flacaltenn
You keep pounding this "no difference in science" between races. Just had my doctor explain to me the bump in my kidney EGFR test.. It's because the RANGES and test have been revised to REMOVE the separate equations for blacks. Because the Woking Dead have invaded the halls of science, we're now gonna IGNORE the difference in reading kidney filtration levels in blacks.
I agree we are not all the same.
Yes - There are persistent and real genetic differences that cluster within racial groups, and more so than many have believed.
Yet these differences still fall far short of indicating sub-speciation, which is the normal standard used by biologists to indicate different “races” or breeds of a larger species.
DNA studies do not indicate that separate classifiable subspecies (races) exist within modern humans.
While different genes for physical traits such as skin and hair colour can be identified between individuals, no consistent patterns of genes across the human genome exist to distinguish one race from another.
It has never been a case of there not being differences between the way human beings look.
The trouble is in the imprecise taxonomy. How do you define a “race” and might there not be other equally valid ways of dividing humans into taxonomical groupings ?
Many scientists worked hard (REAL HARD) on finding working definition of race as a biological fact. They all failed.
They all failed not because genetic differences can’t be observed between various humans (after all, if there weren’t mDNA differences, we wouldn’t know much about human maternal ancestry).
They all failed because genetic differences do not support social races, races that divide people into (pardon my words) “black”, “white”, “yellow” and “red”.
The only living subspecies of the species Homo sapiens is Homo sapiens sapiens. That is current scientific knowledge. And it is very likely to remain the only one, unless Sasquatch or the Yeti decide to walk into a science lab for a DNA test one day.
flacaltenn
You;ve been sucked into a war of RENAMING EVERYTHING. Which is what the Woking Dead do for "birthing mothers" rather than women. Here's the 2 sides in the war to STOP screwing with science for politically correct reasons. The same way the political agencies have IGNORED "natural immunity" and all of the previous virology knowledge on that to write vaccine mandates that DONT RECOGNIZE SCIENCE.
With you guys there always has to be at least one mention of "Woke" or “the liberals” or “lefties”
You will never find such mention in serious scientific publications.
But I guess you can always claim ideological martyr status for being shouted down as being iconoclasts in the public square and pretend that marginalized trash are actually hidden gems of knowledge only you and a select few others can see.
Look - Let’s have the debate
Let's see what you're theories would actually mean in public policy terms. Let’s see how the race scientists intend to address the problems of our time and indeed things they see as problems.
But I don't think they or you will because the reason you and others believe in this is because you need a new theory of racism that allows you to separate yourselves from the blue collar stormfronters. So they come up with this high sounding “Scientific” theory.
flacaltenn
.
The Woking Dead want to STOP using genomic differences based on race for "social justice" and "equity" reasons whilst they DO RECOGNIZE IMPORTANT medical differences in "genomic places of origin" -- like sub-saharan Africa, but they WILL NOT CALL IT "by race".
Dude- Like what do you want ? Do you want science to say "Science shows that blk ppl are dumb n*ggers and there ain't nothing no one can do about it because on average black people are a sub species of mankind"
Stop fking being a fking pu s s sy and just man up bring it
