🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Politifact, on Trump's claim that Hillary "lied many times to the FBI"

[

Politifact twists half-truths from Democrats into "mostly true" or "half-true" while twisting the same level of half-truths from Republicans to "mostly false" or "pants on fire." .

Hardly. when Obama said if you liked your insurance you could keep it, that was true for about 95% of Americans, making it 'mostly true' by a large margin.
Politifact then turned around and labeled that 'lie of the year'.
 
LOL @ Politifact

"Using averages alone, we already start to see some interesting patterns in the data. PolitiFact is much more likely to rate Republicans as their worst of the worst “Pants on Fire” rating, usually only reserved for when they feel a candidate is not only wrong, but aggressively and maliciously lying.

All by himself, Trump has almost half of all the “Pants on Fire” ratings from the articles we scraped. Even outside of Trump, PolitiFact seems to assign this rating particularly unevenly. During the 2012 election season, PolitiFact assigned Mitt Romney 19 “Pants on Fire” ratings. For comparison, for every single Democrat combined from 2007-2016 the “Pants on Fire” rating was only assigned 25 times.

This seems to indicate Romney wasn’t just a liar, but an insane, raving liar, spewing malicious deceit at every possible opportunity. In the mere two years he was in the spotlight as a Republican presidential nominee, Romney somehow managed to rival the falsehoods told by the entire party of Democrats over the course of a decade. Or it is possible that PolitiFact has a slant in their coverage.

Romney did not strike me as a particularly egregious liar, nor has Hillary Clinton struck me as the single most honest politician to run for president in the last 10 years. Take a moment, a deep breath, and ponder this: If we decide we’re okay using PolitiFact’s aggregate fact-checking to declare Republicans to be most dishonest than Democrats, we have also committed ourselves to a metric in which Hillary Clinton is more honest than Barack Obama.

Running The Data On PolitiFact Shows Bias Against Conservatives

That’s because Republicans lie a lot. If they told the truth about their policies, no sane person would ever vote for them.

As Republicans, we’re going to run up the deficits, start pointless wars and squander the nation’s wealth. We’re also going to take wealth from the working and middle class and give it to the rich. Who would vote for that?
 
[

Politifact twists half-truths from Democrats into "mostly true" or "half-true" while twisting the same level of half-truths from Republicans to "mostly false" or "pants on fire." .

Hardly. when Obama said if you liked your insurance you could keep it, that was true for about 95% of Americans, making it 'mostly true' by a large margin.
Politifact then turned around and labeled that 'lie of the year'.

OMFG!!! You have to twist what Obama said???

If you like your plan, you can keep it.
 
Politifact is code for another liberal entity spreading propaganda to dumb-down the easiest targets for Democrat support........................Breathe.

Politifact is dishonest, and only an ignorant child believes the OP.

A. Hillary said they did not delete emails that were classified. This has since been proven false, and therefore, Politifact is wrong. On a side, the Demonicrats continue to misrepresent what a classified email is. It has NOTHING to do with whether or not it's marked classified, but they have no problem lying in your face to misrepresent what a classified email is.

B. Hillary lied about the content of the emails. Therefore Politifact is wrong.

C. Hillary told the FBI she couldn't remember anything nearly 40 times. Stupid shit too, like "I don't remember any instruction on how to handle email". Yeah right. It's government policy to instruct EVERYONE how to manage email content, and we're talking the STATE DEPT.

Hillary lied about about instructions and procedures, content, how the emails were managed, and how emails were cleansed. For Politifact she's an angel. To anyone with a dose of critical application, this entire thing is BS. The Demonicrats and the FBI plug one another in the ass and like it. It's simply a lasting effect of a corrupt Obama admin.
 
tom-false.jpg

Politifact concludes that not only did she not lie "many" times to the FBI, but she didn't lie to the FBI, period.

