"Once again, the gay community feels the need to be sore winners," wrote Christopher Ciccone, who hi

There is no right to marry.
The Supreme Court disagrees...
Bripat believes the Supreme Court helps to enforce obamas fascist dictatorship.

They obviously do. The Four leftwing stooges on the court will uphold the Democrat position no matter what the facts are. The legal system of the entire country is subject to the whim of one man, Anthony Kennedy, who thinks he's qualified to define "love."
Love was never up for a vote, just the civil right to marry, and what would you know about love my little infant, you only have it for yourself...

If it wasn't up for a vote, then why did Kennedy feel the need to mention it?
Probably because it strengthened his argument that since most of the country had already decided it was acceptable there was no reason to wait around for the cave-dwellers such as you and Mary to catch up with the decent folks...
 
Good Lord, some of you people are so pathetically brainwashed. Gays are such a minority, fact there isn't any rational reason to allow gay marriage, let alone the American supreme court gives credence to it, it just....boggles my mind. Next election, I won't bother. It seems the inmates are running the asylum .
Correction: there are no rational reasons to oppose gay marriage, only religious moralistic ones.

You have it precisely backwards.
Name one rational objection to gay marriage. I Can't wait to shred your bigoted paranoid ass. Literally. Bend over, I've got kyjelly.
You are bigoted FOR them, so, what is your point? Put that KYjelly on your bread and eat it, creep.
 
The Supreme Court disagrees...
Bripat believes the Supreme Court helps to enforce obamas fascist dictatorship.

They obviously do. The Four leftwing stooges on the court will uphold the Democrat position no matter what the facts are. The legal system of the entire country is subject to the whim of one man, Anthony Kennedy, who thinks he's qualified to define "love."
LOOOOOOOOL. The Supreme Court changes, I'm sure you wouldn't care what the Supreme Court did under a republican president, you see, welcome to reality you fucking idiot. This is not a fascist Dictatorship, how paranoid can you be?

Yes, that is the essence of fascism - rule by fiat.
No, fascism is dictated by ultra nationalism, obsession with the military, hatred of left wing thought, corporatism..

That's all leftwing horseshit. If fascism is an economic system, then it's leftwing. "hatred of leftwing thought" isn't how you define an economic system. The definitions of fascism leftwing turds like you and PMH use are just a collection of properties that don't uniquely identify the phenomenon. Various combinations of them could be applied to many of the governments in the world, that you would be the last to call "fascist," like the Soviet Union.
 
Good Lord, some of you people are so pathetically brainwashed. Gays are such a minority, fact there isn't any rational reason to allow gay marriage, let alone the American supreme court gives credence to it, it just....boggles my mind. Next election, I won't bother. It seems the inmates are running the asylum .
Correction: there are no rational reasons to oppose gay marriage, only religious moralistic ones.

You have it precisely backwards.
Name one rational objection to gay marriage. I Can't wait to shred your bigoted paranoid ass. Literally. Bend over, I've got kyjelly.
You are bigoted FOR them, so, what is your point? Put that KYjelly on your bread and eat it, creep.
IM Bigoted towards bigots, guess that makes me a bigot against bigots?
 
Bripat believes the Supreme Court helps to enforce obamas fascist dictatorship.

They obviously do. The Four leftwing stooges on the court will uphold the Democrat position no matter what the facts are. The legal system of the entire country is subject to the whim of one man, Anthony Kennedy, who thinks he's qualified to define "love."
LOOOOOOOOL. The Supreme Court changes, I'm sure you wouldn't care what the Supreme Court did under a republican president, you see, welcome to reality you fucking idiot. This is not a fascist Dictatorship, how paranoid can you be?

Yes, that is the essence of fascism - rule by fiat.
No, fascism is dictated by ultra nationalism, obsession with the military, hatred of left wing thought, corporatism..

