NYT clears Romney: No Evidence Romney lied

[Dr.House]

How could the NY Times know without having access to all internal Bain documents for the years in question? Have they seen such documents?

No, and the NYT article says so, but it was edited out.

Here is the edited part:

his campaign has declined to say if he attended any meetings or had any other contact with Bain during the period.

NYTimes: "Indeed, no evidence has yet emerged that Mr. Romney exercised his powers at Bain after February 1999 or directed the funds’ investments after he left..."

 

[Lakhota]

All Romney has to do is release his income tax returns - along with all relevant Bain documentation for the years in question. Problem solved...

Except there is no problem. All there is is leftist butthurt.

We'll see how "butthurt" voters are...

 

[jack113]

All Romney has to do is release his income tax returns - along with all relevant Bain documentation for the years in question. Problem solved...

Except there is no problem. All there is is leftist butthurt.

As usual intelligence hides from Koch suckers and Romney communism.

 

[ScienceRocks]

What's best for keeping our nation's number one is the question we should be seeking. Does it really matter if Romney was an owner of bain at the time? Every president since Nixon outsourced...Seriously, I would rather we keep our businesses in our country and work towards our own betterment, but anyone that can prove that Obama hasn't done the same can throw the first stone.

Let's talk about the economy and issues that are important.

 

[edthecynic]

NYTimes: "Indeed, no evidence has yet emerged that Mr. Romney exercised his powers at Bain after February 1999 or directed the funds’ investments after he left..."

And in typical CON$ervofascist fashion, you dishonestly edited out the essential part that shows Willard's campaign is hiding something. Remember in Willard's hearing on his eligibility to run for governor it was stated that he actively attended the board meetings!!!

Here's what you dishonestly edited out immediately after the ellipsis:

although his campaign has declined to say if he attended any meetings or had any other contact with Bain during the period.

 

[Dot Com]

All Romney has to do is release his income tax returns - along with all relevant Bain documentation for the years in question. Problem solved...

Except there is no problem. All there is is leftist butthurt.

As usual intelligence hides from Koch suckers and Romney communism.

Romnunism & Romneycare

 

[Oddball]

How could the NY Times know without having access to all internal Bain documents for the years in question? Have they seen such documents?

No, and the NYT article says so, but it was edited out.

Here is the edited part:

his campaign has declined to say if he attended any meetings or had any other contact with Bain during the period.

NYTimes: "Indeed, no evidence has yet emerged that Mr. Romney exercised his powers at Bain after February 1999 or directed the funds’ investments after he left..."

First CNN, now the NYT takes it on the lam from the Boiking plantation?

I feel a terrible disturbance in The Force.

 

[ItsjustmeIthink]

So NYT = Romeny's current tax return now?

 

[daveman]

All Romney has to do is release his income tax returns - along with all relevant Bain documentation for the years in question. Problem solved...

Except there is no problem. All there is is leftist butthurt.

We'll see how "butthurt" voters are...

Indeed we will. Do you have your excuse for Obama's failure to get re-elected picked out?

I predict you're going to go with "Everyone who voted for Romney is RACIST!!!"

Second pick is "The election was STOLEN!!!"

 

[Dr.House]

NYTimes: "Indeed, no evidence has yet emerged that Mr. Romney exercised his powers at Bain after February 1999 or directed the funds’ investments after he left..."

And in typical CON$ervofascist fashion, you dishonestly edited out the essential part that shows Willard's campaign is hiding something. Remember in Willard's hearing on his eligibility to run for governor it was stated that he actively attended the board meetings!!!

Here's what you dishonestly edited out immediately after the ellipsis:

although his campaign has declined to say if he attended any meetings or had any other contact with Bain during the period.

The first part of the sentence is the essential part of it... That's why they put it first...

You fail again... The absence of something does not signify guilt...

Has Rush Limbaugh had you arrested yet for stalking?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

CNN, WaPost and now even the NYTimes calls Obama a liar

 

[daveman]

All Romney has to do is release his income tax returns - along with all relevant Bain documentation for the years in question. Problem solved...