The fact-check extends Trump's horrendous record of lying, and makes it hard for USMB conservatives to spread the Hillary-lied-to-the-FBI lie, as liberals will whip out this fact-check and embarrass them:

Trump falsely claims Clinton lied to FBI


1f5c805a600c33f9ada09c288688b34d.jpg
 
Politifact is code for another liberal entity spreading propaganda to dumb-down the easiest targets for Democrat support........................Breathe.

Politifact is dishonest, and only an ignorant child believes the OP.

A. Hillary said they did not delete emails that were classified. This has since been proven false, and therefore, Politifact is wrong. On a side, the Demonicrats continue to misrepresent what a classified email is. It has NOTHING to do with whether or not it's marked classified, but they have no problem lying in your face to misrepresent what a classified email is.

B. Hillary lied about the content of the emails. Therefore Politifact is wrong.

C. Hillary told the FBI she couldn't remember anything nearly 40 times. Stupid shit too, like "I don't remember any instruction on how to handle email". Yeah right. It's government policy to instruct EVERYONE how to manage email content, and we're talking the STATE DEPT.

Hillary lied about about instructions and procedures, content, how the emails were managed, and how emails were cleansed. For Politifact she's an angel. To anyone with a dose of critical application, this entire thing is BS. The Demonicrats and the FBI plug one another in the ass and like it. It's simply a lasting effect of a corrupt Obama admin.

Yeah the FBI director and Hillary were great pals, that's why he he went to such lengths to air her dirty laundry during an election cycle, twice, obviously throwing the election towards the lying piece of shit we have for president now.

Even the once Republican Darling and Boy Scout Jim Comey said she didn't lie to the FBI.
 
tom-false.jpg

Politifact concludes that not only did she not lie "many" times to the FBI, but she didn't lie to the FBI, period.

The fact-check extends Trump's horrendous record of lying, and makes it hard for USMB conservatives to spread the Hillary-lied-to-the-FBI lie, as liberals will whip out this fact-check and embarrass them:

Trump falsely claims Clinton lied to FBI



1f5c805a600c33f9ada09c288688b34d.jpg



Nothing quite like video evidence to PROVE that: 1. Hillary lied. 2. Politifact lied. 3. Comey is bent over for Demonicrats, meaning he's corrupt as fuck, doesn't know his place, lacks integrity and Trump fired his Dem. fucking ass.
 
Politifact is code for another liberal entity spreading propaganda to dumb-down the easiest targets for Democrat support........................Breathe.

Politifact is dishonest, and only an ignorant child believes the OP.

A. Hillary said they did not delete emails that were classified. This has since been proven false, and therefore, Politifact is wrong. On a side, the Demonicrats continue to misrepresent what a classified email is. It has NOTHING to do with whether or not it's marked classified, but they have no problem lying in your face to misrepresent what a classified email is.

B. Hillary lied about the content of the emails. Therefore Politifact is wrong.

C. Hillary told the FBI she couldn't remember anything nearly 40 times. Stupid shit too, like "I don't remember any instruction on how to handle email". Yeah right. It's government policy to instruct EVERYONE how to manage email content, and we're talking the STATE DEPT.

Hillary lied about about instructions and procedures, content, how the emails were managed, and how emails were cleansed. For Politifact she's an angel. To anyone with a dose of critical application, this entire thing is BS. The Demonicrats and the FBI plug one another in the ass and like it. It's simply a lasting effect of a corrupt Obama admin.

Yeah the FBI director and Hillary were great pals, that's why he he went to such lengths to air her dirty laundry during an election cycle, twice, obviously throwing the election towards the lying piece of shit we have for president now.

Even the once Republican Darling and Boy Scout Jim Comey said she didn't lie to the FBI.

Keep those sunglasses on dog. Or you can click on the video just posted, which should adjust your brain to a more proper perspective.
 
LOL @ Politifact

"Using averages alone, we already start to see some interesting patterns in the data. PolitiFact is much more likely to rate Republicans as their worst of the worst “Pants on Fire” rating, usually only reserved for when they feel a candidate is not only wrong, but aggressively and maliciously lying.

