Pakistani Ambassador to USA accused of blasphemy

Well, sure, first of all, she's a woman.

But what is she accused of having done/said/written/thought?
 
Well, sure, first of all, she's a woman.

But what is she accused of having done/said/written/thought?

First of all, she's a woman and that takes away any rights.

Second, it doesn't matter who made the accusation, it will go to an Imam and not a judge. He will find her guilty and order her beheading.

The question is - what will King Barry Hussein do about it?
 
There is always a loophole, if a person hears the evidence they may get charged with blasphemy....:eusa_silenced:

"The charge is difficult to defend since blasphemy is not defined and courts often hesitate to hear evidence, fearful that reproducing it will also be blasphemy.Recent cases have included a teacher who made a mistake setting homework, a man who threw away a business card belonging to a man name Mohammed, and a Pakistani Christian girl, Rimsha Masih, who was accused of burning pages of Muslim holy texts last year"

Next thing we will read is that someone will be charged for burning the toast.



Can%20I%20have%20Mo%20toast.JPG
 
"The charge is difficult to defend since blasphemy is not defined and courts often hesitate to hear evidence, fearful that reproducing it will also be blasphemy."

Thus showing once again, as if we needed it, that sharia 'law' is antithetical to American and common law precepts.
 
"The charge is difficult to defend since blasphemy is not defined and courts often hesitate to hear evidence, fearful that reproducing it will also be blasphemy."

Thus showing once again, as if we needed it, that sharia 'law' is antithetical to American and common law precepts.

(My bold)

Yah, well, except that the Meese Commission (?) on Pornography back when made pretty much the same argument, except that is was porn instead of blasphemy that was under discussion. Proving, I suppose, that "Grated minds think alike ..."
 
"The charge is difficult to defend since blasphemy is not defined and courts often hesitate to hear evidence, fearful that reproducing it will also be blasphemy."

Thus showing once again, as if we needed it, that sharia 'law' is antithetical to American and common law precepts.

(My bold)

Yah, well, except that the Meese Commission (?) on Pornography back when made pretty much the same argument, except that is was porn instead of blasphemy that was under discussion. Proving, I suppose, that "Grated minds think alike ..."


Curious, did the execute people for pornography and threaten with death people who suggesting amending pornography laws?
 
Islam is a cancer on the human race and needs to be dealt with as such.

Perhaps refuse her asylum and fly her back to Pakistan...enroute, the aircraft should have mechanical problems and divert to somewhere in western India...but should be tragically lost over open water. A few days later, appropriate wreckage should wash up on the coast...no bodies should be recovered.

The plane should actually be diverted to Diego Garcia, and the ambassador given asylum and a new identity. The wreckage should simply be planted by a submarine.
 
The ambassador should definitely be given asylum, even if this pisses off the Pakistanis even more. Might be a nice way of giving the middle finger to the ISI for helping the Taliban.
 
Islam is a cancer on the human race and needs to be dealt with as such.

Perhaps refuse her asylum and fly her back to Pakistan...enroute, the aircraft should have mechanical problems and divert to somewhere in western India...but should be tragically lost over open water. A few days later, appropriate wreckage should wash up on the coast...no bodies should be recovered.

The plane should actually be diverted to Diego Garcia, and the ambassador given asylum and a new identity. The wreckage should simply be planted by a submarine.

They could always send in the guys who pretended to kill Osama bin Laden, they have experience in acting. :D
 
Well, sure, first of all, she's a woman.

But what is she accused of having done/said/written/thought?

First of all, she's a woman and that takes away any rights.

Second, it doesn't matter who made the accusation, it will go to an Imam and not a judge. He will find her guilty and order her beheading.

The question is - what will King Barry Hussein do about it?

Do about it? She's not our ambassador. I'm sure she'd get asylum, if that's what she wants.
 
Pakistani man accuses ambassador to U.S. of blasphemy | Reuters


Which means she could face the death penalty if she isn't murdered.

Clearly they want to get rid of her and this is a charge against which she will be unable to defend herself.

I guess she could seek asylum, but that would strain relations with the failed state of Pakistan.

She'll likely be declared personae non grata and replaced.


The more interesting question is WHY Pakistan wants her gone?

We will likely never know the answer to that question but I have very little doubt somebody in the STATE DEPARTMENT knows exactly why she was singled out for removal from this office.

This is a calculated insult to the USA.

It is likely a message sent by action rather than by words.
 

Forum List

Back
Top