Nothing generates unemployment like liberal policy

[JoeNormal]

7. Binge-Watching Computers. Can computers learn human behavior by binge-watching TV shows such as “The Office” and “Desperate Housewives?” The study was funded in part by the Department of Defense’s Office of Naval Research and the National Science Foundation, which helped researchers study how TV shows “train computers to understand and predict human behavior.” Flake said he sees this research as nonsensical. “Spending nearly a half a billion dollars to … turn computers into couch potatoes doesn’t compute for me,” he said.

There are some criticism-worthy examples on your list but this isn't one of them. This is how deep learning neural networks are trained and why people who aren't creative or exceptionally technically savvy are in danger of losing their livelihoods. From all outward signs, this includes you.

It's not the government's job to "train" them, nitwit. Try reading the U.S. Constitution and then get back to me...k? From all outward signs, you're as ignorant about your own government as you are technology. Scary.

OMG, people like you are just too stupid to live. Yeah, let's just let China and India develop that technology first. That's the visionary right wing that I've come to know.

 

[danielpalos]

reducing labor reduces labor costs. is the national socialist right wing, always so, disingenuous.

Yes folks...progressives really are this stupid. Socialism is the polar opposite of "right-wing". But - blaming the right for their own sins is what fascists do best.

projection and fallacy is all the national socialist right wing has.

 

[P@triot]

reducing labor reduces labor costs. is the national socialist right wing, always so, disingenuous.

Yes folks...progressives really are this stupid. Socialism is the polar opposite of "right-wing". But - blaming the right for their own sins is what fascists do best.

projection and fallacy is all the national socialist right wing has.

It's pretty funny to watch the progressive fascists project their projection on the other side...

 

[danielpalos]

reducing labor reduces labor costs. is the national socialist right wing, always so, disingenuous.

Yes folks...progressives really are this stupid. Socialism is the polar opposite of "right-wing". But - blaming the right for their own sins is what fascists do best.

projection and fallacy is all the national socialist right wing has.

It's pretty funny to watch the progressive fascists project their projection on the other side...

in other words, you have nothing.

 

[P@triot]

reducing labor reduces labor costs. is the national socialist right wing, always so, disingenuous.

Yes folks...progressives really are this stupid. Socialism is the polar opposite of "right-wing". But - blaming the right for their own sins is what fascists do best.

projection and fallacy is all the national socialist right wing has.

It's pretty funny to watch the progressive fascists project their projection on the other side...

in other words, you have nothing.

Snowflake....I've owned you. First I pointed out your contradiction of "reducing" labor costs when you stated not to have labor in the first place (can't reduce below 0 buttercup).

Then you came back with the hilariously "right-wing socialists" when socialism/fascism/etc. is the polar opposite of right-wing ideology. You're so ignorant of politics - you don't even understand the basic political scale.

 

[danielpalos]

reducing labor reduces labor costs. is the national socialist right wing, always so, disingenuous.

Yes folks...progressives really are this stupid. Socialism is the polar opposite of "right-wing". But - blaming the right for their own sins is what fascists do best.

projection and fallacy is all the national socialist right wing has.

It's pretty funny to watch the progressive fascists project their projection on the other side...

in other words, you have nothing.

Snowflake....I've owned you. First I pointed out your contradiction of "reducing" labor costs when you stated not to have labor in the first place (can't reduce below 0 buttercup).

Then you came back with the hilariously "right-wing socialists" when socialism/fascism/etc. is the polar opposite of right-wing ideology. You're so ignorant of politics - you don't even understand the basic political scale.

reducing labor reduces labor costs. is the national socialist right wing, always so, disingenuous.

want to, "own that"?

 

[pinqy]

reducing labor reduces labor costs.

Not necessarily. Cost = wages X labor. So if labor goes down, but wages go up, then the cost can go up.

 

[danielpalos]

reducing labor reduces labor costs.

Not necessarily. Cost = wages X labor. So if labor goes down, but wages go up, then the cost can go up.

you can still reduce labor to reduce labor costs; don't be lazy like the poor who make poor lifestyle choices; you have a work ethic from the Age of Iron, to consider.

 

[P@triot]

7. Binge-Watching Computers. Can computers learn human behavior by binge-watching TV shows such as “The Office” and “Desperate Housewives?” The study was funded in part by the Department of Defense’s Office of Naval Research and the National Science Foundation, which helped researchers study how TV shows “train computers to understand and predict human behavior.” Flake said he sees this research as nonsensical. “Spending nearly a half a billion dollars to … turn computers into couch potatoes doesn’t compute for me,” he said.

