Now Blacks get a new thumping with California's new 'Genealogy Office'for Reparations Eligibility

[RoshawnMarkwees]

YOU ARE ABOUT AS BLACK AS BRITNEY SPEARS

Spears are African weapons so she’s black.

 

[Missourian]

Whites won't be getting reparations for slavery. Yoou guys can try twisting this all you want but when Native Americans got reparations they did the similar things with determining bloodlines and nobody white was able to get reparations.

Fake news...the argument for reparations ISN'T that you're black...it's that your enslaved ancestors is owed reparations for slavery...and those reparations should be paid to their descendants.

By that theory, it should not make one iota of difference what race the recipient is...only that they are direct descendants of an enslaved person.

 

[BluesLegend]

Can I "identify" as black if I was like an Eskimo or whatever?

Yes, so long as your voter ID is (D). Or if you pay Dem politicians and government employees bribes.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Fake news...the argument for reparations ISN'T that you're black...it's that your enslaved ancestors is owed reparations for slavery...and those reparations should be paid to their descendants.

By that theory, it should not make one iota of difference what race the recipient is...only that they are direct descendants of an enslaved person.

Those slaves had longer lifespans than their free counterparts in their native countries. Their lives were potentially improved. Blacks owe America a debt.

 

[BluesLegend]

Fake news...the argument for reparations ISN'T that you're black...it's that your enslaved ancestors is owed reparations for slavery...and those reparations should be paid to their descendants.

By that theory, it should not make one iota of difference what race the recipient is...only that they are direct descendants of an enslaved person.

This is great news. Those Roman MF'ers who enslaved my people owe me!!!

 

[TheGreatSatan]

Yes, so long as your voter ID is (D). Or if you pay Dem politicians and government employees bribes.

If I paint my face black, does that count?

 

[IM2]

Fake news...the argument for reparations ISN'T that you're black...it's that your enslaved ancestors is owed reparations for slavery...and those reparations should be paid to their descendants.

By that theory, it should not make one iota of difference what race the recipient is...only that they are direct descendants of an enslaved person.

White man, don't begin to think that you can tell me what the argument for reparations are about. You don't know what reparations are being asked for and you listen to white race hucksters. Whites who were related to slaves will not get reparations. Reparations are for slavery and the resulting discrimination from Jim Crow after slavery along with modern racism that continues. Whites were not denied due to Jim Crow, so whites won't be getting reparations.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

White man, don't begin to think that you can tell me what the argument for reparations are about. You don't know what reparations are being asked for and you listen to white race hucksters. Whites who were related to slaves will not get reparations. Reparations are for slavery and the resulting discrimination from Jim Crow after slavery along with modern racism that continues. Whites were not denied due to Jim Crow, so whites won't be getting reparations.

Reparations are retarded and so are the people pushing it.

 

[BluesLegend]

If I paint my face black, does that count?

Black paint's main ingredient is CARBON so you could be charged with crimes against the climate.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

How black does one have to be to get money from democrats?

Do I need to show ID?

The Democrats say that ID cards are racist.

Voter ID laws discriminate against racial and ethnic minorities, new study reveals

Voter ID laws are becoming more common and more strict, and the stakes for American democracy are high and growing higher by the year. New research from the University of California San Diego provides evidence that voter ID laws disproportionately reduce voter turnout in more racially diverse...

phys.org

How Voter ID Laws Discriminate Against Racial Minorities

A new study finds evidence that strict voting laws do suppress the ballot by race.

www.theatlantic.com

Joe Biden: Voter ID laws "an attempt to repress minority voting"

At Urban League conference, the VP denounces Republican-backed ID laws while the GOP chairman pushes a message of inclusion

www.cbsnews.com

Merrick Garland slams voter ID laws as ‘discriminatory’ and ‘unnecessary’ - Washington Examiner

Attorney General Merrick Garland said he would continue to fight back against voter ID laws, calling them "discriminatory, burdensome, and unnecessary."

www.washingtonexaminer.com

 

[IM2]

The us govt broke every known treaty with the natives. Blacks sold their own into slavery. You're not getting nor do you deserve one cent. You should pay the ancestors families who fought in the civil war to free blacks from liberal democrats.

