Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who says people never move beyond a minimum wage?Some people are paid so little that they get food stamps. Or have to live in a camper... I think that a country like ours should share the riches a little more. Trickle down doesn't work all that well. But you\re ok so you don't care about others. GO TRUMP!It wouldn't be that much of a difference. But you don't mind being served by people who can't make a living. I bet you shop at Walmart as well.So basically fuck the people who want a nice $40 meal, and those paying $150 for a meal are just fine.
What a fucking bougie douche you are.
The wait staff usually does just fine. For some of them it's a part time job, for some a second job.
My father did side work growing up. Where is it written that you only need 1 job to provide a sustainable life, especially if you are low skilled or just starting out?
This tries to make low end jobs like professions, something you can do for a career, and they were never meant for that.
it's a way of coddling people to keep them needy on progressives, and not encouraging them to better themselves.
Of course a snitty bougie freak like you is OK with that.
They are paid so little because their skills set isn't worth much. They can improve their skill set and move on to a better paying position.
By subsidizing them at a low skill level, you remove the incentive to increase skill.
It's you ilk that don't care about them, because you want to coddle them and incentivize them staying at subsistence level.
And in actuality, when you raise pay to a point where a person of low skill no longer provides enough labor to justify the cost, either the business will fire them and hire a more skilled person, or eliminate their position via increasing the workload of others, or automation.
Most do
Doesn’t mean they should be exploited while earning minimum wages
Still over $15 an hourDoesn’t matterProperty is high because of all the regulations you democrats have put on new and resold propertyWhen the prevailing wages do not provide an income where workers can afford rent, food and healthcare, the state has to step up and supplement low wages
More reason to increase minimum wage
If workers never advance in skill beyond what can earn them below $15 an hour, the issue isn't with the system, it's with the person.
That person simply isn't worth $15 an hour, or probably even $10 an hour. But forcing an employer to pay them more than they provide as a value input is a great way to ruin a local economy.
Is the property you rent worth $10,000 a month, is a pound of beef worth $7?
You pay the going rate, if the going minimum wage is $15, you pay it
Rents, taxes, energy, cost of supplies are all a cost of doing business
So is the price of labor
Yet, we don’t see restaurants threatening to go out of business every time rent or taxes increase
Funny how 30 grand a year government dog catchers in red states do the same job as 100 grand dog catchers in the blue cities/states.
Who says people never move beyond a minimum wage?Some people are paid so little that they get food stamps. Or have to live in a camper... I think that a country like ours should share the riches a little more. Trickle down doesn't work all that well. But you\re ok so you don't care about others. GO TRUMP!It wouldn't be that much of a difference. But you don't mind being served by people who can't make a living. I bet you shop at Walmart as well.
The wait staff usually does just fine. For some of them it's a part time job, for some a second job.
My father did side work growing up. Where is it written that you only need 1 job to provide a sustainable life, especially if you are low skilled or just starting out?
This tries to make low end jobs like professions, something you can do for a career, and they were never meant for that.
it's a way of coddling people to keep them needy on progressives, and not encouraging them to better themselves.
Of course a snitty bougie freak like you is OK with that.
They are paid so little because their skills set isn't worth much. They can improve their skill set and move on to a better paying position.
By subsidizing them at a low skill level, you remove the incentive to increase skill.
It's you ilk that don't care about them, because you want to coddle them and incentivize them staying at subsistence level.
And in actuality, when you raise pay to a point where a person of low skill no longer provides enough labor to justify the cost, either the business will fire them and hire a more skilled person, or eliminate their position via increasing the workload of others, or automation.
Most do
Doesn’t mean they should be exploited while earning minimum wages
They are not being exploited, they are being paid for the value of the labor they add.
If they feel they are not, they can move to a job that does.
Exploited? In turns out you do show your inner communist from time to time.
I bet all you can afford to hire is Messikins. amirite or AMIRITE?Some people are paid so little that they get food stamps. Or have to live in a camper... I think that a country like ours should share the riches a little more. Trickle down doesn't work all that well. But you\re ok so you don't care about others. GO TRUMP!It wouldn't be that much of a difference. But you don't mind being served by people who can't make a living. I bet you shop at Walmart as well.So basically fuck the people who want a nice $40 meal, and those paying $150 for a meal are just fine.
