Obama is Leaving America Worse off than Under Bush

[Stephanie]

anyone ever hear about this? or about Any cost from this administration how they have spent our money.? these Damn Lamestream medias has become an Enemy to us as well as this administration and the Democrat party

SNIP:
US Paradrops 50 Tons Of Ammo To Syrian Rebels


Submitted by Tyler Durden on 10/12/2015 20:04 -0400






As we noted over the weekend, the US has now thrown in the towel on the ill-fated (and that’s putting it lightly) strategy of training Syrian fighters and sending them into battle only to be captured and killed by other Syrian fighters who the US also trained.

The Pentagon’s effort to recruit 5,400 properly “vetted” anti-ISIS rebels by the end of the year ended in tears when the entire world laughed until it cried after word got out that only “four or five” of these fighters were actually still around. The rest are apparently either captured, killed, lost in the desert, or fighting for someone else.

This has cost the US taxpayer somewhere in the neighborhood of $40 million over the last six months.

Because this latest program was such a public embarrassment, the Pentagon had to come up with a new idea to assist Syria’s “freedom fighters” now that they are fleeing under bombardment by the Russian air force only to be cut down by Hezbollah.

The newest plan: helicopter ammo. No, really. The US has now resorted to dropping "tons" of ammo into the middle of nowhere and hoping the “right” people find it.

No, really.

Here’s CNN:

ALL OF here:
US Paradrops 50 Tons Of Ammo To Syrian Rebels | Zero Hedge
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
and lets see the COST of all this.

snip:

Says President Barack Obama has launched "twice as many strikes (on) countries that are predominantly Muslim" than President George W. Bush.

— LZ Granderson on Sunday, September 28th, 2014 in comments on CNN's "State of the Union"

LZ Granderson: Obama has bombed twice as many Muslim countries as Bush

all of it here:
LZ Granderson: Obama has bombed twice as many Muslim countries as Bush

 

[Stephanie]

wth did you just spew? stop babbling nonsense

Dont wory about it steph. You are one of the more stupid ones on here.

You have no fucking idea if the word authorize and ability are one and the same.

And you are definitely to stupid to use a dictionary. Carry on idiot.

go out and play. and you kiss your mother with they vulgar mouth of yours? It's YOU who doesn't have a clue or knows the first thing about manners either, typical leftie

 

[Conservative65]

A trillion here, a trillion there... don't worry you'll be long gone before it really matters. Ronnie knew that too.

Money really does grow on trees in the small minds of liberals and politicians.

Money is made of paper and paper comes from trees

Mostly cotton actually, and cotton doesn't grow on trees.

• Democrats seem to think money grows on trees. Their answer is to spend more and more and more then go pick it.

You do know that Republicans control spending, right?

Not when your ****** President vetoes it.

 

[gipper]

A trillion here, a trillion there... don't worry you'll be long gone before it really matters. Ronnie knew that too.

Money really does grow on trees in the small minds of liberals and politicians.

Money is made of paper and paper comes from trees

Mostly cotton actually, and cotton doesn't grow on trees.

• Democrats seem to think money grows on trees. Their answer is to spend more and more and more then go pick it.

You do know that Republicans control spending, right?

Yet another fact proving the two parties are very much alike. Yet millions of Americans accept the divisive propaganda promoted by the parties and the media. Thus keeping us divided while they continue to screw us.

 

[gipper]

anyone ever hear about this? or about Any cost from this administration how they have spent our money.? these Damn Lamestream medias has become an Enemy to us as well as this administration and the Democrat party

SNIP:
US Paradrops 50 Tons Of Ammo To Syrian Rebels


Submitted by Tyler Durden on 10/12/2015 20:04 -0400






As we noted over the weekend, the US has now thrown in the towel on the ill-fated (and that’s putting it lightly) strategy of training Syrian fighters and sending them into battle only to be captured and killed by other Syrian fighters who the US also trained.

The Pentagon’s effort to recruit 5,400 properly “vetted” anti-ISIS rebels by the end of the year ended in tears when the entire world laughed until it cried after word got out that only “four or five” of these fighters were actually still around. The rest are apparently either captured, killed, lost in the desert, or fighting for someone else.

This has cost the US taxpayer somewhere in the neighborhood of $40 million over the last six months.

Because this latest program was such a public embarrassment, the Pentagon had to come up with a new idea to assist Syria’s “freedom fighters” now that they are fleeing under bombardment by the Russian air force only to be cut down by Hezbollah.

The newest plan: helicopter ammo. No, really. The US has now resorted to dropping "tons" of ammo into the middle of nowhere and hoping the “right” people find it.

No, really.

