Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So, you just had to go ahead and demonstrate in total your inability to argue your case without inserting your emotions?
You blatantly proved his point.
You don't get emotional about the murder of 26 kids? I guess you see it as the cost of doing business and making sure there is a gun in every cradle...err I mean cabinet.
Yet you keep responding.
He's just trying to insert logic into the conversation rather than knee jerk liberal gobblety-goop.
When he gets his ass whipped (as he always does) he gets into cut-and-paste mode. Much like the kid in the back seat during a long car trip..."I'm not touching you".
It's his defense mechanism.
luckily we avoided another situation like that a couple of weeks ago
when a good guy with a gun stopped a bad guy with a gun
from continuing on his spree
Simple:What part of what you quoted says that I believe any registration mandate is enforceable upon any citizen not enrolled in the militia?The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.You have a point rightwinger. The recording of an enrolled militia member's name and recording the type and caliber of the arm (singular) he intended to muster with, is a legitimate exercise of militia regulatory powers (federal and state). It was called the "return of the militia" . . . essentially a detailed census of a militia company's resources to evaluate readiness -- IOW, information used to help determine if that company was actually "well regulated" (properly functioning / in operational order and condition).
Problem is, there is no current legal purpose or justification for government to record any information pertaining to the identity of a private citizen simply because he owns a gun nor any identifiers pertaining to his personal arms (under the auspices of militia regulation).
To build constitutional legitimacy for a gun registry you would need to reenact a militia law (e.g., Militia Act of 1792) that again brings enrolled citizens under the umbrella of federal militia regulations.
Since 1903, Congress has relieved the citizens from any obligation to perform militia duty but it has also extinguished any authority it might claim to have any interest whatsoever in the personal arms of the private citizen (again, under the auspices of militia regulation).
So, no.
He's just trying to insert logic into the conversation rather than knee jerk liberal gobblety-goop.
When he gets his ass whipped (as he always does) he gets into cut-and-paste mode. Much like the kid in the back seat during a long car trip..."I'm not touching you".
It's his defense mechanism.
He's getting his ass kicked by who? You? The one that just posted the picture of the kids murdered by a lunatic?
While I agree somebody is getting their ass handed to them it certainly isn't M14.
luckily we avoided another situation like that a couple of weeks ago
when a good guy with a gun stopped a bad guy with a gun
from continuing on his spree
Good thing he was a "good guy".
You don't get emotional about the murder of 26 kids?
Your arguments rest on emotion, ignorance and/or dishonesty.When he gets his ass whipped...Yet you keep responding.
He's just trying to insert logic into the conversation rather than knee jerk liberal gobblety-goop.
You don't get emotional about the murder of 26 kids?
Sure I do. Of course.
I just don't use the victims of that crime to push my agenda the way you do.
Thank you for helping to prove the premise than anti-gun loons can only argue from emotion, ignorance and/or dishonesty.You don't get emotional about the murder of 26 kids?....
luckily we avoided another situation like that a couple of weeks ago
when a good guy with a gun stopped a bad guy with a gun
from continuing on his spree
Good thing he was a "good guy".
exactly we need more of em in the schools
Good thing he was a "good guy".
exactly we need more of em in the schools
Totally agree if you mean guards. Not teachers.
So, you just had to go ahead and demonstrate in total your inability to argue your case without inserting your emotions?
You blatantly proved his point.
You don't get emotional about the murder of 26 kids? I guess you see it as the cost of doing business and making sure there is a gun in every cradle...err I mean cabinet.
When he gets his ass whipped (as he always does) he gets into cut-and-paste mode. Much like the kid in the back seat during a long car trip..."I'm not touching you".
It's his defense mechanism.
He's getting his ass kicked by who? You? The one that just posted the picture of the kids murdered by a lunatic?
While I agree somebody is getting their ass handed to them it certainly isn't M14.
He's the one disengaged and doing cut and pastes. An easy victory for me, as always.
I>U...I>him.
Like most other anti-gun loons, she wakes every morning with great hopes to hear of another school shooting, so that she can gleefully use the blood of innocents to push her mindless agenda.You don't get emotional about the murder of 26 kids?
Sure I do. Of course.
I just don't use the victims of that crime to push my agenda the way you do.
exactly we need more of em in the schools
Totally agree if you mean guards. Not teachers.
guards might be teachers
Thank you for helping to prove the premise than anti-gun loons can only argue from emotion, ignorance and/or dishonesty.You don't get emotional about the murder of 26 kids?
Sure I do. Of course.
I just don't use the victims of that crime to push my agenda the way you do.
No, you pretend there are no victims...until someone suggests common-sense remedies for gun violence then you play the role yourself.
He's getting his ass kicked by who? You? The one that just posted the picture of the kids murdered by a lunatic?
While I agree somebody is getting their ass handed to them it certainly isn't M14.
He's the one disengaged and doing cut and pastes. An easy victory for me, as always.
I>U...I>him.
Yeah, an illogical and asinine argument always trumps a cut and paste. I do believe you win the USMB award for most retarded post. Ever.
Totally agree if you mean guards. Not teachers.
guards might be teachers
In some cases, yes.
He's just trying to insert logic into the conversation rather than knee jerk liberal gobblety-goop.
When he gets his ass whipped (as he always does) he gets into cut-and-paste mode. Much like the kid in the back seat during a long car trip..."I'm not touching you".
It's his defense mechanism.
I asked you would this law have prevented those murders at newton?
You remain silent.
So, you just had to go ahead and demonstrate in total your inability to argue your case without inserting your emotions?
You blatantly proved his point.
You don't get emotional about the murder of 26 kids? I guess you see it as the cost of doing business and making sure there is a gun in every cradle...err I mean cabinet.
Would this new law have prevented these murders?