What a fucking bougie douche you are.
The wait staff usually does just fine. For some of them it's a part time job, for some a second job.
My father did side work growing up. Where is it written that you only need 1 job to provide a sustainable life, especially if you are low skilled or just starting out?
This tries to make low end jobs like professions, something you can do for a career, and they were never meant for that.
it's a way of coddling people to keep them needy on progressives, and not encouraging them to better themselves.
Of course a snitty bougie freak like you is OK with that.
Some people are paid so little that they get food stamps.
So instead of supplementing their low income with food stamps, they should get all their money from the government. DURR
I think that a country like ours should share the riches a little more.
Multi-generational welfare recipients, great idea!
Doesn’t matterProperty is high because of all the regulations you democrats have put on new and resold propertyYou are leaving out a large section of New Yorkers on welfare. Because of bad education, broken families, over regulation.
When the prevailing wages do not provide an income where workers can afford rent, food and healthcare, the state has to step up and supplement low wages
More reason to increase minimum wage
If workers never advance in skill beyond what can earn them below $15 an hour, the issue isn't with the system, it's with the person.
That person simply isn't worth $15 an hour, or probably even $10 an hour. But forcing an employer to pay them more than they provide as a value input is a great way to ruin a local economy.
Is the property you rent worth $10,000 a month, is a pound of beef worth $7?
You pay the going rate, if the going minimum wage is $15, you pay it
Rents, taxes, energy, cost of supplies are all a cost of doing business
So is the price of labor
Yet, we don’t see restaurants threatening to go out of business every time rent or taxes increase
Who says people never move beyond a minimum wage?Some people are paid so little that they get food stamps. Or have to live in a camper... I think that a country like ours should share the riches a little more. Trickle down doesn't work all that well. But you\re ok so you don't care about others. GO TRUMP!The wait staff usually does just fine. For some of them it's a part time job, for some a second job.
My father did side work growing up. Where is it written that you only need 1 job to provide a sustainable life, especially if you are low skilled or just starting out?
This tries to make low end jobs like professions, something you can do for a career, and they were never meant for that.
it's a way of coddling people to keep them needy on progressives, and not encouraging them to better themselves.
Of course a snitty bougie freak like you is OK with that.
They are paid so little because their skills set isn't worth much. They can improve their skill set and move on to a better paying position.
By subsidizing them at a low skill level, you remove the incentive to increase skill.
It's you ilk that don't care about them, because you want to coddle them and incentivize them staying at subsistence level.
And in actuality, when you raise pay to a point where a person of low skill no longer provides enough labor to justify the cost, either the business will fire them and hire a more skilled person, or eliminate their position via increasing the workload of others, or automation.
Most do
Doesn’t mean they should be exploited while earning minimum wages
They are not being exploited, they are being paid for the value of the labor they add.
If they feel they are not, they can move to a job that does.
Exploited? In turns out you do show your inner communist from time to time.
Those with low skills or who perform menial labor are least capable of negotiating a higher salary
Just because employers can force these workers to accept low wages doesn’t mean we should allow it.
That is why we have a minimum wage
Who says people never move beyond a minimum wage?Some people are paid so little that they get food stamps. Or have to live in a camper... I think that a country like ours should share the riches a little more. Trickle down doesn't work all that well. But you\re ok so you don't care about others. GO TRUMP!The wait staff usually does just fine. For some of them it's a part time job, for some a second job.
My father did side work growing up. Where is it written that you only need 1 job to provide a sustainable life, especially if you are low skilled or just starting out?
This tries to make low end jobs like professions, something you can do for a career, and they were never meant for that.
it's a way of coddling people to keep them needy on progressives, and not encouraging them to better themselves.
Of course a snitty bougie freak like you is OK with that.
They are paid so little because their skills set isn't worth much. They can improve their skill set and move on to a better paying position.
By subsidizing them at a low skill level, you remove the incentive to increase skill.
It's you ilk that don't care about them, because you want to coddle them and incentivize them staying at subsistence level.