Except there is no problem. All there is is leftist butthurt.

As usual intelligence hides from Koch suckers and Romney communism.

I mention leftist butthurt, and you pop up.



Oh, and "Coke" suckers?

Do you know how stupid you idiots sound when you say that?

No. You probably don't. You probably think it's pronounced "cock", don't you?

 

[Dr.House]

CNN, WaPost and now even the NYTimes calls Obama a liar

Not looking good for 0bama...

After such a poor fundraising June, too...


Well, lets hope the USMB libs dig deep and send in those unneeded dollars they have lying around....

 

[edthecynic]

How could the NY Times know without having access to all internal Bain documents for the years in question? Have they seen such documents?

No, and the NYT article says so, but it was edited out.

Here is the edited part:

his campaign has declined to say if he attended any meetings or had any other contact with Bain during the period.

NYTimes: "Indeed, no evidence has yet emerged that Mr. Romney exercised his powers at Bain after February 1999 or directed the funds’ investments after he left..."

CON$ervoFascists always reveal that they know they are lying by the parts they edit out!!!
In this case you edited out the part that shows Willard's campaign knows he attended board meetings as his hearing on his eligibility for governor stated he did.

although his campaign has declined to say if he attended any meetings or had any other contact with Bain during the period.

 

[Dr.House]

So NYT = Romeny's current tax return now?

No, it's Barry's College Transcripts....

 

[Conservative]

Funny...

what's the matter, can't handle the truth, Shitting Bull?

 

[edthecynic]

NYTimes: "Indeed, no evidence has yet emerged that Mr. Romney exercised his powers at Bain after February 1999 or directed the funds’ investments after he left..."

And in typical CON$ervofascist fashion, you dishonestly edited out the essential part that shows Willard's campaign is hiding something. Remember in Willard's hearing on his eligibility to run for governor it was stated that he actively attended the board meetings!!!

Here's what you dishonestly edited out immediately after the ellipsis:

although his campaign has declined to say if he attended any meetings or had any other contact with Bain during the period.

The first part of the sentence is the essential part of it... That's why they put it first...

You fail again... The absence of something does not signify guilt...

Has Rush Limbaugh had you arrested yet for stalking?

BULLSHIT!

If the part you edited out was not critical, neither you nor newsmax would have edited it out!!! You reveal it's absolute importance by your attempt to hide it.
Thank you.

 

[HUGGY]

NYT clears Romney: No Evidence Romney lied

No such article exists. You are a liar.

Google search "nyt calls Obama a liar" comes up with no article.

 

[Dr.House]

No, and the NYT article says so, but it was edited out.

Here is the edited part:

NYTimes: "Indeed, no evidence has yet emerged that Mr. Romney exercised his powers at Bain after February 1999 or directed the funds’ investments after he left..."

CON$ervoFascists always reveal that they know they are lying by the parts they edit out!!!
In this case you edited out the part that shows Willard's campaign knows he attended board meetings as his hearing on his eligibility for governor stated he did.

although his campaign has declined to say if he attended any meetings or had any other contact with Bain during the period.

Again, for the Limbaugh Stalkers out there...

NYTimes: "Indeed, no evidence has yet emerged that Mr. Romney exercised his powers at Bain after February 1999 or directed the funds’ investments after he left..."

That important part of the NYTimes reported article means there is no fucking evidence of the shit you lying sacks of shit continue to preach as your own little gospel...

The NYTimes says you are lying...

So what's the next fauxtrage?

 

[Dr.House]

NYT clears Romney: No Evidence Romney lied

No such article exists. You are a liar.

Google search "nyt calls Obama a liar" comes up with no article.

You remain a fucking idiot and should permanently remove yourself from an internet which you clearly do NOT know how to fucking use....

The NYT article was posted...

Fuck off HomoHUGGY... Back to YouToooobz with you....