Oh, I See: Liberals Think a Muslim Can Be President, but Not a Bible-Believing Christian

[ninja007]

"Oh, I See: Liberals Think a Muslim Can Be President, but Not a Bible-Believing Christian"

No, you don't 'see.'

The vast majority of liberals are bible-believing Christians, even more persons of faith.

Any person of any faith, or someone free from faith, can become president, provided he acknowledges and respects Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

What liberals correctly and appropriately oppose are religious extremists who have contempt for Establishment Clause jurisprudence, who seek to conjoin church and state in violation of the Framers' mandate to keep both separate, and who work to codify religious dogma into secular law.

Indeed, everyone from across the political spectrum should denounce those hostile to Establishment Clause jurisprudence – conservatives, moderates, and liberals.

hahahaha! You believe that!? Yeah- thats why you libs don't support Israel, believe in abortion, gay marriage and numerous other anti God things.

 

[LittleNipper]

The Democrats have the Republicans beat hands down. They've got JC..., Jimmy Carter, more like the biblical Jesus than anything the Republicans have thrown our way in living memory.

President Carter has not a shred of Biblical support for his apparent acceptance of Gay marriage. Jesus provided Biblical reference. President Carter has only personal opinion.

There is not one sentence in the Bible that condemns same sex civil marriage.

There has never been same sex civil marriage throughout all history until this generation of Secular Humanists. The Bible clearly states that marriage was designed by God to be between a man and a woman. Two men cannot have children together and a child is a gift from God to a married couple.

 

[sealybobo]

Of course, liberals are all in an uproar over Ben Carson's statement that he does not think a Muslim should ever be President. Yet, liberals do not think that a Bible-believing Christian should ever be President. So I guess they'd rather see a Muslim in the White House instead of a Bible-believing Christian, if they had to choose one or the other.

Personally, I don't agree with Carson. I've known some good and politically conservative Muslims who I think would govern justly and capably. In some towns and counties, mainstream conservative Muslims have teamed up with Christians to support conservative policies, including cracking down on porn shops.

But I can certainly appreciate where Carson is coming from.

Anyway, liberals, spare us your phony, hypocritical "outrage" over Carson's position, given the fact that you guys would ban conservative Christians from being President if you could get away with it.

We have gotten away with it. In 2008 and 2012 we stopped radical Christians from winning the white house.

I don't like radical Christians or Muslims. You're both crazy.

Let's elect a hissedic Jew!

 

[konradv]

There has never been same sex civil marriage throughout all history until this generation of Secular Humanists. The Bible clearly states that marriage was designed by God to be between a man and a woman. Two men cannot have children together and a child is a gift from God to a married couple.

I'm a Christian. If Jesus didn't address it, homosexuality must not be a sin or at most a very minor one. If it deserves universal condemnation or hell, He'd have said something.

 

[sealybobo]

"Oh, I See: Liberals Think a Muslim Can Be President, but Not a Bible-Believing Christian"

No, you don't 'see.'

The vast majority of liberals are bible-believing Christians, even more persons of faith.

Any person of any faith, or someone free from faith, can become president, provided he acknowledges and respects Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

What liberals correctly and appropriately oppose are religious extremists who have contempt for Establishment Clause jurisprudence, who seek to conjoin church and state in violation of the Framers' mandate to keep both separate, and who work to codify religious dogma into secular law.

Indeed, everyone from across the political spectrum should denounce those hostile to Establishment Clause jurisprudence – conservatives, moderates, and liberals.

hahahaha! You believe that!? Yeah- thats why you libs don't support Israel, believe in abortion, gay marriage and numerous other anti God things.

Because there is no God. Why elect a delusional person who believes in the invisible man?

 

[LittleNipper]

"Is it lawful for a man to put away his wife for every cause?" (Matthew 19:3) They wanted to teach that divorce for any reason was acceptable. Jesus, however, in answer pointed them to the first book of the Bible, Genesis 1:27, and said, "Have ye not read, that He which made them at the beginning made them male and female?" (Matthew 19:4) God made the sexes. God made men and women. God made marriage. Determining the nature of human sexuality in the beginning, He ordained that a man should desire and cleave unto his wife, and the wife unto her husband.

Therefore Jesus pointed the leaders to Genesis 2:24 where God had said, "For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh." (Matthew 19:5) Since God made marriage, it is His institution, not man's. He made the man to dwell with the woman. God performed the first wedding, and still today, it is God Who joins a husband and wife in marriage.