And in actuality, when you raise pay to a point where a person of low skill no longer provides enough labor to justify the cost, either the business will fire them and hire a more skilled person, or eliminate their position via increasing the workload of others, or automation.
Most do
Doesn’t mean they should be exploited while earning minimum wages
They are not being exploited, they are being paid for the value of the labor they add.
If they feel they are not, they can move to a job that does.
Exploited? In turns out you do show your inner communist from time to time.
Those with low skills or who perform menial labor are least capable of negotiating a higher salary
Just because employers can force these workers to accept low wages doesn’t mean we should allow it.
That is why we have a minimum wage
Still over $15 an hourDoesn’t matterProperty is high because of all the regulations you democrats have put on new and resold propertyIf workers never advance in skill beyond what can earn them below $15 an hour, the issue isn't with the system, it's with the person.
That person simply isn't worth $15 an hour, or probably even $10 an hour. But forcing an employer to pay them more than they provide as a value input is a great way to ruin a local economy.
Is the property you rent worth $10,000 a month, is a pound of beef worth $7?
You pay the going rate, if the going minimum wage is $15, you pay it
Rents, taxes, energy, cost of supplies are all a cost of doing business
So is the price of labor
Yet, we don’t see restaurants threatening to go out of business every time rent or taxes increase
Funny how 30 grand a year government dog catchers in red states do the same job as 100 grand dog catchers in the blue cities/states.
Who says people never move beyond a minimum wage?Some people are paid so little that they get food stamps. Or have to live in a camper... I think that a country like ours should share the riches a little more. Trickle down doesn't work all that well. But you\re ok so you don't care about others. GO TRUMP!The wait staff usually does just fine. For some of them it's a part time job, for some a second job.
My father did side work growing up. Where is it written that you only need 1 job to provide a sustainable life, especially if you are low skilled or just starting out?
This tries to make low end jobs like professions, something you can do for a career, and they were never meant for that.
it's a way of coddling people to keep them needy on progressives, and not encouraging them to better themselves.
Of course a snitty bougie freak like you is OK with that.
They are paid so little because their skills set isn't worth much. They can improve their skill set and move on to a better paying position.
By subsidizing them at a low skill level, you remove the incentive to increase skill.
It's you ilk that don't care about them, because you want to coddle them and incentivize them staying at subsistence level.
And in actuality, when you raise pay to a point where a person of low skill no longer provides enough labor to justify the cost, either the business will fire them and hire a more skilled person, or eliminate their position via increasing the workload of others, or automation.
Most do
Doesn’t mean they should be exploited while earning minimum wages
They are not being exploited, they are being paid for the value of the labor they add.
If they feel they are not, they can move to a job that does.
Exploited? In turns out you do show your inner communist from time to time.
Those with low skills or who perform menial labor are least capable of negotiating a higher salary
Just because employers can force these workers to accept low wages doesn’t mean we should allow it.
That is why we have a minimum wage
Still over $15 an hourDoesn’t matterProperty is high because of all the regulations you democrats have put on new and resold propertyIs the property you rent worth $10,000 a month, is a pound of beef worth $7?
You pay the going rate, if the going minimum wage is $15, you pay it
Rents, taxes, energy, cost of supplies are all a cost of doing business
So is the price of labor
Yet, we don’t see restaurants threatening to go out of business every time rent or taxes increase
Funny how 30 grand a year government dog catchers in red states do the same job as 100 grand dog catchers in the blue cities/states.
It takes what 25 people making $15 bucks an hour to pay that 100 grand a year dog catcher.
Compared to 5 in a red state . Do the math.
On what planet is that going to happen?I bet all you can afford to hire is Messikins. amirite or AMIRITE?Some people are paid so little that they get food stamps. Or have to live in a camper... I think that a country like ours should share the riches a little more. Trickle down doesn't work all that well. But you\re ok so you don't care about others. GO TRUMP!It wouldn't be that much of a difference. But you don't mind being served by people who can't make a living. I bet you shop at Walmart as well.
The wait staff usually does just fine. For some of them it's a part time job, for some a second job.
My father did side work growing up. Where is it written that you only need 1 job to provide a sustainable life, especially if you are low skilled or just starting out?
