deltex1
Gold Member
Fuck the heat...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Listen, you braindead boot licker, Bush spied on terrorists. Obama spies on innocent Americans.
Listen, you braindead boot licker, Bush spied on terrorists. Obama spies on innocent Americans.Too bad you didn't say that when Bush was doing his warrantless wiretapping and Congress backdated his authorization.My brothers and I were discussing this at my folks' house yesterday (Mom and Dad celebrated their 68th wedding anniversary!), and my oldest brother, who's a liberal, said, "You know what worries me the most? That I wasn't surprised about this."
Sad times for America.
Oh, right, terrorists were BAD GUYS then.
![]()
Listen, jackazz dupes. This is a Bush program, the difference is NOW they need warrants and have judicial review every 3 months. Try to get it through your thick skulls...
Listen, jackazz dupes. This is a Bush program, the difference is NOW they need warrants and have judicial review every 3 months. Try to get it through your thick skulls...
Horse patoot, fear mongered, paranoid dupes. Your BS charlatan heroes making big bucks off your fears and ignorance. NO EVIDENCE of ANY such thing.
Listen, you braindead boot licker, Bush spied on terrorists. Obama spies on innocent Americans.Too bad you didn't say that when Bush was doing his warrantless wiretapping and Congress backdated his authorization.
Oh, right, terrorists were BAD GUYS then.
![]()
Are right wingers really so naive as to believe that? You're right that Obama is essentially spying on us citizens, but to think that Bush didn't do the same thing!?
You're the political equivalent of a five year old who still believes in the tooth fairy. Wake up! Both parties are fucking us. They're both spying on us. It's not a question of left vs right, but us vs them.
If you talk to or E-mail terrorists, THEN they get a warrant to see what you're saying, dupes. Everything else is BS. How 'bout, STFU, paranoid idiot Pub dupes?
Listen, you braindead boot licker, Bush spied on terrorists. Obama spies on innocent Americans.
I'm fairly certain that Bush spied on Americans too.
Let's face it, the past 40+ years in American have blown politically.
Got any proof Bush spied on average Americans?
He may have.
Obama decided he didn't need permission from the courts.
Dissent is patriotic only when a Republican is in the Oval Office. Otherwise, it's treason.Whatever happened that the first duty of a citizen was to question the government?
Actually, dupes, this thread has proven Bush did the warrantless stuff, not Obama- Jeebus you dupes are STUPID...ay caramba....
Your ARTICLE says this is all based on one Dem rep who backed off and said warrants are always needed, liar/dupe gd waste of time. CNS of course is always totally fos, dupe.
NY TIMES:
Director of National Intelligence Michael McConnell:
The Executive Branch DOES NOT NEED WARRANTS
.
.
That's under Booosh fer chrissake. SAME PROGRAM, but Pub a-holes feel THEY'RE above the law. Same goes for perfidious Albion tapping visitng diplomats. Got NOTHING to do with Dems...BTW, you're an idiot waste of time. LOL
To review: NOT a new program, Dems doing NOTHING wrong, hater dupes...
Oh, Yes sir.. Strange as it is.. Both He and Graham both had phone calls or couriers or some dam thing affecting their short term memory..
See the link Ravi posted for the Update.. Nadler nows says "he's satisfied with Admin assurances that warrants are involved".. NOT A LIE --- but no where near the truth that voting citizens need to know...
Gee, why was he so talkative at one time now he only speaks through a spokesman.
Also, the trouble is that Nadler's quote refers to Thursday's hearing with FBI Director Robert Mueller and not the separate "secret Capitol Hill briefing" in the CNET story.
.
I can tell you what approximately happened. He got a call from the Security Liasion in WHouse..
"If you want to be the only Congressman on Capitol Hill tomorrow without a Security Clearance, you don't need to respond. But otherwise, we need you to revise your statement to reflect our existing National Security public statements".. With an additional threat thrown in quoting violations of National Security and the penalties attached..
Certainly, the Admin can selectively pull clearances with no justification to the public. And we KNOW that the Dear Leaders primary goal here is NOT TO CALM the people or suggest remedies to this lawlessness, but to NAIL the leakers. That was his 1st and only reaction before going out for a few days of fundraising in friendly spaces..
Too bad Pub dissent is lying hater BS, Duh Duh Dave.