Obama Calls For End Of Freedom Of Speech On The Internet Within Days Of Turning It Over To UN

Here's Obama talking about ending freedom of speech on the Internet within days of turning control of the net to the United Nations.



Um....did you even watch the 2 minute video?

"Its not censorship. But creating places where people can say 'this is reliable'. "

Did you swallow another batshit conspiracy whole without actually fact checking it?

So Democrat liberals get to tell s which web site is reliable?


So you can't quote Obama advocating censorship either?

Well that was easy.

Is there anyone here that can actually back up the OP's claims? Anyone at all?

Do you know what the word.censorship means? It means reviewing material and discarding that which is deemed unacceptable.


Where did Obama indicate that you couldn't get that information elsewhere on the internet? Remember, the claim is that Obama is calling for the end of freedom of speech on the internet.

So far you've accused Obama of nothing more egregious than say, Wikipedia.
 
You got it...'reliable' is the key woid. Reliable according to who? Why hasnt congress jumped in on this?

Jumped on what? Remember, your ilk have essentially abandoned every accusation made in the OP. And when pressed to cite any example of Obama calling for censorship.....

.....you awkwardly try to change the topic.

In case you're curious why the majority of the American electorate isn't terribly impressed with the batshit conspiracy theories the alt right tells itself, this thread is a superb example.

Well this topic easily seperates the stupid from the more intelligent ones. There is no fixing stupidity and the libtards once again prove how stupid they really are.

Laughing...of the two of us, who understands the concept of a quote? I'll give you a hint: Its not you. As when I ask you to quote the president advocating censorship.....

.......you slink away with your tail between your legs.
If your argument had merit, you wouldn't have to run.

He advocated censorship in his entire proposal....except when he siad 'this isn't censorship'...which is of course a.lie. It is censorship.

Then it will be remarkably easy for you to quote Obama advocating censorship.

Please do so.
His entire statement on the.topic advocates censorship, where he advocates a review of material to assure everything is factual. I especially like how he couches it in terms of safety. Protecting.people from untrue stuff. That's fucking hilarious, considering the source.
 
Jumped on what? Remember, your ilk have essentially abandoned every accusation made in the OP. And when pressed to cite any example of Obama calling for censorship.....

.....you awkwardly try to change the topic.

In case you're curious why the majority of the American electorate isn't terribly impressed with the batshit conspiracy theories the alt right tells itself, this thread is a superb example.

Well this topic easily seperates the stupid from the more intelligent ones. There is no fixing stupidity and the libtards once again prove how stupid they really are.

Laughing...of the two of us, who understands the concept of a quote? I'll give you a hint: Its not you. As when I ask you to quote the president advocating censorship.....

.......you slink away with your tail between your legs.
If your argument had merit, you wouldn't have to run.

He advocated censorship in his entire proposal....except when he siad 'this isn't censorship'...which is of course a.lie. It is censorship.

Then it will be remarkably easy for you to quote Obama advocating censorship.

Please do so.
His entire statement on the.topic advocates censorship, where he advocates a review of material to assure everything is factual


Then it will be remarkably easy for you to show us a passage where Obama advocates 'the end of free speech on the internet'.

Yet predictably...instead of offering us any such quote, you give us excuses why you can't. Just like everyone else in this thread.

Shocker.
 
Here's Obama talking about ending freedom of speech on the Internet within days of turning control of the net to the United Nations.



Um....did you even watch the 2 minute video?

"Its not censorship. But creating places where people can say 'this is reliable'. "

Did you swallow another batshit conspiracy whole without actually fact checking it?

So Democrat liberals get to tell s which web site is reliable?


So you can't quote Obama advocating censorship either?

Well that was easy.

Is there anyone here that can actually back up the OP's claims? Anyone at all?

Do you know what the word.censorship means? It means reviewing material and discarding that which is deemed unacceptable.


Where did Obama indicate that you couldn't get that information elsewhere on the internet? Remember, the claim is that Obama is calling for the end of freedom of speech on the internet.

So far you've accused Obama of nothing more egregious than say, Wikipedia.