This tries to make low end jobs like professions, something you can do for a career, and they were never meant for that.
it's a way of coddling people to keep them needy on progressives, and not encouraging them to better themselves.
Of course a snitty bougie freak like you is OK with that.
Some people are paid so little that they get food stamps.
So instead of supplementing their low income with food stamps, they should get all their money from the government. DURR
I think that a country like ours should share the riches a little more.
Multi-generational welfare recipients, great idea!
If we boot 20 million illegals, low end wages will rise with no government mandate.
But you wouldn't support that, right?
Never said it should provide a livable wageWho says people never move beyond a minimum wage?Some people are paid so little that they get food stamps. Or have to live in a camper... I think that a country like ours should share the riches a little more. Trickle down doesn't work all that well. But you\re ok so you don't care about others. GO TRUMP!
They are paid so little because their skills set isn't worth much. They can improve their skill set and move on to a better paying position.
By subsidizing them at a low skill level, you remove the incentive to increase skill.
It's you ilk that don't care about them, because you want to coddle them and incentivize them staying at subsistence level.
And in actuality, when you raise pay to a point where a person of low skill no longer provides enough labor to justify the cost, either the business will fire them and hire a more skilled person, or eliminate their position via increasing the workload of others, or automation.
Most do
Doesn’t mean they should be exploited while earning minimum wages
They are not being exploited, they are being paid for the value of the labor they add.
If they feel they are not, they can move to a job that does.
Exploited? In turns out you do show your inner communist from time to time.
Those with low skills or who perform menial labor are least capable of negotiating a higher salary
Just because employers can force these workers to accept low wages doesn’t mean we should allow it.
That is why we have a minimum wage
They also provide the lowest added value.
A "livable wage" is not a minimum wage.
I was answering your question. Please try again soon.
Is it just you or do all hillbillies think that $15/hour is way too much money to make on a job?Who says people never move beyond a minimum wage?Some people are paid so little that they get food stamps. Or have to live in a camper... I think that a country like ours should share the riches a little more. Trickle down doesn't work all that well. But you\re ok so you don't care about others. GO TRUMP!
They are paid so little because their skills set isn't worth much. They can improve their skill set and move on to a better paying position.
By subsidizing them at a low skill level, you remove the incentive to increase skill.
It's you ilk that don't care about them, because you want to coddle them and incentivize them staying at subsistence level.
And in actuality, when you raise pay to a point where a person of low skill no longer provides enough labor to justify the cost, either the business will fire them and hire a more skilled person, or eliminate their position via increasing the workload of others, or automation.
Most do
Doesn’t mean they should be exploited while earning minimum wages
They are not being exploited, they are being paid for the value of the labor they add.
If they feel they are not, they can move to a job that does.
Exploited? In turns out you do show your inner communist from time to time.
Those with low skills or who perform menial labor are least capable of negotiating a higher salary
Just because employers can force these workers to accept low wages doesn’t mean we should allow it.
That is why we have a minimum wage
Those with low skills or who perform menial labor are least capable of negotiating a higher salary
Yup, that's what low or no skilled workers, in a market flooded by illegals, have to deal with.
Just because employers can force these workers to accept low wages doesn’t mean we should allow it.
Better that their support be 100% welfare, eh? Because 50% is cruel.
If your worth it go ask your boss for a raise.Is it just you or do all hillbillies think that $15/hour is way too much money to make on a job?Who says people never move beyond a minimum wage?They are paid so little because their skills set isn't worth much. They can improve their skill set and move on to a better paying position.
By subsidizing them at a low skill level, you remove the incentive to increase skill.
It's you ilk that don't care about them, because you want to coddle them and incentivize them staying at subsistence level.
And in actuality, when you raise pay to a point where a person of low skill no longer provides enough labor to justify the cost, either the business will fire them and hire a more skilled person, or eliminate their position via increasing the workload of others, or automation.
Most do
Doesn’t mean they should be exploited while earning minimum wages
They are not being exploited, they are being paid for the value of the labor they add.
If they feel they are not, they can move to a job that does.
Exploited? In turns out you do show your inner communist from time to time.
