DiamondDave
Army Vet
"I Do Think At A Certain Point You've Made Enough Money"
Bill Gates and Warren Buffet reached the same conclusion
But funny.. government nor government officials came to that conclusion FOR them
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
"I Do Think At A Certain Point You've Made Enough Money"
Bill Gates and Warren Buffet reached the same conclusion
RealClearPolitics - Video - Obama To Wall Street: "I Do Think At A Certain Point You've Made Enough Money"
None of your damn business you socialist pig.
It's quite amazing that the same morons (you) who opposed bailing out these "to big to fail" mega financials don't favor legislation to prevent them from being getting that big again. Do you WANT the economy to fail?
Having the U.S. Government not strongarming them into making loans to people with no assets or incomes would be a great start. Notice however, how that not-so-small part of the problem is never addressed. Unfortunately, this bill being floated around will ensure a permanent "too big to fail" situation.
You ain't gonna fix the problem by letting the same crooks who gave us the problem propose the fixes.
"I Do Think At A Certain Point You've Made Enough Money"
Bill Gates and Warren Buffet reached the same conclusion
But funny.. government nor government officials came to that conclusion FOR them
It's quite amazing that the same morons (you) who opposed bailing out these "to big to fail" mega financials don't favor legislation to prevent them from being getting that big again. Do you WANT the economy to fail?
Having the U.S. Government not strongarming them into making loans to people with no assets or incomes would be a great start. Notice however, how that not-so-small part of the problem is never addressed. Unfortunately, this bill being floated around will ensure a permanent "too big to fail" situation.
You ain't gonna fix the problem by letting the same crooks who gave us the problem propose the fixes.
Nice post. You wanna know what has yet to be asked? Is Government too BIG to fail? [And who's gonna bail them out when they fail the U.S. Taxpayer when they ruin the economy of not only the United States, but the rest of the world?
And the question applies to any Government anywhere.
Nice post. You wanna know what has yet to be asked? Is Government too BIG to fail? [And who's gonna bail them out when they fail the U.S. Taxpayer when they ruin the economy of not only the United States, but the rest of the world?
And the question applies to any Government anywhere.
Having the U.S. Government not strongarming them into making loans to people with no assets or incomes would be a great start. Notice however, how that not-so-small part of the problem is never addressed. Unfortunately, this bill being floated around will ensure a permanent "too big to fail" situation.
You ain't gonna fix the problem by letting the same crooks who gave us the problem propose the fixes.
Nice post. You wanna know what has yet to be asked? Is Government too BIG to fail? [And who's gonna bail them out when they fail the U.S. Taxpayer when they ruin the economy of not only the United States, but the rest of the world?
And the question applies to any Government anywhere.
It's too big already and it has already failed. Unfortunately, the current mentality in D.C. is that we haven't spent enough money. Fits the lcassic definition of insanity in my book. If it doesn't work, double down on it.. if that doesn't work, double down on that... and so on and so on.
"I Do Think At A Certain Point You've Made Enough Money"
Bill Gates and Warren Buffet reached the same conclusion
But funny.. government nor government officials came to that conclusion FOR them
Nice post. You wanna know what has yet to be asked? Is Government too BIG to fail? [And who's gonna bail them out when they fail the U.S. Taxpayer when they ruin the economy of not only the United States, but the rest of the world?
And the question applies to any Government anywhere.
It's too big already and it has already failed. Unfortunately, the current mentality in D.C. is that we haven't spent enough money. Fits the lcassic definition of insanity in my book. If it doesn't work, double down on it.. if that doesn't work, double down on that... and so on and so on.
Exactly. Vicious circle isn't it? Something's gonna break eventually. We already see it in Greece...don't we?
Yes, Obama has made it clear that his ideology is socialism."I Do Think At A Certain Point You've Made Enough Money"
Bill Gates and Warren Buffet reached the same conclusion
But funny.. government nor government officials came to that conclusion FOR them
Obama was merely stating his personal opinion on reasonable bounds for personal wealth. When he starts passing laws come and see me.......until that time...quit your petty bitching
Having the U.S. Government not strongarming them into making loans to people with no assets or incomes would be a great start. Notice however, how that not-so-small part of the problem is never addressed. Unfortunately, this bill being floated around will ensure a permanent "too big to fail" situation.
You ain't gonna fix the problem by letting the same crooks who gave us the problem propose the fixes.
Nice post. You wanna know what has yet to be asked? Is Government too BIG to fail? [And who's gonna bail them out when they fail the U.S. Taxpayer when they ruin the economy of not only the United States, but the rest of the world?
And the question applies to any Government anywhere.
It's too big already and it has already failed. Unfortunately, the current mentality in D.C. is that we haven't spent enough money. Fits the lcassic definition of insanity in my book. If it doesn't work, double down on it.. if that doesn't work, double down on that... and so on and so on. Also fits the classic definition of arrogance... "I know this has never worked, but only because I haven't done it"
Yes, Obama has made it clear that his ideology is socialism.But funny.. government nor government officials came to that conclusion FOR them
Obama was merely stating his personal opinion on reasonable bounds for personal wealth. When he starts passing laws come and see me.......until that time...quit your petty bitching
Yes, Obama has made it clear that his ideology is socialism.But funny.. government nor government officials came to that conclusion FOR them
Obama was merely stating his personal opinion on reasonable bounds for personal wealth. When he starts passing laws come and see me.......until that time...quit your petty bitching
I don't play with strawmen.Yes, Obama has made it clear that his ideology is socialism.Obama was merely stating his personal opinion on reasonable bounds for personal wealth. When he starts passing laws come and see me.......until that time...quit your petty bitching
Helping the wealthiest Americans= Capitalism at its finest
Helping working Americans= Socialism
I don't play with strawmen.Yes, Obama has made it clear that his ideology is socialism.
Helping the wealthiest Americans= Capitalism at its finest
Helping working Americans= Socialism
His desire to redistribute wealth is clear and a tenet of socialist ideology.
Having the U.S. Government not strongarming them into making loans to people with no assets or incomes would be a great start.
Notice however, how that not-so-small part of the problem is never addressed. Unfortunately, this bill being floated around will ensure a permanent "too big to fail" situation.
I don't play with strawmen.Yes, Obama has made it clear that his ideology is socialism.
Helping the wealthiest Americans= Capitalism at its finest
Helping working Americans= Socialism
His desire to redistribute wealth is clear and a tenet of socialist ideology.
[
There is no law requiring banks to make bad loans and sell them to investors as good loans, you are mistaken. If its the CRA you are thinking of, most of the bad loans that were made were made by institutions not bound by the CRA regulations. The large investment banks, for instance, are not covered under the CRA.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were required to have 55% of the loans they bought be for people who make less than the median income in the U.S.
Please show me the law that said what percentage of these loans had to be made to people that could not afford them.Banks were threatened with revocation or non-approval of bank charters if they didn't meet specific minority and low income loan quotas.