The claim is that he advacates censorship. Which he did. And he wasn't talking about a single site. He was talking about screening the entire flow of information. Which is what commie pigs do.
 
Well this topic easily seperates the stupid from the more intelligent ones. There is no fixing stupidity and the libtards once again prove how stupid they really are.

Laughing...of the two of us, who understands the concept of a quote? I'll give you a hint: Its not you. As when I ask you to quote the president advocating censorship.....

.......you slink away with your tail between your legs.
If your argument had merit, you wouldn't have to run.

He advocated censorship in his entire proposal....except when he siad 'this isn't censorship'...which is of course a.lie. It is censorship.

Then it will be remarkably easy for you to quote Obama advocating censorship.

Please do so.
His entire statement on the.topic advocates censorship, where he advocates a review of material to assure everything is factual


Then it will be remarkably easy for you to show us a passage where Obama advocates 'the end of free speech on the internet'.

Yet predictably...instead of offering us any such quote, you give us excuses why you can't. Just like everyone else in this thread.

Shocker.
The passage that ends with'of course it isn't censorship'.

That's the third time I've said that to you, so now you go on ignore with your commie troll brethren, pig.

And I didn't make any such excuses, lying pig commie. That, like your insistence that obammy doesn't advocate censorship, is a lie.
 
Laughing...of the two of us, who understands the concept of a quote? I'll give you a hint: Its not you. As when I ask you to quote the president advocating censorship.....

.......you slink away with your tail between your legs.
If your argument had merit, you wouldn't have to run.

He advocated censorship in his entire proposal....except when he siad 'this isn't censorship'...which is of course a.lie. It is censorship.

Then it will be remarkably easy for you to quote Obama advocating censorship.

Please do so.
His entire statement on the.topic advocates censorship, where he advocates a review of material to assure everything is factual


Then it will be remarkably easy for you to show us a passage where Obama advocates 'the end of free speech on the internet'.

Yet predictably...instead of offering us any such quote, you give us excuses why you can't. Just like everyone else in this thread.

Shocker.
The passage that ends with'of course it isn't censorship'

The quote please.

Not more excuses why you can't show us anything where Obama advocates censorship or the end of free speech on the internet.
 
Um....did you even watch the 2 minute video?

"Its not censorship. But creating places where people can say 'this is reliable'. "

Did you swallow another batshit conspiracy whole without actually fact checking it?
So Democrat liberals get to tell s which web site is reliable?

So you can't quote Obama advocating censorship either?

Well that was easy.

Is there anyone here that can actually back up the OP's claims? Anyone at all?
Do you know what the word.censorship means? It means reviewing material and discarding that which is deemed unacceptable.

Where did Obama indicate that you couldn't get that information elsewhere on the internet? Remember, the claim is that Obama is calling for the end of freedom of speech on the internet.

So far you've accused Obama of nothing more egregious than say, Wikipedia.
The claim is that he advacates censorship. Which he did. And he wasn't talking about a single site. He was talking about screening the entire flow of information. Which is what commie pigs do.

The thread is literally called 'Obama calls for the end of freedom of speech on the internet'.

If you're going to backpedal, you'll have to find some way of preventing us from reading the title of the thread. As it destroys your argument.

Quote Obama advocating the end of freedom of speech on the internet. Not a paraphrase. Not a delusional made up quotes like you offered us before. Not your lies.

But the actual quote of Obama saying what you've attributed to him.

It so simple, yet its sent an entire thread's worth of alt-right circle jerkers into a hopeless tail spin, fleeing in every direction.
 
And how is it censorship to have a 'website that is reliable'?

You....you didn't even watch the clip, did you
We are arguing with a drunk. ^^^

And....Ad Hominem. Shocker.

Explain how having a website that is reliable is 'censorship'? So far you've accused Obama of nothing more egregious than Wikipedia.

So much for the OP's absurd claim that Obama is 'calling for the end of freedom of speech on the internet'.
 
Then it will be remarkably easy for you to show us a passage where Obama advocates 'the end of free speech on the internet'.

Yet predictably...instead of offering us any such quote, you give us excuses why you can't. Just like everyone else in this thread.
We could bother providing it but nuance seems to escape you.
 
