Lakhota
Diamond Member
Tic toc tic toc tic toc, Motherf'ers.
America is watching.
Yeah, we know...
http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/223789-chart-who-really-caused-the-deficit.html
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tic toc tic toc tic toc, Motherf'ers.
America is watching.
Tic toc tic toc tic toc, Motherf'ers.
America is watching.
Yeah, we know...
http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/223789-chart-who-really-caused-the-deficit.html
Idiot thats the wrong budget. That's not the one that no one voted to support.
The link is in response to those who have said that Reid would not allow a GOP House budget to be debated and voted on in the Senate. Well, he did, and it did not pass.
Idiot thats the wrong budget. That's not the one that no one voted to support.
The link is in response to those who have said that Reid would not allow a GOP House budget to be debated and voted on in the Senate. Well, he did, and it did not pass.
I thought the argument for the past year was that the republican house didn't have a budget?
Idiot thats the wrong budget. That's not the one that no one voted to support.
The link is in response to those who have said that Reid would not allow a GOP House budget to be debated and voted on in the Senate. Well, he did, and it did not pass.
I thought the argument for the past year was that the republican house didn't have a budget?
This was NOT President Obama's budget. You wingnuts need to read the details.
This was NOT President Obama's budget. You wingnuts need to read the details.
Are you disagreeing with ABC?
The White House today reacted to news that representations of President Obamas budget had been voted down by the House and Senate by decrying the introduction of the amendments, by Republicans, as gimmicks.
This was NOT President Obama's budget. You wingnuts need to read the details.
Lakhota's right
This was NOT President Obama's budget. You wingnuts need to read the details.
Are you disagreeing with ABC?
The White House today reacted to news that representations of President Obamas budget had been voted down by the House and Senate by decrying the introduction of the amendments, by Republicans, as gimmicks.
You didn't read the last part of your link:
This is the presidents budget, said the top Democrat on the Senate Budget Committee, Sen. Kent Conrad of South Dakota, indicating the voluminous budget proposal President Obama offered. This is what Sen. Sessions has presented as being the presidents budget, he said, indicating the much slimmer document.
I think its readily apparent there is a big difference between the presidents budget, which I hold in my hands, and what Sen. Sessions has presented as being the presidents budget. This is not the presidents budget. So, of course, were not going to support it. Its not what the president proposed.
The White House official said the Sessions and Mulvaneys bills were mere GOP stunts to get Democrats on record opposing the Presidents budget as well as distracting from what the House Republican budget would do, which the official described as protect(ing) massive tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires while making the middle class and seniors pay.
Epic Failure. And that's an understatement.
'President Obama's budget suffered a second embarrassing defeat Wednesday, when senators voted 99-0 to reject it.
Coupled with the House's rejection in March, 414-0, that means Mr. Obama's budget has failed to win a single vote in support this year.'
"A stunning development for the president of the United States in his fourth year in office," Mr. Sessions said of the unanimous opposition.'
Obama budget defeated 99-0 in Senate - Washington Times
This was NOT President Obama's budget. You wingnuts need to read the details.
Maybe you need to read it.
From the Article:
"But Republicans said they used all of the president's numbers in the proposal, so it faithfully represented his plan."
"Sen. Jeff Sessions, Alabama Republican, even challenged Democrats to point out any errors in the numbers and he would correct them a challenge no Democrats took up."
You fail again, Lakhota
This was NOT President Obama's budget. You wingnuts need to read the details.
Maybe you need to read it.
From the Article:
"But Republicans said they used all of the president's numbers in the proposal, so it faithfully represented his plan."
"Sen. Jeff Sessions, Alabama Republican, even challenged Democrats to point out any errors in the numbers and he would correct them a challenge no Democrats took up."
You fail again, Lakhota
Holy shit, you are stupid. Even using the same total numbers, a 50-page budget can be VASTLY different that a 2000-page budget. The devil was in the lack of details in the wingnut con job. In short - it was NOT Obama's budget. Get real...
As per law, Obama has submitted a budget for each fiscal year he’s been president — fiscal years 2010, 2011 and 2012, according to a quick check on the Government Printing Office’s website, where the documents are posted. It’s as simple as that.
2010? There was no budget passed in 2010.As per law, Obama has submitted a budget for each fiscal year hes been president fiscal years 2010, 2011 and 2012, according to a quick check on the Government Printing Offices website, where the documents are posted. Its as simple as that.