Here’s CNN:

ALL OF here:
US Paradrops 50 Tons Of Ammo To Syrian Rebels | Zero Hedge
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
and lets see the COST of all this.

snip:

Says President Barack Obama has launched "twice as many strikes (on) countries that are predominantly Muslim" than President George W. Bush.

— LZ Granderson on Sunday, September 28th, 2014 in comments on CNN's "State of the Union"

LZ Granderson: Obama has bombed twice as many Muslim countries as Bush

all of it here:
LZ Granderson: Obama has bombed twice as many Muslim countries as Bush

The media lies or distorts the news every day. Obama is no different than W when it comes to war and foreign interventions. The media just doesn't report it when a D is in the WH.

 

[Conservative65]

A trillion here, a trillion there... don't worry you'll be long gone before it really matters. Ronnie knew that too.

Money really does grow on trees in the small minds of liberals and politicians.

Money is made of paper and paper comes from trees

Mostly cotton actually, and cotton doesn't grow on trees.

• Democrats seem to think money grows on trees. Their answer is to spend more and more and more then go pick it.

You do know that Republicans control spending, right?

A trillion here, a trillion there... don't worry you'll be long gone before it really matters. Ronnie knew that too.

Money really does grow on trees in the small minds of liberals and politicians.

Money is made of paper and paper comes from trees

Mostly cotton actually, and cotton doesn't grow on trees.

• Democrats seem to think money grows on trees. Their answer is to spend more and more and more then go pick it.

You do know that Republicans control spending, right?

If so, shouldn't Republicans get credit for the deficit being reduced instead of Obama. If they control it, why do so many of you give him credit for something you say Republicans control? That's right, you pucker.

 

[nat4900]

We've never been given a look at all that Obama has spent on the military constantly dropping bombs all over the middle east. so this is why his cult followers can spew how Bush and war. blaa blaa blaa

Take out your "morality scale" and place on one side.....the bombs dropped on the ME by Obama...and on the other, place the caskets of US soldiers coming home.......Then, even a right wing moron can judge.

 

[Faun]

Money really does grow on trees in the small minds of liberals and politicians.

Money is made of paper and paper comes from trees

Mostly cotton actually, and cotton doesn't grow on trees.

• Democrats seem to think money grows on trees. Their answer is to spend more and more and more then go pick it.

You do know that Republicans control spending, right?

Not when your ****** President vetoes it.

Dayam, you're one dumbfucking conservative.

Idiot... if Obama vetoes a spending bill, NOTHING in it gets spent.

Just how rightarded are you??

Also, what adjective did you use to describe Obama? All I see is, "******"

 

[Faun]

Money really does grow on trees in the small minds of liberals and politicians.

Money is made of paper and paper comes from trees

Mostly cotton actually, and cotton doesn't grow on trees.

• Democrats seem to think money grows on trees. Their answer is to spend more and more and more then go pick it.

You do know that Republicans control spending, right?

Money really does grow on trees in the small minds of liberals and politicians.

Money is made of paper and paper comes from trees

Mostly cotton actually, and cotton doesn't grow on trees.

• Democrats seem to think money grows on trees. Their answer is to spend more and more and more then go pick it.

You do know that Republicans control spending, right?

If so, shouldn't Republicans get credit for the deficit being reduced instead of Obama. If they control it, why do so many of you give him credit for something you say Republicans control? That's right, you pucker.

You really don't know shit, do ya, rightie? You're so stupid, you're now conflating spending with revenue. The decrease in the deficit has nothing to do with spending since federal spending is at an all-time high under Republicans. The deficit reduction occurred due to increased revenue; stemming primarily from tax increases (which Republicans oppose) and the surge in employment.

 

[Conservative65]

Money is made of paper and paper comes from trees

Mostly cotton actually, and cotton doesn't grow on trees.

• Democrats seem to think money grows on trees. Their answer is to spend more and more and more then go pick it.

You do know that Republicans control spending, right?

Money is made of paper and paper comes from trees

Mostly cotton actually, and cotton doesn't grow on trees.

• Democrats seem to think money grows on trees. Their answer is to spend more and more and more then go pick it.

You do know that Republicans control spending, right?

If so, shouldn't Republicans get credit for the deficit being reduced instead of Obama. If they control it, why do so many of you give him credit for something you say Republicans control? That's right, you pucker.

You really don't know shit, do ya, rightie? You're so stupid, you're now conflating spending with revenue. The decrease in the deficit has nothing to do with spending since federal spending is at an all-time high under Republicans. The deficit reduction occurred due to increased revenue; stemming primarily from tax increases (which Republicans oppose) and the surge in employment.

If that's what you want to believe.

Since many of those working the jobs that were supposedly created don't pay income taxes, your surge argument is invalid and discounted.

