Poll: Rush Limbaugh--Hannity--Savage--Levin. A question to their audiences?

[bodecea]

It works for Rush either way, when Dem's lose their heads explode and they freak out for years and Rush has a hey day with that material. The Al Gore loss was hilarious. If Dem's win well they are failure factories and prolific liars, plus the hypocrisy goes to 10. Its win/win for Rush he can't lose.

Yes...the Al Gore loss was hilarious...I was really laughing on 9/11, 2001. Quite a comical treat.

 

[Eaglewings]

 

[BluesLegend]

It works for Rush either way, when Dem's lose their heads explode and they freak out for years and Rush has a hey day with that material. The Al Gore loss was hilarious. If Dem's win well they are failure factories and prolific liars, plus the hypocrisy goes to 10. Its win/win for Rush he can't lose.

The point I am trying to make, is Rush Limbaugh and the others actually promoting a Hillary Clinton win--by supporting candidates that cannot win the White House.

It's no secret that all of them have been throwing Trump rallies on their shows since he announced.

Trump is polling at a NEGATIVE 51% with a 65% no like opinion of very large voting block in this country--LATINO'S. It's virtual impossible for him to win the White house with these numbers. Historically since Reagan, the GOP nominee has to capture at least 34.5% of this group to win. Yet they continue to promote him.

Big Surprise: Hispanic Voters Can’t Stand Donald Trump

the libturd tack record of choosing winning Republican candidates is somewhat less than stellar. The pushed McCain and Romney as candidates with the best chance to win. Republicans would have to be complete fools to take campaign advice from the likes of you.

Both the Dem and Rep establishments want a candidate that is bought and paid for by their donors and special interests. Given half a choice a lot of the RINO's would prefer the Dem candidate over say a Carson or Trump or someone they can't control.

They will actively campaign against Trump, Carson or Cruz if any of them get the nomination. That's the kind of scumbags they are.

Big piles of money has already been spent trying to take out Trump they are running negative ads by the buckets full. So far Trump has defied the golden rule that he who spends the most on the most negative ads wins. If ever they get Trump out of the way watch out, they will focus on Carson like a laser. The poor guy won't know what hit him.

I don't know if Trump is my choice or if he would make a good president. But its altogether refreshing to watch the rigged corrupted election process in this country upended by him and the establishment freaking out.

 

[BluesLegend]

Rush doesn't endorse anyone,

Actually he does, but without actually saying he endorses them so when they lose, and they always lose, his waning influence is not obvious to his gullible DittoTards.
By "like and don't like" your MessiahRushie means "endorse and don't endorse."

January 4, 2008
RUSH: People need leadership. It's one of my mantras. They want leadership. And to a lot of these people, I am their leader. And they think that I am AWOL on leadership because I don't come out and endorse a candidate, and because I don't come out and go through the candidates' particulars and suggest this is good, this is bad. I have actually been doing that; if anybody listens regularly, they shouldn't really be having a tough time figuring out who I like and who I don't like.

CALLER: Totally.

RUSH: But nevertheless, maybe that kind of subtlety is not powerful enough to get through.

Rush seems to be living in your head rent free, its pretty common.

 

[BluesLegend]

It works for Rush either way, when Dem's lose their heads explode and they freak out for years and Rush has a hey day with that material. The Al Gore loss was hilarious. If Dem's win well they are failure factories and prolific liars, plus the hypocrisy goes to 10. Its win/win for Rush he can't lose.

Yes...the Al Gore loss was hilarious...I was really laughing on 9/11, 2001. Quite a comical treat.

Ahahaha and there we have an example years later ^^^

 

[bripat9643]

 

[oreo]

It works for Rush either way, when Dem's lose their heads explode and they freak out for years and Rush has a hey day with that material. The Al Gore loss was hilarious. If Dem's win well they are failure factories and prolific liars, plus the hypocrisy goes to 10. Its win/win for Rush he can't lose.

The point I am trying to make, is Rush Limbaugh and the others actually promoting a Hillary Clinton win--by supporting candidates that cannot win the White House.

It's no secret that all of them have been throwing Trump rallies on their shows since he announced.

Trump is polling at a NEGATIVE 51% with a 65% no like opinion of very large voting block in this country--LATINO'S. It's virtual impossible for him to win the White house with these numbers. Historically since Reagan, the GOP nominee has to capture at least 34.5% of this group to win. Yet they continue to promote him.

