Trump has been implicated in a crimeThe word is stipulateHe plead guilty to trying to influence the election and stipulated it was at the direction of Crooked DonnieCohen's guilty pleas were about HIS actions, not Trump's. And, so far, the "campaign violation" is weaker than the case against John Edwards, for which he was found not guilty.
So, the delusion is yours, my friend.
He didn't "stipulate", he "claimed". So, now you're faced with his credibility and that is, to be kind, questionable.
As part of his guilty plea, he stipulated that Trump ordered him to pay
Trump is already admitting he paid.....but can’t prove it
*sigh* It is so sad that you're so blind to the truth because you WANT to get Trump for ANYTHING. He is CLAIMING that the intent was to influence the election, but provides no proof that it was Trump's intent to influence the election rather than merely to protect his marriage. And, I can't imagine that any prosecutor would build a case on Cohen's testimony when he's said so many things and pleaded guilty to fraudulently obtaining money from Trump's organization.
Worth looking into.....wouldn’t you agree?
LOL! If it came from a credible source and not someone who obviously was saying whatever it took to get a plea deal, perhaps. But, in this case, unless there is documentation that Trump intended the action to influence the election and had nothing to do with protecting his marriage, it's not worth the time. Just as it wasn't worth the time and money it took to prosecute John Edwards for a similar "crime".