Obama's plan for gun control...

[rightwinger]

Who wants to pay for registering a gun... the gov only wants to know so they know how many guns are out there in case of marshal law.

The government will seize the records of the NRA if they want to find where the gun owners are

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Who wants to pay for registering a gun... the gov only wants to know so they know how many guns are out there in case of marshal law.

The government will seize the records of the NRA if they want to find where the gun owners are

To be a member of the NRA does not mean you own a firearm. try again.

 

[Old Rocks]

Back to 'Guns, God, and Gays'. The wingnuts have bombed on everything else. The economy is improving, people are going back to work, the push on contraception blew up in their faces, time to manufacture a non-existant issue.

 

[rightwinger]

Who wants to pay for registering a gun... the gov only wants to know so they know how many guns are out there in case of marshal law.

The government will seize the records of the NRA if they want to find where the gun owners are

To be a member of the NRA does not mean you own a firearm. try again.

LOL.....Thanks, that's a good one

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The government will seize the records of the NRA if they want to find where the gun owners are

To be a member of the NRA does not mean you own a firearm. try again.

LOL.....Thanks, that's a good one

You are very confused. How many kids are given memberships as gifts by their grand father or father? Or even gifts to other people?

 

[rightwinger]

To be a member of the NRA does not mean you own a firearm. try again.

LOL.....Thanks, that's a good one

You are very confused. How many kids are given memberships as gifts by their grand father or father? Or even gifts to other people?

Are there guns in that kids home?

Obama will find out. Your NRA membership is a ticket to gun confiscation. Obama will stop at nothing to get your guns. The NRA is just a clever government ruse to find out where the guns are

 

[Too Tall]

If it happens I have pvc ready.

You can make a wicked potato cannon with PVC conduit.

Been there, done that. More damned fun!

 

[bigrebnc1775]

LOL.....Thanks, that's a good one

You are very confused. How many kids are given memberships as gifts by their grand father or father? Or even gifts to other people?

Are there guns in that kids home?

Obama will find out. Your NRA membership is a ticket to gun confiscation. Obama will stop at nothing to get your guns. The NRA is just a clever government ruse to find out where the guns are

I don't know are there?

 

[rightwinger]

You are very confused. How many kids are given memberships as gifts by their grand father or father? Or even gifts to other people?

Are there guns in that kids home?

Obama will find out. Your NRA membership is a ticket to gun confiscation. Obama will stop at nothing to get your guns. The NRA is just a clever government ruse to find out where the guns are

I don't know are there?

I bet every one of those kids has a BB gun

Shoot your damn eye out

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Are there guns in that kids home?

Obama will find out. Your NRA membership is a ticket to gun confiscation. Obama will stop at nothing to get your guns. The NRA is just a clever government ruse to find out where the guns are

I don't know are there?

I bet every one of those kids has a BB gun

Shoot your damn eye out

A BB gun is not a firearm try again. besides living in a home with firearms does not make a person a firearm owner.

 

[NoNukes]

Sources have told me that Obama already has plans to confiscate all privately held guns one he gets reelected. Attorney General Holder has already found provisions in the Patriot Act that authorize him to do it until the War on Terrorism has ended

He has already confiscated membership lists from the NRA to fond out where the gun owners are. Gun owners are advised to get your shooting in between now and November because you will not have your guns for long. Gun owners will be given receipts that they can use to get their guns back once the War on Terror has been declared officially over

Sources have told me that Rick Santorum has already compiled a list of dog owners across the country.

That is an Urban Legend, in fact, Santorum is looking to round up all gays and send them to resettlement camps where they can be reprogramed to be like real Americans. Once they have prayed the gay away, they will be allowed to rejoin decent society

And they will all be given a gun.

 

[rightwinger]

I don't know are there?

I bet every one of those kids has a BB gun

Shoot your damn eye out

A BB gun is not a firearm try again. besides living in a home with firearms does not make a person a firearm owner.

BB guns aren't covered under the second amendment?

 

[Mustang]

Obama is likely to sign some kind of International Agreement regarding control of firearms by the public. He'll need to do this to justify whatever initial control is necessary to implement the disarming of the public so that when his personal police force is created, he can announce the beginning of the Obama dynasty. Far fetched, you say?

Global gun control law pushed by Clinton - National Law Enforcement | Examiner.com

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is pushing for the United States to become a party to a global gun control law proposed by the United Nations. And President Barack Obama appears to be sympathetic to such an international power-grab and he's already displayed a propensity for bypassing the legislative process.
In fact, many believe the recent "Operation Fast and Furious" scandal had more to do with gaining support for gun control and gun ownership bans than it had to do with crimefighting and drug cartels.
"The laws are designed and intended to lead to the complete ban and confiscation of all firearms," according to Sharon.