 

[Conservative65]

Money is made of paper and paper comes from trees

Mostly cotton actually, and cotton doesn't grow on trees.

• Democrats seem to think money grows on trees. Their answer is to spend more and more and more then go pick it.

You do know that Republicans control spending, right?

Not when your ****** President vetoes it.

Dayam, you're one dumbfucking conservative.

Idiot... if Obama vetoes a spending bill, NOTHING in it gets spent.

Just how rightarded are you??

Also, what adjective did you use to describe Obama? All I see is, "******"

Congress didn't pass an immigration bill or gun control so Obama decided to do something on his own. You're the idiot if you think it can't happen.

 

[Geaux4it]

Lol. Obama sucks as POTUS and it has zero to do with him being black but everything to do with him being a radical Islam supporter and Muslim

-Geaux

 

[Faun]

Mostly cotton actually, and cotton doesn't grow on trees.

• Democrats seem to think money grows on trees. Their answer is to spend more and more and more then go pick it.

You do know that Republicans control spending, right?

Mostly cotton actually, and cotton doesn't grow on trees.

• Democrats seem to think money grows on trees. Their answer is to spend more and more and more then go pick it.

You do know that Republicans control spending, right?

If so, shouldn't Republicans get credit for the deficit being reduced instead of Obama. If they control it, why do so many of you give him credit for something you say Republicans control? That's right, you pucker.

You really don't know shit, do ya, rightie? You're so stupid, you're now conflating spending with revenue. The decrease in the deficit has nothing to do with spending since federal spending is at an all-time high under Republicans. The deficit reduction occurred due to increased revenue; stemming primarily from tax increases (which Republicans oppose) and the surge in employment.

If that's what you want to believe.

Since many of those working the jobs that were supposedly created don't pay income taxes, your surge argument is invalid and discounted.

That's not a matter of opinion. Numbers are real. The deficit has not dropped because of spending because spending is at an all-time high under this Republican Congress. The deficit has dropped because tax revenues are also at an all-time high.

You righties voted these Republicans into office in a landslide in 2014 -- they thanked you by increasing spending to unprecedented levels.



And then idiots like you try to credit those out of control spending-maniac Republicans credit for lowering the deficit

 

[Faun]

Mostly cotton actually, and cotton doesn't grow on trees.

• Democrats seem to think money grows on trees. Their answer is to spend more and more and more then go pick it.

You do know that Republicans control spending, right?

Not when your ****** President vetoes it.

Dayam, you're one dumbfucking conservative.

Idiot... if Obama vetoes a spending bill, NOTHING in it gets spent.

Just how rightarded are you??

Also, what adjective did you use to describe Obama? All I see is, "******"

Congress didn't pass an immigration bill or gun control so Obama decided to do something on his own. You're the idiot if you think it can't happen.

The president doesn't write spending bills, ya dumbfuck. Only the House can do that. Learn civics 101 before you speak so you don't look so retarded.

Meanwhile, in response to educating you that Republicans control spending, you idiotically pointed out that Obama can veto their spending bills. Meaning nothing in such bills gets spent; meaning Obama would be the one cutting spending when he vetoes such bills.

You really are a fucking rightard.

 

[Dovahkiin]

OP is smoking some crazy stuff.
Obama’s Numbers (January 2016 Update)

 

[Conservative65]

• Democrats seem to think money grows on trees. Their answer is to spend more and more and more then go pick it.

You do know that Republicans control spending, right?

Not when your ****** President vetoes it.

Dayam, you're one dumbfucking conservative.

Idiot... if Obama vetoes a spending bill, NOTHING in it gets spent.

Just how rightarded are you??

Also, what adjective did you use to describe Obama? All I see is, "******"

Congress didn't pass an immigration bill or gun control so Obama decided to do something on his own. You're the idiot if you think it can't happen.

The president doesn't write spending bills, ya dumbfuck. Only the House can do that. Learn civics 101 before you speak so you don't look so retarded.

Meanwhile, in response to educating you that Republicans control spending, you idiotically pointed out that Obama can veto their spending bills. Meaning nothing in such bills gets spent; meaning Obama would be the one cutting spending when he vetoes such bills.

You really are a fucking rightard.

According to the Constitution, the President doesn't have authority to issue executive orders which carry the same weight as law yet your boy did just that because Congress wouldn't pass one the way he wanted. Quit kissing his black ass before you speak and look like an idiot.

 

[Conservative65]

• Democrats seem to think money grows on trees. Their answer is to spend more and more and more then go pick it.

You do know that Republicans control spending, right?

• Democrats seem to think money grows on trees. Their answer is to spend more and more and more then go pick it.

