Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
If I walked into a shopping mall with a 60 round clip, I could kill more people faster than with a two shot derringer. That's the difference between a weapon used for defense and one used for offense.You say that banning high capacity magazines serves no purpose? It makes the assault weapon an offensive weapon. Unless you really REALLY believe that you will need more than ten rounds of ammunition to extricate yourself from a dangerous situation, you must agree. Unless, of course, you harbor some fantasy of holding back hordes of zombies or Chinese troops landing off the coast of Sarasota or fending off all the gangbangers in Detroit all by yourself. Ten rounds serves for self defense. More than that enables postal workers to go postal, mass shooters to shoot masses of people, and bank robbers to pin down the LAPD.
And how is it that you know, for sure, that no one will ever need more than 10 rounds to defend themselves?
And just to educate you, the difference between an offensive weapon and a defensive weapon (in this context) is the way it is used. Magazine capacity has no bearing on the matter. If I attack you with a derringer, that makes the two shot pistol an offensive weapon.
The point is not to have blood baths like those depicted in the movies.If I walked into a shopping mall with a 60 round clip, I could kill more people faster than with a two shot derringer. That's the difference between a weapon used for defense and one used for offense.And how is it that you know, for sure, that no one will ever need more than 10 rounds to defend themselves?
And just to educate you, the difference between an offensive weapon and a defensive weapon (in this context) is the way it is used. Magazine capacity has no bearing on the matter. If I attack you with a derringer, that makes the two shot pistol an offensive weapon.
It's a magazine, not a clip. If you're going to argue about this shit, try not to sound so ignorant. There is no such thing as a 60 round clip.
That said, since you're going to kill all these people, would it not makes sense for the good guys to not be placed at a tactical disadvantage? Why would you want to do that?
What's more realistic: kids shot in school or your fantasy of the NKVD?
Should we accept the stench of death in our schools as the cost of your warped fantasy
You get the small government hyperConservatives in congress to appropriate the money for more prisons and we'll both count it as a minor victory.What's more realistic: kids shot in school or your fantasy of the NKVD? Should we accept the stench of death in our schools as the cost of your warped fantasy
What's more realistic, keeping violent felons locked up (they commit 75% of gun murders) or banning weapons or magazines based on their use in mass shootings (which account for 1% of gun murders)?
The point is not to have blood baths like those depicted in the movies.If I walked into a shopping mall with a 60 round clip, I could kill more people faster than with a two shot derringer. That's the difference between a weapon used for defense and one used for offense.
It's a magazine, not a clip. If you're going to argue about this shit, try not to sound so ignorant. There is no such thing as a 60 round clip.
That said, since you're going to kill all these people, would it not makes sense for the good guys to not be placed at a tactical disadvantage? Why would you want to do that?
More children die of FIRE ANT bites.
If I walked into a shopping mall with a 60 round clip, I could kill more people faster than with a two shot derringer. That's the difference between a weapon used for defense and one used for offense.You say that banning high capacity magazines serves no purpose? It makes the assault weapon an offensive weapon. Unless you really REALLY believe that you will need more than ten rounds of ammunition to extricate yourself from a dangerous situation, you must agree. Unless, of course, you harbor some fantasy of holding back hordes of zombies or Chinese troops landing off the coast of Sarasota or fending off all the gangbangers in Detroit all by yourself. Ten rounds serves for self defense. More than that enables postal workers to go postal, mass shooters to shoot masses of people, and bank robbers to pin down the LAPD.
And how is it that you know, for sure, that no one will ever need more than 10 rounds to defend themselves?
And just to educate you, the difference between an offensive weapon and a defensive weapon (in this context) is the way it is used. Magazine capacity has no bearing on the matter. If I attack you with a derringer, that makes the two shot pistol an offensive weapon.
If I walked into a shopping mall with a 60 round clip, I could kill more people faster than with a two shot derringer. That's the difference between a weapon used for defense and one used for offense.And how is it that you know, for sure, that no one will ever need more than 10 rounds to defend themselves?
And just to educate you, the difference between an offensive weapon and a defensive weapon (in this context) is the way it is used. Magazine capacity has no bearing on the matter. If I attack you with a derringer, that makes the two shot pistol an offensive weapon.
No, you are wrong. The difference between an offensive weapon and a defensive weapon is how it is used. That is the only determining factor.
The effectiveness of machine gun laws is actually a great example of why this would be effective.
More children die of FIRE ANT bites.
Oh shit. Insect control!!!
More children die of FIRE ANT bites.
Oh shit. Insect control!!!
More children die of FIRE ANT bites.
Oh shit. Insect control!!!
Hell YES!!! I have no problem with a ban on fire ants. Those little bastards are like wingless wasps!!
Just an FYI for the discussion:
from:Gun Control Facts: Why a "High Capacity" Magazine Ban Would Not Prevent Mass Shootings - PolicyMic
"A Department of Justice report from 2004 about the previous Federal Assault Weapons Ban a report which Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), the creator of that ban, links on her official website says that most studies say the information they can obtain shows fewer than 10 shots are used to kill most murder victims, meaning that a 10-round limit isn't likely to have a measurable effect on murder rates. Specific data ... suggestthat relatively few attacks involve more than 10 shots fired.
The report went on to say: Gun murder victims are shot two to three times on average according to a number of sources, and a study at a Washington, DC trauma center reported that only 8% of all gunshot victims treated from 1988 through 1990 had five or more wounds, though they note that number of gunshots may not be representative of the total number of shots fired.
However, the report also states: the few available studies on shots fired show that assailants fire less than four shots on average, a number well within the 10-round magazine limit adding it is usually unclear how many cases, if any, involved more than 10 shots.""
So the average number of rounds fired by assailants is 4. If the study showing the average number of defensive round fired being 2 is adequate evidence that no one ever uses more than 2 rounds in self defense, then the study by the DoJ is adequate evidence that the criminals don't use more than 4 rounds to kill people.
Hell YES!!! I have no problem with a ban on fire ants. Those little bastards are like wingless wasps!!
If I walked into a shopping mall with a 60 round clip, I could kill more people faster than with a two shot derringer. That's the difference between a weapon used for defense and one used for offense.You say that banning high capacity magazines serves no purpose? It makes the assault weapon an offensive weapon. Unless you really REALLY believe that you will need more than ten rounds of ammunition to extricate yourself from a dangerous situation, you must agree. Unless, of course, you harbor some fantasy of holding back hordes of zombies or Chinese troops landing off the coast of Sarasota or fending off all the gangbangers in Detroit all by yourself. Ten rounds serves for self defense. More than that enables postal workers to go postal, mass shooters to shoot masses of people, and bank robbers to pin down the LAPD.
And how is it that you know, for sure, that no one will ever need more than 10 rounds to defend themselves?
And just to educate you, the difference between an offensive weapon and a defensive weapon (in this context) is the way it is used. Magazine capacity has no bearing on the matter. If I attack you with a derringer, that makes the two shot pistol an offensive weapon.