Blacks didn't exacty sell their own. Would you say the German is the same as the Irish? Then there is this:

Before the white man came to Africa, tribal wars were mostly fought with swords, spears, bows and arrows. Although these weapons were lethal they were nowhere near as quick and fatal as the gun. The problem here was that, only the white strangers had guns and decided which tribal group to support in times of battle. Any tribal group the white strangers supported with their powerful cannons, guns and ammunitions, easily conquered their enemies. This also created another major problem. The white strangers did not support any tribal group for free. In fact, the white strangers started demanding taxes (which included pieces of gold and prisoners of war) and total submission after victory. Any tribal group or community which failed to submit to the Europeans and pay taxes were wiped out. Sometimes the leaders of those communities were executed publicly as a form of warning to neighboring communities. Most communities in Africa were turned into concentration camps with European authorities in place.

Although not often mentioned in history books, there were well trained and well equiped European troops all across Sub-Saharan Africa and they fought several battles with native tribes who refused to submit to European authority and that explains the several "European against natives" wars in the African history.

Africans did not sell their own people into slavery

www.africaw.com

But the fact here is that white bought the slaves. They weren't forced to. Here is are some facts idiots like you don't know:

“In fact, most American slaves were not kidnapped on another continent. Though over 12.7 million Africans were forced onto ships to the Western hemisphere, estimates only have 400,000-500,000 landing in present-day America. How then to account for the four million black slaves who were tilling fields in 1860? “The South,” the Sublettes write, “did not only produce tobacco, rice, sugar, and cotton as commodities for sale; it produced people.” Slavers called slave-breeding “natural increase,” but there was nothing natural about producing slaves; it took scientific management. Thomas Jefferson bragged to George Washington that the birth of black children was increasing Virginia’s capital stock by four percent annually.”

“According to database-backed estimates by David Eltis and David Richardson, only about 389,000 kidnapped Africans were disembarked in the ports of the present-day United States, the majority of them before independence.”

“By 1860, those few hundred thousand Africans had given way to four million African Americans.”

Ned & Constance Sublette, The American Slave Coast: A History of the Slave-Breeding Industry

So according to this information less than 400,000 slaves ended up in America.. By 1860 there were 4 million slaves living here. The importation of slaves was made illegal in 1808. From 1808 until 1860, the number of slaves increased by at least 1,000 percent. If we use the old, worn out excuse of Africans selling each other, Africans would be responsible for approximately 389 thousand slaves. What about the 3.1-4 million additional slaves? Africans did not create them. This was done by whites who created the slave breeding industry for business, pleasure, and entertainment.

Reparations are owed for that alone.

Last, whites did not fight to free anyone. That's why we had Jim Crow. Millions of blacks fought against slavery long before the Civil War. And:

The Gullah/Geechee Wars were the longest lasting and most-costly wars fought in terms of the loss of military personnel and the money spent than any war the United States engaged in until the Vietnam War.

The Black Seminoles are a small offshoot of the Gullah who escaped from the rice plantations in South Carolina and Georgia. They built their own settlements on the Florida frontier, fought a series of wars to preserve their freedom, and were scattered across North America. They have played a significant role in American history, but have never received the recognition they deserve.


Learn your history boy.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

Black paint's main ingredient is CARBON so you could be charged with crimes against the climate.

If I buy the paint for my face from a black guy does that give me carbon credit?

 

[Cougarbear]

Does reparations mean dough to me? I'm black on the inside, where it counts.

That day when reparations are handed out, I'll be a black person. Just like a man can decide on the spur of the moment he is a woman.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Admiral Rockwell Tory

How many in that Reparations office are Blacks , you think. And why would a White be legislated out of eligibility for working there just beause of their color. See where this is goin

All the employees will be black. The heads of the new office will fly around the world and wine and dine at taxpayer expense. They will never accomplish anything and the new agency will never go away. Ever.

 

[IM2]

That day when reparations are handed out, I'll be a black person. Just like a man can decide on the spur of the moment he is a woman.

And you won't get reparations. How about you decide you can be one of these groups?

1970: Richard Nixon signed into law House Resolution 471 restoring Blue Lake and surrounding area to the Taos Pueblo (New Mexico). The land had been taken by presidential order in 1906. (A History of the Indians in the United States by Angie Debo (Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, 1984, p. 422); see also "Taos Pueblo celebrates 40th anniversary of Blue Lake's return" by Matthew van Buren, Santa Fe New Mexican, September 18, 2010.)

The payments from 1971-1988 are taken from the booklet Black Reparations Now! 40 Acres, $50 Dollars, and a Mule, + Interest by Dorothy Benton-Lewis; and borrowed from N’COBRA (National Coalition of Blacks for Reparations in America).

1971: Around $1 billion + 44 million acres of land: Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act.

