Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are you talking about some change other than the selection of the baseline?
Do you have links to the original publication of these three graphs - where we might see the author's comments?
Never mind. I found the usual crap on WUWT in which the immediate and completely unsupported conclusion was that every change Hansen made was made to exacerbate the appearance of global warming. WUWT's contributor seems to have made absolutely NO attempt to find out why GISS adjusted/altered/corrected their data.
Here is a good discussion from GISS about the changes.
....
and here
A New Estimate of the Average Earth Surface Land Temperature Spanning 1753 to 2011 | Geoinformatics & Geostatistics: An Overview
"Received: September 24, 2012 Accepted: December 02, 2012 Published: December 07, 2012"
is a link to BEST's peer reviewed work
Abe - this is what was said about the journal before one of the BEST papers was published in Volume One, Issue One. OMICS Publishing Launches New Brand with 53 Journal Titles | Scholarly Open Access
I dont know what happened with the peer review when the BEST papers were originally submitted to a recognized journal, all I know is that they didnt get published there.
you dont think it is fishy that only one of the four(?) papers has been published, and even that one in a brand new pay-for-publish journal, but I do. we are three years down the road from when BEST was put in the public eye by press release.
and here
A New Estimate of the Average Earth Surface Land Temperature Spanning 1753 to 2011 | Geoinformatics & Geostatistics: An Overview
"Received: September 24, 2012 Accepted: December 02, 2012 Published: December 07, 2012"
is a link to BEST's peer reviewed work
Abe - this is what was said about the journal before one of the BEST papers was published in Volume One, Issue One. OMICS Publishing Launches New Brand with 53 Journal Titles | Scholarly Open Access
I dont know what happened with the peer review when the BEST papers were originally submitted to a recognized journal, all I know is that they didnt get published there.
you dont think it is fishy that only one of the four(?) papers has been published, and even that one in a brand new pay-for-publish journal, but I do. we are three years down the road from when BEST was put in the public eye by press release.
This review is the work of :
Jeffrey Beall
I work as a librarian at Auraria Library, University of Colorado Denver, in Denver, Colorado.
An academic librarian for over 22 years, I have published extensively in the areas of metadata, full-text searching, and information retrieval.
My interest in scholarly open-access publishing began in 2009 when I reviewed the publisher Bentham Open in The Charleston Advisor, a journal that reviews electronic resources.
********************************************************************
who gives a tip of the ol' lynch-lid to Anthony Watts for tipping him off to the new journal and who seems to disapprove of the work of non-English speakers. Impressive source.
SSDD - I'm sure that the warmers will say that the adjustments to the US temps are neutral. Some went down, some went up. Its just a fluke that it increases the warming trend.
Abe - this is what was said about the journal before one of the BEST papers was published in Volume One, Issue One. OMICS Publishing Launches New Brand with 53 Journal Titles | Scholarly Open Access
I dont know what happened with the peer review when the BEST papers were originally submitted to a recognized journal, all I know is that they didnt get published there.
you dont think it is fishy that only one of the four(?) papers has been published, and even that one in a brand new pay-for-publish journal, but I do. we are three years down the road from when BEST was put in the public eye by press release.
This review is the work of :
Jeffrey Beall
I work as a librarian at Auraria Library, University of Colorado Denver, in Denver, Colorado.
An academic librarian for over 22 years, I have published extensively in the areas of metadata, full-text searching, and information retrieval.
My interest in scholarly open-access publishing began in 2009 when I reviewed the publisher Bentham Open in The Charleston Advisor, a journal that reviews electronic resources.
********************************************************************
who gives a tip of the ol' lynch-lid to Anthony Watts for tipping him off to the new journal and who seems to disapprove of the work of non-English speakers. Impressive source.
just out of curiousity---where was Watts mentioned? the criticism of the group of journals was written in May12, long before the BEST paper was submitted in Sep12, and the skeptic world was scrambling to find out anything about the journal when it accepted the BEST paper in Dec12.
the racist insult was SOP for you guys too. nice touch
This review is the work of :
Jeffrey Beall
I work as a librarian at Auraria Library, University of Colorado Denver, in Denver, Colorado.
An academic librarian for over 22 years, I have published extensively in the areas of metadata, full-text searching, and information retrieval.
My interest in scholarly open-access publishing began in 2009 when I reviewed the publisher Bentham Open in The Charleston Advisor, a journal that reviews electronic resources.
********************************************************************
who gives a tip of the ol' lynch-lid to Anthony Watts for tipping him off to the new journal and who seems to disapprove of the work of non-English speakers. Impressive source.
just out of curiousity---where was Watts mentioned? the criticism of the group of journals was written in May12, long before the BEST paper was submitted in Sep12, and the skeptic world was scrambling to find out anything about the journal when it accepted the BEST paper in Dec12.
the racist insult was SOP for you guys too. nice touch
you may have missed this Abe. where was Watts mentioned as tipping the librarian off?