That's all leftwing horseshit. If fascism is an economic system, then it's leftwing. "hatred of leftwing thought" isn't how you define an economic system. The definitions of fascism leftwing turds like you and PMH use are just a collection of properties that don't uniquely identify the phenomenon. Various combinations of them could be applied to many of the governments in the world, that you would be the last to call "fascist," like the Soviet Union.
It's not an economic system, it's a political idea, a mix of things, but the reality is, it's dictated by the above, and all self proclaimed fascists hate everything that's remotely left wing, ever talked to a neo nazi?
 
The Supreme Court disagrees...
Bripat believes the Supreme Court helps to enforce obamas fascist dictatorship.

They obviously do. The Four leftwing stooges on the court will uphold the Democrat position no matter what the facts are. The legal system of the entire country is subject to the whim of one man, Anthony Kennedy, who thinks he's qualified to define "love."
Love was never up for a vote, just the civil right to marry, and what would you know about love my little infant, you only have it for yourself...

If it wasn't up for a vote, then why did Kennedy feel the need to mention it?
Probably because it strengthened his argument that since most of the country had already decided it was acceptable there was no reason to wait around for the cave-dwellers such as you and Mary to catch up with the decent folks...

That isn't his job, moron. He supposed to make decisions based on their popularity.
 
Bripat believes the Supreme Court helps to enforce obamas fascist dictatorship.

They obviously do. The Four leftwing stooges on the court will uphold the Democrat position no matter what the facts are. The legal system of the entire country is subject to the whim of one man, Anthony Kennedy, who thinks he's qualified to define "love."
LOOOOOOOOL. The Supreme Court changes, I'm sure you wouldn't care what the Supreme Court did under a republican president, you see, welcome to reality you fucking idiot. This is not a fascist Dictatorship, how paranoid can you be?

Yes, that is the essence of fascism - rule by fiat.
No, fascism is dictated by ultra nationalism, obsession with the military, hatred of left wing thought, corporatism..

That's all leftwing horseshit. If fascism is an economic system, then it's leftwing. "hatred of leftwing thought" isn't how you define an economic system. The definitions of fascism leftwing turds like you and PMH use are just a collection of properties that don't uniquely identify the phenomenon. Various combinations of them could be applied to many of the governments in the world, that you would be the last to call "fascist," like the Soviet Union.
Communism is left-wing, Fascism is right-wing. It's not hard to work out, if you study up, which you never have.
 
They obviously do. The Four leftwing stooges on the court will uphold the Democrat position no matter what the facts are. The legal system of the entire country is subject to the whim of one man, Anthony Kennedy, who thinks he's qualified to define "love."
LOOOOOOOOL. The Supreme Court changes, I'm sure you wouldn't care what the Supreme Court did under a republican president, you see, welcome to reality you fucking idiot. This is not a fascist Dictatorship, how paranoid can you be?

Yes, that is the essence of fascism - rule by fiat.
No, fascism is dictated by ultra nationalism, obsession with the military, hatred of left wing thought, corporatism..

That's all leftwing horseshit. If fascism is an economic system, then it's leftwing. "hatred of leftwing thought" isn't how you define an economic system. The definitions of fascism leftwing turds like you and PMH use are just a collection of properties that don't uniquely identify the phenomenon. Various combinations of them could be applied to many of the governments in the world, that you would be the last to call "fascist," like the Soviet Union.
It's not an economic system, it's a political idea, a mix of things, but the reality is, it's dictated by the above, and all self proclaimed fascists hate everything that's remotely left wing, ever talked to a neo nazi?

If it's not an economic system, then were do you get off calling it "right-wing?" "right and left" refer to attitudes about economic systems: either pro-socialist or anti-socialist. There is nothing inherently "right-wing" about nationalism or militarism except in the minds of socialists who don't have any evidence to support their case.

Are you having trouble following this?
 
They obviously do. The Four leftwing stooges on the court will uphold the Democrat position no matter what the facts are. The legal system of the entire country is subject to the whim of one man, Anthony Kennedy, who thinks he's qualified to define "love."
LOOOOOOOOL. The Supreme Court changes, I'm sure you wouldn't care what the Supreme Court did under a republican president, you see, welcome to reality you fucking idiot. This is not a fascist Dictatorship, how paranoid can you be?

Yes, that is the essence of fascism - rule by fiat.
No, fascism is dictated by ultra nationalism, obsession with the military, hatred of left wing thought, corporatism..

That's all leftwing horseshit. If fascism is an economic system, then it's leftwing. "hatred of leftwing thought" isn't how you define an economic system. The definitions of fascism leftwing turds like you and PMH use are just a collection of properties that don't uniquely identify the phenomenon. Various combinations of them could be applied to many of the governments in the world, that you would be the last to call "fascist," like the Soviet Union.
Communism is left-wing, Fascism is right-wing. It's not hard to work out, if you study up, which you never have.

That's about the extent of your argument: none, in other words. Stamping your foot and insisting you're view is correct is really all people like you have ever done in these debates.
 
Bripat believes the Supreme Court helps to enforce obamas fascist dictatorship.

They obviously do. The Four leftwing stooges on the court will uphold the Democrat position no matter what the facts are. The legal system of the entire country is subject to the whim of one man, Anthony Kennedy, who thinks he's qualified to define "love."
Love was never up for a vote, just the civil right to marry, and what would you know about love my little infant, you only have it for yourself...

If it wasn't up for a vote, then why did Kennedy feel the need to mention it?
Probably because it strengthened his argument that since most of the country had already decided it was acceptable there was no reason to wait around for the cave-dwellers such as you and Mary to catch up with the decent folks...

That isn't his job, moron. He supposed to make decisions based on their popularity.
Polling Tracks Growing and Increasingly Diverse Support for the Freedom to Marry | Freedom to Marry
 
Bripat believes the Supreme Court helps to enforce obamas fascist dictatorship.

They obviously do. The Four leftwing stooges on the court will uphold the Democrat position no matter what the facts are. The legal system of the entire country is subject to the whim of one man, Anthony Kennedy, who thinks he's qualified to define "love."
Love was never up for a vote, just the civil right to marry, and what would you know about love my little infant, you only have it for yourself...

If it wasn't up for a vote, then why did Kennedy feel the need to mention it?
Probably because it strengthened his argument that since most of the country had already decided it was acceptable there was no reason to wait around for the cave-dwellers such as you and Mary to catch up with the decent folks...

That isn't his job, moron. He supposed to make decisions based on their popularity.
He didn't make the decision based on that, he referenced the larger picture that included society. His decision was based on Equality before the Law, which is why you lost. The fags are equal to you, believe it or not...
 
LOOOOOOOOL. The Supreme Court changes, I'm sure you wouldn't care what the Supreme Court did under a republican president, you see, welcome to reality you fucking idiot. This is not a fascist Dictatorship, how paranoid can you be?

Yes, that is the essence of fascism - rule by fiat.
No, fascism is dictated by ultra nationalism, obsession with the military, hatred of left wing thought, corporatism..

That's all leftwing horseshit. If fascism is an economic system, then it's leftwing. "hatred of leftwing thought" isn't how you define an economic system. The definitions of fascism leftwing turds like you and PMH use are just a collection of properties that don't uniquely identify the phenomenon. Various combinations of them could be applied to many of the governments in the world, that you would be the last to call "fascist," like the Soviet Union.
It's not an economic system, it's a political idea, a mix of things, but the reality is, it's dictated by the above, and all self proclaimed fascists hate everything that's remotely left wing, ever talked to a neo nazi?

If it's not an economic system, then were do you get off calling it "right-wing?" "right and left" refer to attitudes about economic systems: either pro-socialist or anti-socialist. There is nothing inherently "right-wing" about nationalism or militarism except in the minds of socialists who don't have any evidence to support their case.

Are you having trouble following this?
Right wing: "the conservative or reactionary section of a political party or system."
Left wing: "the liberal, socialist, or radical section of a political party or system."
These ideas involve more then just economic systems.
 
They obviously do. The Four leftwing stooges on the court will uphold the Democrat position no matter what the facts are. The legal system of the entire country is subject to the whim of one man, Anthony Kennedy, who thinks he's qualified to define "love."
Love was never up for a vote, just the civil right to marry, and what would you know about love my little infant, you only have it for yourself...

