Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
PubliusInfinitu said:There is not ONE SCINTILLA OF THIS "FINANCIAL DISASTER THAT IS NOT ROOTED IN LEFTISM! So stow the anti-American bullshit.
I just love these blanket assessments with absolutely NOTHING to back them up.
Every time CON$ervatism fails, and it fails every time it's tried, they say it was CON$ervatives acting like Libs. LOL
Hardly, but will say socialism and communism have failed 100% of time. Capitalism? Not so, not saying there haven't been glitches, but not on the level of the others.
And every time they say the same thing as CON$, it wasn't really socialism or communism that failed.
She criticizes the administration so she's a domestic terrorist?
The lefties are so fucking insecure they cannot stand the thought that someone may disagree with them and oh the horrors,, rally a protest. they simply freak out and start blathering about violence, and inciting violenceI still remember the leftie threatening a revolution if the obamalama was not nominated. I still remember the black panthers standing at the polling place tapping their nightsticks and looking intimidating..
buncha DUmbazz HYPOCRITES is what lefties are!
How funny! I invite you to READ what you just wrote, honey. Ironically, hypocrisy doesn't even begin to describe your own ranting diatribes. You're so "insecure," you're in panic mode! Do you EVER have anything of substance to say, and minus all the profanity?
Even at my local polling place there were two black guys standing outside the door as you enter the building to vote. They had on TSHRTS reflecting Black Power. Can you imagine the reporting and riots of white people did that with tshirts that said White Power?
I think you're full of shit. Polling place monitors would not have allowed that. Not all of us suffer from gullible-itis, ya know.
PubliusInfinitu said:There is not ONE SCINTILLA OF THIS "FINANCIAL DISASTER THAT IS NOT ROOTED IN LEFTISM! So stow the anti-American bullshit.
I just love these blanket assessments with absolutely NOTHING to back them up.
ROFL... Blanket assessments?
ROFLMNAO...
Well Ive posted it 500 times, so once more is no big deal...
The current financial crisis is a direct result of the abuse of power by the Leftists in the legislature; it began nearly a century ago and slowly crept deeper into the US Markets, but was accelerated exponentially in the 1990s when the "Progressives" in the legislature, threatened the US mortgage industry with Civil Rights lawsuits if they did not underwrite mortgages in red-line districts... thus manipulating and undermining the reasonable and time tested actuarial thresholds of mortgage lending...
I just get sick and tired of seeing the same old, same old lame conservative ideological BS. We KNOW it doesn't work, yet you continue to truck on, and nothing (NOTHING!!) convinces you otherwise. Maybe if you mixed up your reading and/or viewing habits a tad, you would understand that not EVERYTHING you attempt to prove is ALL true. When you restrict yourself to only one set of partisan material, it's called tunnel vision. Apparently you've read my other postings in other threads; otherwise you wouldn't be suggesting that I'm having a bad hair day. Therefore, it should be obvious to you that I DO, in fact, mix it up. I have strong opinions on over-spending by either party, where our taxes go, and everything else rationally discussed on those issues. But when it comes to stoic, rabidly right ideology which is often not right, but wrong, I will prove it.
Conservatism works every time it's tried.
Of course, it hasnt been tried in decades. Hence why you see problems.
Every time CON$ervatism fails, and it fails every time it's tried, they say it was CON$ervatives acting like Libs. LOL
Hardly, but will say socialism and communism have failed 100% of time. Capitalism? Not so, not saying there haven't been glitches, but not on the level of the others.
And every time they say the same thing as CON$, it wasn't really socialism or communism that failed.
ROFL...
OK...
I love this one...
So I'm going to beat ya rhetorically senseless with it...
Now I'll be needing you to DEFINE: SUCCESS
AND I'll ask that you utilize THAT DEFINITION TO DEMONSTRATE WHERE SOCIALISM HAS "SUCCEEDED"...
Best of luck...
Now here's how this will go...
First she'll ignore the challenge...
Second she will redefine "success" to a point where it's meaningless and try to show that because socialism EXISTS... it therefore succeeds.
Capitalism is the natural order of economics... it cannot fail; it is impossible FOR Capitalism TO FAIL.
If you define SUCCESS and FAILURE... TRY to describe how Capitalism MIGHT FAIL... using the scope of those definitions... It can't be done...
What the left wants to do is to project their erroneous notion of fairness into an equation wherein FAIRNESS IS IRRELEVANT... principle-less, secular 'moral imperatives'... which economics does not serve...
As I've stated many time, Socialism is NOT an economic system... it's an ideology which attempts to use economics in it's sales pitch.
And just as Capitalism CANNOT fail... Socialism can never succeed... IF success is defined by the meeting of its stated goal...
Capitalisms goal is the free exchange of goods and services to the mutual benefit of both parties... where prudent, sound, virtuous people trade, both will benefit from the exchange; socialism strips virtue and prudence from the equation and there is NO place in left-think for sound reasoning.
PubliusInfinitu said:There is not ONE SCINTILLA OF THIS "FINANCIAL DISASTER THAT IS NOT ROOTED IN LEFTISM! So stow the anti-American bullshit.