Here's Obama talking about ending freedom of speech on the Internet within days of turning control of the net to the United Nations.



Um....did you even watch the 2 minute video?

"Its not censorship. But creating places where people can say 'this is reliable'. "

Did you swallow another batshit conspiracy whole without actually fact checking it?

I watched it. Obama was trying to say it in a manner that would disguise what he meant and appear more.....shall we say....acceptable to idiots......like yourself.


if you watched it, you didn't understand it. that's what happens when you're irrational, ignorant and insist on spewing garbage.

thanks. i needed the laugh.
 
Well this topic easily seperates the stupid from the more intelligent ones. There is no fixing stupidity and the libtards once again prove how stupid they really are.

Laughing...of the two of us, who understands the concept of a quote? I'll give you a hint: Its not you. As when I ask you to quote the president advocating censorship.....

.......you slink away with your tail between your legs.
If your argument had merit, you wouldn't have to run.

He advocated censorship in his entire proposal....except when he siad 'this isn't censorship'...which is of course a.lie. It is censorship.

Then it will be remarkably easy for you to quote Obama advocating censorship.

Please do so.
His entire statement on the.topic advocates censorship, where he advocates a review of material to assure everything is factual




Then it will be remarkably easy for you to show us a passage where Obama advocates 'the end of free speech on the internet'.

Yet predictably...instead of offering us any such quote, you give us excuses why you can't. Just like everyone else in this thread.

Shocker.

Not censorship, just a curative function. You know, a curator who can weed out parts they don't like.
 
Then it will be remarkably easy for you to show us a passage where Obama advocates 'the end of free speech on the internet'.

Yet predictably...instead of offering us any such quote, you give us excuses why you can't. Just like everyone else in this thread.
We could bother providing it but nuance seems to escape you.

And we need to censor nuance sometimes, said the stutterer who wants to deputize people to track climate change. And they don't even need a phd.
 
Here's Obama talking about ending freedom of speech on the Internet within days of turning control of the net to the United Nations.



Um....did you even watch the 2 minute video?

"Its not censorship. But creating places where people can say 'this is reliable'. "

Did you swallow another batshit conspiracy whole without actually fact checking it?

LMAO please tell me you are kidding. It is censorship.................What part of everything this SOB said he wouldn't do he did. Second off they use little tricky wordage that zombies often can't understand it goes right over their heads.
That is why these idiots do everything right out in the open, they know most American's are so fkn stupid they won't catch anything they are doing.

Although ppl are catching on..

They know Americans are complacent and lazy. They have said as much over and over.
 
Laughing...of the two of us, who understands the concept of a quote? I'll give you a hint: Its not you. As when I ask you to quote the president advocating censorship.....

.......you slink away with your tail between your legs.
If your argument had merit, you wouldn't have to run.

He advocated censorship in his entire proposal....except when he siad 'this isn't censorship'...which is of course a.lie. It is censorship.

Then it will be remarkably easy for you to quote Obama advocating censorship.

Please do so.
His entire statement on the.topic advocates censorship, where he advocates a review of material to assure everything is factual




Then it will be remarkably easy for you to show us a passage where Obama advocates 'the end of free speech on the internet'.

Yet predictably...instead of offering us any such quote, you give us excuses why you can't. Just like everyone else in this thread.

Shocker.

Not censorship, just a curative function. You know, a curator who can weed out parts they don't like.

Weed it out from *what*? So far Obama has described nothing more sinister than Wikipedia.

There's a reason you guys are quoting yourselves and not Obama on this issue: he's simply never said what you attribute to him.
 
Here's Obama talking about ending freedom of speech on the Internet within days of turning control of the net to the United Nations.



Um....did you even watch the 2 minute video?

"Its not censorship. But creating places where people can say 'this is reliable'. "

Did you swallow another batshit conspiracy whole without actually fact checking it?

LMAO please tell me you are kidding. It is censorship.................What part of everything this SOB said he wouldn't do he did. Second off they use little tricky wordage that zombies often can't understand it goes right over their heads.
That is why these idiots do everything right out in the open, they know most American's are so fkn stupid they won't catch anything they are doing.

