shart_attack
Gold Member
- Jan 6, 2014
- 10,012
- 2,191
Anybody else notice that it's a short bus?
Exactly, my man: exactly.
The bus of Democrats.
![badgrin :badgrin: :badgrin:](/styles/smilies/badgrin.gif)
![Riding-in-the-Short-Bus.jpg](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theblogmocracy.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FRiding-in-the-Short-Bus.jpg&hash=799b95faba1ba0ee0562bf3b0c0ab93c)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Anybody else notice that it's a short bus?
Bill Clinton made over a hundred million giving speeches.
Obama will make 5 times that much being the first black president who took on the entire racist Republican Party and won.
He's not going to fall for more tricks of ignorant and racist confederate right wingnuts.
Bill Clinton made over a hundred million giving speeches.
Obama will make 5 times that much being the first black president who took on the entire racist Republican Party and won.
He's not going to fall for more tricks of ignorant and racist confederate right wingnuts.
yurt said:wow, the entire party is racist. talk about painting with a broad brush.
do you ever tell the truth?
Why spend so much money to hide something if there's nothing to hide?
Is it some sort of money laundering?
6 years later and the crazies are still bellyaching.....
I'm not particularly worked up about this, but you don't find it just a little scary that we are electing Presidents who have a large gap in their history that they REFUSE to fill in?
I find it impossible to believe that if this were a conservative President, you wouldn't be going ape shit.
There is a large fallacy in your argument. No president in our history has undergone as much examination at this one. President's aren't required to release diddly-squat about their personal life, including their education.
We already had this with a conservative President, George W. Bush, Jr., and it didn't bother me a bit. Personal liberty and all that jazz.
The fallacy is your when you suggest that because past Presidents weren't scrutinized neither should this one be.
There are and were large questions about Obama's past, some legitimate, some not so much. Regardless , the American people should absolutely know who it is they are voting for, if you don't want to release that information. you don't have to. Don't run for political office.
6 years later and the crazies are still bellyaching.....
I'm not particularly worked up about this, but you don't find it just a little scary that we are electing Presidents who have a large gap in their history that they REFUSE to fill in?
I find it impossible to believe that if this were a conservative President, you wouldn't be going ape shit.
There is a large fallacy in your argument. No president in our history has undergone as much examination at this one. President's aren't required to release diddly-squat about their personal life, including their education.
We already had this with a conservative President, George W. Bush, Jr., and it didn't bother me a bit. Personal liberty and all that jazz.
George Bush got into graduate school at Harvard with a C average. The university that I attended for graduate school would not even look at you unless you had a B average. It was a good school, but it was not Harvard. Why were people not after Bush to explain this?
6 years later and the crazies are still bellyaching.....
I'm not particularly worked up about this, but you don't find it just a little scary that we are electing Presidents who have a large gap in their history that they REFUSE to fill in?
I find it impossible to believe that if this were a conservative President, you wouldn't be going ape shit.
There is a large fallacy in your argument. No president in our history has undergone as much examination at this one. President's aren't required to release diddly-squat about their personal life, including their education.
We already had this with a conservative President, George W. Bush, Jr., and it didn't bother me a bit. Personal liberty and all that jazz.
The fallacy is your when you suggest that because past Presidents weren't scrutinized neither should this one be.
There are and were large questions about Obama's past, some legitimate, some not so much. Regardless , the American people should absolutely know who it is they are voting for, if you don't want to release that information. you don't have to. Don't run for political office.
Oh please. No POTUS or candidate has ever been scrutinized more. Have you ever even heard of the idea of a candidate releasing his college transcripts before this one? Me neither.
Short bus, the one all the special kids ride.Anybody else notice that it's a short bus?
"Asshole" is too kind a word.
Lawyers fees to hide things. Hardly feed to not do something.
Though it's not nice to blame the victims of a liberal education for their stupidity. Somehow I think I can accept a little criticism for having just done that.
6 years later and the crazies are still bellyaching.....
I'm not particularly worked up about this, but you don't find it just a little scary that we are electing Presidents who have a large gap in their history that they REFUSE to fill in?
I find it impossible to believe that if this were a conservative President, you wouldn't be going ape shit.
There is a large fallacy in your argument. No president in our history has undergone as much examination at this one. President's aren't required to release diddly-squat about their personal life, including their education.
