Police State: Nonviolent Offenders Obeyed State Laws, Went To Jail Anyway...

paulitician

Platinum Member
Oct 7, 2011
38,401
4,162
1,130
'Half the prison population is nonviolent drug offenders'


Sharanda Jones never considered herself a criminal mastermind. Her job was just buying the cocaine powder; other members of the organization rendered it into crack cocaine and sold it. Jones owned a gun — for self-protection — but never used it.

And yet Jones, a nonviolent drug purchaser, is serving life without parole — at a cost to the taxpayers of over a million dollars.

“She was treated as a leader, and at the time she really believed that she was minimally involved and decided to go to trial,” said Molly Gill, government affairs counsel at Families Against Mandatory Minimums, a criminal justice advocacy organization. “When you do that … if you are a leader convicted, that’s considered perjury. All of those factors bumped her sentence up and up and up.”

At issue are federal laws that compel judges to impose harsh sentences on convicted defendants. Most cover nonviolent offenses and are largely drug related.

But thanks to a growing sense among people on all sides of the political spectrum that the law should change, Congress is poised to revisit mandatory minimums. It was recently announced that the Justice Safety Valve Act, a bipartisan bill co-sponsored by Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul and Vermont Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy, will get a Senate committee hearing in September.

If approved by Congress, the act would restore some measure of discretion to judges, allowing them to impose lighter sentences on nonviolent offenders when appropriate.

Mandatory minimums are an increasing concern for Conservatives. For one thing, the cost to incarcerate nonviolent offenders is simply too high...

Read more: Nonviolent offenders obeyed state laws, went to jail anyway | The Daily Caller
 
Last edited:
'Half the prison population is nonviolent drug offenders'


Sharanda Jones never considered herself a criminal mastermind. Her job was just buying the cocaine powder; other members of the organization rendered it into crack cocaine and sold it. Jones owned a gun — for self-protection — but never used it.

And yet Jones, a nonviolent drug purchaser, is serving life without parole — at a cost to the taxpayers of over a million dollars.

“She was treated as a leader, and at the time she really believed that she was minimally involved and decided to go to trial,” said Molly Gill, government affairs counsel at Families Against Mandatory Minimums, a criminal justice advocacy organization. “When you do that … if you are a leader convicted, that’s considered perjury. All of those factors bumped her sentence up and up and up.”

At issue are federal laws that compel judges to impose harsh sentences on convicted defendants. Most cover nonviolent offenses and are largely drug related.

But thanks to a growing sense among people on all sides of the political spectrum that the law should change, Congress is poised to revisit mandatory minimums. It was recently announced that the Justice Safety Valve Act, a bipartisan bill co-sponsored by Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul and Vermont Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy, will get a Senate committee hearing in September.

If approved by Congress, the act would restore some measure of discretion to judges, allowing them to impose lighter sentences on nonviolent offenders when appropriate.

Mandatory minimums are an increasing concern for Conservatives. For one thing, the cost to incarcerate nonviolent offenders is simply too high...

Read more: Nonviolent offenders obeyed state laws, went to jail anyway | The Daily Caller

This is mind-blowing, because I remember the Reagan "law and order" politicos making real political hay out of making outlandish sentencing guidelines for relatively minor offenses. Republicans just LOVED prison back in the 80's.

Are you telling me that the "law and order" crowd is finally rethinking this? It's a bit late, since much damage has already been done . . .
 
Half the non violent offenders are violent, but just happened to be sentenced on a non violent beef. Or, just part of the charges are non violent, the rest are very violent.

Check the laws dealing with conspiracy.
 
'Half the prison population is nonviolent drug offenders'


Sharanda Jones never considered herself a criminal mastermind. Her job was just buying the cocaine powder; other members of the organization rendered it into crack cocaine and sold it. Jones owned a gun — for self-protection — but never used it.

And yet Jones, a nonviolent drug purchaser, is serving life without parole — at a cost to the taxpayers of over a million dollars.

“She was treated as a leader, and at the time she really believed that she was minimally involved and decided to go to trial,” said Molly Gill, government affairs counsel at Families Against Mandatory Minimums, a criminal justice advocacy organization. “When you do that … if you are a leader convicted, that’s considered perjury. All of those factors bumped her sentence up and up and up.”

At issue are federal laws that compel judges to impose harsh sentences on convicted defendants. Most cover nonviolent offenses and are largely drug related.

But thanks to a growing sense among people on all sides of the political spectrum that the law should change, Congress is poised to revisit mandatory minimums. It was recently announced that the Justice Safety Valve Act, a bipartisan bill co-sponsored by Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul and Vermont Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy, will get a Senate committee hearing in September.

If approved by Congress, the act would restore some measure of discretion to judges, allowing them to impose lighter sentences on nonviolent offenders when appropriate.

Mandatory minimums are an increasing concern for Conservatives. For one thing, the cost to incarcerate nonviolent offenders is simply too high...

Read more: Nonviolent offenders obeyed state laws, went to jail anyway | The Daily Caller

This is mind-blowing, because I remember the Reagan "law and order" politicos making real political hay out of making outlandish sentencing guidelines for relatively minor offenses. Republicans just LOVED prison back in the 80's.

