EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 14,850
- 10,070
- 2,138
In order for him to have been in his underwear:
- An experienced FBI agent had to have filled out that entire Criminal Complaint without once mentioning the important point that he was in his jockey shorts at the time;
- The same agent must have mentioned that they retrieved items from his pocket, without mentioning that his pants were on the floor at the time;
- Either the witness outside was watching someone else, or DePape removed his pants after breaking in, and;
- There must be another source for the underwear story in the first place, because the only known source for it is a San Francisco TV station reporter who quickly retracted it.
There is no evidence or even report that he was in his underwear, and several points that would make it supremely unlikely.
You should probably stop with the underwear claims.
Just stop stop stop investigating this....
Wahhhh