Big Surprise: Hispanic Voters Can’t Stand Donald Trump

the libturd tack record of choosing winning Republican candidates is somewhat less than stellar. The pushed McCain and Romney as candidates with the best chance to win. Republicans would have to be complete fools to take campaign advice from the likes of you.

Both the Dem and Rep establishments want a candidate that is bought and paid for by their donors and special interests. Given half a choice a lot of the RINO's would prefer the Dem candidate over say a Carson or Trump or someone they can't control.

I once asked an R & E groupie what they meant by RINO: Their reply: Someone who was pretending to be a Republican but was really a Democrat.

That's also the definition of Donald Trump--who is their top choice in this race- LOL-

 

[Dot Com]

A question to Rush Limbaugh, Shawn Hannity, Mike Savage & Mark Levin, etc. audiences?

Over the years we have heard all about these "Obscene profit" breaks. So my question & poll is: How in the heck are the ring wing radio talk show hosts going to keep up with these OBSCENE profits if Hillary Clinton loses the election? Limbaugh has been blasting her for at least 20 years, non-stop. Who in the heck is he going to be able to talk about if there is a Republican President--& Hillary Clinton is out of the political scene?

Maybe this is why they are all PROMOTING a candidate in Donald Trump, that has absolutely no chance of winning the White House. After he's gone--they'll move to another far right wing candidate that has no chance either, then another, then another--all the way up until the nomination.

Their profits come from the Establishment & Rino groupies who they have to keep at a certain level of hysteria to keep those profits rolling in. A Republican in the oval office--spells a calmer atmosphere and it's going to get real booooring on their radio shows. Those radios are going to get turned off, meaning OBSCENE profits turn into Piddly profits.

This is what happens when you have political discourse associated with RATINGS & MONEY.

well 007 thinks The Donald can win. Ooops!!! I just proved your point

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Limbaugh has been national since '88. Reagan was still in office, and then daddy Bush took over until January '93.
After the Clinton years, W was in for eight years.

In the 27 years he's been on, a Republican has been president for 13 of those years.

He has remained solid regardless of who is in the White House.

 

[Dot Com]

Just like what Obama has done for gun sales, slick willy made rush a multi-millionaire and the most listened to commutator in history...

whats a commutator

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

A question to Rush Limbaugh, Shawn Hannity, Mike Savage & Mark Levin, etc. audiences?

It's the same shit with every Presidential Election. Leftists hacking up a lung trying to claim that Limbaugh's ratings are dependent upon a catastrophe in the office of the President.

Limbaugh's ratings remain the same without regard to whose President.

 

[oreo]

Rush doesn't endorse anyone,

Actually he does, but without actually saying he endorses them so when they lose, and they always lose, his waning influence is not obvious to his gullible DittoTards.
By "like and don't like" your MessiahRushie means "endorse and don't endorse."

January 4, 2008
RUSH: People need leadership. It's one of my mantras. They want leadership. And to a lot of these people, I am their leader. And they think that I am AWOL on leadership because I don't come out and endorse a candidate, and because I don't come out and go through the candidates' particulars and suggest this is good, this is bad. I have actually been doing that; if anybody listens regularly, they shouldn't really be having a tough time figuring out who I like and who I don't like.

CALLER: Totally.

RUSH: But nevertheless, maybe that kind of subtlety is not powerful enough to get through.

I have been on political boards for at least 15 years. The ones I notice that so are so totally ill-informed on issues are right wing radio listeners. They never read anything. Certainly never do their own homework on the candidates they support.

They carry around the Rush Limbaugh bible with them. They love the hate talk.

Here is a great article on the mentality of a Trump supporter.

Column: Trump exploits rational political ignorance

 

[bripat9643]

It works for Rush either way, when Dem's lose their heads explode and they freak out for years and Rush has a hey day with that material. The Al Gore loss was hilarious. If Dem's win well they are failure factories and prolific liars, plus the hypocrisy goes to 10. Its win/win for Rush he can't lose.

The point I am trying to make, is Rush Limbaugh and the others actually promoting a Hillary Clinton win--by supporting candidates that cannot win the White House.

It's no secret that all of them have been throwing Trump rallies on their shows since he announced.