Are you telling me that the "law and order" crowd is finally rethinking this? It's a bit late, since much damage has already been done . . .

Who isn't for "law & order?" Let not try and turn this into the usual petty partisan rant-fest. This is legislation being presented by Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul and Vermont Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy. It's a logical Bi-Partisan effort. Lets just respect that and leave it there.
 
She deserves every second of the sentence she got.

If she didn't want to go to jail, she shouldn't have been buying drug.
 
Is the guy who non violently drives the get away car for a bank robbery a non violent offender?

She got what she deserved.
 
Is the guy who non violently drives the get away car for a bank robbery a non violent offender?

She got what she deserved.

Possibly. And it's time to evolve. Our Prisons are bursting at the seams. There are too many nonviolent offenders being incarcerated. It's time for change.
 
So she conspires to deal drugs and we are supposed to somehow feel bad for her?

What about all those people who have been killed because of powder she bought?

Sorry no sympathy. You don't want to serve jail time for a "non-violent" offense? Don't commit a "non-violent" offense. Pure and simple.
 
Is the guy who non violently drives the get away car for a bank robbery a non violent offender?

She got what she deserved.

Possibly. And it's time to evolve. Our Prisons are bursting at the seams. There are too many nonviolent offenders being incarcerated. It's time for change.

Yeah it is time for a change. It's freakin time for people to STOP COMMITTING CRIMES. Not legalizing every crime.
 
Is the guy who non violently drives the get away car for a bank robbery a non violent offender?

She got what she deserved.

Possibly. And it's time to evolve. Our Prisons are bursting at the seams. There are too many nonviolent offenders being incarcerated. It's time for change.

Yeah it is time for a change. It's freakin time for people to STOP COMMITTING CRIMES. Not legalizing every crime.

People will always commit crimes. That's never gonna change. But yes, legalizing some current 'crimes' would be a step in the right direction. Nonviolent drug offenders don't belong in Prisons alongside brutal Murderers and Rapists. It's time to consider more logical humane options.
 
Possibly. And it's time to evolve. Our Prisons are bursting at the seams. There are too many nonviolent offenders being incarcerated. It's time for change.

Yeah it is time for a change. It's freakin time for people to STOP COMMITTING CRIMES. Not legalizing every crime.

People will always commit crimes. That's never gonna change. But yes, legalizing some current 'crimes' would be a step in the right direction. Nonviolent drug offenders don't belong in Prisons alongside brutal Murderers and Rapists. It's time to consider more logical humane options.

The more crimes you "legalize" the less crime there is, right?

Forget about what's right or wrong.. That doesn't matter.
 
Yeah it is time for a change. It's freakin time for people to STOP COMMITTING CRIMES. Not legalizing every crime.

People will always commit crimes. That's never gonna change. But yes, legalizing some current 'crimes' would be a step in the right direction. Nonviolent drug offenders don't belong in Prisons alongside brutal Murderers and Rapists. It's time to consider more logical humane options.

The more crimes you "legalize" the less crime there is, right?

Forget about what's right or wrong.. That doesn't matter.

Maybe doing drugs isn't as wrong as you think it is? Maybe it isn't even a crime? Think on it for a bit.
 
People will always commit crimes. That's never gonna change. But yes, legalizing some current 'crimes' would be a step in the right direction. Nonviolent drug offenders don't belong in Prisons alongside brutal Murderers and Rapists. It's time to consider more logical humane options.

The more crimes you "legalize" the less crime there is, right?

Forget about what's right or wrong.. That doesn't matter.

Maybe doing drugs isn't as wrong as you think it is? Maybe it isn't even a crime? Think on it for a bit.

People aren't arrested or go to jail for "doing drugs".

They get arrested for having drugs or for what they did while on drugs.

Merely being high doesn't get you arrested.
 
The more crimes you "legalize" the less crime there is, right?

Forget about what's right or wrong.. That doesn't matter.

Maybe doing drugs isn't as wrong as you think it is? Maybe it isn't even a crime? Think on it for a bit.

People aren't arrested or go to jail for "doing drugs".

They get arrested for having drugs or for what they did while on drugs.

Merely being high doesn't get you arrested.

Unfortunately, that's not necessarily true. Our Prisons are filled with people who just don't belong there. Some people do enjoy drugs, but that doesn't necessarily make them awful criminals. Most users are peaceful nonviolent people who pose no threat to Society. They don't belong in cages with brutal Murderers and Rapists. It's time for our judicial system to evolve.
 
I hate to side with the far right on anything but she should be in prison serving big time. She knew what she was doing and the consequences of her actions. My only beef is that she would have gotten a lighter sentence if it was just cocaine and not crack cocaine being sold.
 
Is the guy who non violently drives the get away car for a bank robbery a non violent offender?

She got what she deserved.

Possibly. And it's time to evolve. Our Prisons are bursting at the seams. There are too many nonviolent offenders being incarcerated. It's time for change.

What about all the violence committed by drug addicts so they can buy her products?
 

Forum List

Back
Top