If it wasn't up for a vote, then why did Kennedy feel the need to mention it?
Probably because it strengthened his argument that since most of the country had already decided it was acceptable there was no reason to wait around for the cave-dwellers such as you and Mary to catch up with the decent folks...

That isn't his job, moron. He supposed to make decisions based on their popularity.
He didn't make the decision based on that, he referenced the larger picture that included society. His decision was based on Equality before the Law, which is why you lost. The fags are equal to you, believe it or not...

He's supposed to rule based on the Constitution, nimrod. You're just admitting that his ruling was made incorrectly.
 
Most responses to my post are by pro gay politicos. Scary, because it means most of you responding are incapable of independent critical thought are just mindlessly defending something because they are brainwashed pawns. It's sad. Don't defend gays or kid yourself. You are just a patsy.
 
Most responses to my post are by pro gay politicos. Scary, because it means most of you responding are incapable of independent critical thought are just mindlessly defending something because they are brainwashed pawns. It's sad. Don't defend gays or kid yourself. You are just a patsy.
What is wrong with gay people? Nothing, except your bigotry.
 
Love was never up for a vote, just the civil right to marry, and what would you know about love my little infant, you only have it for yourself...

If it wasn't up for a vote, then why did Kennedy feel the need to mention it?
Probably because it strengthened his argument that since most of the country had already decided it was acceptable there was no reason to wait around for the cave-dwellers such as you and Mary to catch up with the decent folks...

That isn't his job, moron. He supposed to make decisions based on their popularity.
He didn't make the decision based on that, he referenced the larger picture that included society. His decision was based on Equality before the Law, which is why you lost. The fags are equal to you, believe it or not...

He's supposed to rule based on the Constitution, nimrod. You're just admitting that his ruling was made incorrectly.
Nope. He ruled using the Constitution. You just don't like it because it overruled your mob rule and homophobia.
 
Most responses to my post are by pro gay politicos. Scary, because it means most of you responding are incapable of independent critical thought are just mindlessly defending something because they are brainwashed pawns. It's sad. Don't defend gays or kid yourself. You are just a patsy.
What is wrong with gay people? Nothing, except your bigotry.

Nothing, until they start trying to get government benefits just because they are shacking up with a fuck buddy.
 
If it wasn't up for a vote, then why did Kennedy feel the need to mention it?
Probably because it strengthened his argument that since most of the country had already decided it was acceptable there was no reason to wait around for the cave-dwellers such as you and Mary to catch up with the decent folks...

That isn't his job, moron. He supposed to make decisions based on their popularity.
He didn't make the decision based on that, he referenced the larger picture that included society. His decision was based on Equality before the Law, which is why you lost. The fags are equal to you, believe it or not...

He's supposed to rule based on the Constitution, nimrod. You're just admitting that his ruling was made incorrectly.
Nope. He ruled using the Constitution. You just don't like it because it overruled your mob rule and homophobia.

He didn't even mention the Constitution, so your claim is absurd on its face.
 
Most responses to my post are by pro gay politicos. Scary, because it means most of you responding are incapable of independent critical thought are just mindlessly defending something because they are brainwashed pawns. It's sad. Don't defend gays or kid yourself. You are just a patsy.
Since you have been unable to provide a rational basis for keeping the gays from getting married it is you that are the drone. Your dogma and fear of the faggots didn't fly in court either.
 
Most responses to my post are by pro gay politicos. Scary, because it means most of you responding are incapable of independent critical thought are just mindlessly defending something because they are brainwashed pawns. It's sad. Don't defend gays or kid yourself. You are just a patsy.
What is wrong with gay people? Nothing, except your bigotry.

Nothing, until they start trying to get government benefits just because they are shacking up with a fuck buddy.
What government benefits? Marriage? Straight people get in, why shouldn't they? Any valid reason? Look up bigoted fuck.
 

Forum List

Back
Top