We already had this with a conservative President, George W. Bush, Jr., and it didn't bother me a bit. Personal liberty and all that jazz.
George Bush got into graduate school at Harvard with a C average. The university that I attended for graduate school would not even look at you unless you had a B average. It was a good school, but it was not Harvard. Why were people not after Bush to explain this?6 years later and the crazies are still bellyaching.....
I'm not particularly worked up about this, but you don't find it just a little scary that we are electing Presidents who have a large gap in their history that they REFUSE to fill in?
I find it impossible to believe that if this were a conservative President, you wouldn't be going ape shit.
There is a large fallacy in your argument. No president in our history has undergone as much examination at this one. President's aren't required to release diddly-squat about their personal life, including their education.
We already had this with a conservative President, George W. Bush, Jr., and it didn't bother me a bit. Personal liberty and all that jazz.
The fallacy is your when you suggest that because past Presidents weren't scrutinized neither should this one be.
There are and were large questions about Obama's past, some legitimate, some not so much. Regardless , the American people should absolutely know who it is they are voting for, if you don't want to release that information. you don't have to. Don't run for political office.
Oh please. No POTUS or candidate has ever been scrutinized more. Have you ever even heard of the idea of a candidate releasing his college transcripts before this one? Me neither.
NO, but then again I've never seen a candidate who believed his shit didn't stink and people claiming he was the smartest man in any room he ever walked into either.
You make claims like that, you best be willing to back them up.
"Asshole" is too kind a word.
Lawyers fees to hide things. Hardly feed to not do something.
Though it's not nice to blame the victims of a liberal education for their stupidity. Somehow I think I can accept a little criticism for having just done that.
Oh, you mean the way Andy Kaufmann is "hiding" faking his own death. Gotcha, wink wink.
Nurse Ratchet should be here soon.
6 years later and the crazies are still bellyaching.....
I'm not particularly worked up about this, but you don't find it just a little scary that we are electing Presidents who have a large gap in their history that they REFUSE to fill in?
I find it impossible to believe that if this were a conservative President, you wouldn't be going ape shit.
There is a large fallacy in your argument. No president in our history has undergone as much examination at this one. President's aren't required to release diddly-squat about their personal life, including their education.
We already had this with a conservative President, George W. Bush, Jr., and it didn't bother me a bit. Personal liberty and all that jazz.
George Bush got into graduate school at Harvard with a C average. The university that I attended for graduate school would not even look at you unless you had a B average. It was a good school, but it was not Harvard. Why were people not after Bush to explain this?6 years later and the crazies are still bellyaching.....
I'm not particularly worked up about this, but you don't find it just a little scary that we are electing Presidents who have a large gap in their history that they REFUSE to fill in?
I find it impossible to believe that if this were a conservative President, you wouldn't be going ape shit.
There is a large fallacy in your argument. No president in our history has undergone as much examination at this one. President's aren't required to release diddly-squat about their personal life, including their education.
We already had this with a conservative President, George W. Bush, Jr., and it didn't bother me a bit. Personal liberty and all that jazz.
The fallacy is your when you suggest that because past Presidents weren't scrutinized neither should this one be.
There are and were large questions about Obama's past, some legitimate, some not so much. Regardless , the American people should absolutely know who it is they are voting for, if you don't want to release that information. you don't have to. Don't run for political office.
Oh please. No POTUS or candidate has ever been scrutinized more. Have you ever even heard of the idea of a candidate releasing his college transcripts before this one? Me neither.
NO, but then again I've never seen a candidate who believed his shit didn't stink and people claiming he was the smartest man in any room he ever walked into either.
You make claims like that, you best be willing to back them up.
Good idea. Why don't you back them up then. Links to where anyone made these proclamations?
I'm especially interested in the non-stinking shit one. I think I have an invention in mind. I'll cut you in on the action.
"Asshole" is too kind a word.
Lawyers fees to hide things. Hardly feed to not do something.
Though it's not nice to blame the victims of a liberal education for their stupidity. Somehow I think I can accept a little criticism for having just done that.
Oh, you mean the way Andy Kaufmann is "hiding" faking his own death. Gotcha, wink wink.
Nurse Ratchet should be here soon.
6 years later and the crazies are still bellyaching.....
