Palestine Today

[P F Tinmore]

Palestine, Israel, and the Assault on Academic Freedom: Legal Panel discussion

 

[P F Tinmore]

Palestinian Christians under Israeli occupation speak out

 

[P F Tinmore]

Why are Palestinians Leaving?

 

[rylah]

Interesting article...shows how complicated the issue of property rights is in the former Ottoman region, but also the general disregard by groups such as this for the Palestinian families affected.

The judge noted:

Barak-Erez closed her ruling by noting the hardship residents would suffer by being evicted from homes where they had lived for decades and which some had even purchased. She therefore urged the state to compensate anyone evicted.

Though the evictions, assuming the trust indeed owns the land, are legal, she wrote, “Evicting people who have lived on this land for decades – some of them without even knowing that the land belongs to others – creates a human problem. Especially when it’s done without compensation or any other solution. It seems the state would do better to consider providing a solution, in appropriate cases, for those evicted from their homes. Property rights are important, but it’s also important to defend people’s homes.”

​

Ateret Cohanim is itself an interesting group intent on creating a
Jewish majority in East Jerusalem by purchasing property with help from district authorities, evicting the tenants and moving Jewish families in. Sometimes with questionable legality. So the question is...why one or the other? Why not both Jews and Palestinians?

Court allows eviction of 700 Palestinians from East Jerusalem neighborhood

The horror of moving Jewish families into property they own in Judea.
And the sky doesn't fall. And the millions getting paid.
And the Arab estate agents specifically appointed by their people for such cases.

Exactly, why not both Arabs and Jews? Arabs are 20% in Israel, why building Jewish communities among Arab ones is a bad thing, beyond the pretentious spectacles of being forced into the top 20% of the worlds richest people?

The horror of moving Jewish families into property they own in Judea.

And the evicted Palestinians lost their homes in 1948. It would be the right thing for them to get their homes back too.

I'm not sure, would it be right for the soldiers of the Caliphate get their property in Spain?
How about King's palace in Madrid?

Show us by example.

 

[rylah]

Palestine, Israel, and the Assault on Academic Freedom: Legal Panel discussion

Actually the fact that the leading BDS holes have both used charity to fund Hamas and activists openly declared to be members was documented in a congressional hearing which led to a known conviction in the US.

The part which their useful idiots never mention is that
BDS itself is a boycott of academic freedom.

 

[rylah]

Why are Palestinians Leaving?

I wonder which country gives it's Christian Arab citizens most of religious freedom and quality of life in the middle east?

 

[P F Tinmore]

Bethlehem - The Living Stones

 

[P F Tinmore]

Palestine, Israel, and the Assault on Academic Freedom: Legal Panel discussion

Actually the fact that the leading BDS holes have both used charity to fund Hamas and activists openly declared to be members was documented in a congressional hearing which led to a known conviction in the US.

The part which their useful idiots never mention is that
BDS itself is a boycott of academic freedom.

Load of hooey.

 

[rylah]

Palestinian Christians under Israeli occupation speak out

Really nothing to do with Sharia and Jihad against non-believers?
Looks like the N. Korean zombie propaganda.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Palestinian official: Nikki Haley is not world's 'schoolmarm'

 

[rylah]

Palestine, Israel, and the Assault on Academic Freedom: Legal Panel discussion

Actually the fact that the leading BDS holes have both used charity to fund Hamas and activists openly declared to be members was documented in a congressional hearing which led to a known conviction in the US.

The part which their useful idiots never mention is that
BDS itself is a boycott of academic freedom.

Load of hooey.

Was enough to convict a couple of Your favorite Jihadis in the US.
My condolences.

 

[P F Tinmore]

City Club of Cleveland.

 

[Hollie]

City Club of Islamic Terrorists

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

The plan is to make the Palestinian's lives so miserable that they will "voluntarily" leave.

(COMMENT)

Oh come now. This is pure "propaganda." It is an exaggeration of the highest order.

Every intelligent Israeli knows that while there are anecdotal examples of Arab Palestinians breaking the bonds that hold them in the West Bank, the Gaza Strip, or one of the other Palestinian population centers scattered around the region, no one really believes that any of the Arab League neighbors is going to allow the accumulated hundreds of thousands, the UNRWA has collected over the last half-century, to just get up and move "(they will "voluntarily" leave)" to one of their neighboring Arab nations. Not only would that be compounding the problem, spreading new encampments of trouble that no one really wants.

Most Respectfully.
R

 

[Coyote]

Interesting article...shows how complicated the issue of property rights is in the former Ottoman region, but also the general disregard by groups such as this for the Palestinian families affected.

The judge noted:

Barak-Erez closed her ruling by noting the hardship residents would suffer by being evicted from homes where they had lived for decades and which some had even purchased. She therefore urged the state to compensate anyone evicted.

Though the evictions, assuming the trust indeed owns the land, are legal, she wrote, “Evicting people who have lived on this land for decades – some of them without even knowing that the land belongs to others – creates a human problem. Especially when it’s done without compensation or any other solution. It seems the state would do better to consider providing a solution, in appropriate cases, for those evicted from their homes. Property rights are important, but it’s also important to defend people’s homes.”

​

Ateret Cohanim is itself an interesting group intent on creating a
Jewish majority in East Jerusalem by purchasing property with help from district authorities, evicting the tenants and moving Jewish families in. Sometimes with questionable legality. So the question is...why one or the other? Why not both Jews and Palestinians?

Court allows eviction of 700 Palestinians from East Jerusalem neighborhood

The horror of moving Jewish families into property they own in Judea.
And the sky doesn't fall. And the millions getting paid.
And the Arab estate agents specifically appointed by their people for such cases.

Exactly, why not both Arabs and Jews? Arabs are 20% in Israel, why building Jewish communities among Arab ones is a bad thing, beyond the pretentious spectacles of being forced into the top 20% of the worlds richest people?

The horror of moving Jewish families into property they own in Judea.

And the evicted Palestinians lost their homes in 1948. It would be the right thing for them to get their homes back too.

Then so should all the Jews who were evicted during the period leading up to 1948 and subsequently.

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

The plan is to make the Palestinian's lives so miserable that they will "voluntarily" leave.

(COMMENT)

Oh come now. This is pure "propaganda." It is an exaggeration of the highest order.

Every intelligent Israeli knows that while there are anecdotal examples of Arab Palestinians breaking the bonds that hold them in the West Bank, the Gaza Strip, or one of the other Palestinian population centers scattered around the region, no one really believes that any of the Arab League neighbors is going to allow the accumulated hundreds of thousands, the UNRWA has collected over the last half-century, to just get up and move "(they will "voluntarily" leave)" to one of their neighboring Arab nations. Not only would that be compounding the problem, spreading new encampments of trouble that no one really wants.

Most Respectfully.
R

WTF? What does that have to do with my post

 

[P F Tinmore]

Interesting article...shows how complicated the issue of property rights is in the former Ottoman region, but also the general disregard by groups such as this for the Palestinian families affected.

The judge noted:

Barak-Erez closed her ruling by noting the hardship residents would suffer by being evicted from homes where they had lived for decades and which some had even purchased. She therefore urged the state to compensate anyone evicted.

Though the evictions, assuming the trust indeed owns the land, are legal, she wrote, “Evicting people who have lived on this land for decades – some of them without even knowing that the land belongs to others – creates a human problem. Especially when it’s done without compensation or any other solution. It seems the state would do better to consider providing a solution, in appropriate cases, for those evicted from their homes. Property rights are important, but it’s also important to defend people’s homes.”

​

Ateret Cohanim is itself an interesting group intent on creating a
Jewish majority in East Jerusalem by purchasing property with help from district authorities, evicting the tenants and moving Jewish families in. Sometimes with questionable legality. So the question is...why one or the other? Why not both Jews and Palestinians?

Court allows eviction of 700 Palestinians from East Jerusalem neighborhood

The horror of moving Jewish families into property they own in Judea.
And the sky doesn't fall. And the millions getting paid.
And the Arab estate agents specifically appointed by their people for such cases.

Exactly, why not both Arabs and Jews? Arabs are 20% in Israel, why building Jewish communities among Arab ones is a bad thing, beyond the pretentious spectacles of being forced into the top 20% of the worlds richest people?

The horror of moving Jewish families into property they own in Judea.

And the evicted Palestinians lost their homes in 1948. It would be the right thing for them to get their homes back too.

Then so should all the Jews who were evicted during the period leading up to 1948 and subsequently.

Sure.

 

[Coyote]

Interesting article...shows how complicated the issue of property rights is in the former Ottoman region, but also the general disregard by groups such as this for the Palestinian families affected.

The judge noted:

Barak-Erez closed her ruling by noting the hardship residents would suffer by being evicted from homes where they had lived for decades and which some had even purchased. She therefore urged the state to compensate anyone evicted.

Though the evictions, assuming the trust indeed owns the land, are legal, she wrote, “Evicting people who have lived on this land for decades – some of them without even knowing that the land belongs to others – creates a human problem. Especially when it’s done without compensation or any other solution. It seems the state would do better to consider providing a solution, in appropriate cases, for those evicted from their homes. Property rights are important, but it’s also important to defend people’s homes.”