There are some criticism-worthy examples on your list but this isn't one of them. This is how deep learning neural networks are trained and why people who aren't creative or exceptionally technically savvy are in danger of losing their livelihoods. From all outward signs, this includes you.

It's not the government's job to "train" them, nitwit. Try reading the U.S. Constitution and then get back to me...k? From all outward signs, you're as ignorant about your own government as you are technology. Scary.

OMG, people like you are just too stupid to live. Yeah, let's just let China and India develop that technology first. That's the visionary right wing that I've come to know.

OMG....people like you are too ignorant to waste good oxygen on:

• First of all, it's completely fucking irrelevant if China or India develops "deep learning neural networks first" you nitwit.

• Second, there is no guarantee that we develop first even if we have government illegally/unconstitutionally pay for it - dumbass. The fact that you need that pointed out to you is as comical as it is tragic.

• Third - government didn't fund Microsoft Windows. Did China or India develop that first? Government didn't fund the iPhone. Did China or India develop that first? Government didn't fund Oracle. Did China or India develop that first? Moron.

Sorry son - but your post is a prime example of why junior high students should stay off of message boards.

 

[P@triot]

want to, "own that"?

Want to "own" the fact that you're too stupid to realize that both socialism and fascism are exclusively left-wing ideology? Right-wing ideology is small, limited government. Thus, the farther right you go government continues to get smaller until it completely ceases to exist - anarchy.

Left-wing ideology embraces a large, strong, centralized government. The further left you go, government gets larger and more powerful until it is totalitarian - fascism, socialism, communism, marxism.

It's ok brother - I realize you junior high kids have a lot to learn still.

 

[P@triot]

Nothing generates unemployment/poverty like left-wing policy...

In 2001 Venezuela was the richest country in South America; it is now among the poorest

As Venezuela crumbles, the regime digs in

 

[danielpalos]

reducing labor reduces labor costs.

Not necessarily. Cost = wages X labor. So if labor goes down, but wages go up, then the cost can go up.

it was in the context of capitalists not being, lazy, and doing more of the work themselves, so they can get richer, faster.

 

[danielpalos]

want to, "own that"?

Want to "own" the fact that you're too stupid to realize that both socialism and fascism are exclusively left-wing ideology? Right-wing ideology is small, limited government. Thus, the farther right you go government continues to get smaller until it completely ceases to exist - anarchy.

Left-wing ideology embraces a large, strong, centralized government. The further left you go, government gets larger and more powerful until it is totalitarian - fascism, socialism, communism, marxism.

It's ok brother - I realize you junior high kids have a lot to learn still.

Just national socialistic right wing fantasy? Liberal socialism is to the left of national socialism.

 

[danielpalos]

Nothing generates unemployment/poverty like left-wing policy...

In 2001 Venezuela was the richest country in South America; it is now among the poorest

As Venezuela crumbles, the regime digs in

Just lousy management.

There is no reason for a command economy, to not command economize its way to the general welfare and the general prosperity.

 

[P@triot]

want to, "own that"?

Want to "own" the fact that you're too stupid to realize that both socialism and fascism are exclusively left-wing ideology? Right-wing ideology is small, limited government. Thus, the farther right you go government continues to get smaller until it completely ceases to exist - anarchy.

Left-wing ideology embraces a large, strong, centralized government. The further left you go, government gets larger and more powerful until it is totalitarian - fascism, socialism, communism, marxism.

It's ok brother - I realize you junior high kids have a lot to learn still.

Just national socialistic right wing fantasy? Liberal socialism is to the left of national socialism.

Yep...and national socialism is to the left of progressivism.

 

[P@triot]

Nothing generates unemployment/poverty like left-wing policy...

In 2001 Venezuela was the richest country in South America; it is now among the poorest

As Venezuela crumbles, the regime digs in

Just lousy management.

Exactly - leadership implemented failed left-wing policy. It always ends the same - more poverty, more misery.

 

[pinqy]

reducing labor reduces labor costs.

Not necessarily. Cost = wages X labor. So if labor goes down, but wages go up, then the cost can go up.

it was in the context of capitalists not being, lazy, and doing more of the work themselves, so they can get richer, faster.

There is no "context" that makes a difference to the math, and capitalism is irrelevant. C=wL If L decreases, then C decreases if w goes down, stays the same or goes up by no more than enough to offset the decrease to L If w goes up too hich, then C will go up.

 

[JoeNormal]

7. Binge-Watching Computers. Can computers learn human behavior by binge-watching TV shows such as “The Office” and “Desperate Housewives?” The study was funded in part by the Department of Defense’s Office of Naval Research and the National Science Foundation, which helped researchers study how TV shows “train computers to understand and predict human behavior.” Flake said he sees this research as nonsensical. “Spending nearly a half a billion dollars to … turn computers into couch potatoes doesn’t compute for me,” he said.

