Paula Abdul Sues for Sexual Assault

While Rod sits it out for an hour, this topic is producing side benefits from the regulars we can expect.

Is Rod really going to go with the 'ignore' for now?
 

This is another one of those things that allegedly happened a million years ago. It is a true injustice against the defendant. But here is the real question: Was Abdul ever hot enough to even want to assault? I know, nobody ever wants to assault anyone. Certainly I don’t, nor would I ever, condone assault or sexual harassment. I am just curious about the mindset of a man who would do it.

I am thinking that if you are going to expose yourself to such risk then the chick ought to be worth it. It would have to be Margot Robbie level stuff, you know? Of course, maybe there is nothing rational about it. Maybe it’s impulsiveness on the part of the harasser. IDK. I DO know that if I decided to harass/sexually assault a woman, then it would have to be some irrefutable, smoking hot stuff. Perhaps this - rational analysis- indicates that I am not prone to doing such.

If I was considering this I don’t think I would go after Paula Abdul. Sure, she was cute back in the day, and she had a very doable body. But she is a “girl next door” type. This means she is common. Why waste the effort on a celebrity commoner when you can get as good, or better, from a non-celebrity and at much less risk to yourself? You can get a chick like that without even having to resort to force.

This situation is most likely the result of Abdul being readily available, his power over her, and maybe even some drugs and alcohol.
Rumors and admissions of substance abuse or addiction are part of the Paula Abdul story, and she isn't exactly a novice at filing lawsuits for grievances. I don't know her and won't judge her morals/integrity but I agree that these lawsuits long after the fact and when there is absolutely no way to gather any evidence to support the grievance(s) should not be allowed. Most especially when they smear a possibly innocent person's reputation and/or integrity in ways that cannot ever be remedied.

Women should understand that if they choose to stay quiet re sexual assault no matter what their reason might be whether out of fear or to protect their job or whatever, they forfeit any legal claim for compensation and could be liable for libel or slander. I simply don't buy the 'we have to believe every woman who comes forward' thing.

I do get a sense that Paula has a deep need for relevance and to be revered as a big star or whatever and she has sometimes been denied that. This is a poor way to get back into the limelight however.
 
You're slowly but surely giving everybody the impression that you're totally absorbed in masturbation fantasies.
And there's also a few hints that your interests are not just on women.

I only mention it to see how you are going to handle it? Be careful!
Put me back on block, you silly bastard.
 
Man you sure put a lot of thought into what type of woman you would sexually assault. Sort of weird but okay.
I made it pretty clear in the op that I am not condoning sexual assault. This is an intellectual exercise, which pretty much excludes emotive drive people like yourself. No offense.
 
I made it pretty clear in the op that I am not condoning sexual assault. This is an intellectual exercise, which pretty much excludes emotive drive people like yourself. No offense.
No offense but if you call yourself Lord Long Rod then people tend to see 'male sexual dominance' as your defining characteristic or at least the way in which you want to the world to visualize you.

So it shouldn't come as any surprise if people sometimes draw the wrong conclusion about you no matter what you say.
 
Wait for it!

But be prepared for nothing too. His reaction and answer is quite likely to come in some unrelated topic.

But let's just face it, he's being called out for his insulting comments against women, as well as his off colour sexual fantasies.

From now on, i've given those comments and that behaviour some meaning for him.
Does it count as being “called out” if I don’t feel like I am being “called out”? Put me back on ignore, shit head, you are not my type. I mean, sure, you have a pussy. But it’s Canadian and probably smells like a bush fire.
 
No offense but if you call yourself Lord Long Rod then people tend to see 'male sexual dominance' as your defining characteristic or at least the way in which you want to the world to visualize you.

So it shouldn't come as any surprise if people sometimes draw the wrong conclusion about you no matter what you say.
Most people tend to draw the right conclusion, as it's intended.
So now what does the name mean? Not in a physical way because that's not the intent. It's much more involved than that.

We know that Rod aspires to be a writer and so my guess is that he writes pornography. That's not meant to be condemning of his choice. That's not the point. The point is on the question that has caused him to make that choice as a substitute?
 
No offense but if you call yourself Lord Long Rod then people tend to see 'male sexual dominance' as your defining characteristic or at least the way in which you want to the world to visualize you.

So it shouldn't come as any surprise if people sometimes draw the wrong conclusion about you no matter what you say.
To the extent that you are talking about low functioning individuals I agree. But fuck them. It is a good way to weed out undesirable half-wits and no-wits.
 
Most people tend to draw the right conclusion, as it's intended.
So now what does the name mean? Not in a physical way because that's not the intent. It's much more involved than that.

We know that Rod aspires to be a writer and so my guess is that he writes pornography. That's not meant to be condemning of his choice. That's not the point. The point is on the question that has caused him to make that choice as a substitute?
Fwiw, and that it's his business alone, I've decided that Rod is gay on account of his disdain for women. That's been amply demonstrated by Rod and it can't be walked back.

So watch for him to go cold on that subject. Or build on it? he will have to respond.

Now it's best for everybody to let it go and let it fester in his head for a few days.
 

This is another one of those things that allegedly happened a million years ago. It is a true injustice against the defendant. But here is the real question: Was Abdul ever hot enough to even want to assault? I know, nobody ever wants to assault anyone. Certainly I don’t, nor would I ever, condone assault or sexual harassment. I am just curious about the mindset of a man who would do it.

I am thinking that if you are going to expose yourself to such risk then the chick ought to be worth it. It would have to be Margot Robbie level stuff, you know? Of course, maybe there is nothing rational about it. Maybe it’s impulsiveness on the part of the harasser. IDK. I DO know that if I decided to harass/sexually assault a woman, then it would have to be some irrefutable, smoking hot stuff. Perhaps this - rational analysis- indicates that I am not prone to doing such.

If I was considering this I don’t think I would go after Paula Abdul. Sure, she was cute back in the day, and she had a very doable body. But she is a “girl next door” type. This means she is common. Why waste the effort on a celebrity commoner when you can get as good, or better, from a non-celebrity and at much less risk to yourself? You can get a chick like that without even having to resort to force.

This situation is most likely the result of Abdul being readily available, his power over her, and maybe even some drugs and alcohol.
Top to bottom, a very sick post.
 

Forum List

Back
Top