- Thread starter
- #41
you do understand that this is neither refutation of my evidence or presentation of your own, right?
just because someone puts a headline on their webpage doesn't make it true. i've presented you with the notice and the section of the INA that grants the power to make such changes in policy to the secretaries of state and homeland security. i've shown where such changes have been made before using the same powers - and i've shown that the supreme court has found such delegation not only constitutional but necessary.
do you have any evidence to suggest that this particular change is somehow different and therefore illegal and unconstitutional? do you offer anything other than articles that make the same accusations you do without any reasoning behind them?
Now....when I prove it.....should I await your apology?
you prove it and i'll be happy to admit i was wrong.
however, what i believe will happen is one of two things - you'll link to an article that links back to the daily caller that says only what you've been saying from the beginning and offers no reasoning or evidence, or you'll post articles I and II of the constitution - neither of which are proof.
so yeah, if you can prove it by all means please do.
and any other activity or association falling within the scope of desire to assist any terrorist organization or terrorist activity; (e) Has not and Immigration Services (USCIS), in consultation with U.S. Immigration and Customs
A Notice by the Homeland Security Department and the State Department on 02/05/2014
https://www.federalregister.gov/art...=immigration+terrorist+associations&commit=Go
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2014-02-05/pdf/2014-02357.pdf