There are some criticism-worthy examples on your list but this isn't one of them. This is how deep learning neural networks are trained and why people who aren't creative or exceptionally technically savvy are in danger of losing their livelihoods. From all outward signs, this includes you.

It's not the government's job to "train" them, nitwit. Try reading the U.S. Constitution and then get back to me...k? From all outward signs, you're as ignorant about your own government as you are technology. Scary.

OMG, people like you are just too stupid to live. Yeah, let's just let China and India develop that technology first. That's the visionary right wing that I've come to know.

OMG....people like you are too ignorant to waste good oxygen on:

• First of all, it's completely fucking irrelevant if China or India develops "deep learning neural networks first" you nitwit.

• Second, there is no guarantee that we develop first even if we have government illegally/unconstitutionally pay for it - dumbass. The fact that you need that pointed out to you is as comical as it is tragic.

• Third - government didn't fund Microsoft Windows. Did China or India develop that first? Government didn't fund the iPhone. Did China or India develop that first? Government didn't fund Oracle. Did China or India develop that first? Moron.

Sorry son - but your post is a prime example of why junior high students should stay off of message boards.

Technology and how it's created are not your thing are they. You really should just stay in your depth unless you're only trying to convince others who are similarly technologically naive that you know what you're talking about.

No private company is going to want to invest in the types of world changing technologies the government funds because they can't make a profit on it within five years. Yet these become the technologies that I entire industries are founded upon.

 

[JoeNormal]

want to, "own that"?

Want to "own" the fact that you're too stupid to realize that both socialism and fascism are exclusively left-wing ideology? Right-wing ideology is small, limited government. Thus, the farther right you go government continues to get smaller until it completely ceases to exist - anarchy.

Left-wing ideology embraces a large, strong, centralized government. The further left you go, government gets larger and more powerful until it is totalitarian - fascism, socialism, communism, marxism.

It's ok brother - I realize you junior high kids have a lot to learn still.

Just national socialistic right wing fantasy? Liberal socialism is to the left of national socialism.

If right wingers didn't have revisionist history, they'd have no history at all.

 

[P@triot]

7. Binge-Watching Computers. Can computers learn human behavior by binge-watching TV shows such as “The Office” and “Desperate Housewives?” The study was funded in part by the Department of Defense’s Office of Naval Research and the National Science Foundation, which helped researchers study how TV shows “train computers to understand and predict human behavior.” Flake said he sees this research as nonsensical. “Spending nearly a half a billion dollars to … turn computers into couch potatoes doesn’t compute for me,” he said.

There are some criticism-worthy examples on your list but this isn't one of them. This is how deep learning neural networks are trained and why people who aren't creative or exceptionally technically savvy are in danger of losing their livelihoods. From all outward signs, this includes you.

It's not the government's job to "train" them, nitwit. Try reading the U.S. Constitution and then get back to me...k? From all outward signs, you're as ignorant about your own government as you are technology. Scary.

OMG, people like you are just too stupid to live. Yeah, let's just let China and India develop that technology first. That's the visionary right wing that I've come to know.

OMG....people like you are too ignorant to waste good oxygen on:

• First of all, it's completely fucking irrelevant if China or India develops "deep learning neural networks first" you nitwit.

• Second, there is no guarantee that we develop first even if we have government illegally/unconstitutionally pay for it - dumbass. The fact that you need that pointed out to you is as comical as it is tragic.

• Third - government didn't fund Microsoft Windows. Did China or India develop that first? Government didn't fund the iPhone. Did China or India develop that first? Government didn't fund Oracle. Did China or India develop that first? Moron.

Sorry son - but your post is a prime example of why junior high students should stay off of message boards.

Technology and how it's created are not your thing are they. You really should just stay in your depth unless you're only trying to convince others who are similarly technologically naive that you know what you're talking about.

No private company is going to want to invest in the types of world changing technologies the government funds because they can't make a profit on it within five years. Yet these become the technologies that I entire industries are founded upon.

Snowflake - I've forgotten more about technology than you know or ever will. You were incapable of answering any of the questions posed to you - which expose your extraordinary ignorance.

Private industry has developed the majority of the world changing technology. Government didn't fund Microsoft Windows. Government didn't fund the iPad. Government didn't fund Oracle. Government didn't fund the cell phone. The list goes on and on and on.

It's ok - we get it. You're a junior kid without a clue but desperate to be involved in the conversation. Someday you'll look back on this and cringe with humiliation over your own astounding stupidity.