- Banned
- #781
Not only should the Bill Gates and Steve Jobs of the world not be punished for their financial success, but they should be acknowledged for the hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions of jobs their particular vision, efforts, and success have produced. Probably both have single handedly made it possible for tens of thousands to move into the top 5% and/or 1%. Also they both have also given generously of their personal time, talent, and personal fortunes to the arts, to science, to scholarship funds, and to relieve suffering all around the world.
Without that 1%, a lot of the 5% would never have achieved that level of financial success. Without the top 5 to 10%, all of us would have far less opportunity and/or financial success than we have achieved.
Too many on the left want to kill the golden goose thinking then they will have all that lovely gold at once. It simply does not work that way, however. Kill or take down or unrich the rich, and we will all be significantly poorer for it.
This is veneration of the rich. This post. Right here. This is how we speak of God-they are gracious, generous, creative, we owe them our thanks and praise for their goodness and their generosity. We could not achieve without them.
The top marginal rate is at it's lowest in decades. It would not unrich the rich.
Would you care to give the example of where I "praised" the rich?
So now you want to declare that "hating" the rich isn't covered under "hate speech"? I was under the impression that any minority (the haters say 1%, that is a minority) targeted by hateful speech/actions was "hate speech". I guess that is "politically correct" to "hate" the rich.
I don't think I know any of the "1%" well enough to condemn them or "praise" them. But by all means, don't let the truth get in the way of a good story.
There's no hate in my comments.
Does that include the personhood bill in the south, or the union stripping in the north, or how about the drug testing of welfare recepients in Florida? All those are social engineering things proposed by the right that would SIGNIFICANTLY increase the size of the government while not doing much in the way of helping anyone.
But the GOP will tell you that they are protecting the rights of the people when it's actually their agenda for social engineering and the rich.
NOTHING has been done in DC since Boehner took over as Speaker of the House towards jobs, just right wing social engineering.
But........they tell us it's for our own good.
![clap2 :clap2: :clap2:](/styles/smilies/clap2.gif)
When one's taxes are raised for no other reason than that someone has decided that one has too much money, then yes, it is a punishment.
Please pay attention. We are talking about raising taxes on the rich so that we can fund the nation.
It's not "influence," it's outright ownership. When one of the 10 richest people in America decided to put her man in the White House, that was all there was too it. Oprah wanted Obama to be president, she directed the party to make him the candidate, they obeyed. Hillary was shit out of luck, one of the owners of the party had decided.
This is delusional. The "Hollywood Elite" do not dictate who anyone votes for.
But she is "good rich" not "bad rich," right?
Hypocrisy so thick you can cut it with a knife...
Thanks for the tacit admission that your comments were wrong.
People can do good or evil with their money, power, and influence. Surely that is not over your head.
So why aren't the Shitters protesting in front of their homes? Demanding that they "give back?"
We know why, we all do. It's pure partisanship. One set of rules for the elite of the party, a vastly different set for everyone else.
![cuckoo :cuckoo: :cuckoo:](/styles/smilies/cuckoo.gif)
![]()
Right.....
They are sitting together. Clooney isn't at the Democratic National Convention introducing Obama.
As for Tea Bagging, hey, the right wingers brought it up.
![]()
The HuffingGlue picture is from a good two years after the leftists started calling those who dared protest Wall Street and corrupt government "Teabaggers."
Still better to be a Teabagger than a Shitter...
It's from 2009. You know, when the Tea Party started.
Last edited: