Please, my fellow Conservatives, let's just stop...

...this silly argument that the SCOTUS has opened the door for Pedophiles to marry children.

You have rights so far as those rights don't harm or infringe upon the rights of others. Pedophilia harms children and therefor cannot ever be legal.

and yeah, the gays advocate it, look at this stuff

Partners Task Force - Age of Consent

No where in your link does it show that they are advocating lowering the age of consent. They are only posting it to make a point about how the age of consent laws are (were) used by other countries and some US States to descriminate against gays. Those governments are doing it by making the age of consent higher for same-sex couples than for heterosexual couples.
 
Last edited:
What's a child? A child is someone below an arbitrarily chosen age. In some places for purposes of sex, a 12 year old is an adult. In the United States, a menstruating female that has the ability to conceive is an adult for some purposes no matter what her chronological age is. If an 11 year old girl is an adult for purposes of buying contraception is she not adult enough to have sex? Yet, we plainly believe that a girl of any age whatsoever able to buy contraception, Plan B, without any question. Especially questions as to her rapist might be, because there is no rapist.

If anything, we are far, far closer to legalizing pedophilia than we are even to legalizing polygamy. Just lower the age of consent.

If at some point, there is an attempt to lower the age of consent then there will be no constitutional right to do so. It is different from the Same Sex Couples issue because that involves consenting adults.

You can argue this all day long but a line HAS to be drawn somewhere, and right now 18 years old is that line. Even IF they do change the age of consent, that has absolutely nothing to do with the Same Sex Marriage issue. Unless we're talking about a gay man tring to have sex with a boy under 18, it isn't the same thing.
 
Last edited:
The prophet muhammed's favorite wife, Aisha, was only 9 years old when he started banging the shit out of her.

To this day, there is no observable age of consent in most muslim countries.

If a man wants to screw a 10 or 11 year old girl, she better keep her mouth shut after he does or she'll be whipped or even executed for being immoral.

And THESE are the dimocraps friends.

And BTW, didja know that muslim countries lead the world in downloading gay butt-sex porno? Fact.

No wonder dimocraps :eusa_drool: love 'em so much.

both of them are scum of the Earth

Agreed but that is really not relevant to this thread. We aren't talking about muslims here.
 
Of course it's a valid argument. Guns should not be allowed to be in the hands of people who are not capable of handling them, agree or disagree?

Doesn't matter, it's irrelevant. You cannot logically add the "what if" to your point, and make it a valid counterpoint to his point.

I actually never said "what if" so are you done with your ridiculousness? Of course it matters, that's the whole point. Preventing guns from getting in to the wrong hands. Let me know when you're ready to discuss like a big boy.

Your inability to comprehend logic is too much of a waste of my time. Besides, this line of discussion is off track.
 
See and I thought we were talking about Polygamy. Can you people ever stick try and stay on topic. So your polygamy scenario was ridiculous then. Got it.

Are we officially moving back to the topic of Gay marriage. Let me know before you switch to something else.

polygamy isnt legal yet. if it were to become legal, the same as above would be sure to happen.

I understand you have the mental capacity of a lemming, but having to walk you through this is a bit annoying.

Listen, I'm sorry your life has turned out as shitty as it has. I mean I know the daily lives of homosexuals has ruined your very existence and if it weren't for those "fags" you'd be living the perfect life. Maybe if you cry about it more everything will magically get better for you.

You can justify wanting to be an asshole towards people simply because of who they choose to love but that's your problem to deal with, not the rest of the 21st century and civilized society.

You really need to read the posts of people here. I have no issue with same sex marriage as long as it is passed by the state legislatures in question. What I do not see is a right to it via judical fiat. The same applies to polygamy and other things of that nature.

If people want to pass it by referendum or legislative vote, fine, you just dont have a consitutional right to it (unless your states consitution has it in there, then you do)

You always seem to equate disagreement with hatred, which means you lack the ability to understand that people that disagree with you are not inherently evil or some form of bigot.
 
...this silly argument that the SCOTUS has opened the door for Pedophiles to marry children.

You have rights so far as those rights don't harm or infringe upon the rights of others. Pedophilia harms children and therefor cannot ever be legal.

It was legal in the past. Hell it's still an accepted practice is some places.

All it takes is an incremental tearing down of standards. Like Marty mentioned, NAMBLA exists already. The fact these people aren't terrified, and actually openly promote their agenda with support from the ACLU should be a concern.

