Government business is being done - note all of the breaks for votes during the process. Unlike Trump, who can only obsess about one thing at a time, Pelosi is able to walk, talk, and chew gum, at the same time. Women, by nature, are better able to multi-task than men, because we have to. Especially working women who are accustomed to balancing work obligations, managing family life and schedules, as well as meals laundry, etc., and social obligations, all while being perfectly groomed.

Multitasking is doing multiple things at the same time. What you listed above is something that pretty much anyone is capable of doing, so you completely missed it.

Second, I really doubt that people like you should be allowed to vote.

And to have kids.

She doesn't vote here. She's Canadian.
 
nope, trump is doing the state's business, unlike the congressional house. They are the one's with the actual quid pro quo going on right now. I want the government business being done, not their infectious fantasies.

It's the state's business to investigate Biden, if there is evidence of wrongdoing. You just said Trump isn't investigating anyone. Your silly deflection to Congress is noted.
actually, it's the DOJ's business to investigate biden, and they are. Not trump. you should learn your agencies better.
It's a pity Trump went to a foreign national to get help for an investigation into Biden rather than go to his own DoJ. He wouldn't be getting impeached if he had.
If there's no dirt on the Biden's, then what are you guys so worried about? Let Hunter testify.
I couldn't care less about Biden. Investigate him for all I care.

But Trump is still not legally allowed to solicit a foreign national to do it for him.
I want my president to uncover and investigate corruption in other nations before he sends my tax dollars to them...what is it that you find troubling about that?....
 
The first step is to get a President that has ll the power. He loads the Supreme Court to vote only his way (isn't working out too well). Then he destroys or totally controls Congress (seems to be on track). Then he loads Congress where he controls over 60% of both houses and has full control. Welcome to Fascism or Socialism depending who is president at the time. The Republic is gone. With a President controlling 66% of Congress he can get the Constitution changed to whatever he wishes. Right now, the only thing standing in the way is the Constitution of the United States and the Supreme Court.

Well why do you suppose the Democrat party is now the anti-white party?
 
The takeaways from Sondland's testimony yesterday were:
The accusations against the Bidens are NOT CREDIBLE
The disinformation campaign against Yavanovich was NOT CREDIBLE
Sondland 100% objects to the withholding of military aid to Ukraine (as does every other witness who has been on so far)

This makes our President look STUPID. He believes conspiracy theories and nurses his grudges (even if the Ukrainians DID support Hillary in 2016, why is he still sulking about that now?) Does everyone who supported Hillary deserve investigations by the government? Apparently so, according to Trump and his supporters.

The entire underpinning of Trump's "favor" is bullshit. So should I be embarrassed that our President is into illegal arm twisting with foreign leaders, or embarrassed that he's dumber than a rock?
This is a perfect example of selective hearing from a person who has an axe to grind.

The only thing I heard from the testimony was that these people are presuming something that doesn't exist.....and that is supposedly grounds for impeachment of the president.
 
No. Right now Biden is running to be the democrat nominee. Once he wins that race he will then be running against Trump for president.
Wrong, he need not win the Democrats' nomination to run in the general election.

Even worse for your position... if it were allowed to solicit foreign nationals for help to eliminate presidential hopefuls prior to the primaries under the fallacious excuse they're not political rivals of an incumbent president running for re-election, that would allow a president to violate campaign laws to eliminate every single candidate from the opposing party.
You are right. He doesn't. However he is ,as of now, running for the nomination for the democrat party. He would have to declare a run as an independent for your theory to hold up.
No. Right now Biden is running to be the democrat nominee. Once he wins that race he will then be running against Trump for president.
Wrong, he need not win the Democrats' nomination to run in the general election.

Even worse for your position... if it were allowed to solicit foreign nationals for help to eliminate presidential hopefuls prior to the primaries under the fallacious excuse they're not political rivals of an incumbent president running for re-election, that would allow a president to violate campaign laws to eliminate every single candidate from the opposing party.
You are right. He doesn't. However he is ,as of now, running for the nomination for the democrat party. He would have to declare a run as an independent for your theory to hold up.
He's running for president....

Joe Biden for President: Official Campaign Website | Join Our Campaign

... the same office as Trump. That makes him a rival.
If he doesn't get the nomination, which he won't, then that means nothing unless he goes third party. You continue to want to leave out a step. Typical libtard.
Tell Giuliani and trump that, ya moron.
You won't believe me but this Biden deal is only the tip of the iceberg. I promise by next June you libtards are going to be crying in your beer as all your heroes are going to jail. This clown show is an attempt to cover for what is really coming. The only way they can save their asses is to get Trump out of office. Got news for you it ain't going to happen.
 