Trump is polling at a NEGATIVE 51% with a 65% no like opinion of very large voting block in this country--LATINO'S. It's virtual impossible for him to win the White house with these numbers. Historically since Reagan, the GOP nominee has to capture at least 34.5% of this group to win. Yet they continue to promote him.

Big Surprise: Hispanic Voters Can’t Stand Donald Trump

the libturd tack record of choosing winning Republican candidates is somewhat less than stellar. The pushed McCain and Romney as candidates with the best chance to win. Republicans would have to be complete fools to take campaign advice from the likes of you.

Both the Dem and Rep establishments want a candidate that is bought and paid for by their donors and special interests. Given half a choice a lot of the RINO's would prefer the Dem candidate over say a Carson or Trump or someone they can't control.

I once asked an R & E groupie what they meant by RINO: Their reply: Someone who was pretending to be a Republican but was really a Democrat.

That's also the definition of Donald Trump--who is their top choice in this race- LOL-

It's Hilarious watching the people who supported Boner, Ryan, McCain and Romney accusing Trump of being insufficiently conservative.

Haven't you idiots figured out that conservatives rightly pay no attention to your advice?

 

[edthecynic]

Rush doesn't endorse anyone,

Actually he does, but without actually saying he endorses them so when they lose, and they always lose, his waning influence is not obvious to his gullible DittoTards.
By "like and don't like" your MessiahRushie means "endorse and don't endorse."

January 4, 2008
RUSH: People need leadership. It's one of my mantras. They want leadership. And to a lot of these people, I am their leader. And they think that I am AWOL on leadership because I don't come out and endorse a candidate, and because I don't come out and go through the candidates' particulars and suggest this is good, this is bad. I have actually been doing that; if anybody listens regularly, they shouldn't really be having a tough time figuring out who I like and who I don't like.

CALLER: Totally.

RUSH: But nevertheless, maybe that kind of subtlety is not powerful enough to get through.

Rush seems to be living in your head rent free, its pretty common.

When a DirttoTard can't rebut the facts, they try to deflect.
Thank you.

 

[bripat9643]

Rush doesn't endorse anyone,

Actually he does, but without actually saying he endorses them so when they lose, and they always lose, his waning influence is not obvious to his gullible DittoTards.
By "like and don't like" your MessiahRushie means "endorse and don't endorse."

January 4, 2008
RUSH: People need leadership. It's one of my mantras. They want leadership. And to a lot of these people, I am their leader. And they think that I am AWOL on leadership because I don't come out and endorse a candidate, and because I don't come out and go through the candidates' particulars and suggest this is good, this is bad. I have actually been doing that; if anybody listens regularly, they shouldn't really be having a tough time figuring out who I like and who I don't like.

CALLER: Totally.

RUSH: But nevertheless, maybe that kind of subtlety is not powerful enough to get through.

I have been on political boards for 15 years. The ones I notice that so are so totally ill-informed on issues are right wing radio listeners. They never read anything. Certainly never do their own homework on the candidates they support.

They carry around the Rush Limbaugh bible with them and that's it.

Here is a great article on the mentality of a Trump supporter.

Column: Trump exploits rational political ignorance

I notice that liberal idiots like you are always making totally unfounded a wrong claims about Rush's audience. Studies have show that his audience is one of the most educated of any media outlet.

 

[edthecynic]

Rush doesn't endorse anyone,

Actually he does, but without actually saying he endorses them so when they lose, and they always lose, his waning influence is not obvious to his gullible DittoTards.
By "like and don't like" your MessiahRushie means "endorse and don't endorse."

January 4, 2008
RUSH: People need leadership. It's one of my mantras. They want leadership. And to a lot of these people, I am their leader. And they think that I am AWOL on leadership because I don't come out and endorse a candidate, and because I don't come out and go through the candidates' particulars and suggest this is good, this is bad. I have actually been doing that; if anybody listens regularly, they shouldn't really be having a tough time figuring out who I like and who I don't like.

CALLER: Totally.

RUSH: But nevertheless, maybe that kind of subtlety is not powerful enough to get through.

I have been on political boards for 15 years. The ones I notice that so are so totally ill-informed on issues are right wing radio listeners. They never read anything. Certainly never do their own homework on the candidates they support.

They carry around the Rush Limbaugh bible with them and that's it.

Here is a great article on the mentality of a Trump supporter.