Although ppl are catching on..

They know Americans are complacent and lazy. They have said as much over and over.


You....you realize this entire thread is one right wing echo chamber excercise where you guys agree with and quote *each other*......but can't actually quote Obama saying anything you've attributed to him, right?

Can you see why, from the outside, this bizarre right wing circle jerk looks borderline delusional?
 
Here's Obama talking about ending freedom of speech on the Internet within days of turning control of the net to the United Nations.



Um....did you even watch the 2 minute video?

"Its not censorship. But creating places where people can say 'this is reliable'. "

Did you swallow another batshit conspiracy whole without actually fact checking it?

I watched it. Obama was trying to say it in a manner that would disguise what he meant and appear more.....shall we say....acceptable to idiots......like yourself.


if you watched it, you didn't understand it. that's what happens when you're irrational, ignorant and insist on spewing garbage.

thanks. i needed the laugh.


Seriously. Its like the right wing has been so mindlessly conditioned to believe that anything they can possibly make up or imagine must be true for no other reason than they've made it up or imagined it.

And when you ask them for a bridge to reality, a quote of Obama actually saying what they've attributed to him.........they just quote themselves some more.

This is what passes for critical thinking among conservatives. And its astonishing to watch.
 
Here's Obama talking about ending freedom of speech on the Internet within days of turning control of the net to the United Nations.



Um....did you even watch the 2 minute video?

"Its not censorship. But creating places where people can say 'this is reliable'. "

Did you swallow another batshit conspiracy whole without actually fact checking it?

I watched it. Obama was trying to say it in a manner that would disguise what he meant and appear more.....shall we say....acceptable to idiots......like yourself.


ANd by 'trying to say', you mean you just making shit up that you can't quote Obama ever actually saying?

You're quoting yourself, revealing yourself. You're telling us nothing about Obama. As he's proposed nothing more sinister than an online dictionary. So much for your latest round of panty shitting hysterics ......as Obama never called for the end of freedom of speech on the internet.

That was you....citing you.
 
He advocated censorship in his entire proposal....except when he siad 'this isn't censorship'...which is of course a.lie. It is censorship.

Then it will be remarkably easy for you to quote Obama advocating censorship.

Please do so.
His entire statement on the.topic advocates censorship, where he advocates a review of material to assure everything is factual




Then it will be remarkably easy for you to show us a passage where Obama advocates 'the end of free speech on the internet'.

Yet predictably...instead of offering us any such quote, you give us excuses why you can't. Just like everyone else in this thread.

Shocker.

Not censorship, just a curative function. You know, a curator who can weed out parts they don't like.

Weed it out from *what*? So far Obama has described nothing more sinister than Wikipedia.

There's a reason you guys are quoting yourselves and not Obama on this issue: he's simply never said what you attribute to him.
Usually when Obama starts mumbling about something, he's already done something about it. Why is he talking about banning the free exchange of ideas on the internet after he has relinquished control over it? Because he's trying to justify his actions. He knows in advance what will happen because that's why he did what he did.
 
Then it will be remarkably easy for you to quote Obama advocating censorship.

Please do so.
His entire statement on the.topic advocates censorship, where he advocates a review of material to assure everything is factual




Then it will be remarkably easy for you to show us a passage where Obama advocates 'the end of free speech on the internet'.

Yet predictably...instead of offering us any such quote, you give us excuses why you can't. Just like everyone else in this thread.

Shocker.

Not censorship, just a curative function. You know, a curator who can weed out parts they don't like.

Weed it out from *what*? So far Obama has described nothing more sinister than Wikipedia.

There's a reason you guys are quoting yourselves and not Obama on this issue: he's simply never said what you attribute to him.
Usually when Obama starts mumbling about something, he's already done something about it. Why is he talking about banning the free exchange of ideas on the internet after he has relinquished control over it? Because he's trying to justify his actions. He knows in advance what will happen because that's why he did what he did.
The info available on the.internet is maybe 1/3 what it was mmm...say ten years ago. Try googling negative memes about hillary sometime. Apparently, there are about three. Which is odd because I've seen more on mybfb page.
 

Forum List

Back
Top