Annie
Diamond Member
- Nov 22, 2003
- 50,848
- 4,827
- 1,790
ANNIE, I just checked google news and every third article says that the disaster is not averted, merely that the immediate risk of the explosion is averted.
Meanwhile three plants are widening evacuation perimeters. Two plants still have no cooling, the japanese nuclear oversight committee says one reactor has a breach in the containment vessel leaking cesium and iodine and the risk of a meltdown is still real. In fact some article say it is happening now.
The attempt to use saltwater as a last resort to cool the reactors is telling because the plants will have to be decommissioned due to corrosion once the reaction is halted.
The news is mostly served to avoid panic.
The use of seawater would indeed require these units to be decomissioned. Seawater is incredibly corrosive, especially when elevated in temperature like this.
This, if true, would indicate that they have basically given up efforts to maintain the reactors in some sort of working order for future repair or use.
If you look at the wikipedia article, it appears that the units in question were due for decommissioning anyway, with replacement by more modern units. It is yet to be seen if these units will now be placed into service. I would think they would, with added saftey features learned from this event.
Ya think? Let's see, the containment building blown. Some leakage. Going to need to start over, in the meantime, let's keep the damage to minimum.
Sounds right to me.