All by himself, Trump has almost half of all the “Pants on Fire” ratings from the articles we scraped. Even outside of Trump, PolitiFact seems to assign this rating particularly unevenly. During the 2012 election season, PolitiFact assigned Mitt Romney 19 “Pants on Fire” ratings. For comparison, for every single Democrat combined from 2007-2016 the “Pants on Fire” rating was only assigned 25 times.

This seems to indicate Romney wasn’t just a liar, but an insane, raving liar, spewing malicious deceit at every possible opportunity. In the mere two years he was in the spotlight as a Republican presidential nominee, Romney somehow managed to rival the falsehoods told by the entire party of Democrats over the course of a decade. Or it is possible that PolitiFact has a slant in their coverage.

Romney did not strike me as a particularly egregious liar, nor has Hillary Clinton struck me as the single most honest politician to run for president in the last 10 years. Take a moment, a deep breath, and ponder this: If we decide we’re okay using PolitiFact’s aggregate fact-checking to declare Republicans to be most dishonest than Democrats, we have also committed ourselves to a metric in which Hillary Clinton is more honest than Barack Obama.

Running The Data On PolitiFact Shows Bias Against Conservatives

That’s because Republicans lie a lot. If they told the truth about their policies, no sane person would ever vote for them.

As Republicans, we’re going to run up the deficits, start pointless wars and squander the nation’s wealth. We’re also going to take wealth from the working and middle class and give it to the rich. Who would vote for that?

Sure, too bad Obama didn't feel the same way about being honest about policies. Also, too bad Hillary didn't have any policies...that she could talk about.
 
Politifact is code for another liberal entity spreading propaganda to dumb-down the easiest targets for Democrat support........................Breathe.

Politifact is dishonest, and only an ignorant child believes the OP.

A. Hillary said they did not delete emails that were classified. This has since been proven false, and therefore, Politifact is wrong. On a side, the Demonicrats continue to misrepresent what a classified email is. It has NOTHING to do with whether or not it's marked classified, but they have no problem lying in your face to misrepresent what a classified email is.

B. Hillary lied about the content of the emails. Therefore Politifact is wrong.

C. Hillary told the FBI she couldn't remember anything nearly 40 times. Stupid shit too, like "I don't remember any instruction on how to handle email". Yeah right. It's government policy to instruct EVERYONE how to manage email content, and we're talking the STATE DEPT.

Hillary lied about about instructions and procedures, content, how the emails were managed, and how emails were cleansed. For Politifact she's an angel. To anyone with a dose of critical application, this entire thing is BS. The Demonicrats and the FBI plug one another in the ass and like it. It's simply a lasting effect of a corrupt Obama admin.

Yeah the FBI director and Hillary were great pals, that's why he he went to such lengths to air her dirty laundry during an election cycle, twice, obviously throwing the election towards the lying piece of shit we have for president now.

Even the once Republican Darling and Boy Scout Jim Comey said she didn't lie to the FBI.

Keep those sunglasses on dog. Or you can click on the video just posted, which should adjust your brain to a more proper perspective.

As I suspected there were no clips of Clinton lying to the FBI. Just the same old Trey badgering the FBI director. How many indictments did Trey get?
 
tom-false.jpg

Politifact concludes that not only did she not lie "many" times to the FBI, but she didn't lie to the FBI, period.

The fact-check extends Trump's horrendous record of lying, and makes it hard for USMB conservatives to spread the Hillary-lied-to-the-FBI lie, as liberals will whip out this fact-check and embarrass them:

Trump falsely claims Clinton lied to FBI
If you follow sites such as snopes and politifact you are beyond help.

"Facts," someone once said, "are stubborn things." If there is one thing that is gnawing the marrow out of political coverage in America today, it's the so-called "fact checkers" whom editors of some of the nation's most prestigious publications have appointed to evaluate the veracity of statements made by candidates for public office.

Now comes a study from the George Mason University Center for Media and Public Affairs that demonstrates empirically that PolitiFact.org, one of the nation's leading "fact checkers," finds that Republicans are dishonest in their claims three times as often as Democrats. "PolitiFact.com has rated Republican claims as false three times as often as Democratic claims during President Obama's second term," the Center said in a release, "despite controversies over Obama administration statements on Benghazi, the IRS and the AP."

