OMG - family of disabled man shot in Charlotte TOOK VIDEO and only now released it

[RetiredGySgt]

Dude, the entirety of the shooting and the immediate aftermath is on the video and there is nothing at his feet.
The photo has to be sometime after the video. Does it not?

The guy was already on the ground with cops around him when she came around the car and got a clear shot.
The very first thing the cops are going to do is remove the weapon so there is no chance the suspect can gain access to it.
This would be done immediately so she wouldnt have caught it in the video.

That's my point.
Then where did the photo come from?
Also the officer in red is bending over Scott in the photo with the purported gun. He never does that in the video. The photo has to be sometime after the video.

View attachment 90800

Video here
Video Emerges From Scene Of Charlotte Police Shooting Of Keith Scott

We dont know where the pic originated.
And I find it highly unlikely that the cops would take a still from her video and photo shop a gun into it.

A "throw down" gun would be far easier to add to a video.

A video the wife took?
Explain how that happened when there is no gun in her video.

Be specific and point out how you can tell ANYTHING from the video? All I see is rapid movement and maybe a couple cars.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

This is a photo of a supposed gun at Scott's feet. It looks more like one of the gloves the officer dropped.View attachment 90780

And here is a still from the video just after the shooting showing no gun.

How do you know it's not underneath him?

Because the police confirmed that the witness photo shows gun on the ground.

Witness photo shows gun at scene, sources confirm
CHARLOTTE, N.C. -- Police sources confirm to NBC Charlotte that a witness' photo taken moments after the shooting of Keith Lamont Scott shows a gun at his feet.

The cop in red tossed down the glove and that's what you're seeing in this photo and its why it was not in the video.

Very clearly seen on the video.

 

[Pop23]

I watched the video and cant see a damn thing, please be specific and explain how it proves he didn't have a firearm. Just because she is saying he doesn't have one doesn't prove anything. And on the video you can not see anything.

Maybe this will help.

Photo released by police claiming gun on ground.

Still from video right after shooting showing no throw down gun on the ground yet.

You do understand that the two are not photo'd at anywhere near the same time, right?

There's police tape in one, non in the other

If that really is a gun it would support the throw down gun theory.
They wouldnt put up crime tape then return the gun to the original location.

Look at the shadow near the victim's feet. It is shorter in the video that doesn't show the gun. The shadow is longer in the other video. Know what that means? It means significant time had passed before the gun appeared.

OMG, SHERLOCK HOLMES!

Did you also notice the posture of the cops as well!!!!!

 

[Hutch Starskey]

We have people that will troll the public in the worst way, Hutch. It's quite possible that picture is bullshit. Why was his wife telling him"Don't you do that!" ?

I have no idea what the wife was saying.
The photo was held up as evidence that he was armed. I'm simply asking questions as to how that could be.

By who? It doesn't appear in the original video.

THE POLICE!!!!

https://www.google.com/amp/www.nyda...y-article-1.2803052?client=ms-android-verizon

That's my point dope!

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

It's a revolver.

With a grip made for Paul Bunyon.

Use your head.

If you watch the video, you see the guy in red pick it up and toss it aside. MSNBC showed a still of that action - it clearly a glove.

Deal with it.

That makes sense.
Because they wouldnt have left a gun sitting there.

It looks like a gun though.

 

[Meathead]

This is a photo of a supposed gun at Scott's feet. It looks more like one of the gloves the officer dropped.View attachment 90780

Hard to say what that is in the photo.

It is. But that photo is sometime after the video. It just seems odd that the police would place his gun on the ground like that later.

Is that really the supposed gun,or is it something else?
I havent seen the vid yet so I cant really say.

That's the photo of the purported gun.

The police Confirmed that the photo shows the gun.

Witness photo shows gun at scene, sources confirm

CHARLOTTE, N.C. -- Police sources confirm to NBC Charlotte that a witness' photo taken moments after the shooting of Keith Lamont Scott shows a gun at his feet.