I just love these blanket assessments with absolutely NOTHING to back them up.
ROFL... Blanket assessments?
ROFLMNAO...
Well Ive posted it 500 times, so once more is no big deal...
The current financial crisis is a direct result of the abuse of power by the Leftists in the legislature; it began nearly a century ago and slowly crept deeper into the US Markets, but was accelerated exponentially in the 1990s when the "Progressives" in the legislature, threatened the US mortgage industry with Civil Rights lawsuits if they did not underwrite mortgages in red-line districts...........................................................................
Need anything else Sis?
Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion: The Constitution Is A Subversive Manifesto Per DHS
read the DHS report here: http://www.thelibertypapers.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/hsa-rightwing-extremism-09-04-07.pdf
Tuesday, April 14, 2009
The Constitution Is A Subversive Manifesto Per DHS
The Department of Homeland Security Report titled "Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment" was first brought to light by Stephen Gordon at The Liberty Papers Blog. The Report was issued a week before the scheduled Tea Parties across the country, and is all over the news today. Reading the report is depressing, not because it reveals any current threat, but because of the shoddy definitions and analysis.
One thing that is not clear from the news reports, to begin with, is that the Report specifically states that there is no current real threat, even from the most extreme White Supremacist groups: "Threats from white supremacist and violent anti-government groups during 2009 have been mostly rhetorical and have not indicated plans to carry out violent acts." From the news accounts, you would think there was an actual threat, but that is not so.
But the even bigger vice is how a "rightwing extremist" is defined. I don't disagree that the few remaining White Supremacist groups should be in any definition, but DHS puts a distinctly political spin on the definition (emphasis mine):
Rightwing extremism in the United States can be broadly divided into those groups, movements, and adherents that are primarily hate-oriented (based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups), and those that are mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely. It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration.
This definition is so broad as to include anyone who seeks to preserve the foundation of our federal-state constitutional distinction, under the 10th Amendment ("The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people"), because such a person could be deemed to "reject federal authority in favor of state or local authority." So Texas Governor Rick Perry, who has come out in support of preserving the constitutional integrity of Texas now should be on the DHS' extremist and radical watch-list.
Similarly, the reference to "abortion or immigration" is purely political. Why pick those two subjects? If someone is planning violence, that is one thing. But vocalizing one's view on a subject and seeking to influence the government are protected by the 1st Amendment ("Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances").
Only in a highly politicized bureaucracy could the Constitution be viewed as a subversive manifesto.
The first goal of all government propaganda is to define the enemies of the state.
Clearly this administration sees as enemies all who disagree.
February 1, 2008
RUSH: you do not know the left in this country. You do not know the enemy.
February 6, 2008
RUSH: Mr. McCain, Ronaldus Magnus did reach out to Democrats -- to defeat them!
RUSH: They are the enemy! They are to be defeated.
"It is the duty of the patriot to protect his country from its government."
-- Thomas Paine, American revolutionary
Odd that it's taken all these years. Suddenly when we have a black president who was plopped in the middle of the worst financial crisis in history that people suddenly feel this patriotic "urge" to protect the citizenry from him.
Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion: The Constitution Is A Subversive Manifesto Per DHS
read the DHS report here: http://www.thelibertypapers.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/hsa-rightwing-extremism-09-04-07.pdf
The first goal of all government propaganda is to define the enemies of the state.
Clearly this administration sees as enemies all who disagree.
February 1, 2008
RUSH: you do not know the left in this country. You do not know the enemy.
February 6, 2008
RUSH: Mr. McCain, Ronaldus Magnus did reach out to Democrats -- to defeat them!
RUSH: They are the enemy! They are to be defeated.
The last time I checked, Rush Limbaugh was not a government agency. This "warning" is coming from the department of homeland security not some fat radio talk show host.
The fact that the government that should be protecting our liberties and among those liberties, the absolute right to free speech and dissent is now labeling acts of free speech and dissent a threat should concern you far more than what Rush Limbaugh says.
Try again.
February 1, 2008
RUSH: you do not know the left in this country. You do not know the enemy.
February 6, 2008
RUSH: Mr. McCain, Ronaldus Magnus did reach out to Democrats -- to defeat them!
RUSH: They are the enemy! They are to be defeated.
The last time I checked, Rush Limbaugh was not a government agency. This "warning" is coming from the department of homeland security not some fat radio talk show host.
The fact that the government that should be protecting our liberties and among those liberties, the absolute right to free speech and dissent is now labeling acts of free speech and dissent a threat should concern you far more than what Rush Limbaugh says.
Try again.
I love it!
Not so much fun when it's YOU under the boot of the Patriot Act instead of the Quakers, is it??? LOL
Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion: The Constitution Is A Subversive Manifesto Per DHS
read the DHS report here: http://www.thelibertypapers.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/hsa-rightwing-extremism-09-04-07.pdf
The first goal of all government propaganda is to define the enemies of the state.
Clearly this administration sees as enemies all who disagree.