That said I don't think the gay agenda or these rulings have anything to do with such issues.


Just for the record, the ACLU supported NAMBLA's freedom of speech, not any of their illegal activities.
 
The prophet muhammed's favorite wife, Aisha, was only 9 years old when he started banging the shit out of her.

To this day, there is no observable age of consent in most muslim countries.

If a man wants to screw a 10 or 11 year old girl, she better keep her mouth shut after he does or she'll be whipped or even executed for being immoral.

And THESE are the dimocraps friends.

And BTW, didja know that muslim countries lead the world in downloading gay butt-sex porno? Fact.

No wonder dimocraps :eusa_drool: love 'em so much.

both of them are scum of the Earth

Agreed but that is really not relevant to this thread. We aren't talking about muslims here.

Someone introduced the topic of 'age of consent'.

I merely pointed out that in many Countries, there is no, or an unenforced, age of consent. And that some cultures just don't think it's such a bad thing to bang 9 year-old girls.

dimocraps loves them some muslim freaks. I don't.

Remember NAMBLA (North American Man-Boy Love Association)?

They were out of Boston, I think. For years and years they were printing and handing out pamphlets; and had an online guide to help gay butt-sex perverts learn how to pick up and butt-fukk young boys.

We (Patriotic Americans) didn't close them down or manage to get them prosecuted (they were protected by Bawney Fwank) but we did manage to run them out of the Country and into Canada.

All this sickness is intertwined.

Whether people choose to believe it or not is irrelevant. It exists.

And it's home is the dimocrap party
 
Last edited:
...this silly argument that the SCOTUS has opened the door for Pedophiles to marry children.

You have rights so far as those rights don't harm or infringe upon the rights of others. Pedophilia harms children and therefor cannot ever be legal.

It was legal in the past. Hell it's still an accepted practice is some places.

All it takes is an incremental tearing down of standards. Like Marty mentioned, NAMBLA exists already. The fact these people aren't terrified, and actually openly promote their agenda with support from the ACLU should be a concern.

That said I don't think the gay agenda or these rulings have anything to do with such issues.


Just for the record, the ACLU supported NAMBLA's freedom of speech, not any of their illegal activities.


really, so is the ACLU going to support Paula Dean? I havent heard a word.
 
The prophet muhammed's favorite wife, Aisha, was only 9 years old when he started banging the shit out of her.

To this day, there is no observable age of consent in most muslim countries.

If a man wants to screw a 10 or 11 year old girl, she better keep her mouth shut after he does or she'll be whipped or even executed for being immoral.

And THESE are the dimocraps friends.

And BTW, didja know that muslim countries lead the world in downloading gay butt-sex porno? Fact.

No wonder dimocraps :eusa_drool: love 'em so much.

both of them are scum of the Earth

Agreed but that is really not relevant to this thread. We aren't talking about muslims here.

Someone introduced the topic of 'age of consent'.

I merely pointed out that in many Countries, there is no, or an unenforced, age of consent. And that some cultures just don't think it's such a bad thing to bang 9 year-old girls.

dimocraps loves them some muslim freaks. I don't.

Remember NAMBLA (North American Man-Boy Love Association)?

They were out of Boston, I think. For years and years they were printing and handing out pamphlets; and had an online guide to help gay butt-sex perverts learn how to pick up and butt-fukk young boys.

We (Patriotic Americans) didn't close them down or manage to get them prosecuted (they were protected by Bawney Fwank) but we did manage to run them out of the Country and into Canada.

All this sickness is intertwined.

Whether people choose to believe it or not is irrelevant. It exists.

And it's home is the dimocrap party

I don't agree that gay couples can be equated with pedophiles. Sorry, with all due respect to a fellow conservative, I'm not buying that.
 
It was legal in the past. Hell it's still an accepted practice is some places.

All it takes is an incremental tearing down of standards. Like Marty mentioned, NAMBLA exists already. The fact these people aren't terrified, and actually openly promote their agenda with support from the ACLU should be a concern.

That said I don't think the gay agenda or these rulings have anything to do with such issues.


Just for the record, the ACLU supported NAMBLA's freedom of speech, not any of their illegal activities.


really, so is the ACLU going to support Paula Dean? I havent heard a word.

Its not the government going after Paula, so the ACLU wont get involved.
 
It was legal in the past. Hell it's still an accepted practice is some places.