You do know that Republicans control spending, right?

If so, shouldn't Republicans get credit for the deficit being reduced instead of Obama. If they control it, why do so many of you give him credit for something you say Republicans control? That's right, you pucker.

You really don't know shit, do ya, rightie? You're so stupid, you're now conflating spending with revenue. The decrease in the deficit has nothing to do with spending since federal spending is at an all-time high under Republicans. The deficit reduction occurred due to increased revenue; stemming primarily from tax increases (which Republicans oppose) and the surge in employment.

If that's what you want to believe.

Since many of those working the jobs that were supposedly created don't pay income taxes, your surge argument is invalid and discounted.

That's not a matter of opinion. Numbers are real. The deficit has not dropped because of spending because spending is at an all-time high under this Republican Congress. The deficit has dropped because tax revenues are also at an all-time high.

You righties voted these Republicans into office in a landslide in 2014 -- they thanked you by increasing spending to unprecedented levels.



And then idiots like you try to credit those out of control spending-maniac Republicans credit for lowering the deficit

They can't increase spending unless Obama signs the bills into law. If he vetoes them, how is that money being spent. Perhaps you should take a Civics class before running that damn mouth. Are you now saying he signed them? If so, it's on him because nothing Congress does matters unless he signs it.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Money is made of paper and paper comes from trees

Mostly cotton actually, and cotton doesn't grow on trees.

OK...money doesn't grow on trees...it grows on bushes

Mostly cotton actually, and cotton doesn't grow on trees.

Democrats seem to think money grows on trees. Their answer is to spend more and more and more then go pick it.

And Republicans think money for wars, money for profits and corruption in the health care system, money for producing dollar bills instead of coins, and so on comes from where exactly?

Republicans KNOW that the ability to wage war comes from the Constitution.

Obamacare has done plenty to make profits for the healthcare system. It's OK with you when it's something the black boy did, though.

Last time I looked, the authority to coin money also comes from the Constitution.

I guess all those trillions spent on social programs that have no mention in the Constitution wasn't real money?

I'm sorry, what's your point? That war is in the constitution therefore it's a good thing to do?

Never said it was a good thing just that's it's CONSTITUTIONAL.

And what relevance does this have to do with the discussion exactly?

 

[rdean]

and remember during Bush years when the average share of the debt was around 10,000 per American,,,what its now? One Million per "Legal American"? what does that come out to,? Payments of 50,000 a month?

After Republicans helped send jobs to China. They fucked up what produces revenue. Now they want to blame it on Obama after the turds they handed him? What a bunch of creeps.

 

[frigidweirdo]

anyone ever hear about this? or about Any cost from this administration how they have spent our money.? these Damn Lamestream medias has become an Enemy to us as well as this administration and the Democrat party

SNIP:
US Paradrops 50 Tons Of Ammo To Syrian Rebels


Submitted by Tyler Durden on 10/12/2015 20:04 -0400






As we noted over the weekend, the US has now thrown in the towel on the ill-fated (and that’s putting it lightly) strategy of training Syrian fighters and sending them into battle only to be captured and killed by other Syrian fighters who the US also trained.

The Pentagon’s effort to recruit 5,400 properly “vetted” anti-ISIS rebels by the end of the year ended in tears when the entire world laughed until it cried after word got out that only “four or five” of these fighters were actually still around. The rest are apparently either captured, killed, lost in the desert, or fighting for someone else.

This has cost the US taxpayer somewhere in the neighborhood of $40 million over the last six months.

Because this latest program was such a public embarrassment, the Pentagon had to come up with a new idea to assist Syria’s “freedom fighters” now that they are fleeing under bombardment by the Russian air force only to be cut down by Hezbollah.

The newest plan: helicopter ammo. No, really. The US has now resorted to dropping "tons" of ammo into the middle of nowhere and hoping the “right” people find it.

No, really.

Here’s CNN:

ALL OF here:
US Paradrops 50 Tons Of Ammo To Syrian Rebels | Zero Hedge
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
and lets see the COST of all this.

snip:

Says President Barack Obama has launched "twice as many strikes (on) countries that are predominantly Muslim" than President George W. Bush.

— LZ Granderson on Sunday, September 28th, 2014 in comments on CNN's "State of the Union"

LZ Granderson: Obama has bombed twice as many Muslim countries as Bush

all of it here:
LZ Granderson: Obama has bombed twice as many Muslim countries as Bush

The media lies or distorts the news every day. Obama is no different than W when it comes to war and foreign interventions. The media just doesn't report it when a D is in the WH.

No, I disagree, they are different. However they're not complete polar opposites. Obama doesn't oppose war, he's just limited in what waring he will do.