Is it almost time for Story Time With Adumb? I like how Schifferbrains wraps up each day's debacle, er....hearing.......with a Fairy Tale.

Since today may be the last debacle, er.....hearing...........I expect a hum-dinger from ol Adumb.
 
I will concur with you that you are not the least informed.
That honor lies with the creepi one.

You have heard the phrase - actions are more important than words; I would think.
Is that a sentiment that you would agree with?

Why would ask?

I want more information about the orange whore's ties to the Russians, who, by the way, are not our allies. There's a history there.

Focus -
An honest person would focus on the actions.
They also would not use terms like "orange whore" if they wanted to be taken seriously.

You remember who did think Russia was our ally?
The last previous President and at least one of his SOS.

Who else does one show the appropriate disdain for the worst piece of shit to sit in the Oval Office in my whole lifetime? Someone who has shown time again that he intends to do as much damage to the United States as possible. Obama never thought that Russia was our ally that could be trusted.

I am focusing on his actions and those of his henchmen.
 
The takeaways from Sondland's testimony yesterday were:
The accusations against the Bidens are NOT CREDIBLE
The disinformation campaign against Yavanovich was NOT CREDIBLE
Sondland 100% objects to the withholding of military aid to Ukraine (as does every other witness who has been on so far)

This makes our President look STUPID. He believes conspiracy theories and nurses his grudges (even if the Ukrainians DID support Hillary in 2016, why is he still sulking about that now?) Does everyone who supported Hillary deserve investigations by the government? Apparently so, according to Trump and his supporters.

The entire underpinning of Trump's "favor" is bullshit. So should I be embarrassed that our President is into illegal arm twisting with foreign leaders, or embarrassed that he's dumber than a rock?
This is a perfect example of selective hearing from a person who has an axe to grind.

The only thing I heard from the testimony was that these people are presuming something that doesn't exist.....and that is supposedly grounds for impeachment of the president.
I heard that, too. I was thinking of new stuff; to me it was more noteworthy than the same thing that has been brought up over and over and over both in the press and at the hearings.
 
Of course, you are allowed to defend yourself. Defending yourself tough does NOT include the right to withhold evidence. You can't defend yourself by shooting a witness for instance either. There are limits on the right to defend yourself. Refusing to comply with a subpoena issued by the house is one of those.
it's not an official impeachment. he isn't obstructing shit.

Just heard on NBC. The FBI is going to interview the whistleblowner..lol
:clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2:

.
Of course, because it's illegal to file false charges. They should send him the bill for all this and add our time, pain, and suffering to the millions who has to watch this farce and had our normal TV interupted. And they complain about waterboarding ..... oy!


They should determine if he had a legitimate need to know about the call, which was classified at the time. If not, the people he spoke to could be in a world of hurt.

.

The call was NOT CLASSIFIED at the time. That's why it was unusual to place it on the super secret classified hard drive. Why would you place an unclassified call on the super classified server?

Trump released the Call Memo himself thinking he could gaslight people into believing there was no extortion, and muddying the waters with Crowdstrike and the Bidens, but witness after witness is utterly destroying both lines of defence.

More you post, more prove there is that you know nothing. Dumb as a rock.

ALL presidential phone calls are classified by default.

According to Presidential Record Act, president's records are public property. The public do have access to records through the FOIA five years after the end of the Administration, and in specific cases for up to twelve years, unless president de-classifies the himself.

What you call "call-memo" is actually transcript done by multiple people who are listening the conversation and taking notes. At the end of the call, notes get compared and if there is discrepancy, they got consolidated and approved by supervisor.

Moving records to separate server was necessary due to leaks of presidential calls to the public.
 
Well Pelosi sure needs to do something. Those testimonies this morning sure as hell didn't advance the Democrat's narrative about "quid pro quo."
The Republicans should have shelled out for a better lawyer. Their guy looks like a weasel and sounds like he has trouble grasping the facts with all his stuttering and stammering.

No problem. Just wait until Nunes and Jim Jordan tears those "witnesses" a new asshole.
Mooooooooo. It's what I think of every time Nunes opens his mouth. He's obsessed with a fake cow. :iyfyus.jpg:

And Gym Jordan is disqualified from being a decent member of the human race due to his passive acceptance of sexual abuse of underage boys.

