NY Times and CNN: No evidence Susan Rice broke the law

[Ted Frazier]

NYT ?
CNN ?
MSNBC ?

This is a joke...right ?

If you don't use Judge Napolitano as a source, the right-wingers will not be happy. He got fired from Fox by the way, for making up the claim that the British wiretapped the Trump tower.

 

[blackhawk]

No evidence Trump or his campaign consipired with Russia during the election either. As always opinion, theory, and speculation are not evidence.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

NYT and CNN? LOL

 

[OKTexas]

As you may recall, Donald Trump was relentlessly fact-checked after claiming (without evidence) that his phones had been wiretapped in the Trump Tower.
The fact-checks have begun regarding another baseless claim: that Susan Rice committed a crime by requesting the unmasking of people in contact with Russian agents under surveillance.

New York Times (4/5//2017):
Trump, Citing No Evidence, Suggests Susan Rice Committed Crime

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/05/us/politics/trump-interview-susan-rice.html

CNN (4/6/2017): Donald Trump says Susan Rice broke the law. His evidence? Nothing. - CNNPolitics.com

So explain how people she had unmasked ended up in news reports, disclosure of classified information is a felony. BTW the person who makes a specific request to unmask US citizens aren't supposed to share those names with anyone else.

Was the name of anyone specific given to the media?

Run along you fucking troll, the names have been in the media for months, look them up.

 

[OKTexas]

As you may recall, Donald Trump was relentlessly fact-checked after claiming (without evidence) that his phones had been wiretapped in the Trump Tower.
The fact-checks have begun regarding another baseless claim: that Susan Rice committed a crime by requesting the unmasking of people in contact with Russian agents under surveillance.

New York Times (4/5//2017):
Trump, Citing No Evidence, Suggests Susan Rice Committed Crime

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/05/us/politics/trump-interview-susan-rice.html

CNN (4/6/2017): Donald Trump says Susan Rice broke the law. His evidence? Nothing. - CNNPolitics.com

So explain how people she had unmasked ended up in news reports, disclosure of classified information is a felony. BTW the person who makes a specific request to unmask US citizens aren't supposed to share those names with anyone else.

Section 7.2(c) of USSID 18 permits the “unmasking” of a U.S. person’s identity if it is necessary to understand the foreign intelligence information or assess its importance. Specifically, this provision outlines several possible justifications upon which the government can rely to claim the unmasking was necessary, such as if the information indicates the U.S. person is an agent of a foreign power, is engaged in the unauthorized disclosure of classified information, may be involved in a crime, or may be the target of hostile intelligence activities of a foreign power.


Rice was within the law. She was doing her job.

Deal with it and bite one.

Only one that appears to have made an unauthorized disclosure of classified information is Rice. How else would the papers get the names and circumstances?

Trump's accusation in the article is not about leaking anything to the media. The accusation is that Rice committed a crime by seeking to find out the names of those speaking to Russians .
The accusation is so weak that you had to change the alleged crime from "unmasking request" to "media leaks".
Before you comment on the thread, learn how to read the articles mentioned in that thread.

Poor pathetic loser, Nunes said the unmasked documents he saw had nothing to do with Russia, there are reports that those unmasked reports were circulated, that's a no-no. Also making a false statement in an unmasking request is a felony. So maybe you should get up to speed before you make a larger fool of yourself.

 

[easyt65]

NY Times and CNN: No evidence Susan Rice broke the law

There is no evidence Trump or his team broke the law, but that hasn't stopped snowflakes from investigating the hell out of them. so, it is only fair to begin the looooooong process of investigating Rice and Obama to see if any crimes might have been committed.

(Snowflakes only enjoy 'fishing' for GOP... )

 

[WelfareQueen]

As you may recall, Donald Trump was relentlessly fact-checked after claiming (without evidence) that his phones had been wiretapped in the Trump Tower.
The fact-checks have begun regarding another baseless claim: that Susan Rice committed a crime by requesting the unmasking of people in contact with Russian agents under surveillance.

New York Times (4/5//2017):
Trump, Citing No Evidence, Suggests Susan Rice Committed Crime

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/05/us/politics/trump-interview-susan-rice.html

CNN (4/6/2017): Donald Trump says Susan Rice broke the law. His evidence? Nothing. - CNNPolitics.com

Are there is zero evidence that Trump colluded with Russia. STFU.....

 

[williepete]

MSNBC experts