meaner gene
Diamond Member
- Feb 11, 2017
- 21,857
- 18,049
- 2,290
That's the New York Post, not the mayor. And the's from the posts "anonymous" sources.that might be true except for the fact he says its for a racist reason,,
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's the New York Post, not the mayor. And the's from the posts "anonymous" sources.that might be true except for the fact he says its for a racist reason,,
think about all the things you believed about trump that were from anonymous sources that ended up being wrong,,That's the New York Post, not the mayor. And the's from the posts "anonymous" sources.
I'll bet the "Administration" from the campaign was incompetent for the Office, and they were hiring more incompetent Black people.Proving that you are who you say you are for voting purposes is not remotely similar to proving your skin color so they can decide if they want to hire you or not.
Do you actually not see the distinction?
"Adams maintains that it will merely help him recognize his employees in the sprawling city workforce."I read the op, and i'm quoting from the op
[I[Several unnamed city officials told the outlet that the request is clearly an effort to hire more diverse staffers. However, Adams maintains that it will merely help him recognize his employees in the sprawling city workforce.[/I]
Anonymous sources, vs the mayors own words.
They quoted the suppositions of "anonymous" sources.I don't know... maybe because the article (which you should read) said so:
If you're white though, those laws don't apply to you.So he doesn't want to hire the best person for the job, he wants
Absolutely.
"I applied for this position and was turned because of my skin color."
There are laws against racist hiring practices and denying employment based on skin color.
And those anonymous sources gave an entirely legitimate reason for wishing to remain anonymous.They quoted the suppositions of "anonymous" sources.
The mayor gave a completely different reason.
andf his reason doesnt make sense,, he can get their picture after they are hired,,They quoted the suppositions of "anonymous" sources.
The mayor gave a completely different reason.
So he doesn't want to hire the best person for the job, he wants
Absolutely.
"I applied for this position and was turned because of my skin color."
There are laws against racist hiring practices and denying employment based on skin color.
he can get a picture after they are hired,,Think about it. If there was no photograph in the personnel file (what the mayor gets to review) there is no proof the mayor even knew the persons ethnicity. Only what they put on the form, like Elizabeth Warren being a native american indian.
We are talking the top tier of NYC government. Those that the mayor would directly deal with. It would be embarrassing for the mayor to think the deputy commissioner walking into his office was the guy delivering starbucks.How many tens of thousands of people (if not more) work for NYC? You actually believe Adams will be studying every employees picture so he can better recognize them?
He’s also asked all department heads to create an org chart “with the faces of my employees” so he can walk into a meeting and put a face to the name.
“Before I walk in, I look over the org chart. I look at their faces so I can walk in and say, “Hello,” he said.
if he has that problem he shouldnt be mayor,,,We are talking the top tier of NYC government. Those that the mayor would directly deal with. It would be embarrassing for the mayor to think the deputy commissioner walking into his office was the guy delivering starbucks.
All I can see is including a photograph in the personnel file, you claim the people don't have.
We are talking the top tier of NYC government. Those that the mayor would directly deal with. It would be embarrassing for the mayor to think the deputy commissioner walking into his office was the guy delivering starbucks.
How would we know? The reporter was from the infamous anti-democratic newspaper the New York Post.And those anonymous sources gave an entirely legitimate reason for wishing to remain anonymous.
so you cant debunk the story and now try discrediting the source,,,How would we know? The reporter was from the infamous anti-democratic newspaper the New York Post.
![]()
New York Post - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
The New York Post (NY Post) is a conservative[8] daily tabloid newspaper published in New York City.
Accusations of racism
so you cant debunk the story and now try discrediting the source,,,
your surrender is accepted,,