Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.

[P F Tinmore]

The Gaza Catastrophe, Part 2: The U.S. Role & Responsibility​

 

[toomuchtime_]

The Gaza Catastrophe, Part 2: The U.S. Role & Responsibility​

The Gaza Catastrophe: homemade by the Palestinians

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews
SUBTOPIC: The Events of 7 OCT 2023
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Cherry picking (suppressed evidence, incomplete evidence) – the act of pointing at individual cases or data that seem to confirm a particular position, while ignoring a significant portion of related cases or data that may contradict that position.[56]
SOURCE: 2.2 Red herring fallacies • Main article: Informal fallacy

The Gaza Catastrophe, Part 2: The U.S. Role & Responsibility​

(COMMENT)


It is NOT uncommon for Hostile Arab Palestinians (HoAP) to select a panel consisting of only personalities (of unofficial standing) that support the Jihadists, Fedayeen Activists, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers, and Asymmetric Resistance Fighter terrorist operations.

It is not uncommon for the United States to support the 19 General International Legal Instruments on Counter-Terrorism, the 2006 Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy, as well as, the Plan of Action to Prevent Violent Extremism (2016).

It should also be noted (which is usually ignored in favor of the HoAP) that pro-HoAP propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law. Any pro-Palestinian advocacy of national (anti-Israeli), racial, or religious (anti-Jewish) hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility, or violence is also prohibited by law. [Article 20, the International Covenant for Civil and Political Rights (CCPR)]

One should also consider that certain HoAP activities in Areas "A, B, and C" are punishable by law.

Article 68 - Penal legislation. V. Penalties. Death penalty​

Convention (IV) relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War.​

Protected persons (Palestinian) who commit an offence which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power (Israeli), but which does not constitute an attempt on the life or limb of members of the occupying forces or administration, nor a grave collective danger, nor seriously damage the property of the occupying forces or administration or the installations used by them, shall be liable to internment or simple imprisonment, provided the duration of such internment or imprisonment is proportionate to the offence committed. Furthermore, internment or imprisonment shall, for such offences, be the only measure adopted for depriving protected persons of liberty. The courts provided for under Article 66 of the present Convention may at their discretion convert a sentence of imprisonment to one of internment for the same period.​

​

The penal provisions promulgated by the Occupying Power in accordance with Articles 64 and 65 may impose the death penalty on a protected person (Palestinian) only in cases where the person is guilty of espionage, of serious acts of sabotage against the military installations of the Occupying Power or of intentional offences which have caused the death of one or more persons, provided that such offences were punishable by death under the law of the occupied territory in force before the occupation began.​

​

The death penalty may not be pronounced against a protected person unless the attention of the court has been particularly called to the fact that since the accused is not a national of the Occupying Power, he is not bound to it by any duty of allegiance.​

​

In any case, the death penalty may not be pronounced against a protected person who was under eighteen years of age at the time of the offence.​

These binding legal measures, noted here, are not all-inclusive and do not reflect any domestic law.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews
SUBTOPIC: The Events of 7 OCT 2023
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Cherry picking (suppressed evidence, incomplete evidence) – the act of pointing at individual cases or data that seem to confirm a particular position, while ignoring a significant portion of related cases or data that may contradict that position.[56]
SOURCE: 2.2 Red herring fallacies • Main article: Informal fallacy

(COMMENT)


It is NOT uncommon for Hostile Arab Palestinians (HoAP) to select a panel consisting of only personalities (of unofficial standing) that support the Jihadists, Fedayeen Activists, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers, and Asymmetric Resistance Fighter terrorist operations.

It is not uncommon for the United States to support the 19 General International Legal Instruments on Counter-Terrorism, the 2006 Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy, as well as, the Plan of Action to Prevent Violent Extremism (2016).

It should also be noted (which is usually ignored in favor of the HoAP) that pro-HoAP propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law. Any pro-Palestinian advocacy of national (anti-Israeli), racial, or religious (anti-Jewish) hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility, or violence is also prohibited by law. [Article 20, the International Covenant for Civil and Political Rights (CCPR)]

One should also consider that certain HoAP activities in Areas "A, B, and C" are punishable by law.