I'm not particularly worked up about this, but you don't find it just a little scary that we are electing Presidents who have a large gap in their history that they REFUSE to fill in?
I find it impossible to believe that if this were a conservative President, you wouldn't be going ape shit.
There is a large fallacy in your argument. No president in our history has undergone as much examination at this one. President's aren't required to release diddly-squat about their personal life, including their education.
We already had this with a conservative President, George W. Bush, Jr., and it didn't bother me a bit. Personal liberty and all that jazz.
George Bush got into graduate school at Harvard with a C average. The university that I attended for graduate school would not even look at you unless you had a B average. It was a good school, but it was not Harvard. Why were people not after Bush to explain this?6 years later and the crazies are still bellyaching.....
I'm not particularly worked up about this, but you don't find it just a little scary that we are electing Presidents who have a large gap in their history that they REFUSE to fill in?
I find it impossible to believe that if this were a conservative President, you wouldn't be going ape shit.
There is a large fallacy in your argument. No president in our history has undergone as much examination at this one. President's aren't required to release diddly-squat about their personal life, including their education.
We already had this with a conservative President, George W. Bush, Jr., and it didn't bother me a bit. Personal liberty and all that jazz.
The fallacy is your when you suggest that because past Presidents weren't scrutinized neither should this one be.
There are and were large questions about Obama's past, some legitimate, some not so much. Regardless , the American people should absolutely know who it is they are voting for, if you don't want to release that information. you don't have to. Don't run for political office.
Oh please. No POTUS or candidate has ever been scrutinized more. Have you ever even heard of the idea of a candidate releasing his college transcripts before this one? Me neither.
NO, but then again I've never seen a candidate who believed his shit didn't stink and people claiming he was the smartest man in any room he ever walked into either.
You make claims like that, you best be willing to back them up.
Good idea. Why don't you back them up then. Links to where anyone made these proclamations?
I'm especially interested in the non-stinking shit one. I think I have an invention in mind. I'll cut you in on the action.
Articles Obama s Problem as The Smartest Person in the Room
That's right. Donald Trump offered him 50 million to go to any charity of his choosing if he released his college admissions. Again......................50 million dollars that would be donated to any charity of Obama's choosing. What's on those admissions he doesn't want to show the American public?
![]()
Obviously you're unaware of how truly idiotic this is.Americans knew everything there was to know about George W. Bush including membership in Yale frat clubs but we don't even know how Barry Sotoro Hussein paid for his Harvard education not to mention his grades which are apparently locked in the same vault as his birth certificate. So much for the "most open administration in history".
Bush Jr. was refused admission to a law school in Texas, but got into Harvard ... interesting.6 years later and the crazies are still bellyaching.....
I'm not particularly worked up about this, but you don't find it just a little scary that we are electing Presidents who have a large gap in their history that they REFUSE to fill in?
I find it impossible to believe that if this were a conservative President, you wouldn't be going ape shit.
There is a large fallacy in your argument. No president in our history has undergone as much examination at this one. President's aren't required to release diddly-squat about their personal life, including their education.
We already had this with a conservative President, George W. Bush, Jr., and it didn't bother me a bit. Personal liberty and all that jazz.
George Bush got into graduate school at Harvard with a C average. The university that I attended for graduate school would not even look at you unless you had a B average. It was a good school, but it was not Harvard. Why were people not after Bush to explain this?
How idiotic is it?Obviously you're unaware of how truly idiotic this is.Americans knew everything there was to know about George W. Bush including membership in Yale frat clubs but we don't even know how Barry Sotoro Hussein paid for his Harvard education not to mention his grades which are apparently locked in the same vault as his birth certificate. So much for the "most open administration in history".
How idiotic is it?Obviously you're unaware of how truly idiotic this is.Americans knew everything there was to know about George W. Bush including membership in Yale frat clubs but we don't even know how Barry Sotoro Hussein paid for his Harvard education not to mention his grades which are apparently locked in the same vault as his birth certificate. So much for the "most open administration in history".
Obviously you're unaware of how truly idiotic this is.Americans knew everything there was to know about George W. Bush including membership in Yale frat clubs but we don't even know how Barry Sotoro Hussein paid for his Harvard education not to mention his grades which are apparently locked in the same vault as his birth certificate. So much for the "most open administration in history".