"The Obama administration is attempting to use tactics and methods of gun control that will inflict major damage to our 2nd Amendment before US citizens even understand what has happened," she added.

Critics believe Obama will appear before the public and tell them that he does not intend to pursue any legislation in the United States that will lead to new gun control laws, while cloaked in secrecy, his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, is committing the US to international treaties and foreign gun control laws.

Continue reading on Examiner.com Global gun control law pushed by Clinton - National Law Enforcement | Examiner.com Global gun control law pushed by Clinton - National Law Enforcement | Examiner.com

Give us your email address. Buy our subscription. Get on our mailing list. Let us sell your name on a mailing list. We'll send you a catalog. We're gonna make money from stoking unwarranted fears.

 

[Liberty]

The question is this: If Healthcare/contraception/housing/food, etc. is a "right" and should be provided for by the government...then by that logic shouldn't the government hand out firearms too for free since keeping and bearing arms is also a right? Head scratcher.

 

[rightwinger]

The question is this: If Healthcare/contraception/housing/food, etc. is a "right" and should be provided for by the government...then by that logic shouldn't the government hand out firearms too for free since keeping and bearing arms is also a right? Head scratcher.

Nobody ever said you should have them for free. Only that you have a right to expect to be able to afford them in your life

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

As a constitutional scholar to an extent myself...

What ‘extent’ would that be? Thus far you’ve exhibited no ‘constitutional scholarship’ at all. Or does your ‘scholarship’ apply only to the Constitution prior to Marbury?

Obama and the democrats acknowledge Heller/McDonald as settled law, they also know is a politically dead issue, as a losing issue as well.

The irony is the actual threat to one’s 2nd Amendment rights comes from the states and local jurisdictions, not the Federal government or some mythical threat from an ‘international treaty.’

 

[Liberty]

As a constitutional scholar to an extent myself...

What ‘extent’ would that be? Thus far you’ve exhibited no ‘constitutional scholarship’ at all. Or does your ‘scholarship’ apply only to the Constitution prior to Marbury?

Obama and the democrats acknowledge Heller/McDonald as settled law, they also know is a politically dead issue, as a losing issue as well.

The irony is the actual threat to one’s 2nd Amendment rights comes from the states and local jurisdictions, not the Federal government or some mythical threat from an ‘international treaty.’

I focus on original intent, rather than case law that was put into effect by corrupt activist judges. *shrug* You sir, follow the path of the corrupt, who have hurt the country. Case Law does NOT supersede the constitution. Ever. If you think it does, I'd like you to cite somewhere in the Judicial powers that allows it to do so.

 

[Liberty]

The question is this: If Healthcare/contraception/housing/food, etc. is a "right" and should be provided for by the government...then by that logic shouldn't the government hand out firearms too for free since keeping and bearing arms is also a right? Head scratcher.

Nobody ever said you should have them for free. Only that you have a right to expect to be able to afford them in your life

in that case guns should be cheaper so more people can afford them. Where are the Beretta and Colt subsidies?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I bet every one of those kids has a BB gun

Shoot your damn eye out

A BB gun is not a firearm try again. besides living in a home with firearms does not make a person a firearm owner.

BB guns aren't covered under the second amendment?

They are not considered arms suitable for militia use according to U.S. v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939)
The case also made clear that the militia consisted of "all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense" and that "when called for service these men were expected to appear bearing arms supplied by themselves and of the kind in common use at the time." In setting forth this definition of the militia, the Court implicitly rejected the view that the Second Amendment guarantees a right only to those individuals who are members of the militia. Had the Court viewed the Second Amendment as guaranteeing the right to keep and bear arms only to "all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense," it would certainly have discussed whether, on remand, there should also be evidence that the defendants met the qualifications for inclusion in the militia, much as it did with regard to the militia use of a short-barrelled shotgun.
U.S. v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939) - Google Scholar

 

[rightwinger]

A BB gun is not a firearm try again. besides living in a home with firearms does not make a person a firearm owner.

BB guns aren't covered under the second amendment?

They are not considered arms suitable for militia use according to U.S. v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939)
The case also made clear that the militia consisted of "all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense" and that "when called for service these men were expected to appear bearing arms supplied by themselves and of the kind in common use at the time." In setting forth this definition of the militia, the Court implicitly rejected the view that the Second Amendment guarantees a right only to those individuals who are members of the militia. Had the Court viewed the Second Amendment as guaranteeing the right to keep and bear arms only to "all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense," it would certainly have discussed whether, on remand, there should also be evidence that the defendants met the qualifications for inclusion in the militia, much as it did with regard to the militia use of a short-barrelled shotgun.
U.S. v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939) - Google Scholar

Even so.......you could put someones eye out