Obama armed ISIS with US tanks and other weapons; Treason

2014: Should Obama be on Trial for Treason

  • Yes.

    Votes: 7 41.2%
  • No.

    Votes: 10 58.8%

  • Total voters
    17
Disillusionment.jpg

Geesh, who makes this shit up?



Idiot RW's.
 
Disillusionment.jpg

Geesh, who makes this shit up?

ISIS got them from Iraqis that left the fighting, we left enough advanced wepons to last a decade. Obama has given them -0-. The Iraqis do not like the boot licker Bush installed, but he controls the country; he refuses to include Sunnis in his government. He sucked up to Bush well enough to be installed.
 
Well there is no doubt that at least some of the weaponry that ISIS is using is American hardware that we had set up the Iraqi army with.

That is not the same as arming ISIS with US tanks and other weapons.

Yes. And almost all was hardware we gave to Iraqi forces who have little faith in Maliki, he was a terrible choice; Bush had interviews conducted of many candidates, chose him because he praised Bush to high heaven.
 
Disillusionment.jpg

Geesh, who makes this shit up?

ISIS got them from Iraqis that left the fighting, we left enough advanced wepons to last a decade. Obama has given them -0-. The Iraqis do not like the boot licker Bush installed, but he controls the country; he refuses to include Sunnis in his government. He sucked up to Bush well enough to be installed.

Zero tanks maybe but plenty enough other weapons for them to strengthen enough to take more. Do you not remember we supported the so called Syrian "rebels " ?
 
Disillusionment.jpg

Geesh, who makes this shit up?

ISIS got them from Iraqis that left the fighting, we left enough advanced wepons to last a decade. Obama has given them -0-. The Iraqis do not like the boot licker Bush installed, but he controls the country; he refuses to include Sunnis in his government. He sucked up to Bush well enough to be installed.

Zero tanks maybe but plenty enough other weapons for them to strengthen enough to take more. Do you not remember we supported the so called Syrian "rebels " ?

Which Syrian rebels? There are different factions - and not all of them are terrorists.
 
Obama has long been reluctant to arm the Syrian opposition, in part because of concerns that weapons may fall into extremist hands. But administration officials say the U.S. has grown increasingly confident in recent months about its ability to distinguish the moderate rebels from the more extremist elements that include the al-Qaida-inspired Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, which has stormed into Iraq and captured much of the northern part of the country.

More: Obama seeks $500M to arm select Syrian rebels

Not all Syrian rebels are terrorists.
 
ISIS got them from Iraqis that left the fighting, we left enough advanced wepons to last a decade. Obama has given them -0-. The Iraqis do not like the boot licker Bush installed, but he controls the country; he refuses to include Sunnis in his government. He sucked up to Bush well enough to be installed.

Zero tanks maybe but plenty enough other weapons for them to strengthen enough to take more. Do you not remember we supported the so called Syrian "rebels " ?

Which Syrian rebels? There are different factions - and not all of them are terrorists.

The Syrian "rebellion "was an army financed by Qatar and Saudi Arabia with other assistance provided by Turkey, the US and various other countries. There are numerous links verifying that these factions were replete with Al Qaeda and other rag tag mercenaries from around the world. Obama was WARNED at that time that this assistance was in great danger of falling into the wrong hands. Guess what ??
 
Zero tanks maybe but plenty enough other weapons for them to strengthen enough to take more. Do you not remember we supported the so called Syrian "rebels " ?

Which Syrian rebels? There are different factions - and not all of them are terrorists.

The Syrian "rebellion "was an army financed by Qatar and Saudi Arabia with other assistance provided by Turkey, the US and various other countries. There are numerous links verifying that these factions were replete with Al Qaeda and other rag tag mercenaries from around the world. Obama was WARNED at that time that this assistance was in great danger of falling into the wrong hands. Guess what ??

You're stupid ??
 
Which Syrian rebels? There are different factions - and not all of them are terrorists.

The Syrian "rebellion "was an army financed by Qatar and Saudi Arabia with other assistance provided by Turkey, the US and various other countries. There are numerous links verifying that these factions were replete with Al Qaeda and other rag tag mercenaries from around the world. Obama was WARNED at that time that this assistance was in great danger of falling into the wrong hands. Guess what ??

You're stupid ??

:lol: nice.
 
Slightly more than a year ago I made a thread asking if Obama should be on Trial for Treason for arming jihadists in Syria, knowing that they'd use it against Americans and our allies not to far down the road.

UPDATED: Obama waives ban on arming terrorists to allow aid to Syrian opposition | WashingtonExaminer.com
Exclusive: Obama authorizes secret U.S. support for Syrian rebels | Reuters
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/15/w...ent-to-syrian-rebels.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

Now the ISIS is rolling about with US tanks and other heavy and modern weaponry, and it's public knowledge that Obama knowingly armed these jihadists, should be be arrested and tried for treason?

Obama has given Aid and Comfort to our Enemies, adhering to their effort to Levy War against the United States and its Allies.

As there are more then Two Witnesses who will testify to Obama's overt Treason, let there be a trial to determine his guilt.

Article III, Section 3 of the United States Constitution:
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

GERTZ-FEATURE-IMAGE-A-captured-Iraqi-T-55-tank-in-Syria.jpeg

.S. intelligence agencies reported this week that photos of the equipment transfers were posted online by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), also known as ISIS, the ultra-violent terror group that broke away from al Qaeda but shares its goals and philosophy.

Pentagon spokesman Cmdr. Bill Speaks confirmed the weapons transfers and expressed concerns about the captured arms.

“We’re aware of reports of some equipment—namely Humvees—and the pictures that have been posted online,” Speaks said in an email. “We are certainly concerned about these reports and are consulting with the Iraqi government to obtain solid confirmation on what assets may have fallen into ISIL’s hands.”

Last year's poll was 9-13, now let's see how the previous 12 months of Obama's Overt Treason influences the same question in 2014.



The tank in the pic is not a US military tank..
 
As previously mentioned, the CIA and Reagan trained Bin Laden and supplied weapons. Maybe Haliburton supplied Isis with the weapons, after all, they took jobs from our military, didn't care about the personal safety of contractors and they did not have to follow the Military Code of Justice. They were in Iraq a long time, wasted a lot of money. Maybe Isis obtained the weapons that way. Haliburton could have sold Isis the weapons, after all they only cared about money.
 
there is little doubt that the US under Obama has supplied weapons to the ME insurgencies. The question is why would we do that. Yes, Reagan helped the mujahedeen in Afghanistan. Even though we knew them not to be boy scouts we saw them as freedom fighters against foreign invasion. Invasion by a country, that at the time was our sworn enemy. Who would have thought that in less then 10 years we would have a president that turned those who were are allies into hated enemies. Yes, folks that all happened under the person I consider the worse president in my lifetime, William Jefferson Clinton. Everything about him reeked of incompetence. Waco, OBL, "free" trade agreements. And everything he did lead to the disasters we see today. Sure you can blame Bush but Bush was only reacting to the situation he inherited from lying Bill.

Oh, and before someone brings up the economy under lying Bill, I will give him some credit for not screwing up the biggest peace time expansion of the economy started under Reagan. It took him 8 year but he did get the job done.
 

Forum List

Back
Top