Second man accuses Rep. Jim Jordan of ignoring OSU abuse

Laughable. If he would had called out that faggot doctor he would had been labeled a homophobic bigot by you assclowns.
He had no direct proof of what was going on. Not to mention those involved were all grown men in college, not children. What was stopping those grown men from punching the faggot perv doctor in the face or filing a police report?

You didn't read the link.

Second man accuses Rep. Jim Jordan of ignoring OSU abuse

The lawsuit was filed by 43 survivors against Ohio State, claiming the university's “ingrained culture of institutional indifference” enabled Strauss to sexually abuse former students and athletes from a half-dozen other sports.

It cites instances of Strauss “drugging and raping athletes” and said Strauss preyed on underage boys who participated in athletic events on the campus.


Oh, and Gym Jordan knew all about the abuse. Gym fails at humanity.

Uh huh, Jordan “knew” about the abuse, because you just know he did.
 
Gotta love how Pelousy is scheduling votes immediately after the Dimwingers bore America to death with their lawyer asking witnesses about their feelings, impressions, and opinions.

I guess they hope America tunes out before the Republicans destroy the latest bullshit "witnesses".

Well Pelosi sure needs to do something. Those testimonies this morning sure as hell didn't advance the Democrat's narrative about "quid pro quo."
The Republicans should have shelled out for a better lawyer. Their guy looks like a weasel and sounds like he has trouble grasping the facts with all his stuttering and stammering.

No problem. Just wait until Nunes and Jim Jordan tears those "witnesses" a new asshole.
Mooooooooo. It's what I think of every time Nunes opens his mouth. He's obsessed with a fake cow. :iyfyus.jpg:

And Gym Jordan is disqualified from being a decent member of the human race due to his passive acceptance of sexual abuse of underage boys.

Second man accuses Rep. Jim Jordan of ignoring OSU abuse

Laughable. If he would had called out that faggot doctor he would had been labeled a homophobic bigot by you assclowns.
He had no direct proof of what was going on. Not to mention those involved were all grown men in college, not children. What was stopping those grown men from punching the faggot perv doctor in the face or filing a police report?

It's amazing how many people come out of the woodwork when they smell lawsuit money.
 
It's the state's business to investigate Biden, if there is evidence of wrongdoing. You just said Trump isn't investigating anyone. Your silly deflection to Congress is noted.
actually, it's the DOJ's business to investigate biden, and they are. Not trump. you should learn your agencies better.
It's a pity Trump went to a foreign national to get help for an investigation into Biden rather than go to his own DoJ. He wouldn't be getting impeached if he had.
If there's no dirt on the Biden's, then what are you guys so worried about? Let Hunter testify.
I couldn't care less about Biden. Investigate him for all I care.

But Trump is still not legally allowed to solicit a foreign national to do it for him.
I want my president to uncover and investigate corruption in other nations before he sends my tax dollars to them...what is it that you find troubling about that?....

Trump's bagman.
 
actually, it's the DOJ's business to investigate biden, and they are. Not trump. you should learn your agencies better.
It's a pity Trump went to a foreign national to get help for an investigation into Biden rather than go to his own DoJ. He wouldn't be getting impeached if he had.
If there's no dirt on the Biden's, then what are you guys so worried about? Let Hunter testify.
I couldn't care less about Biden. Investigate him for all I care.

But Trump is still not legally allowed to solicit a foreign national to do it for him.
I want my president to uncover and investigate corruption in other nations before he sends my tax dollars to them...what is it that you find troubling about that?....

Trump's bagman.
Its your tax dollars too pal.....do some research on just how much money we send to other nations annually...and then look into the status of those dollars afterwards...Trump is tired of American foreign aid being ripped off no matter how many dems are profiting from it.....
 
Isn’t it interesting that every single Democrat says Trump should be thrown out of office or we are all going to die and every single Republican says Trump is the greatest POTUS of all time?

Can we see that this is all just political theater? It’s not an inquiry. It’s BULLSHIT.

WE ARE SHEEP BEING FUCKED OVER BY THE RULING CLASS.

WAKE UP!
 
The takeaways from Sondland's testimony yesterday were:
The accusations against the Bidens are NOT CREDIBLE
The disinformation campaign against Yavanovich was NOT CREDIBLE
Sondland 100% objects to the withholding of military aid to Ukraine (as does every other witness who has been on so far)

This makes our President look STUPID. He believes conspiracy theories and nurses his grudges (even if the Ukrainians DID support Hillary in 2016, why is he still sulking about that now?) Does everyone who supported Hillary deserve investigations by the government? Apparently so, according to Trump and his supporters.