From this truth Jesus draws a conclusion. In harmony with Genesis 2:23 He says, "Wherefore they are no more twain but one flesh." (Matthew 19:6).

 

[LittleNipper]

There has never been same sex civil marriage throughout all history until this generation of Secular Humanists. The Bible clearly states that marriage was designed by God to be between a man and a woman. Two men cannot have children together and a child is a gift from God to a married couple.

I'm a Christian. If Jesus didn't address it, homosexuality must not be a sin or at most a very minor one. If it deserves universal condemnation or hell, He'd have said something.

His Heavenly Father already addressed it. It is an abomination. Jesus came to fulfill the Holy Scripture and Save ---- not rewrite the Holy Scripture which is the Word of God..

 

[LittleNipper]

"Oh, I See: Liberals Think a Muslim Can Be President, but Not a Bible-Believing Christian"

No, you don't 'see.'

The vast majority of liberals are bible-believing Christians, even more persons of faith.

Any person of any faith, or someone free from faith, can become president, provided he acknowledges and respects Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

What liberals correctly and appropriately oppose are religious extremists who have contempt for Establishment Clause jurisprudence, who seek to conjoin church and state in violation of the Framers' mandate to keep both separate, and who work to codify religious dogma into secular law.

Indeed, everyone from across the political spectrum should denounce those hostile to Establishment Clause jurisprudence – conservatives, moderates, and liberals.

hahahaha! You believe that!? Yeah- thats why you libs don't support Israel, believe in abortion, gay marriage and numerous other anti God things.

Because there is no God. Why elect a delusional person who believes in the invisible man?

"The fool says in his heart that there is no God." Why should we elect fools?

 

[konradv]

His Heavenly Father already addressed it. It is an abomination. Jesus came to fulfill the Holy Scripture and Save ---- not rewrite the Holy Scripture which is the Word of God..

He mentioned other sins. Why didn't he mention homosexuality, if it's so important?

 

[Sallow]

Muslims didn't massacre over 100 million Native Americans and steal their land - Christians did.

exaggerate for effect much?

That's no exaggeration.

 

[JoeB131]

Of course, liberals are all in an uproar over Ben Carson's statement that he does not think a Muslim should ever be President. Yet, liberals do not think that a Bible-believing Christian should ever be President. So I guess they'd rather see a Muslim in the White House instead of a Bible-believing Christian, if they had to choose one or the other.

When did a liberal ever say this?

It seems you've set up a strawman, with the qualification of a "bible believing Christian"... what does that mean? Are there Christians who don't believe in the bible?

It would seem to me if you have had 44 Presidents, all of whom were Christians, they must have believed in the Bible, right?

Or do you mean they don't believe in the bible the way you do.

YOu really need to get your argument straight before you spout off, GUy.

 

[LittleNipper]

His Heavenly Father already addressed it. It is an abomination. Jesus came to fulfill the Holy Scripture and Save ---- not rewrite the Holy Scripture which is the Word of God..

He mentioned other sins. Why didn't he mention homosexuality, if it's so important?

I would say that the disciples of Christ informed the Church of what Christ taught them. We are to accept the sinner but not the sin.

Romans 1:26-27 (English Majority Text Version, EMTV), Paul writes
“ For this reason [idolatry] God gave them up to passions of dishonor; for even their females exchanged the natural use for that which is contrary to nature, and likewise also the males, having left the natural use of the female, were inflamed by their lust for one another, males with males, committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the recompense which was fitting for their error.

 

[mudwhistle]

Of course, liberals are all in an uproar over Ben Carson's statement that he does not think a Muslim should ever be President. Yet, liberals do not think that a Bible-believing Christian should ever be President.

Where did you get the idea liberals don't think a Christian should be President, straw man?

Jimmy Carter was as liberal as they come, and he was an evangelical.

Barack Obama is also a Christian. Remember Reverend Wright? I know it makes your head asplode to try to convince yourself Obama's a Muslim AND that he attended a liberal Christian church for decades.

The left believes that a Democrat can be a Christian but they also know that a Democrat doesn't have a conscience....so they won't follow it and actually act like a Christian.

 

[LittleNipper]

Muslims didn't massacre over 100 million Native Americans and steal their land - Christians did.

exaggerate for effect much?

That's no exaggeration.

I believe it was purchased. Many American Natives died from Small Pox; however, such was not an act of the colonists. And I do know that many Colonists married Native Americans (Pocahontas for example). So many "Indians" were assimilated. Clearly even the Scandinavians do not still live as Vikings and the Germanic tribes do not live as the barbarians of yore. They eventually were Christianized.