Article 68 - Penal legislation. V. Penalties. Death penalty​

Convention (IV) relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War.​

Protected persons (Palestinian) who commit an offence which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power (Israeli), but which does not constitute an attempt on the life or limb of members of the occupying forces or administration, nor a grave collective danger, nor seriously damage the property of the occupying forces or administration or the installations used by them, shall be liable to internment or simple imprisonment, provided the duration of such internment or imprisonment is proportionate to the offence committed. Furthermore, internment or imprisonment shall, for such offences, be the only measure adopted for depriving protected persons of liberty. The courts provided for under Article 66 of the present Convention may at their discretion convert a sentence of imprisonment to one of internment for the same period.​

​

The penal provisions promulgated by the Occupying Power in accordance with Articles 64 and 65 may impose the death penalty on a protected person (Palestinian) only in cases where the person is guilty of espionage, of serious acts of sabotage against the military installations of the Occupying Power or of intentional offences which have caused the death of one or more persons, provided that such offences were punishable by death under the law of the occupied territory in force before the occupation began.​

​

The death penalty may not be pronounced against a protected person unless the attention of the court has been particularly called to the fact that since the accused is not a national of the Occupying Power, he is not bound to it by any duty of allegiance.​

​

In any case, the death penalty may not be pronounced against a protected person who was under eighteen years of age at the time of the offence.​

These binding legal measures, noted here, are not all-inclusive and do not reflect any domestic law.

Most Respectfully,
R

WOW, so many tropes.

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews
SUBTOPIC: The Events of 7 OCT 2023
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Cherry picking (suppressed evidence, incomplete evidence) – the act of pointing at individual cases or data that seem to confirm a particular position, while ignoring a significant portion of related cases or data that may contradict that position.[56]
SOURCE: 2.2 Red herring fallacies • Main article: Informal fallacy

(COMMENT)


It is NOT uncommon for Hostile Arab Palestinians (HoAP) to select a panel consisting of only personalities (of unofficial standing) that support the Jihadists, Fedayeen Activists, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers, and Asymmetric Resistance Fighter terrorist operations.

It is not uncommon for the United States to support the 19 General International Legal Instruments on Counter-Terrorism, the 2006 Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy, as well as, the Plan of Action to Prevent Violent Extremism (2016).

It should also be noted (which is usually ignored in favor of the HoAP) that pro-HoAP propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law. Any pro-Palestinian advocacy of national (anti-Israeli), racial, or religious (anti-Jewish) hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility, or violence is also prohibited by law. [Article 20, the International Covenant for Civil and Political Rights (CCPR)]

One should also consider that certain HoAP activities in Areas "A, B, and C" are punishable by law.

Article 68 - Penal legislation. V. Penalties. Death penalty​

Convention (IV) relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War.​

Protected persons (Palestinian) who commit an offence which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power (Israeli), but which does not constitute an attempt on the life or limb of members of the occupying forces or administration, nor a grave collective danger, nor seriously damage the property of the occupying forces or administration or the installations used by them, shall be liable to internment or simple imprisonment, provided the duration of such internment or imprisonment is proportionate to the offence committed. Furthermore, internment or imprisonment shall, for such offences, be the only measure adopted for depriving protected persons of liberty. The courts provided for under Article 66 of the present Convention may at their discretion convert a sentence of imprisonment to one of internment for the same period.​

​

The penal provisions promulgated by the Occupying Power in accordance with Articles 64 and 65 may impose the death penalty on a protected person (Palestinian) only in cases where the person is guilty of espionage, of serious acts of sabotage against the military installations of the Occupying Power or of intentional offences which have caused the death of one or more persons, provided that such offences were punishable by death under the law of the occupied territory in force before the occupation began.​

​

The death penalty may not be pronounced against a protected person unless the attention of the court has been particularly called to the fact that since the accused is not a national of the Occupying Power, he is not bound to it by any duty of allegiance.​

​

In any case, the death penalty may not be pronounced against a protected person who was under eighteen years of age at the time of the offence.​

These binding legal measures, noted here, are not all-inclusive and do not reflect any domestic law.

Most Respectfully,
R

It is NOT uncommon for Hostile Arab Palestinians (HoAP) to select a panel consisting of only personalities (of unofficial standing) that support the Jihadists, Fedayeen Activists, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers, and Asymmetric Resistance Fighter terrorist operations.

You can post opposing views.

