kyzr
Diamond Member
- Oct 14, 2009
- 37,201
- 28,596
- Thread starter
- #1,101
I'm sorry, but your TDS is really serious.All Trump supporters.OMG, give it up already. Of the ~500 rioters how many were Trump supporters, and how many were non-Trump supporters?Earlier you said I was the only one who thought it was other than Trump supporters doing the rioting. Since then, I have pointed out about a dozen folks who have said it was someone other than blob supporters. You even pointed it out yourself.1. OK, ABC wasn't in the Harvard study, not sure why it was missed, but I'm sure that they are closer to NBC on bias than FXN."The only point I'm bringing up about ABC News is that they do have a bias as documented by the following Harvard Study"1. OK, now we're getting somewhere, actual facts to debate. You like ABC news. Fine, I'm glad you didn't put up CNN or MSDNC as real news outlets. The only point I'm bringing up about ABC News is that they do have a bias as documented by the following Harvard Study:Of course I can. Here's a real news website...You can't prove that 100% of revolver is fake news, anymore than you can prove that the MSM's fake news and propaganda is real.LOLOLOLOLThere are MANY sites that are covering the potential FBI involvement, not just revolver.Dumbfuck, Carlson is just another wackadoo like you. Want proof? His source is revolver.news. Revolver.news is a fake news website. It was just started last year and it conceals who started the site...OK, I googled it and that's what came up. Funny how google puts up RT and censors RWs. WTF?RT is Russia Today, a propaganda tool of Putin/Russians....1. Xiden is quite the liar too, as you well know. Just sayin'There is no way of knowing if they really believe what they post. Trump is the most prolific liar to ever enter the public space. That his supporters would also lie their ass off is a very small jump in logic. Feel free to man up and call them out if you want. We all know you don't have the stones to do it.1. How do you know that the posters being referenced aren't just messing with you? TkyzrJan 6th was Xi and Nancy's Reichstag Fire. To our uneducated Progressive brothers and sistas, the Reichstag Fire was a false flag that brought Hitler to power same way the Stolen election put Xi's puppets in the American White House
"Hitler had been appointed Chancellor of Germany only four weeks previously, on 30 January 1933, when he was invited by President von Hindenburg to lead a coalition government. Hitler's government had urged von Hindenburg to dissolve the Reichstag and to call elections for 5 March."
On the evening of 27 February 1933—six days before the parliamentary election—fire broke out in the Reichstag chambers.
Reichstag Fire Decree - Wikipedia
"The Reichstag Fire Decree (German: Reichstagsbrandverordnung) is the common name of the Decree of the Reich President for the Protection of People and State (German: Verordnung des Reichspräsidenten zum Schutz von Volk und Staat) issued by German President Paul von Hindenburg on the advice of Chancellor Adolf Hitler on 28 February 1933 in immediate response to the Reichstag fire. The decree nullified many of the key civil liberties of German citizens. With Nazis in powerful positions in the German government, the decree was used as the legal basis for the imprisonment of anyone considered to be opponents of the Nazis, and to suppress publications not considered "friendly" to the Nazi cause. The decree is considered by historians as one of the key steps in the establishment of a one-party Nazi state in Germany."
Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to support democrats
See...your fellow blob supporters think it wasn't Trump supporters who stormed the capitol.
So your poll is useless unless you change it to condemning their fellow Trump supporters....which they never, ever will. When you're weak minded...you have to have a herd mentality because you're too dumb to exist on your own for long.
Either you're being willfully aloof or you're just retarded. I can explain it to you but I can't understand it for you.2. My poll proves that at least 80% of GOP voters condemn the violence at the capital caused by Trump supporters. Until it can be proven that any other groups were involved. The rioters were herded to the capital by people with bullhorns.
I know what the Trump supporters will do; they will vote for anyone with an R next to their name on the ballot.3. We'll see in 2022 and 2024 how Republicans and Trump supporters do. Buckle-up buttercup.
Your poll is still useless.
![]()
How Many False Claims Did Biden Make In His First 100 Days Compared To Trump?
The Washington Post's fact checker tallied all the false and misleading claims Biden made in speeches, interviews and tweets since taking office.www.huffpost.com
2. We don't know what we don't know about who all was involved in the 1/6 riot.
![]()
Media hushes up report suggesting FBI involvement in Capitol riot, as White House turns anti-terrorism efforts on American people
Court filings suggest that FBI operatives were among the mob who stormed the US Capitol in January, and may have set up the riot. With the riot used as justification for new terrorism policy, the media is downplaying the story.www.rt.com
3. Dodge/non-response/willful ignorance. The poll results are clear assuming honest responses. Republicans condemn the 1/6 riot.
4. You are totally free to have any opinion you want about the poll results. This thread was to settle a disagreement "HappyJoy" and I were having on another thread. He seems okay with the poll results. The poll questions were as agreed to, not just mine.
OK, here's another link to Tucker.
![]()
Tucker Carlson accuses the FBI of being behind January 6 Capitol riot
Fox News host Tucker Carlson on Tuesday night pointed to the number of 'unindicted co-conspirators' from the Capitol riot, arguing they were FBI agents spurring on the insurrectionists.www.dailymail.co.uk
![]()
Real news agencies don't hide who they are.
Don't forget that the MSM covers up for the deep state. I'm not saying FBI involvement is proven, just being investigated.