Yes, Obama submitted the 2013 budget (and 2010-2011-2012 too)
PolitiFact
Epic Failure. And that's an understatement.
'President Obama's budget suffered a second embarrassing defeat Wednesday, when senators voted 99-0 to reject it.
Coupled with the House's rejection in March, 414-0, that means Mr. Obama's budget has failed to win a single vote in support this year.'
"A stunning development for the president of the United States in his fourth year in office," Mr. Sessions said of the unanimous opposition.'
Obama budget defeated 99-0 in Senate - Washington Times
Top Democrat on the Senate Budget Committee, Sen. Kent Conrad of South Dakota, said "This is not the presidents budget."
House and Senate Unanimously Reject Obama Budgets Or Do They? - ABC News
So, the exact same numbers in both budgets... but only the GOP numbers would harm the economyWhile the Sessions and Mulvaney bills put forward the same topline numbers as those in the presidents budget, neither offered any specifics. The Sessions legislation was 56 pages long; actual budgets are closer to 2,000 pages long.
Thus, a White House official said, the Sessions proposal was a shell that could be filled with a number of things that could hurt our economy and hurt the middle class, a White House official said.
This was NOT President Obama's budget. You wingnuts need to read the details.
Lakhota's right
This was NOT President Obama's budget. You wingnuts need to read the details.
Are you disagreeing with ABC?
The White House today reacted to news that representations of President Obamas budget had been voted down by the House and Senate by decrying the introduction of the amendments, by Republicans, as gimmicks.
You didn't read the last part of your link:
This is the presidents budget, said the top Democrat on the Senate Budget Committee, Sen. Kent Conrad of South Dakota, indicating the voluminous budget proposal President Obama offered. This is what Sen. Sessions has presented as being the presidents budget, he said, indicating the much slimmer document.
I think its readily apparent there is a big difference between the presidents budget, which I hold in my hands, and what Sen. Sessions has presented as being the presidents budget. This is not the presidents budget. So, of course, were not going to support it. Its not what the president proposed.
The White House official said the Sessions and Mulvaneys bills were mere GOP stunts to get Democrats on record opposing the Presidents budget as well as distracting from what the House Republican budget would do, which the official described as protect(ing) massive tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires while making the middle class and seniors pay.
Top Democrat on the Senate Budget Committee, Sen. Kent Conrad of South Dakota, said "This is not the presidents budget."
House and Senate Unanimously Reject Obama Budgets Or Do They? - ABC News
So, the exact same numbers in both budgets... but only the GOP numbers would harm the economyWhile the Sessions and Mulvaney bills put forward the same topline numbers as those in the presidents budget, neither offered any specifics. The Sessions legislation was 56 pages long; actual budgets are closer to 2,000 pages long.
Thus, a White House official said, the Sessions proposal was a shell that could be filled with a number of things that could hurt our economy and hurt the middle class, a White House official said.
Top Democrat on the Senate Budget Committee, Sen. Kent Conrad of South Dakota, said "This is not the presidents budget."
House and Senate Unanimously Reject Obama Budgets Or Do They? - ABC News
So, the exact same numbers in both budgets... but only the GOP numbers would harm the economyWhile the Sessions and Mulvaney bills put forward the same topline numbers as those in the presidents budget, neither offered any specifics. The Sessions legislation was 56 pages long; actual budgets are closer to 2,000 pages long.
Thus, a White House official said, the Sessions proposal was a shell that could be filled with a number of things that could hurt our economy and hurt the middle class, a White House official said.
No, the devil was in the LACK of details - exactly how funds are allocated. Using your logic, why not just submit ONE bottom line total number.
So, the exact same numbers in both budgets... but only the GOP numbers would harm the economy
No, the devil was in the LACK of details - exactly how funds are allocated. Using your logic, why not just submit ONE bottom line total number.
Ok, so if the GOP submits something with a lack of details, that's bad... but when Obama does it, no worries. Got it.
No, the devil was in the LACK of details - exactly how funds are allocated. Using your logic, why not just submit ONE bottom line total number.
Ok, so if the GOP submits something with a lack of details, that's bad... but when Obama does it, no worries. Got it.
Obama's budget is around 2,000 pages. The Sessions amendment was around 50 pages.