1974: A $10 million out-of-court settlement was reached between the U.S. government and Tuskegee victims, black men who had been unwitting subjects of a study of untreated syphilis, and who did not receive available treatments. (“The Tuskegee Timeline”, CDC, updated March 2, 2020.)

1980: $81 million: Klamaths of Oregon. ("Spending Spree" by Dylan Darling, Herald and News (Klamath Falls, OR), June 21, 2005.)

1980: $105 million: Sioux of South Dakota for seizure of their land. (United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians, 448 U.S. 371 (1980).)

1985: $12.3 million: Seminoles of Florida. (see Racial Justice in America: A Reference Handbook by David B. Mustard, 2002, ABC-CLIO, p. 81.)

1985: $31 million: Chippewas of Wisconsin. (see Racial Justice in America: A Reference Handbook by David B. Mustard, 2002, ABC-CLIO, p. 81.)

1986: $32 million per 1836 Treaty: Ottawas of Michigan. (see Racial Justice in America: A Reference Handbook by David B. Mustard, 2002, ABC-CLIO, p. 81.)

2016: The U.S. government reached a settlement of $492 million with 17 Native American tribes to resolve lawsuits alleging the federal government mismanaged tribal land, resources, and money. (“U.S. Government To Pay $492 Million To 17 American Indian Tribes” by Rebecca Hersher, NPR, September 27, 2016.)

2018: The Supreme Court, in a 4-4 deadlock, let stand a lower court's order to the state of Washington to make billions of dollars worth of repairs to roads, where the state had built culverts below road channels and structures in a way that prevented salmon from swimming through and reaching their spawning grounds, that had damaged the state’s salmon habitats and contributed to population loss. The case involved the Stevens Treaties, a series of agreements in 1854-55, in which tribes in Washington State gave up millions of acres of land in exchange for "the right to take fish." Implicit in the treaties, courts would later rule, was a guarantee that there would be enough fish for the tribes to harvest. Destroying the habitat reduces the population and thus violates these treaties. This decision directly affects the Swinomish Tribe. ("A Victory For A Tribe That’s Lost Its Salmon" by John Eligon, The New York Times, June 12, 2018.)

 

[IM2]

Admiral Rockwell Tory


All the employees will be black. The heads of the new office will fly around the world and wine and dine at taxpayer expense. They will never accomplish anything and the new agency will never go away. Ever.

Why do whites like you make such dumb ass statements?

 

[Cougarbear]

And you won't get reparations. How about you decide you can be one of these groups?

1970: Richard Nixon signed into law House Resolution 471 restoring Blue Lake and surrounding area to the Taos Pueblo (New Mexico). The land had been taken by presidential order in 1906. (A History of the Indians in the United States by Angie Debo (Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, 1984, p. 422); see also "Taos Pueblo celebrates 40th anniversary of Blue Lake's return" by Matthew van Buren, Santa Fe New Mexican, September 18, 2010.)

The payments from 1971-1988 are taken from the booklet Black Reparations Now! 40 Acres, $50 Dollars, and a Mule, + Interest by Dorothy Benton-Lewis; and borrowed from N’COBRA (National Coalition of Blacks for Reparations in America).

1971: Around $1 billion + 44 million acres of land: Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act.

1974: A $10 million out-of-court settlement was reached between the U.S. government and Tuskegee victims, black men who had been unwitting subjects of a study of untreated syphilis, and who did not receive available treatments. (“The Tuskegee Timeline”, CDC, updated March 2, 2020.)

1980: $81 million: Klamaths of Oregon. ("Spending Spree" by Dylan Darling, Herald and News (Klamath Falls, OR), June 21, 2005.)

1980: $105 million: Sioux of South Dakota for seizure of their land. (United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians, 448 U.S. 371 (1980).)

1985: $12.3 million: Seminoles of Florida. (see Racial Justice in America: A Reference Handbook by David B. Mustard, 2002, ABC-CLIO, p. 81.)

1985: $31 million: Chippewas of Wisconsin. (see Racial Justice in America: A Reference Handbook by David B. Mustard, 2002, ABC-CLIO, p. 81.)

1986: $32 million per 1836 Treaty: Ottawas of Michigan. (see Racial Justice in America: A Reference Handbook by David B. Mustard, 2002, ABC-CLIO, p. 81.)

2016: The U.S. government reached a settlement of $492 million with 17 Native American tribes to resolve lawsuits alleging the federal government mismanaged tribal land, resources, and money. (“U.S. Government To Pay $492 Million To 17 American Indian Tribes” by Rebecca Hersher, NPR, September 27, 2016.)