February 1, 2008
RUSH: you do not know the left in this country. You do not know the enemy.
February 6, 2008
RUSH: Mr. McCain, Ronaldus Magnus did reach out to Democrats -- to defeat them!
RUSH: They are the enemy! They are to be defeated.
The last time I checked, Rush Limbaugh was not a government agency. This "warning" is coming from the department of homeland security not some fat radio talk show host.
The fact that the government that should be protecting our liberties and among those liberties, the absolute right to free speech and dissent is now labeling acts of free speech and dissent a threat should concern you far more than what Rush Limbaugh says.
Try again.
The last time I checked, Rush Limbaugh was not a government agency. This "warning" is coming from the department of homeland security not some fat radio talk show host.
The fact that the government that should be protecting our liberties and among those liberties, the absolute right to free speech and dissent is now labeling acts of free speech and dissent a threat should concern you far more than what Rush Limbaugh says.
Try again.
I love it!
Not so much fun when it's YOU under the boot of the Patriot Act instead of the Quakers, is it??? LOL
What? you assume i supported the Patriot Act? You have just proven yet again that you have no other agenda than your own partisan pap.
I raise a legitimate constitutional argument and you cannot seem to think beyond the confines of the two political parties and the childish finger pointing and name calling that all political argument has devolved to.
That you can't seem to even fathom the possibility that a person cannot fit into your limited paradigm is obvious.
The larger issue here, which obviously evades you, is that the government is now defining citizens who dissent as threats. That is an argument that is nonpartisan but since you are incapable of being objective you are utterly incapable of seeing this.
Did you actually read the article? I see nothing wrong with keeping tabs on extremist groups as long as the proper safeguards are in place...warrants, etc. They aren't targeting the teabaggers, perhaps you missed that.The last time I checked, Rush Limbaugh was not a government agency. This "warning" is coming from the department of homeland security not some fat radio talk show host.
The fact that the government that should be protecting our liberties and among those liberties, the absolute right to free speech and dissent is now labeling acts of free speech and dissent a threat should concern you far more than what Rush Limbaugh says.
Try again.
I love it!
Not so much fun when it's YOU under the boot of the Patriot Act instead of the Quakers, is it??? LOL
What? you assume i supported the Patriot Act? You have just proven yet again that you have no other agenda than your own partisan pap.
I raise a legitimate constitutional argument and you cannot seem to think beyond the confines of the two political parties and the childish finger pointing and name calling that all political argument has devolved to.
That you can't seem to even fathom the possibility that a person cannot fit into your limited paradigm is obvious.
The larger issue here, which obviously evades you, is that the government is now defining citizens who dissent as threats. That is an argument that is nonpartisan but since you are incapable of being objective you are utterly incapable of seeing this.
I love it!
Not so much fun when it's YOU under the boot of the Patriot Act instead of the Quakers, is it??? LOL
What? you assume i supported the Patriot Act? You have just proven yet again that you have no other agenda than your own partisan pap.
I raise a legitimate constitutional argument and you cannot seem to think beyond the confines of the two political parties and the childish finger pointing and name calling that all political argument has devolved to.
That you can't seem to even fathom the possibility that a person cannot fit into your limited paradigm is obvious.
The larger issue here, which obviously evades you, is that the government is now defining citizens who dissent as threats. That is an argument that is nonpartisan but since you are incapable of being objective you are utterly incapable of seeing this.
What obviously evades you is this is not NEW. Not even close! One need only look back to the 60s and Nixon's "Enemies List." But it's good to know you have come over to the side of the dippy hippies of the U C Berkley Free Speech Movement.
Did you actually read the article? I see nothing wrong with keeping tabs on extremist groups as long as the proper safeguards are in place...warrants, etc. They aren't targeting the teabaggers, perhaps you missed that.I love it!
Not so much fun when it's YOU under the boot of the Patriot Act instead of the Quakers, is it??? LOL
What? you assume i supported the Patriot Act? You have just proven yet again that you have no other agenda than your own partisan pap.
I raise a legitimate constitutional argument and you cannot seem to think beyond the confines of the two political parties and the childish finger pointing and name calling that all political argument has devolved to.
That you can't seem to even fathom the possibility that a person cannot fit into your limited paradigm is obvious.
The larger issue here, which obviously evades you, is that the government is now defining citizens who dissent as threats. That is an argument that is nonpartisan but since you are incapable of being objective you are utterly incapable of seeing this.
February 1, 2008
RUSH: you do not know the left in this country. You do not know the enemy.
February 6, 2008
RUSH: Mr. McCain, Ronaldus Magnus did reach out to Democrats -- to defeat them!
RUSH: They are the enemy! They are to be defeated.
The last time I checked, Rush Limbaugh was not a government agency. This "warning" is coming from the department of homeland security not some fat radio talk show host.
The fact that the government that should be protecting our liberties and among those liberties, the absolute right to free speech and dissent is now labeling acts of free speech and dissent a threat should concern you far more than what Rush Limbaugh says.
Try again.
Hey, he lost twenty seven pounds, thats right, 27. there, I educated you, thank me