Column: Trump exploits rational political ignorance

I notice that liberal idiots like you are always making totally unfounded a wrong claims about Rush's audience. Studies have show that his audience is one of the most educated of any media outlet.

Yeah, just as sure as he has a CERTIFIED "accuracy" rating of 99.8%

 

[oreo]

I don't know if any of you are watching MSNBC prior 3rd debate. The GOP Latino's got on their and basically stated they won't vote for Republicans if they kept getting insulted

These are REPUBLICAN Latino's. I want to Thank all you TRUMP supporters for putting Hillary Clinton in the OVAL office--you freaking idiots.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Why are liberals at war with information? Rush Limbaugh is single handedly responsible for the modern concept of talk radio. There was a time that lefties pronounced his show DOA because a democrat was elected president or a republican was elected president. It's an absurd thought but liberals are motivated by emotions rather than logic. Liberals hoped Rush was DOA so they were amazed when it didn't turn out that way. There might be a couple of left wing shows on talk radio but they don't seem to last long unless they are privately financed by shadow lefties. It doesn't matter who is elected, Hannity, Rush, Savage and Levin are .....gasp.....capitalists who rely on the confiscatory costs of ads on their program. Do lefties have a better idea?

Liberals also believe people really want to listen to an uninterrupted diet of the their sanctimony and bullshit. That's why their attempts to counter conservative talk radio and FOX have consistently failed.

LOL! We had a Leftist set on our local talk radio station on Saturday's some years back. Talk about a BUFFOON!

I OWNED that low-rent piece of shit. He opened a website with a forum ... and after only a few months he had to SHUT IT DOWN because of the beating I laid on the idiots that fawned over that sot, spewing the same rancid drivel that our in-house whack-jobs spew on this site.

I called his program using every conceivable voice imaginable and without fail I'd hand him his ass. The topic was usually the War on Terror and he was TERRIBLE if you left him with his aid de camp... to ramble on by themselves. But when you added an American to the mix, the whole house of cards came apart almost INSTANTLY.

I did the same thing for Ed Shultz as well, until they simply stopped taking calls from my area code ENTIRELY!

 

[bripat9643]

Rush doesn't endorse anyone,

Actually he does, but without actually saying he endorses them so when they lose, and they always lose, his waning influence is not obvious to his gullible DittoTards.
By "like and don't like" your MessiahRushie means "endorse and don't endorse."

January 4, 2008
RUSH: People need leadership. It's one of my mantras. They want leadership. And to a lot of these people, I am their leader. And they think that I am AWOL on leadership because I don't come out and endorse a candidate, and because I don't come out and go through the candidates' particulars and suggest this is good, this is bad. I have actually been doing that; if anybody listens regularly, they shouldn't really be having a tough time figuring out who I like and who I don't like.

CALLER: Totally.

RUSH: But nevertheless, maybe that kind of subtlety is not powerful enough to get through.

I have been on political boards for 15 years. The ones I notice that so are so totally ill-informed on issues are right wing radio listeners. They never read anything. Certainly never do their own homework on the candidates they support.

They carry around the Rush Limbaugh bible with them and that's it.

Here is a great article on the mentality of a Trump supporter.

Column: Trump exploits rational political ignorance

I notice that liberal idiots like you are always making totally unfounded a wrong claims about Rush's audience. Studies have show that his audience is one of the most educated of any media outlet.

Yeah, just as sure as he has a CERTIFIED "accuracy" rating of 99.8%

You're obviously too stupid to get the joke.

 

[francoHFW]

Liberal talk-radio station Air America files for bankruptcy, will go off the air

Air America, the liberal talk-radio network that helped boost the careers of Al Franken and Rachel Maddow, said Thursday that it was declaring bankruptcy and going off the air.

The company, founded in 2004 and based in New York, strove to provide left-leaning commentary and call-in programs as an alternative to such popular conservative radio talkers as Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and Michael Savage.

It was troubled almost from the start. The company had difficulty lining up affiliates and attracting a sizable audience. It filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy-court protection just 30 months after its inception and was resold to an investor group in early 2007 for $4.25 million.


Poor things...........couldn't get sponsors and hardly anyone was listening to them.............

Oh wait a minute...............Right wing Radio gets good ratings and sponsors.................oops................And will continue to do so if the Hildabeast loses.

That's what brainwashed ignoramuses do- stick with the few people that do their message, for dupes only.