 

[P F Tinmore]

The Gaza Catastrophe, Part 3: International Law & Humanitarian Crisis​

 

[P F Tinmore]

The Gaza Catastrophe, Part 4: What Comes Next?​

 

[P F Tinmore]

Introduction to the Gaza Catastrophe: 2024 Congressional Briefing Series​

 

[P F Tinmore]

Ali Abunimah: Israel has lost​

 

[P F Tinmore]

Israel Unmasked: A Serial Killer Society High On Hate, w/ Abby Martin & Rania Khalek​

 

[P F Tinmore]

"Gaza is literally starving. Israel is using starvation as a weapon of war" Yasmine Ahmed​

 

[P F Tinmore]

"The Nakba is a structure, not an event. Its authors openly admit its aims" explains Dr. Ardi Imseis​

 

[P F Tinmore]

Fiery Israel-Palestine Debate with Bassem Youssef​

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews
SUBTOPIC: The Pro-Palestinian and Anti-Israeli Movements form a Clear and Present Danger in America
※→ et al,

(REFERENCE)

Concept: clear and present danger​

The clear and present danger test originated in Schenck v. the United States. The test says that the printed or spoken word may not be the subject of previous restraint or subsequent punishment unless its expression creates a clear and present danger of bringing about a substantial evil. It is a standard which is used to ascertain whether a particular speech is within the First Amendment right or not. See: Schenck v. United States (1919)

Requirements:​

The clear and present danger test features two independent conditions: first, the speech must impose a threat that a substantive evil might follow, and second, the threat is a real, imminent threat. The court had to identify and quantify both the nature of the threatened evil and the imminence of the perceived danger.
SOURCE: Cornell University • Law

(COMMENT)​

I believe that The Pro-Palestinian and Anti-Israeli Movements form a Clear and Present Danger in America.

EXAMPLE: (From ABC News) Happening Now​

​

Pro-Palestinian protesters at Cal State Los Angeles entered a campus building on Wednesday, taking over the ground floor, as "a small number" of administrators still inside were asked to shelter in place, campus officials said.​

​

"I can confirm that there are still a small number of administrators in the building," said Erik Frost Hollins, a school spokesperson. "We are working through options to bring this fluid situation to the best resolution possible."​

Nearly everyday, we come in contact with elements of The Pro-Palestinian and Anti-Israeli Movements that advocate violence as a means to a solution. Americans need to be very careful and cautious as these elements are abusing the Right to Free Speech and have become a danger to the public.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[RoccoR]

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews
SUBTOPIC: The Pro-Palestinian and Anti-Israeli Movements form a Clear and Present Danger in America
※→ et al,

(REFERENCE)

(COMMENT)​

I believe that The Pro-Palestinian and Anti-Israeli Movements form a Clear and Present Danger in America.

EXAMPLE: (From ABC News) Happening Now​

​

Pro-Palestinian protesters at Cal State Los Angeles entered a campus building on Wednesday, taking over the ground floor, as "a small number" of administrators still inside were asked to shelter in place, campus officials said.​

​

"I can confirm that there are still a small number of administrators in the building," said Erik Frost Hollins, a school spokesperson. "We are working through options to bring this fluid situation to the best resolution possible."​

Nearly everyday, we come in contact with elements of The Pro-Palestinian and Anti-Israeli Movements that advocate violence as a means to a solution. Americans need to be very careful and cautious as these elements are abusing the Right to Free Speech and have become a danger to the public.

Most Respectfully,
R

Nearly everyday, we come in contact with elements of The Pro-Palestinian and Anti-Israeli Movements that advocate violence as a means to a solution. Americans need to be very careful and cautious as these elements are abusing the Right to Free Speech and have become a danger to the public.

How so?

 

[P F Tinmore]

Understanding Hamas & Why That Matters: Session 3 featuring Dr. Jeroen Gunning​

 

[P F Tinmore]

Understanding Hamas & Why That Matters: Session 4 featuring Mouin Rabbani​

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews
SUBTOPIC: Pro-Palestinian and Anti-Israeli Movements that Advocate Violence
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Think about it!

Nearly everyday, we come in contact with elements of The Pro-Palestinian and Anti-Israeli Movements that advocate violence as a means to a solution. Americans need to be very careful and cautious as these elements are abusing the Right to Free Speech and have become a danger to the public.

How so?

(COMMENT)

How many times have you justified terrorist attacks against Israeli targets?

How many times have you cited the General Assembly Resolution reaffirming the right to use "all means available."

And then there are the Arab Palestinians who openly support the HAMAS Charter and the General Policies and Principles.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

Palestine Talks | In conversation with Aaron Mate​