All it takes is an incremental tearing down of standards. Like Marty mentioned, NAMBLA exists already. The fact these people aren't terrified, and actually openly promote their agenda with support from the ACLU should be a concern.

That said I don't think the gay agenda or these rulings have anything to do with such issues.


Just for the record, the ACLU supported NAMBLA's freedom of speech, not any of their illegal activities.


really, so is the ACLU going to support Paula Dean? I havent heard a word.

560431_398206030201901_838208285_n.jpg
 
It was legal in the past. Hell it's still an accepted practice is some places.

All it takes is an incremental tearing down of standards. Like Marty mentioned, NAMBLA exists already. The fact these people aren't terrified, and actually openly promote their agenda with support from the ACLU should be a concern.

That said I don't think the gay agenda or these rulings have anything to do with such issues.


Just for the record, the ACLU supported NAMBLA's freedom of speech, not any of their illegal activities.


really, so is the ACLU going to support Paula Dean? I havent heard a word.

This is off topic but just because you have freedom of speech, doesn't mean you have immunity to the consequences of that speech.
 
Agreed but that is really not relevant to this thread. We aren't talking about muslims here.

Someone introduced the topic of 'age of consent'.

I merely pointed out that in many Countries, there is no, or an unenforced, age of consent. And that some cultures just don't think it's such a bad thing to bang 9 year-old girls.

dimocraps loves them some muslim freaks. I don't.

Remember NAMBLA (North American Man-Boy Love Association)?

They were out of Boston, I think. For years and years they were printing and handing out pamphlets; and had an online guide to help gay butt-sex perverts learn how to pick up and butt-fukk young boys.

We (Patriotic Americans) didn't close them down or manage to get them prosecuted (they were protected by Bawney Fwank) but we did manage to run them out of the Country and into Canada.

All this sickness is intertwined.

Whether people choose to believe it or not is irrelevant. It exists.

And it's home is the dimocrap party

I don't agree that gay couples can be equated with pedophiles. Sorry, with all due respect to a fellow conservative, I'm not buying that.

For a while a few decades ago NAMBLA was part of the "big tent" of the gay rights movement, until they realized they were a liability and kicked them to the curb.

And they are pederasts, not pedophiles, big difference.

Harry Hay - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

From the article:

In the early 1980s, Hay joined other early gay rights activists protesting the exclusion of the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) from participation in LGBT social movements, most noticeably pride parades on the grounds that such exclusions constituted a betrayal by the gay community.[37] In 1983, at a New York University forum, sponsored by an on-campus gay organization, he remarked "f the parents and friends of gays are truly friends of gays, they would know from their gay kids that the relationship with an older man is precisely what thirteen-, fourteen-, and fifteen-year-old kids need more than anything else in the world."[53] In 1986 Hay was confronted by police when he attempted to march in the Los Angeles pride parade, from which NAMBLA had been banned, with a sign reading "NAMBLA walks with me."[14][note 5] Hay refused to participate in the official 1994 parade in New York City commemorating the 25th anniversary of the Stonewall riots because of its exclusionary policies. Instead he joined an alternate parade called "The Spirit of Stonewall".[37]
 
Agreed but that is really not relevant to this thread. We aren't talking about muslims here.

Someone introduced the topic of 'age of consent'.

I merely pointed out that in many Countries, there is no, or an unenforced, age of consent. And that some cultures just don't think it's such a bad thing to bang 9 year-old girls.

dimocraps loves them some muslim freaks. I don't.

Remember NAMBLA (North American Man-Boy Love Association)?

They were out of Boston, I think. For years and years they were printing and handing out pamphlets; and had an online guide to help gay butt-sex perverts learn how to pick up and butt-fukk young boys.

We (Patriotic Americans) didn't close them down or manage to get them prosecuted (they were protected by Bawney Fwank) but we did manage to run them out of the Country and into Canada.

All this sickness is intertwined.

Whether people choose to believe it or not is irrelevant. It exists.

And it's home is the dimocrap party

I don't agree that gay couples can be equated with pedophiles. Sorry, with all due respect to a fellow conservative, I'm not buying that.

Then you ignore the evidence.

I'm not saying that all pedophiles are gay butt-rangers, I'm saying that the incidence of pedophilia among gay butt-rangers is much higher than it is among straight men and women.

This topic can get circular real quick. If you want to do some independent, online research, you'll see that I'm correct. If you don't, that's okay. I'm not going to argue with you about it. :eusa_angel:
 

Forum List

Back
Top