected officials and now claiming that courts can rule on districting issues? Yes, of cours eyou are. Because you are a dishonest lying fuck of a piece of shit.

Holy shit Rabbi

Your third shot and you have still failed to back up your ridiculous claim
Talking out of your ass will do that

Fuck off you dishonest piece of shit. Go troll somewhere else.

How astute!

Came up with that retort by yourself?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

That's a problem country wide...except in a few places where citizens do the redistricting. Of course, that could end with a SCOTUS ruling.

Hope it does but doubt if the Supreme Court has the balls

Setting district lines should be taken away from the politicians

Thats a violation of the Constittution. Not that you really care about that.

Link

U.S. Constitution Constitution US Law LII Legal Information Institute

Damn Rabbi .......when given a chance you fail again

Show where in the Constitution or in any case based on Constitutional grounds that the courts do not have the juristiction to rule on gerrymandering

Or why not make it easier on yourself and just admit you are making shit up again?

The Constitution provides that the States not the federal Government control how voting occurs in their State. That would include how the districts are designed and created.

 

[The Rabbi]

Hope it does but doubt if the Supreme Court has the balls

Setting district lines should be taken away from the politicians

Thats a violation of the Constittution. Not that you really care about that.

Link

U.S. Constitution Constitution US Law LII Legal Information Institute

Damn Rabbi .......when given a chance you fail again

Show where in the Constitution or in any case based on Constitutional grounds that the courts do not have the juristiction to rule on gerrymandering

Or why not make it easier on yourself and just admit you are making shit up again?

The Constitution provides that the States not the federal Government control how voting occurs in their State. That would include how the districts are designed and created.

This obvious fact will not shut up the trolling asshole. He will merely deflect to something else.