- Feb 22, 2017
- 109,032
- 37,882
Except he was shot by the police and not a school staff member
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Of course he was school staff. He was the armed resource officer who was based there. When you say shot by the "police," you're giving a misleading implication that calling and waiting for the cops was a better solution ... even though the first three who arrived help that armed resource officer direct traffic ...
I'm still looking for one of these not leftist Democrat serving posts you claim to write
The school resource office is a member of the police force and is trained in weapons handling.
He is not a paid school staff member.
Also the NASRO is opposed to arming teachers, but I guess in your Repub mind they are Dems also.
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Try reading the message again, government educated failure. You didn't contradict my point. He worked for and was paid for by the school and was on site. I didn't say he's not a cop, I said the way you phrased it was misleading in a convenient way for your endless Democrat cause.
I'm for onsite security. I just am against disarming trained CC holders as Democrats want to do. You have blood all over your hands. This shows that guns at schools are what saves lives. We need more of them in the right hands.
The irony is that would dramatically reduce the need to use them
He is not paid by the school, you idiot.
He does not work for the school, he works for the local PD and is assigned to work at the school.
I am for on site security as well, the difference between us is I do not celebrate two kids being shot at a school like you do.
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
We know. You only celebrate when 10 or more are killed.