🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Overwhelming majority of studies find that gun control policies don't work

MindWars

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2016
42,227
10,772
Overwhelming Majority Of Studies Find That Gun Control Policies Don’t Work
An analysis of thousands of gun control studies claims that just 63 of those studies found connections between more stringent gun control laws violent crime and suicide reductions.
--------------------------------------------------

The only way gun grabbing sheep will believe any gun information is if their Lord and Savior Obama said it. Often stupid can't be fixed. They believe what they want to because that DUNCE GENE is stronger than logic, common sense, factual data etc.
 
Overwhelming Majority Of Studies Find That Gun Control Policies Don’t Work
An analysis of thousands of gun control studies claims that just 63 of those studies found connections between more stringent gun control laws violent crime and suicide reductions.
--------------------------------------------------

The only way gun grabbing sheep will believe any gun information is if their Lord and Savior Obama said it. Often stupid can't be fixed. They believe what they want to because that DUNCE GENE is stronger than logic, common sense, factual data etc.
What were the 63?
 
Let the CDC have a shot at it. Conservatives are so scared of the result they’ve been blocking then for over 20 years.
 
upload_2018-3-3_8-57-42.png
 
Not true. Gun control worked for Hitler and Stalin. That's what the libs want to happen here.
 
Not true. Gun control worked for Hitler and Stalin. That's what the libs want to happen here.
Hitler gave away millions of guns and the lucky ones got tanks and flamethrowers. Dismissed! Those stupid emails you`ve been getting for the last 30 years are just that .Stupid...and dishonest.
 
Let the CDC have a shot at it. Conservatives are so scared of the result they’ve been blocking then for over 20 years.


No..they haven't blocked anything...that is a lie...

This is some gun research from the CEC in 2006....

Violence-Related Firearm Deaths Among Residents of Metropolitan Areas and Cities --- United States, 2006--2007

And this one....

Source of Firearms Used by Students in School-Associated Violent Deaths --- United States, 1992--1999

And this one....

http://www.thecommunityguide.org/violence/viol-AJPM-evrev-firearms-law.pdf

And this one....

Surveillance for Fatal and Nonfatal Firearm-Related Injuries --- United States, 1993--1998

And this one....

Firearm Homicides and Suicides in Major Metropolitan Areas — United States, 2006–2007 and 2009–2010

And this one...

Indoor Firing Ranges and Elevated Blood Lead Levels — United States, 2002–2013

And this one....

Rates of Homicide, Suicide, and Firearm-Related Death Among Children -- 26 Industrialized Countries


==================

The Deleware study of 2015...

When Gun Violence Felt Like a Disease, a City in Delaware Turned to the C.D.C.

When epidemiologists from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention came to this city, they were not here to track an outbreak of meningitis or study the effectiveness of a particular vaccine.



They were here to examine gun violence.

This city of about 70,000 had a 45 percent jump in shootings from 2011 to 2013, and the violence has remained stubbornly high; 25 shooting deaths have been reported this year, slightly more than last year, according to the mayor’s office
.-------



The final report, which has been submitted to the state, reached a conclusion that many here said they already knew: that there are certain patterns in the lives of many who commit gun violence.

“The majority of individuals involved in urban firearm violence are young men with substantial violence involvement preceding the more serious offense of a firearm crime,” the report said. “Our findings suggest that integrating data systems could help these individuals better receive the early, comprehensive help that they need to prevent violence involvement.”

Researchers analyzed data on 569 people charged with firearm crimes from 2009 to May 21, 2014, and looked for certain risk factors in their lives, such as whether they had been unemployed, had received help from assistance programs, had been possible victims of child abuse, or had been shot or stabbed. The idea was to show that linking such data could create a better understanding of who might need help before becoming involved in violence.



------------------
Why Congress stopped gun control activism at the CDC

I was one of three medical doctors who testified before the House’s Labor, Health, Human Services, and Education Appropriations Subcommittee on March 6, 1996 about the CDC’s misdeeds. (Note: This testimony and related events are described in my three-part documented historical series). Here is what we showed the committee:

  • Dr. Arthur Kellermann’s1993 New England Journal of Medicine article that launched his career as a rock star gun control advocate and gave rise to the much-repeated “three times” fallacy. His research was supported by two CDC grants.
Kellermann and his colleagues used the case control method, traditionally an epidemiology research tool, to claim that having a gun in the home triples the risk of becoming a homicide victim. In the article Kellermann admitted that “a majority of the homicides (50.9 percent) occurred in the context of a quarrel or a romantic triangle.” Still another 30 percent “were related to drug dealing” or “occurred during the commission of another felony, such as a robbery, rape, or burglary.”

In summary, the CDC funded a flawed study of crime-prone inner city residents who had been murdered in their homes. The authors then tried to equate this wildly unrepresentative group with typical American gun owners. The committee members were not amused.

  • The Winter 1993 CDC official publication, Public Health Policy for Preventing Violence, coauthored by CDC official Dr. Mark Rosenberg. This taxpayer-funded gun control polemic offered two strategies for preventing firearm injuries—“restrictive licensing (for example, only police, military, guards, and so on)” and “prohibit gun ownership.”
  • The brazen public comments of top CDC officials, made at a time when gun prohibitionists were much more candid about their political goals.
We’re going to systematically build a case that owning firearms causes deaths. We’re doing the most we can do, given the political realities.” (P.W. O’Carroll, Acting Section Head of Division of Injury Control, CDC, quoted in Marsha F. Goldsmith, “Epidemiologists Aim at New Target: Health Risk of Handgun Proliferation,” Journal of the American Medical Association vol. 261 no. 5, February 3, 1989, pp. 675-76.) Dr. O’Carroll later said he had been misquoted.

But his successor Dr. Mark Rosenberg was quoted in the Washington Post as wanting his agency to create a public perception of firearms as “dirty, deadly—and banned.” (William Raspberry, “Sick People With Guns,” Washington Post, October 19, 1994.


  • CDC Grant #R49/CCR903697-06 to the Trauma Foundation, a San Francisco gun control advocacy group, supporting a newsletter that frankly advocated gun control.
 
Not true. Gun control worked for Hitler and Stalin. That's what the libs want to happen here.
Hitler gave away millions of guns and the lucky ones got tanks and flamethrowers. Dismissed! Those stupid emails you`ve been getting for the last 30 years are just that .Stupid...and dishonest.

Yeah, it worked great for six million jews huh. What a moron.
 
Even sewer rats won't associate with InfoWars. Sewer rats have standards,
 
It is amazing how all these gun proponents talk about how the Nazis took guns away. The truth is Nazis lessened gun control laws. After WWI the allies imposed restrictions on armaments and guns that Germany may have, including its citizens. When Hitler came to power he ignored those restrictions imposed by his predecessor and permitted more Germans to own more private arms.
 

Forum List

Back
Top