There is a "truth gap" in Washington, but it doesn't exist along the lines the fact checkers would have you think.

https://www.usnews.com/opinion/blog...inds-fact-checkers-biased-against-republicans
 
Politifact is code for another liberal entity spreading propaganda to dumb-down the easiest targets for Democrat support........................Breathe.

Politifact is dishonest, and only an ignorant child believes the OP.

A. Hillary said they did not delete emails that were classified. This has since been proven false, and therefore, Politifact is wrong. On a side, the Demonicrats continue to misrepresent what a classified email is. It has NOTHING to do with whether or not it's marked classified, but they have no problem lying in your face to misrepresent what a classified email is.

B. Hillary lied about the content of the emails. Therefore Politifact is wrong.

C. Hillary told the FBI she couldn't remember anything nearly 40 times. Stupid shit too, like "I don't remember any instruction on how to handle email". Yeah right. It's government policy to instruct EVERYONE how to manage email content, and we're talking the STATE DEPT.

Hillary lied about about instructions and procedures, content, how the emails were managed, and how emails were cleansed. For Politifact she's an angel. To anyone with a dose of critical application, this entire thing is BS. The Demonicrats and the FBI plug one another in the ass and like it. It's simply a lasting effect of a corrupt Obama admin.

Yeah the FBI director and Hillary were great pals, that's why he he went to such lengths to air her dirty laundry during an election cycle, twice, obviously throwing the election towards the lying piece of shit we have for president now.

Even the once Republican Darling and Boy Scout Jim Comey said she didn't lie to the FBI.

Keep those sunglasses on dog. Or you can click on the video just posted, which should adjust your brain to a more proper perspective.

As I suspected there were no clips of Clinton lying to the FBI. Just the same old Trey badgering the FBI director. How many indictments did Trey get?

Wholly fuck, have you had your IQ checked or are you just dishonest?

IQ check pending said even Comey said Clinton didn't lie (i.e., she's a fucking angel).

Video evidence PROVED that Comey said no such thing. He said Hillary lied, only in political words that Hillary would appreciate. He probably figured his life depended on it.



In more simple terms:
Blindboo told mom he cleaned his room.
Did Blindboo clean his room?
Nah, but at least he didn't lie.
 
LOL @ Politifact

"Using averages alone, we already start to see some interesting patterns in the data. PolitiFact is much more likely to rate Republicans as their worst of the worst “Pants on Fire” rating, usually only reserved for when they feel a candidate is not only wrong, but aggressively and maliciously lying.

All by himself, Trump has almost half of all the “Pants on Fire” ratings from the articles we scraped. Even outside of Trump, PolitiFact seems to assign this rating particularly unevenly. During the 2012 election season, PolitiFact assigned Mitt Romney 19 “Pants on Fire” ratings. For comparison, for every single Democrat combined from 2007-2016 the “Pants on Fire” rating was only assigned 25 times.

This seems to indicate Romney wasn’t just a liar, but an insane, raving liar, spewing malicious deceit at every possible opportunity. In the mere two years he was in the spotlight as a Republican presidential nominee, Romney somehow managed to rival the falsehoods told by the entire party of Democrats over the course of a decade. Or it is possible that PolitiFact has a slant in their coverage.

Romney did not strike me as a particularly egregious liar, nor has Hillary Clinton struck me as the single most honest politician to run for president in the last 10 years. Take a moment, a deep breath, and ponder this: If we decide we’re okay using PolitiFact’s aggregate fact-checking to declare Republicans to be most dishonest than Democrats, we have also committed ourselves to a metric in which Hillary Clinton is more honest than Barack Obama.

Running The Data On PolitiFact Shows Bias Against Conservatives
Forget the "rating," just read the sources. That's where the truth lies. They do a good job on that part.

Their sources are all fake news.
That's where you're wrong. I feel sorry for you.
 

Forum List

Back
Top