georgephillip
Diamond Member
"Obama has had his sites on Social Security and Medicare since he took office in 2008. Its clear now, that he plans to use the cover of the stage-managed debt ceiling crisis to achieve his objective."
That's how Mike Whitney ends his brief article in
Mike alleges that "the two-party duopoly" is once again using another fake government shutdown/debt ceiling 'hostage taking' melodrama to shift attention away from defunding Obamacare to negotiations on Social Security and Medicare."
"Obama will use GOP 'hostage taking' as the proximate cause for caving in, saying that he had to give ground to prevent a catastrophic default that would have pushed the economy back into recession.
"In an appearance on ABCs lightweight News program 'This Week,' Boehner more-or-less admitted to what was going on behind-the-scenes saying:
'Lets look at whats driving the problem. 10,000 baby-boomers like me retiring, every single day. 70,000 this week. 3.5 million this year. And its not like theres money in Social Security or Medicare. The governments, over the last 30 years, have spent it all.
We know these programs are important to tens of millions of Americans, but if we dont address the underlying problems, they are not sustainable.'
Boehner, who's been in the US House for 23 of those 30 years, and Obama are on the same side of the current amateur night dog-and-pony fight in DC. Both serve the richest 1% of Americans; the same 1% who own America.
Neither Boehner nor Barry believe "those who own the country should have to pay for its maintenance and upkeep."
How will "choosing" between Boehner or Barry in the voting booth ever change that reality?
That's how Mike Whitney ends his brief article in
titled: "The 'Debt Ceiling' Smokescreen"Counterpunch
Mike alleges that "the two-party duopoly" is once again using another fake government shutdown/debt ceiling 'hostage taking' melodrama to shift attention away from defunding Obamacare to negotiations on Social Security and Medicare."
"Obama will use GOP 'hostage taking' as the proximate cause for caving in, saying that he had to give ground to prevent a catastrophic default that would have pushed the economy back into recession.
"In an appearance on ABCs lightweight News program 'This Week,' Boehner more-or-less admitted to what was going on behind-the-scenes saying:
'Lets look at whats driving the problem. 10,000 baby-boomers like me retiring, every single day. 70,000 this week. 3.5 million this year. And its not like theres money in Social Security or Medicare. The governments, over the last 30 years, have spent it all.
We know these programs are important to tens of millions of Americans, but if we dont address the underlying problems, they are not sustainable.'
Boehner, who's been in the US House for 23 of those 30 years, and Obama are on the same side of the current amateur night dog-and-pony fight in DC. Both serve the richest 1% of Americans; the same 1% who own America.
Neither Boehner nor Barry believe "those who own the country should have to pay for its maintenance and upkeep."
How will "choosing" between Boehner or Barry in the voting booth ever change that reality?