​

Ateret Cohanim is itself an interesting group intent on creating a
Jewish majority in East Jerusalem by purchasing property with help from district authorities, evicting the tenants and moving Jewish families in. Sometimes with questionable legality. So the question is...why one or the other? Why not both Jews and Palestinians?

Court allows eviction of 700 Palestinians from East Jerusalem neighborhood

The horror of moving Jewish families into property they own in Judea.
And the sky doesn't fall. And the millions getting paid.
And the Arab estate agents specifically appointed by their people for such cases.

Exactly, why not both Arabs and Jews? Arabs are 20% in Israel, why building Jewish communities among Arab ones is a bad thing, beyond the pretentious spectacles of being forced into the top 20% of the worlds richest people?

The horror of moving Jewish families into property they own in Judea.

And the evicted Palestinians lost their homes in 1948. It would be the right thing for them to get their homes back too.

Then so should all the Jews who were evicted during the period leading up to 1948 and subsequently.

Sure.

How would competing claims be decided?

 

[Coyote]

Interesting article...shows how complicated the issue of property rights is in the former Ottoman region, but also the general disregard by groups such as this for the Palestinian families affected.

The judge noted:

Barak-Erez closed her ruling by noting the hardship residents would suffer by being evicted from homes where they had lived for decades and which some had even purchased. She therefore urged the state to compensate anyone evicted.

Though the evictions, assuming the trust indeed owns the land, are legal, she wrote, “Evicting people who have lived on this land for decades – some of them without even knowing that the land belongs to others – creates a human problem. Especially when it’s done without compensation or any other solution. It seems the state would do better to consider providing a solution, in appropriate cases, for those evicted from their homes. Property rights are important, but it’s also important to defend people’s homes.”

​

Ateret Cohanim is itself an interesting group intent on creating a
Jewish majority in East Jerusalem by purchasing property with help from district authorities, evicting the tenants and moving Jewish families in. Sometimes with questionable legality. So the question is...why one or the other? Why not both Jews and Palestinians?

Court allows eviction of 700 Palestinians from East Jerusalem neighborhood

The horror of moving Jewish families into property they own in Judea.
And the sky doesn't fall. And the millions getting paid.
And the Arab estate agents specifically appointed by their people for such cases.

Exactly, why not both Arabs and Jews? Arabs are 20% in Israel, why building Jewish communities among Arab ones is a bad thing, beyond the pretentious spectacles of being forced into the top 20% of the worlds richest people?

The horror of moving Jewish families into property they own in Judea.

And the evicted Palestinians lost their homes in 1948. It would be the right thing for them to get their homes back too.

Why are the settlements only Jewish?

Why do Palestinians get evicted but only Jewish residents move in?

If Jews have a right to to move there then why not Arabs?

 

[P F Tinmore]

Interesting article...shows how complicated the issue of property rights is in the former Ottoman region, but also the general disregard by groups such as this for the Palestinian families affected.

The judge noted:

Barak-Erez closed her ruling by noting the hardship residents would suffer by being evicted from homes where they had lived for decades and which some had even purchased. She therefore urged the state to compensate anyone evicted.

Though the evictions, assuming the trust indeed owns the land, are legal, she wrote, “Evicting people who have lived on this land for decades – some of them without even knowing that the land belongs to others – creates a human problem. Especially when it’s done without compensation or any other solution. It seems the state would do better to consider providing a solution, in appropriate cases, for those evicted from their homes. Property rights are important, but it’s also important to defend people’s homes.”

​

Ateret Cohanim is itself an interesting group intent on creating a
Jewish majority in East Jerusalem by purchasing property with help from district authorities, evicting the tenants and moving Jewish families in. Sometimes with questionable legality. So the question is...why one or the other? Why not both Jews and Palestinians?

Court allows eviction of 700 Palestinians from East Jerusalem neighborhood

The horror of moving Jewish families into property they own in Judea.
And the sky doesn't fall. And the millions getting paid.
And the Arab estate agents specifically appointed by their people for such cases.

Exactly, why not both Arabs and Jews? Arabs are 20% in Israel, why building Jewish communities among Arab ones is a bad thing, beyond the pretentious spectacles of being forced into the top 20% of the worlds richest people?

The horror of moving Jewish families into property they own in Judea.

And the evicted Palestinians lost their homes in 1948. It would be the right thing for them to get their homes back too.

Why are the settlements only Jewish?

Why do Palestinians get evicted but only Jewish residents move in?

If Jews have a right to to move there then why not Arabs?

Move the Palestinians out and move the Jews in. That has been the plan for a hundred years.