2018: The Supreme Court, in a 4-4 deadlock, let stand a lower court's order to the state of Washington to make billions of dollars worth of repairs to roads, where the state had built culverts below road channels and structures in a way that prevented salmon from swimming through and reaching their spawning grounds, that had damaged the state’s salmon habitats and contributed to population loss. The case involved the Stevens Treaties, a series of agreements in 1854-55, in which tribes in Washington State gave up millions of acres of land in exchange for "the right to take fish." Implicit in the treaties, courts would later rule, was a guarantee that there would be enough fish for the tribes to harvest. Destroying the habitat reduces the population and thus violates these treaties. This decision directly affects the Swinomish Tribe. ("A Victory For A Tribe That’s Lost Its Salmon" by John Eligon, The New York Times, June 12, 2018.)

Nope! I’ll sue the government agencies for every penny they have for gender discrimination. They won’t have a chance.

 

[DBA]

Why do whites like you make such dumb ass statements?

The entire idea is utterly ridiculous and yet completely understandable in that it was proposed by dimwitted Democrats.

 

[IM2]

Nope! I’ll sue the government agencies for every penny they have for gender discrimination. They won’t have a chance.

You will lose. You won't just be able to declare yourself black and get reparations. But that's what white race hustlers have you dumb whites believing.

 

[IM2]

The entire idea is utterly ridiculous and yet completely understandable in that it was proposed by dimwitted Democrats.

Was it ridiculous in these cases?

1970: Richard Nixon signed into law House Resolution 471 restoring Blue Lake and surrounding area to the Taos Pueblo (New Mexico). The land had been taken by presidential order in 1906. (A History of the Indians in the United States by Angie Debo (Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, 1984, p. 422); see also "Taos Pueblo celebrates 40th anniversary of Blue Lake's return" by Matthew van Buren, Santa Fe New Mexican, September 18, 2010.)

The payments from 1971-1988 are taken from the booklet Black Reparations Now! 40 Acres, $50 Dollars, and a Mule, + Interest by Dorothy Benton-Lewis; and borrowed from N’COBRA (National Coalition of Blacks for Reparations in America).

1971: Around $1 billion + 44 million acres of land: Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act.

1974: A $10 million out-of-court settlement was reached between the U.S. government and Tuskegee victims, black men who had been unwitting subjects of a study of untreated syphilis, and who did not receive available treatments. (“The Tuskegee Timeline”, CDC, updated March 2, 2020.)

1980: $81 million: Klamaths of Oregon. ("Spending Spree" by Dylan Darling, Herald and News (Klamath Falls, OR), June 21, 2005.)

1980: $105 million: Sioux of South Dakota for seizure of their land. (United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians, 448 U.S. 371 (1980).)

1985: $12.3 million: Seminoles of Florida. (see Racial Justice in America: A Reference Handbook by David B. Mustard, 2002, ABC-CLIO, p. 81.)

1985: $31 million: Chippewas of Wisconsin. (see Racial Justice in America: A Reference Handbook by David B. Mustard, 2002, ABC-CLIO, p. 81.)

1986: $32 million per 1836 Treaty: Ottawas of Michigan. (see Racial Justice in America: A Reference Handbook by David B. Mustard, 2002, ABC-CLIO, p. 81.)

2016: The U.S. government reached a settlement of $492 million with 17 Native American tribes to resolve lawsuits alleging the federal government mismanaged tribal land, resources, and money. (“U.S. Government To Pay $492 Million To 17 American Indian Tribes” by Rebecca Hersher, NPR, September 27, 2016.)

2018: The Supreme Court, in a 4-4 deadlock, let stand a lower court's order to the state of Washington to make billions of dollars worth of repairs to roads, where the state had built culverts below road channels and structures in a way that prevented salmon from swimming through and reaching their spawning grounds, that had damaged the state’s salmon habitats and contributed to population loss. The case involved the Stevens Treaties, a series of agreements in 1854-55, in which tribes in Washington State gave up millions of acres of land in exchange for "the right to take fish." Implicit in the treaties, courts would later rule, was a guarantee that there would be enough fish for the tribes to harvest. Destroying the habitat reduces the population and thus violates these treaties. This decision directly affects the Swinomish Tribe. ("A Victory For A Tribe That’s Lost Its Salmon" by John Eligon, The New York Times, June 12, 2018.)

And I only used some of the ones in the last 50 years, there are way more. So you are apparently ignorant about this issue and really should not be arguing.