Still from video shows no gun!!!

.
Did you notice that the car by the gun was blue and the car on the other was white?

They would have had to reposition the body. A bit much don't you think while that crazy black bitch was screaming at them.

Don't do it Keith, Don't do it!

Sheesh!

 

[ClosedCaption]

Be specific and point out how you can tell ANYTHING from the video?

By using your eyes

 

[Hutch Starskey]

I watched the video and cant see a damn thing, please be specific and explain how it proves he didn't have a firearm. Just because she is saying he doesn't have one doesn't prove anything. And on the video you can not see anything.

Maybe this will help.

Photo released by police claiming gun on ground.

Still from video right after shooting showing no throw down gun on the ground yet.

You do understand that the two are not photo'd at anywhere near the same time, right?

There's police tape in one, non in the other

That's the point!

 

[Pop23]

This is a photo of a supposed gun at Scott's feet. It looks more like one of the gloves the officer dropped.View attachment 90780

And here is a still from the video just after the shooting showing no gun.

How do you know it's not underneath him?

Because the police confirmed that the witness photo shows gun on the ground.

Witness photo shows gun at scene, sources confirm
CHARLOTTE, N.C. -- Police sources confirm to NBC Charlotte that a witness' photo taken moments after the shooting of Keith Lamont Scott shows a gun at his feet.

Moments after AND Police tape already in place????

 

[JQPublic1]

This is a photo of a supposed gun at Scott's feet. It looks more like one of the gloves the officer dropped.View attachment 90780

And here is a still from the video just after the shooting showing no gun.

How do you know it's not underneath him?

Because the police confirmed that the witness photo shows gun on the ground.

Witness photo shows gun at scene, sources confirm
CHARLOTTE, N.C. -- Police sources confirm to NBC Charlotte that a witness' photo taken moments after the shooting of Keith Lamont Scott shows a gun at his feet.

See post #192

 

[edthecynic]

The guy was already on the ground with cops around him when she came around the car and got a clear shot.
The very first thing the cops are going to do is remove the weapon so there is no chance the suspect can gain access to it.
This would be done immediately so she wouldnt have caught it in the video.

Except the police confirmed that the gun on the ground in the photo was the gun they claim he had.

Witness photo shows gun at scene, sources confirm

CHARLOTTE, N.C. -- Police sources confirm to NBC Charlotte that a witness' photo taken moments after the shooting of Keith Lamont Scott shows a gun at his feet.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Sure they did, they had the video all this time and only now released it, sure thing. The family has been lying since this started.

Or they waited to release it to use as leverage on the advice of their counsel.
The police will have no choice but to release their own now.

Since they didn't release it until after the police finally showed them their video that took them days to edit, she didn't tell them she had a video to see whether they would alter their videos thinking they were safe to edit them.

So now you claim the government shoots innocents and fabricates evidence against innocents while at the same time you say the government needs to be bigger and more powerful.

You're stuck on stupid.

So when the police release a photo showing the purported gun and it's nowhere to be seen in the new video, where did it come from?

https://www.google.com/amp/www.nyda...y-article-1.2803052?client=ms-android-verizon

 

[Pop23]

I watched the video and cant see a damn thing, please be specific and explain how it proves he didn't have a firearm. Just because she is saying he doesn't have one doesn't prove anything. And on the video you can not see anything.

Maybe this will help.

Photo released by police claiming gun on ground.

Still from video right after shooting showing no throw down gun on the ground yet.

You do understand that the two are not photo'd at anywhere near the same time, right?

There's police tape in one, non in the other

That's the point!

Which is, that there is no way, other then a plant, for a gun, or another object to be in that position much later?

1. It was lifted from the subject and placed away from him?

2. It's a glove.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Why would the officers be yelling "drop the gun" repeatedly if he didnt have a gun?
And the women was telling her husband "dont do it" so what exactly was she referring to?

