- Thread starter
- #21
i posted for you the portion of the law that grants the secretary of homeland defense and the secretary of state the ability to grant exemptions after consultation with each other and the attorney general. that's a part of the law that was passed by congress and signed by the president - satisfying acticles I and II of the constitution.
so have they acted outside of the law by granting these waivers?
The Constitution is the law of the land.
Surely you know that.
that's not being disputed and you're not being honest by pretending it is.
is the INA, a law passed by congress and signed by the president, constitutional? if it is, as it must be assumed until it is found otherwise in the courts, then the waivers are in accordance with the powers granted by the law.
or do you have any evidence to suggest that the waivers are not allowed under Section 212(d)(3)(B)(i)?
Do you understand the difference between legislative branch and the executive branch?