Those with low skills or who perform menial labor are least capable of negotiating a higher salary
Just because employers can force these workers to accept low wages doesn’t mean we should allow it.
That is why we have a minimum wage
Those with low skills or who perform menial labor are least capable of negotiating a higher salary
Yup, that's what low or no skilled workers, in a market flooded by illegals, have to deal with.
Just because employers can force these workers to accept low wages doesn’t mean we should allow it.
Better that their support be 100% welfare, eh? Because 50% is cruel.
If your worth it go ask your boss for a raise.Is it just you or do all hillbillies think that $15/hour is way too much money to make on a job?Who says people never move beyond a minimum wage?
Most do
Doesn’t mean they should be exploited while earning minimum wages
They are not being exploited, they are being paid for the value of the labor they add.
If they feel they are not, they can move to a job that does.
Exploited? In turns out you do show your inner communist from time to time.
Those with low skills or who perform menial labor are least capable of negotiating a higher salary
Just because employers can force these workers to accept low wages doesn’t mean we should allow it.
That is why we have a minimum wage
Those with low skills or who perform menial labor are least capable of negotiating a higher salary
Yup, that's what low or no skilled workers, in a market flooded by illegals, have to deal with.
Just because employers can force these workers to accept low wages doesn’t mean we should allow it.
Better that their support be 100% welfare, eh? Because 50% is cruel.
.
The government isn't putting up any money, just setting the standards LIKE THEY ALWAYS HAVE!If your worth it go ask your boss for a raise.Is it just you or do all hillbillies think that $15/hour is way too much money to make on a job?They are not being exploited, they are being paid for the value of the labor they add.
If they feel they are not, they can move to a job that does.
Exploited? In turns out you do show your inner communist from time to time.
Those with low skills or who perform menial labor are least capable of negotiating a higher salary
Just because employers can force these workers to accept low wages doesn’t mean we should allow it.
That is why we have a minimum wage
Those with low skills or who perform menial labor are least capable of negotiating a higher salary
Yup, that's what low or no skilled workers, in a market flooded by illegals, have to deal with.
Just because employers can force these workers to accept low wages doesn’t mean we should allow it.
Better that their support be 100% welfare, eh? Because 50% is cruel.
.
But dont ask the government...
.
The government isn't putting up any money, just setting the standards LIKE THEY ALWAYS HAVE!If your worth it go ask your boss for a raise.Is it just you or do all hillbillies think that $15/hour is way too much money to make on a job?Those with low skills or who perform menial labor are least capable of negotiating a higher salary
Just because employers can force these workers to accept low wages doesn’t mean we should allow it.
That is why we have a minimum wage
Those with low skills or who perform menial labor are least capable of negotiating a higher salary
Yup, that's what low or no skilled workers, in a market flooded by illegals, have to deal with.
Just because employers can force these workers to accept low wages doesn’t mean we should allow it.
Better that their support be 100% welfare, eh? Because 50% is cruel.
.
But dont ask the government...
.
Never said it should provide a livable wageWho says people never move beyond a minimum wage?They are paid so little because their skills set isn't worth much. They can improve their skill set and move on to a better paying position.
By subsidizing them at a low skill level, you remove the incentive to increase skill.
It's you ilk that don't care about them, because you want to coddle them and incentivize them staying at subsistence level.
And in actuality, when you raise pay to a point where a person of low skill no longer provides enough labor to justify the cost, either the business will fire them and hire a more skilled person, or eliminate their position via increasing the workload of others, or automation.
Most do
Doesn’t mean they should be exploited while earning minimum wages
They are not being exploited, they are being paid for the value of the labor they add.
If they feel they are not, they can move to a job that does.
Exploited? In turns out you do show your inner communist from time to time.
Those with low skills or who perform menial labor are least capable of negotiating a higher salary
Just because employers can force these workers to accept low wages doesn’t mean we should allow it.
That is why we have a minimum wage
They also provide the lowest added value.
A "livable wage" is not a minimum wage.
But it should provide a basic start in life to move on to higher paying jobs
Pay for college, buy a car, move out of your parents house
It used to pay for these things, it no longer does