No she is telling the POLICE, don't do it, don't shoot him.

Don't you do it was to her husband. Police just wanted to arrest him.

Nope.

They were looking for someone else and chose to shoot an innocent man instead.

And yes, they did make that choice.

They could have tasered him and checked his ID but they didn't.

They could have shot him once. l

They could have talked to his wife.

They made no effort to identify him or DE-escalate. They just opened fire.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Go to 1.21 through 1.24 on the video. There is clearly something lying on the ground.
Whether it's a gun or not is anyone guess.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/24/us/charlotte-keith-scott-shooting-video.html

 

[Pop23]

Sure they did, they had the video all this time and only now released it, sure thing. The family has been lying since this started.

Or they waited to release it to use as leverage on the advice of their counsel.
The police will have no choice but to release their own now.

Since they didn't release it until after the police finally showed them their video that took them days to edit, she didn't tell them she had a video to see whether they would alter their videos thinking they were safe to edit them.

So now you claim the government shoots innocents and fabricates evidence against innocents while at the same time you say the government needs to be bigger and more powerful.

You're stuck on stupid.

So when the police release a photo showing the purported gun and it's nowhere to be seen in the new video, where did it come from?

https://www.google.com/amp/www.nyda...y-article-1.2803052?client=ms-android-verizon

1. Under him

2. Beside him

3. Above his head

4. Under his jacket

5. Removed from under the car.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

I watched the video and cant see a damn thing, please be specific and explain how it proves he didn't have a firearm. Just because she is saying he doesn't have one doesn't prove anything. And on the video you can not see anything.

Maybe this will help.

Photo released by police claiming gun on ground.

Still from video right after shooting showing no throw down gun on the ground yet.

You do understand that the two are not photo'd at anywhere near the same time, right?

There's police tape in one, non in the other

If that really is a gun it would support the throw down gun theory.
They wouldnt put up crime tape then return the gun to the original location.

DING...DING....DING. WE HAVE A WINNAH.

It only took you half the thread to get it.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

I watched the video and cant see a damn thing, please be specific and explain how it proves he didn't have a firearm. Just because she is saying he doesn't have one doesn't prove anything. And on the video you can not see anything.

Maybe this will help.

Photo released by police claiming gun on ground.

Still from video right after shooting showing no throw down gun on the ground yet.

You do understand that the two are not photo'd at anywhere near the same time, right?

There's police tape in one, non in the other

If that really is a gun it would support the throw down gun theory.
They wouldnt put up crime tape then return the gun to the original location.

Look at the shadow near the victim's feet. It is shorter in the video that doesn't show the gun. The shadow is longer in the other video. Know what that means? It means significant time had passed before the gun appeared.

OMG, SHERLOCK HOLMES!

Did you also notice the posture of the cops as well!!!!!

Make fun if you want but its true. Its also what intelligent people do - compare other things in the photo.

Its not a gun. Its a glove.

Deal with it.

 

[Meathead]

I have seldom seen stupider people, but then admittedly, I've spent precious little time among blacks except for a 3-year spell in DC.

 

[Pop23]

Maybe this will help.

Photo released by police claiming gun on ground.

Still from video right after shooting showing no throw down gun on the ground yet.

You do understand that the two are not photo'd at anywhere near the same time, right?

There's police tape in one, non in the other

If that really is a gun it would support the throw down gun theory.
They wouldnt put up crime tape then return the gun to the original location.

Look at the shadow near the victim's feet. It is shorter in the video that doesn't show the gun. The shadow is longer in the other video. Know what that means? It means significant time had passed before the gun appeared.

OMG, SHERLOCK HOLMES!

Did you also notice the posture of the cops as well!!!!!

Make fun if you want but its true. Its also what intelligent people do - compare other things in the photo.

Its not a gun. Its a glove.

Deal with it.

We know that because you were obviously there?