![]()
Were feds involved in facilitating the 1/6 siege? Number of unindicted co-conspirators raise questions.
The significant number of unindicted co-conspirators involved in the January 6 Capitol siege is strangely similar to those in Michigan plot to kidnap Gov. Whitmer, where it was discovered embedded FBI undercover/informants were intimately involved in facilitating the plot.www.lawenforcementtoday.com![]()
NOW WE HAVE PROOF: FBI and DHS Attempted to Recruit Green Beret to Infiltrate Oath Keepers Before Jan. 6 Riot -- AND HE RECORDED IT | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Throughout 2020 the Black Lives Matter terrorist group was linked to conservatively 91% of the riots that resulted in the most expensive property damage in US insurance history There were zero Trump rallies that turned violent during that same time period.www.thegatewaypundit.com
![]()
Evidence Surfaces That The FBI Planned And Executed January 6 Capitol Riot - The Tatum Report
Evidence is mounting that the FBI was involved in planning and executing the January 6 Capitol event after…tatumreport.com
They're ALL sourcing fake news revolver.news, ya fucking moron.
All you're doing is posting fake news and pretending like it's real news because other non-news outlets are echoing that one fake news site.
You never answered my question... do you even know you’re psychotic?
Name-calling means you lose the debate. Thanks for playing.
![]()
ABC News – Breaking News, Latest News and Videos
Your trusted source for breaking news, analysis, exclusive interviews, headlines, and videos at ABCNews.comabcnews.go.com
You can see who owns the site, they don't hide it. You can see it's well established, being around for 23 years...
![]()
You can click on any abcnews.go article and it shows who the authors are, with links which show they're journalists.
That's what real news looks like. It doesn't hide from the public. It doesn't conceal who's behind the articles. That's what fake news does. That's what the source you're leaning on does. They've only been around 1 year and they hide who's behind it. They conceal who's site it is...
![]()
In the article you fall for, they don't disclose who wrote it...
![]()
Unindicted Co-Conspirators in 1/6 Cases Raise Disturbing Questions of Federal Foreknowledge - Revolver News
Unindicted co-conspirators could unravel the full story of what the FBI knew in advance about the January 6th Capitol Riots.www.revolver.news
And you can't find that nonsense on real news.
Of course, I'm explaining this to a moron who actually claimed he's pro-choice after saying he's not pro-choice, so there's that.![]()
View attachment 505133![]()
Harvard Study reveals media bias
Every news outlet in the study was negative more often than positive.www.studentnewsdaily.com
2. From the above chart you can see that FXN is the most "fair and balanced" news outlet. NBC is just below CNN in bias.
3. FXN generally has both parties represented in debates. CNN, MSDNC, and most MSM programs don't have Republican views presented. If I don't hear both sides presented fairly, I'm not watching their propaganda.
4. As I already explained ad nauseum, abortion is legal, therefore it is NOT murder, duh. Yet, as a Catholic, I am morally opposed to abortion. My position isn't really to complicated unless you're a low-IQ democrat.
5. Summarizing, we don't have any set of facts or any set of alternate facts that we can agree on, correct?
I can't believe I actually have to point this out to you ... but apparently, I do ...... ABC isn't in that study. Do you ever post anything based in reality??
"As I already explained ad nauseum, abortion is legal, therefore it is NOT murder"
You just can't stop lying, can ya? YOU called it murder before you said it's not murder...
Abortion is the murder of babies for convenience.
You're literally talking out of both sides of your mouth. When it's convenient for you for abortion to be murder, you call it murder. When that becomes inconvenient for you, you deny it's murder.
"Summarizing, we don't have any set of facts or any set of alternate facts that we can agree on, correct?"
Not if you're going to eschew reality and stick with fake news. I prefer to live in reality. You don't have to, mind you, it's your choice.
2. You must have reading comprehension issues, and you just love to quote things out of context. I have no clue if that blue quote is real or not. Even if it is it means in the "moral context" and not in the "legal context". So stop mis-applying my prior quotes. The "both sides of my mouth are the "legal and moral" sides. They are very different sides.
3. LOL, keep drinking the state propaganda. I prefer to hear both sides of arguments, fake news only presents one side.
Your criticizing others' comprehension at this point is laughable.
No. What I said was your poll question didn't specify blob supporters as those who committed the acts of violence.My point being that the vast majority of the 500 were Trump supporters, and the poll questions are reasonable, which is what we were debating. You wanted Republicans listed, I said the vast majority of the rioters were obviously Trump supporters.
Blob supporters have come to occupy a fantasy land where Trump was a conservative, he never lied, he won the election, and someone else committed the acts of violence at the capitol. You, yourself, after insisting nobody had that view other than me cited Fox News as having that view....after I gave you about 20 instances of people spouting that nonsense on this very forum.
Had your poll question cited the violence by blob supporters, you wouldn't have gotten any buy-in from blob supporters on the poll. Such is the life inside the cult.
Correct. They were not in attendance.If the FBI, or antifa, or BLM, or other anarchists were in attendance, doesn't matter as far as the poll is concerned.
View attachment 505291
Its obvious that the rioters were Trump supporters.
Agreed that there are many partisan/rabid Trump supporters spouting nonsense, just like you people with TDS spouting nonsense.
The poll question is just fine as it is, and as "HappyJoy" forwarded to me.
Its obvious to rational observers who the rioters were.
Last edited: