which keeps them out of the issue we were discussingNo shit Sushi Boy, it's a SEAL delivery vehicle, but, speaking as someone who has actually BEEN on one, they do have defensive and offensive weapons.
but do carry on with the deflections
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
which keeps them out of the issue we were discussingNo shit Sushi Boy, it's a SEAL delivery vehicle, but, speaking as someone who has actually BEEN on one, they do have defensive and offensive weapons.
yeah, but shoes dont counti get their daily updates
this is still in experimental stage and is not a missile platform
as i wrote, i have no idea about those ships, and don't care. but i am interested in stilettos.
yeah, but shoes dont countas i wrote, i have no idea about those ships, and don't care. but i am interested in stilettos.
shoes? i was thinking of knives..
No shit Sushi Boy, it's a SEAL delivery vehicle, but, speaking as someone who has actually BEEN on one, they do have defensive and offensive weapons.
Wasn't there an agreement between Reagan and Gorbachev that said Gorby would allow a united Germany only if we promised not to build a missile shield?
Okie doke, then about your looking ignorant on the proper spelling of one of our states. Your choice.Pah, not that I care about the cultural heritage of exterminated Aboriginal natives ,
still, concerning the "provocation", just what would be your response if Russia sets up a "defensive missle system" in Venezuela?
In addition, these interceptors can be easily refitted with nuclear warheads.
me eitherOkie doke, then about your looking ignorant on the proper spelling of one of our states. Your choice.Pah, not that I care about the cultural heritage of exterminated Aboriginal natives ,
still, concerning the "provocation", just what would be your response if Russia sets up a "defensive missle system" in Venezuela?
In addition, these interceptors can be easily refitted with nuclear warheads.
I wouldn't care if the Russians set up an analogous BMDS in Venezuela.
Nope, not likely.me eitherOkie doke, then about your looking ignorant on the proper spelling of one of our states. Your choice.Pah, not that I care about the cultural heritage of exterminated Aboriginal natives ,
still, concerning the "provocation", just what would be your response if Russia sets up a "defensive missle system" in Venezuela?
In addition, these interceptors can be easily refitted with nuclear warheads.
I wouldn't care if the Russians set up an analogous BMDS in Venezuela.
it not likely we would even need to nuke Brazil
Massachusetts has two Ts, mightypeon.
because the system is designed to work in tiersI'm not sure why this thread even exists?? Its my understanding that Obama simply replaced the land based ABM system with the mobile version. Hopefully the EU would pay for the ABM shield, otherwise I don't see why we should pay for it.
because the system is designed to work in tiersI'm not sure why this thread even exists?? Its my understanding that Obama simply replaced the land based ABM system with the mobile version. Hopefully the EU would pay for the ABM shield, otherwise I don't see why we should pay for it.
you remove parts of it you reduce the effectiveness
It comes down to "bang for the buck". How many dollars to build, maintain, upgrade, and protect, a land based system versus a mobile system, which is just as effective. Its protecting the EU, so let them pay for whatever level of protection they want.
It comes down to "bang for the buck". How many dollars to build, maintain, upgrade, and protect, a land based system versus a mobile system, which is just as effective. Its protecting the EU, so let them pay for whatever level of protection they want.
Yeah. 'Cause, of course, we have no interest of any kind in defending any of our allies or anything.