Oscar Wao
Victory is Mine
And to the OP: Who cares about Governor Poison?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How about lowering spending, too?
The way you're "OH LYKE OMGZ UNIUNZ RAWKZ ANDZ REPUBS R LYKE SO GREEDY"...kinda why I had my "archangel" theory.O please.
As if Unions are the archangels sent from God for the American workers...
I didn't say that unions were the archangels, I said that the GOP hates unions because it fucks with their greed.
Personally? I think the idea of a union is a good thing, as it makes it easier to keep the working conditions and wages fair with how the company is doing.
However........sometimes they get too big and ask for too much, which is what happened to GM.
And let's say that while unions may have their "angel" side...they also have their "devil" side...and there's more of a "devil" side than an "angel" one.
And Palin worship is destroying conservatism, no, I take that back, it's poisoning mindsObama's Policies are unhealthy for Children and other living things
Yo, my Dad was a union guy too, let's say he got the "devil" treatment instead of the "angel" one...The way you're "OH LYKE OMGZ UNIUNZ RAWKZ ANDZ REPUBS R LYKE SO GREEDY"...kinda why I had my "archangel" theory.I didn't say that unions were the archangels, I said that the GOP hates unions because it fucks with their greed.
Personally? I think the idea of a union is a good thing, as it makes it easier to keep the working conditions and wages fair with how the company is doing.
However........sometimes they get too big and ask for too much, which is what happened to GM.
And let's say that while unions may have their "angel" side...they also have their "devil" side...and there's more of a "devil" side than an "angel" one.
Actually, you're right. But, having lived in a union family for a long time, I can tell you it's not so much the fault of the union itself, as it is the fault of the people in charge of it.
Remember Jimmy Hoffa?
But, if you watch the news, it seems that the majority of those with lots of cash think nothing of stepping on the backs of others to get more. Matter of fact, one commentator called them "billionaire cannibals", because they used the free stuff available to the poor, while refusing to utilize their own resources.
And no........greed is not good, that's why it's one of the Seven Deadly Sins.
How about lowering spending, too?
I'm curious to see how the OP would distinguish "civility" from "niceness". You say that there are unpleasant truths that, despite the fact that they are hard to hear, need to be said. I get that.
But to say that people can't have a civil discourse is utterly false. To profess that you're "just tellin' it like it is" doesn't excuse atrocious behavior. It's in your OWN best interest to find the right mix between intense and idiotic, even if what you're saying is the truth.
I totally agree, btw, that Pelosi is a complete hypocrite for espousing disruption by her side and denouncing it when it's her opponents. Disruption serves NO ONE.
The original post seems to be a huge rationalization for being a jerk. Just my 2 cents.
In fact, Palin was quite civil in her criticisms of HR 3200 although she stated her concerns about what some saw as health care rationing that was implicit in the bill in dramatic terms. It is her critics who continue to be uncivil.
If you went to a townhall meeting in which the Congressman would only restate his predetermined talking points when confronted with difficult questions, would it be wrong of you to shout out that he was being unresponsive to important questions if that were the only way to draw attention to what he was doing?
It has been amusing watching the Palin haters yell like dopey kids about this, still trying to bring back October & November of last year.Nice write up - and confirms my view that Palin has dominated Obama on what was Obama's own issue. She might actually be as tough as those who have long supported her say.
Now we must see if Obama has any real toughness and if he can reassert control within his own party....
Mrs Palin spoke out on two parts of this bill, and now both are off the table.
They can insult her, spin bitch and whine all they want, but she got results vs a President with a fillibuster proof senate and control of the house.
That is a fine accomplishment.
Just out of curiosity..........
How the fuck is the pitbull bitch from Alaska going to be able to call a spade a spade, when the stupid **** doesn't even have any fucking idea of what the truth is outside her own deluded bullshit?
Pain in the ass Palin isn't smart enough, good enough, or dedicated enough to make people like her.
She's a quitter bimbo.
Civil? I don't think so. She lied, she frightened old people and she used her kid as a political tool.I'm curious to see how the OP would distinguish "civility" from "niceness". You say that there are unpleasant truths that, despite the fact that they are hard to hear, need to be said. I get that.
But to say that people can't have a civil discourse is utterly false. To profess that you're "just tellin' it like it is" doesn't excuse atrocious behavior. It's in your OWN best interest to find the right mix between intense and idiotic, even if what you're saying is the truth.
I totally agree, btw, that Pelosi is a complete hypocrite for espousing disruption by her side and denouncing it when it's her opponents. Disruption serves NO ONE.
The original post seems to be a huge rationalization for being a jerk. Just my 2 cents.
In fact, Palin was quite civil in her criticisms of HR 3200 although she stated her concerns about what some saw as health care rationing that was implicit in the bill in dramatic terms. It is her critics who continue to be uncivil.
If you went to a townhall meeting in which the Congressman would only restate his predetermined talking points when confronted with difficult questions, would it be wrong of you to shout out that he was being unresponsive to important questions if that were the only way to draw attention to what he was doing?