Obama's newest poll results- Public Says his Presidency is Over

Not a Romney fan, but his plan for a residual force in Iraq was correct.
Yeah, because the residual force would have won where the world's most advanced military could not, right?

Iraq would be just fine if only America occupied it forever over lies.
 
There is no confidence in this government. The social fabric does not address the majority. The law is not to be trusted. You know this only goes one way, right?
 
Someone please explain how Mormney would have won Iraq, considering that military victory was never going to happen in Iraq no matter who was President?

Iraq was won before 2012. Obama wanted no residual force. This is the result. Your President is incompetent.



Oh you're right. Bush wanted us in Iraq for the next 50 years with the result being the loss of 250,000 more American troops lives lost as "residual" damage.
 
Last edited:
Not a Romney fan, but his plan for a residual force in Iraq was correct.
Yeah, because the residual force would have won where the world's most advanced military could not, right?

Iraq would be just fine if only America occupied it forever over lies.

It worked for Korea.
So you're arguing that America should lie to the world, invade any country on a whim, and set up permanent military bases from which to control the local population?

That's not at all an Empire. That's just free market Capitalism, right?
 
Someone please explain how Mormney would have won Iraq, considering that military victory was never going to happen in Iraq no matter who was President?

Iraq was won before 2012. Obama wanted no residual force. This is the result. Your President is incompetent.



Oh you're right. Bush wanted us in Iraq for the next 50 years with the result being the loss of 250,000 more American troops lives lost as "residual" damage.

Well, I was gonna say probably a million or 2 million casualties. At least. Probably an invasion from Jupiter too.
 
Not a Romney fan, but his plan for a residual force in Iraq was correct.
Yeah, because the residual force would have won where the world's most advanced military could not, right?

Iraq would be just fine if only America occupied it forever over lies.

Iraq was secure in 2012. It was won.
No, the war was not "won" at all. The war was lost the very second that Bush invaded Iraq over lies. Iraq hasn't been secure in over 30 years and Bush made it even less so.
 
Yeah, because the residual force would have won where the world's most advanced military could not, right?

Iraq would be just fine if only America occupied it forever over lies.

It worked for Korea.
So you're arguing that America should lie to the world, invade any country on a whim, and set up permanent military bases from which to control the local population?

That's not at all an Empire. That's just free market Capitalism, right?

Not your problem. Taxpayers will take care of you.
 
Not a Romney fan, but his plan for a residual force in Iraq was correct.
Yeah, because the residual force would have won where the world's most advanced military could not, right?

Iraq would be just fine if only America occupied it forever over lies.

We still have nearly 70,000 troops in Europe in Asia.. 70,000, 60 years later and we won WWII !
United States military deployments - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
And Europe also didn't have violent religious insurgents trained by the CIA in guerrilla tactics adopted from the Viet Cong.

The war in Iraq was lost in 1979 when the CIA created the modern-day jihad.
 
Yeah, because the residual force would have won where the world's most advanced military could not, right?

Iraq would be just fine if only America occupied it forever over lies.

We still have nearly 70,000 troops in Europe in Asia.. 70,000, 60 years later and we won WWII !
United States military deployments - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
And Europe also didn't have violent religious insurgents trained by the CIA in guerrilla tactics adopted from the Viet Cong.

The war in Iraq was lost in 1979 when the CIA created the modern-day jihad.


the saddest part of reading stuff like this is knowing the idiot that wrote it belives it.

muslim fanatics don't need; never needed the CIA to wage Jihad
 
Yeah, because the residual force would have won where the world's most advanced military could not, right?

Iraq would be just fine if only America occupied it forever over lies.

We still have nearly 70,000 troops in Europe in Asia.. 70,000, 60 years later and we won WWII !
United States military deployments - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
And Europe also didn't have violent religious insurgents trained by the CIA in guerrilla tactics adopted from the Viet Cong.

The war in Iraq was lost in 1979 when the CIA created the modern-day jihad.

Hmmm, 1979. So you are blaming the whole mess on Jimmy Carter? Woo.
 
Not a Romney fan, but his plan for a residual force in Iraq was correct.



5000 dead American troops not enough for Romney and you?

Well the far left had more to do with that as they needed a high body count to try and make their invalid points.

Now the far left just spits on the deaths of those 5000 as by example of your post.

Another boring far left talk points post over 10 years old now..
 

Forum List

Back
Top