The entire underpinning of Trump's "favor" is bullshit. So should I be embarrassed that our President is into illegal arm twisting with foreign leaders, or embarrassed that he's dumber than a rock?
This is a perfect example of selective hearing from a person who has an axe to grind.

The only thing I heard from the testimony was that these people are presuming something that doesn't exist.....and that is supposedly grounds for impeachment of the president.
I heard that, too. I was thinking of new stuff; to me it was more noteworthy than the same thing that has been brought up over and over and over both in the press and at the hearings.
You do know that this hearing is a smokescreen set up by Hillary and the Democrats to lessen the impact of the release of the IG report and the coming indictments of FBI and DoJ officials who have committed crimes, right?
 
Both Biden and Trump are running for the same office.
No. Right now Biden is running to be the democrat nominee. Once he wins that race he will then be running against Trump for president.
Wrong, he need not win the Democrats' nomination to run in the general election.

Even worse for your position... if it were allowed to solicit foreign nationals for help to eliminate presidential hopefuls prior to the primaries under the fallacious excuse they're not political rivals of an incumbent president running for re-election, that would allow a president to violate campaign laws to eliminate every single candidate from the opposing party.
You are right. He doesn't. However he is ,as of now, running for the nomination for the democrat party. He would have to declare a run as an independent for your theory to hold up.
Both Biden and Trump are running for the same office.
No. Right now Biden is running to be the democrat nominee. Once he wins that race he will then be running against Trump for president.
Wrong, he need not win the Democrats' nomination to run in the general election.

Even worse for your position... if it were allowed to solicit foreign nationals for help to eliminate presidential hopefuls prior to the primaries under the fallacious excuse they're not political rivals of an incumbent president running for re-election, that would allow a president to violate campaign laws to eliminate every single candidate from the opposing party.
You are right. He doesn't. However he is ,as of now, running for the nomination for the democrat party. He would have to declare a run as an independent for your theory to hold up.
He's running for president....

Joe Biden for President: Official Campaign Website | Join Our Campaign

... the same office as Trump. That makes him a rival.
If he doesn't get the nomination, which he won't, then that means nothing unless he goes third party. You continue to want to leave out a step. Typical libtard.

Biden announced his campaign in April, and he was leading in the polls when the Crime Family was trying to shake down the Ukraine president. There wasn't time to leave out a step. Maybe if Trump had scheduled his call with Zelensky sometime next year, after the DNC Convention, you'd have a point.
 
It's a pity Trump went to a foreign national to get help for an investigation into Biden rather than go to his own DoJ. He wouldn't be getting impeached if he had.
If there's no dirt on the Biden's, then what are you guys so worried about? Let Hunter testify.
I couldn't care less about Biden. Investigate him for all I care.

But Trump is still not legally allowed to solicit a foreign national to do it for him.
I want my president to uncover and investigate corruption in other nations before he sends my tax dollars to them...what is it that you find troubling about that?....

Trump's bagman.
Its your tax dollars too pal.....do some research on just how much money we send to other nations annually...and then look into the status of those dollars afterwards...Trump is tired of American foreign aid being ripped off no matter how many dems are profiting from it.....

He didn't reduce the aid - he just tried to get a personal benefit from it. Oh, what a savings!
 
Trump isn't investigating anyone.

Not even Biden? He only wants to outsource that? We have a Justice Dept and investigative agencies, but The Only One wants Ukraine to announce an investigation. That's fucked-up, comrade.
nope, trump is doing the state's business, unlike the congressional house. They are the one's with the actual quid pro quo going on right now. I want the government business being done, not their infectious fantasies.

Government business is being done - note all of the breaks for votes during the process. Unlike Trump, who can only obsess about one thing at a time, Pelosi is able to walk, talk, and chew gum, at the same time. Women, by nature, are better able to multi-task than men, because we have to. Especially working women who are accustomed to balancing work obligations, managing family life and schedules, as well as meals laundry, etc., and social obligations, all while being perfectly groomed.
I have no need of your sexist claptrap moralizing. What bills has Pelosi put on Trump's desk?

The proper question is not what bills have gone to trump, but what bills were sent to the Senate and sat on by McConnell.

You would think by now, the commiecrats would have learned that payback is a bitch. But as we see with this farce they are proceeding with, they are too stupid to learn from past mistakes.

Nearly 400 House bills stuck in Senate limbo
 

Forum List

Back
Top